This paper develops a framework to decompose the change in New Zealand’s public debt ratio into four component effects: the primary balance, real GDP growth, real interest rates, and exchange rates. We study New Zealand's debt dynamics over three periods: the decade after the Global Financial Crisis (2008 – 2018), the fiveyear forecasts (2019 – 2023), and the mediumterm projections (2024 – 2033). We find asymmetry between the component effects of the debt dynamics on New Zealand's public debt ratio. The primary balance is the larger contributor to the public debt ratio (either positive or negative), while the automatic debt dynamics (the interestgrowth differential and exchange rates) are relatively benign.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Working Paper are strictly those of the author(s). They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury or the New Zealand Government. The New Zealand Treasury and the New Zealand Government take no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in these working papers. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Matthew Bell, Andrew Binning, Anna HamerAdams, Angus Hawkins, Thomas Helbling, Robert Kirkby, Oscar Parkyn and Eric Tong for their comments and feedback on earlier drafts of the paper.
 Keywords:
 public debt; debt dynamics; fiscal policy; debt sustainability; fiscal sustainability
Formats and related files
Executive Summary#
We establish a framework to analyse New Zealand's public debt dynamics, by augmenting the Fiscal Strategy Model (FSM) with a debt dynamics model. We apply the framework to study New Zealand's public debt ratio in recent history, and to project the dynamics into the future. This contributes to the literature on debt dynamics by formalising an accounting framework to study New Zealand's debt dynamics.
We find asymmetry between the component effects of the debt dynamics on New Zealand's public debt ratio. The primary balance is the larger contributor to the public debt ratio (either positive or negative), while the automatic debt dynamics (the interestgrowth differential and the exchange rate effect) are relatively benign. This pattern may continue. Declining global real interest rates have affected public debt dynamics, and the Treasury forecasts that low interest rates will persist over the next five years.
Since 2008, the primary balance had the largest effect on gross public debt levels in New Zealand. In the years following the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and Canterbury earthquakes, public debt rose sharply. The Government's fiscal response reduced gross debt from 2013. Across the forecast years (2019 to 2023), the gross debt ratio is expected to decline due to forecast primary surpluses. The mediumterm projections (2024 to 2033) show a slightly different trend. Although the gross debt ratio is expected to be lower by 2033, we project a deteriorating primary surplus and increasingly unfavourable automatic debt dynamics. These dynamics are partly driven by the assumption that government bond rates will return to their historical average. Although outside the scope of this paper, there is some evidence that bond yields will remain low. If this is the case, it may alleviate concerns about the automatic debt dynamics in the projection period.
1 Introduction#
New Zealand experienced a cycle of public debt accumulation over the past decade. In the wake of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), and compounded by the Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011, core Crown debttoGDP (a gross debt measure) increased by about 20 percentage points, reaching a peak of 40 percent of GDP in 2013. In 2011, the Government targeted a return to Budget surplus by fiscal year 2015. This target was achieved mainly through slowing the growth of nominal spending so that expendituretoGDP declined (Philip, Bose & Sullivan 2017). Since then, debt levels have reduced and, at the time of writing, core Crown debt is at 34 percent of GDP. The New Zealand Treasury (the Treasury) forecasts that core Crown debt will decline to 26 percent of GDP by 2024.[1]
New Zealand's increased public debt in the years following the GFC is consistent with global trends for advanced economies. Between 2007 and 2018, gross debttoGDP for advanced economies increased by 50 percent (IMF 2019). However, relative to advanced economies, New Zealand's initial gross debt ratio was low. The gross debt ratios for advanced economies, New Zealand, and the global average, is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Gross debttoGDP
Source: IMF data mapper
While New Zealand's public debt ratio remains modest by international standards, history shows us that debt levels can rapidly change. The purpose of this analysis is to develop a framework that can track and explain debt changes in the past, as well as project its dynamics into the future. We introduce a debt dynamics framework and apply it to the Treasury's Fiscal Strategy Model (FSM). The result is a model that attributes the change in New Zealand’s gross debt ratio to key factors: the primary balance, real GDP growth, real interest rate, and exchange rate.
This model shows the interaction between the primary balance and the automatic debt dynamics.[2] This feature adds utility to the model, by improving the ability to analyse the reasons behind changes in debt. For example, if real GDP grows faster than real interest rates, even a neutral primary balance would lead to a reduction in the gross debt ratio. In contrast, if the real interest rate exceeds the real GDP growth rate, the public debt burden may become unsustainable unless the government raises large enough primary surpluses. These tradeoffs are faced by governments, and the debt dynamics model provides a lens to put these tradeoffs into perspective.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 introduces two concepts of debt sustainability: the academic definition of sustainability, and the more policy relevant definition used in this paper. Section 3 sets out the framework we use to analyse public debt dynamics, along with other measures of debt sustainability. Section 4 presents the results across three periods: fiscal year 2008 to 2018, the Treasury's baseline forecast period (fiscal year 2019 to 2023), and the baseline mediumterm projection period (fiscal year 2024 to 2033). Section 5 concludes.
2 Sustainability and debt dynamics#
Public debt policy is an important fiscal policy issue, yet there is no consensus on what a suitable debt level is with respect to economic growth. Some studies have found nonlinearity where high levels of initial debt have a proportionately larger (negative) effect on growth (Kumar and Woo 2010, Cecchetti et al 2011). Pescatori, Sandri and Simon (2014) find that the trajectory of debt can be just as important as debt levels, and possibly more important to understand growth prospects. To add more complexity to this issue, it is unclear whether governments still face an intertemporal budget constraint in an environment of low nominal (and real) interest rates that are less than growth rates. Blanchard (2019) presents empirical evidence that this is the historical norm in the United States, rather than the exception, and suggests that public debt may have no fiscal cost.
The model introduced in this paper does not provide answers to these questions. Its purpose is to aid the assessment of debt sustainability by allowing policymakers to assess New Zealand's public debt dynamics. The approach used in this paper is to disaggregate the changes in into the effects of the primary balance[3], real GDP growth, real interest rates, and the exchange rate.
This Section begins with an introduction to the concept of debt sustainability. We start with the formal, academic definition and then introduce a broader, policy pragmatic, approach that is relevant for this study. This Section concludes by introducing a formal framework to assess public debt dynamics, and we extend this framework in Section 3 so that it is relevant for the New Zealand context.
2.1 Measures of sustainability#
2.1.1 The intertemporal solvency condition
Sustainability can be expressed interms of the government's intertemporal budget constraint (Buckle and Cruickshank 2013). Debt is sustainable if the intertemporal solvency condition is satisfied, where the expected present value of the future primary balances (future income less expenses) covers the existing stock of debt. The intertemporal solvency condition can be expressed as:
where D_{0} is the initial stock of debt, D_{n} is the stock of debt at time t for t = N periods, (1 + t) equals nominal interest and PB_{t} equals the primary balance in period t. For simplicity, we assume no foreign currency denominated debt, which means that the exchange rates and foreign inflation are excluded from the condition. This budget constraint does not impose spending constraints on the government, because higher deficits simply mean higher debt. To arrive at a more meaningful budget constraint, a terminal debt limit is imposed. Specifically, a no Ponzi game (transversality) condition is applied:
The noPonzi game solvency condition can be expressed as follows:
This condition requires that the present value of debt decline to zero at the limit, which restricts the government's ability to service debt by issuing new debt on a regular basis. While this condition does not rule out terminal period debt or even growing debt, it does rule out the growth of debt at a rate that is higher than the nominal interest rate (IMF 2017b).
Using the intertemporal solvency condition to assess debt sustainability has its limitations. The approach relies on unobservable information for a future that may not eventuate. Furthermore, solvency can be achieved under the condition even with immediate primary deficits, provided that primary surpluses are generated sometime in the future (IMF 2017b).
2.1.2 Other measures of sustainability
Governments can be viewed as infinitely lived agents that might never repay all their outstanding debt (Ley 2010). Therefore, perhaps more important in the longterm is an assessment of the government's ability to repay its debts relative to a measure of repayment capacity (Ley 2010). Bartolli and Cottarelli (1994) find that, where economic growth exceeds the interest rate, governments face no binding solvency constraint, and could issue debt to service old debt, which would contravene the noPonzi game solvency condition. They argue that a milder definition of solvency is appropriate. They propose a bounded debttoGDP solvency condition, whereby nominal debt may continue to grow, but that growth in debt must not exceed the rate of GDP growth. They argue that this approach is consistent with the financial solvency condition that is based on an assessment of collateral and liability.[4]
The International Monetary Fund's (IMF's) approach to debt sustainability is that debt cannot grow faster than incomes and the capacity to repay it. Debt is sustainable if projected debttoGDP ratios are stable, decline, and are sufficiently low[5] and if a country can service its debt without the need for implausibly large policy adjustments, renegotiation, or default. Sustainability rules out the accumulation of debt at a rate greater than the capacity to service debt (especially in the long run). (IMF 2017b)
A debttoGDP ratio that is stable or in decline implies solvency if interest rates exceed the GDP growth rate (though this is not a favourable condition for the economy). Alternatively, debttoGDP can decline even if nominal debt levels increase. This would occur if the GDP growth rate exceeds the interest rate (though it would contravene the solvency condition). Therefore, while debttoGDP that is stable or in decline does not guarantee solvency, it is the decline in the debt burden (in this case debttoGDP) that we are concerned with. (IMF 2017b).
2.1.3 A debt dynamics framework
The empirical debt sustainability literature began with Bohn (1995), who ran regressions of the primary balance on lagged debt and other variables to check for debt sustainability. Bohn's framework has been applied to crosscountry datasets and has been extended to include a nonlinear specification allowing for default risk (D'Erasmo, Mendoza and Zhang 2016). Chung and Leeper (2007) imposed a linearized intertemporal government budget constraint on an identified vector autoregression and studied its implications for fiscal financing. They found robust evidence in favor of a stabilizing role for the primary surplus following shocks to taxes and transfers. Leeper, Plante and Traum (2009) use Bayesian methods to estimate and evaluate a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model that estimates fiscal policy rules to understand the economic effects of fiscal policy. They show how government debt has been financed historically and examine how adjustments in each fiscal instrument affected the observed equilibrium.
The approach we take in this paper is to use an intertemporal accounting identity that links the accumulation of debt stocks over time to the fiscal balance, disaggregating projected debttoGDP into its contributory factors.
The case with no foreign currency denominated borrowing
Building on the debt evolution formula and assuming for simplicity that there is no foreign currency denominated debt (IMF 2017b; Ley 2010)[6]:
where D_{t} is the stock of debt at time t, (1 + i_{t+1}), equals nominal interest at time t + 1 and PB_{t+1} equals the primary balance in period t + 1.
To measure the debt burden, the level of debt stock is expressed as a ratio of GDP. Therefore, dividing equation (3) by nominal GDP (Y) at t + 1 gives:
Denoting the contemporaneous ratios as lower case, we can also let Y_{t+1} = (1 + g_{t+1})(1 + π_{t+1})Y_{t}. where g_{t+1} equals the real growth rate of the economy and π equals the domestic inflation rate. We can then show the previous equation as:
Expressing the final contemporaneous ratio in lower case, we are left with:
Applying the Fisher equation that links nominal and real interest rates:
we arrive at:
where r_{t+1} equals the real interest rate at time t + 1 and ∅ reflects the coefficient on automatic debt dynamics for a closed economy. With this notation, the government budget constraint becomes:
This can also be written as:
Next, the change in the debttoGDP ratio can be obtained by deducting d_{t} from both sides and factoring the equation:
Notice that:
This results in an equation that disaggregates the change in debttoGDP into movements in interest rates, real GDP growth, past debt and primary balances:
This can be rewritten as:
And if we assume constant rates for the automatic debt dynamics, we can write the previous equation as:
The interest rategrowth differential is an important driver of the debt dynamics. The debt dynamics are favourable if r < g (if 1(if ∅ < 1) and unfavourable if r > g (if ∅ > 1)>. If we assume constant values for the parameters (∅, pb) so that d_{t+1} and d_{t} have a linear relationship, favourable debt dynamics imply a return to a stable equilibrium if debt is changed from its equilibrium (IMF 2013b). Unfavourable debt dynamics imply the opposite: debt becomes explosive if its level is changed from the equilibrium based on constant parameters.
Unfavourable debt dynamics mean that more effort is required to stabilise debt and thus achieve debt sustainability. This underscores the importance of market confidence on borrowing rates and economic growth (IMF 2012). Furthermore, if a country is at a borderline unsustainable level of debt, any shock that lowers growth or increases interest rates could push debt into unsustainable territory.
Globally, the automatic debt dynamics have been favourable since 2008, mainly reflecting lower global interest rates. In his 2019 American Economic Association Presidential Lecture, Oliver Blanchard asks what the implications of current low global interest rates are for government debt policy. He establishes that this condition has been the historical norm in the United States and is expected to continue to hold for a long time. He argues that public debt in this case may have no fiscal cost, though public debt may have welfare costs.
Notes
 [3] The primary balance measure is calculated by excluding net interest expense from the cash surplus/deficit when analysing gross public debt dynamics (IMF 2014).
 [4] The boundedness approach to solvency means debt is sustainable if debttoGDP is stable or falls. However, it does not guarantee that the noPonzi game condition holds. If the interest rate exceeds the growth rate, then the bounded debttoGDP approach and the noPonzi game solvency condition are equivalent assessments of solvency, however, if the growth rate exceeds the interest rate, the bounded debttoGDP approach is less strict as debttoGDP could fall even with primary deficits, which is not consistent with the noPonzi game assessment of solvency. (Bartolini & Cottarelli 1994).
 [5] In addition to declining, debt ratios must be sufficiently low to avoid the risk of default.
 [6] We extend this to include foreign currency denominated debt in Section 3.
3 Analytical framework#
This Section presents the analytical framework that is used to assess public debt dynamics in New Zealand. The Treasury's existing Fiscal Strategy Model (FSM) projects the financial performance and the financial position of the government over a mediumterm horizon and links the fiscal flows to the corresponding debt stocks. We augment this model with the public debt dynamics framework setout in this section. We also introduce other measures to assess debt sustainability: the debt stabilising primary balance and coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics.
3.1 Methodology#
3.1.1 Economic Variables in the Fiscal Strategy Model
The FSM projects New Zealand's public balance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flows. The FSM also contains historical years (historical data), the fiveyear economic and fiscal forecasts, and the tenyear projections. Under the Public Finance Act (1989), the tenyear projections are required to be published in the government's annual report on fiscal strategy.
The economic forecasts
The FSM takes the mediumterm economic forecasts as exogenous inputs from Matai, which is the Treasury's macroeconometric forecasting model of the economy. Matai is a dynamic simultaneous equations model, consisting of a set of behavioural equations that characterize the behaviour of New Zealand's economy.
The economic projections
The FSM uses the forecast years as a base to produce the mediumterm projections. While this is a growthbased projection model that applies growth rates forecast base, for some of the economic variables, levels are targeted. The projections involve relatively few interactions, drivers and assumptions, and are smooth trends that are not subject to the influences of the business cycle. Projections cannot be used to “forecast” the future, as that would imply a more rigorous methodology. Projections provide an indication of what the future may look like given historical policy settings.
For real (and nominal) GDP, the first projected year's value is derived by applying a growth rate to the final forecast year's GDP value. Each year, the projected GDP rate grows from the preceding year in the same manner. From this point forward, trend growth is assumed in the projections, although, for some economic variables, a transition from their endofforecast value to their longterm trend level is required. Real GDP is projected via a labourbased production function, as:
Real GDP equals the real GDP in the previous year multiplied by total hours worked growth and labour productivity growth. Total hours worked growth is determined using the unemployment rate (UR), average weekly hours worked (AWHW) and the labour force (LF):
Key economic longterm assumptions
Most economic variables are at, or very close to, their assumed longrun trend growth rates or levels at the end of the forecast period. A few may require transition in the early years of the projections. In these cases, the annual convergence rate is based on recent actual and forecast performance. The labour productivity growth rate, unemployment rate, average weekly hours worked, CPI measured inflation and tenyear government bond rate are important for the debt dynamics and are set to target certain longterm rates. Table 1 sets these out.
Variable  Units and scale  Long term assumption 

Unemployment rate  Annual average (% of labour force) 
4.3% 
GDP deflator  Annual % growth  2.0% 
Average weekly hours worked  Hours per week  33.55 
Labour productivity growth  Hours worked measure  1.5% 
Government 10year bonds  Average percent rate  5.3% 
Source: The Treasury (HYEFU 2018)
3.1.2 The public debt dynamics
The public debt dynamics framework (equation 5) is an extension of the framework setout in Section 2 that now accounts for foreign currency denominated debt. Full derivations are available in Appendix 2.
Where:
Δd_{t+1} = change in public debttoGDP between periods t and t + 1
d_{t} = public debt to GDP in period t
pb_{t+1} = primary balancetoGDP in period t + 1
ot_{t+1} = other debt creating flows to GDP period t + 1
res_{t+1} = a residual that ensures the identity balances[7]
π_{t+1} = inflation in period t + 1
g_{t+1} = real GDP growth in period t + 1
ε_{t+1} = the rate of exchange rate depreciation e_{t+1 }/e_{t }1
e_{t+1} = the nominal exchange rate, which is defined as domestic currency per US dollar
a_{t} = foreign debt as a share of total debt =
= effective interest rate (local currency) * (1  α_{t }) plus (foreign currency)* α_{t}
= nominal interest rate on foreign currency denominated debt in period t + 1
This equation forms the basis for the decomposition of the change in public debttoGDP into the following components: i) primary fiscal balance, ii) real GDP growth, iii) the real interest rate, iv) the real exchange rate, v) other debt creating flows and, iv) a residual balancing term. The last term, the residual, is the actual change in debttoGDP less the sum of (i) to (v) which ensures that the identity holds. It could reflect the impact of debt restructuring, realised contingent liabilities and measurement errors.
Contribution of the effective real interest rate:
Contribution of real GDP growth:
Contribution of exchange rate depreciation:
3.1.3 Debt stabilising primary balance
When setting fiscal sustainability targets, fiscal authorities may first try to stabilise the public debttoGDP ratio. This requires an estimate of the debt stabilising primary balance. To find the debt stabilising primary balance, we use equation 5 and set Δd_{t+1} equal to zero. For simplicity, we also set the other debt creating flows (ot_{t+ }_{1}) and the residual (res_{t +1}) to zero. Then we rearrange to solve for which is the primary balance that leads to no change in debt between periods, as follows:
We compare New Zealand's historical and forecast primary balances to the debt stabilising primary balance for each year as another measure of sustainability.
3.1.4 Coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics
The interest rategrowth differential is an important driver of the debt dynamics. The trajectory of public debttoGDP depends on the value of the parameter phi (∅), which is the coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics. For a country with foreign currency denominated debt, the coefficient on automatic debt dynamics can be expressed as follows (derived in Appendix 2):
This equation shows that higher interest rates (local and foreign) will lead to unfavourable debt dynamics, and higher real GDP growth and inflation will lead to more favourable debt dynamics. As in Section 2.1.3, the debt dynamics are favourable if and unfavourable if .
We calculate this historical parameter for New Zealand, along with its forecast and projected values as a final test of sustainability to supplement the main analysis.
3.2 Data#
New Zealand's key fiscal indicator is net core Crown debttoGDP[8]; however, for consistency with the IMF and others (World Bank 2005, Vanlaer et al 2017), we use a gross debt measure for our analysis.[9] Interms of the coverage of the public sector, we use available statistics at the core Crown level. Table 2 sets out the data sources.
Variable  Variable description  Data used  Data source 

Effective weighted average interest rate 
Core Crown interest payments Core Crown borrowings Interest payments on foreign currency denominated debt (in NZD) Foreign currency denominated debt (in NZD) 
New Zealand Debt Management The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 

∅_{t+1}  Rate of inflation in period t + 1 as measured by the GDP deflator 
Nominal GDP Real GDP 
The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 
g_{t+1}  Rate of real GDP growth in period t + 1  Real GDP 
The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 
d_{t}  Public debt to GDP in period t 
Core Crown borrowings Nominal GDP 
The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 
α_{t}  Foreign currency denominated debt as a share of total debt in period t 
Foreign currency denominated debt (nominal value in foreign currency yearonyear) Core Crown borrowings 
New Zealand Debt Management The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 
ε_{t+1}  Rate of exchange rate depreciation  Exchange rate (NZD/foreign currency)  Reserve Bank of New Zealand 
Nominal interest rate on foreign currency denominated debt in period t + 1 
Interest payments on foreign currency denominated debt (in NZD) Foreign currency denominated debt (in NZD) 
New Zealand Debt Management  
pb_{t+1}  Primary balance in period t + 1  Core Crown cashflow statement: Interest payments + net cashflow from operations + net cashflow from investing + issues of circulating currency less net movements in cash  The Treasury (fiscal data, HYEFU 2018 & HYEFU 2018 FSM) 
Notes
 [7] If a change in debt cannot be explained via the previous components, there must be unidentified residual flows. The residual may be comprised of the recognition of contingent liabilities.
 [8] Excluding NZ Super Fund and advances.
 [9] This framework can be extended to disaggregate the net debt dynamics, which may be used to supplement gross debt dynamics analysis.
4 Results#
4.1 History: 2008 to 2018#
This start of the sample period 2008 to 2018 coincides with the onset of the GFC. While the worst of the GFC was thought to be over by 2010, the economic recovery proved to be slower than anticipated (Philip et al 2017). The destructive Canterbury earthquakes in late 2010 and early 2011 led to further deterioration of the Crown accounts. By 2013, net debt had increased by almost five times the 2008 level.
In Budget 2011, the Government set out a goal to return to surplus no later than 2015/16, which was subsequently brought forward to 2014/15. Budgets from 2011 onwards implemented a fiscal strategy based on reducing the growth of core Crown operating expenses. Overall, the return to surplus was achieved largely through a reduction in expense growth, which stabilized and began to reduce debttoGDP. Fiscal policy can affect real GDP growth via aggregate demand in the shortterm. Consistent with this, fiscal policy began to have a contractionary effect on aggregate demand from 2012, after it had been expansionary in the years following the GFC (Philip et al 2017). Figure 2 sets out the core Crown debt to GDP ratio over this period.
Figure 2: Core Crown debttoGDP
Source: Author using data from the Treasury
Debt decomposition
Table 3 sets out the cumulative debt decomposition for 2008 to 2018.[10] As per the methodology established in section 3.1, the relevant drivers assessed are the primary balance, automatic debt dynamics (the interestgrowth differential and contribution from exchange rate depreciation), other debt creating flows and a residual.
Public debt decomposition  2008 to 2018 (cumulative) 

Change in core Crown borrowings (gross debt)  +13.7% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  +13.0% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  +14.1% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  1.1% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  1.2% 
Real interest rate  +7.2% 
Real GDP growth  8.3% 
Contribution from real exchange rate depreciation  0.0% 
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0% 
Residual  +0.7% 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
Gross public sector debt increased by approximately 13.7 percentage points between 2008 and 2018. The primary balance has the largest impact over this period, contributing to a cumulative 14.1 percentage point increase in debt.
The automatic debt dynamics account for a small reduction in the debt ratio over this period (1.1 percentage points). The growthinterest differential is small across this period, which reflects not only low interest rates but also subdued growth. The contribution from the real exchange rate depreciation was negligible across the period (a 0.05 percentage point change if rounded to two decimal points) because the Government's holdings of foreign currency denominated debt was minimal.[11] A small residual of 0.7% ensures that the identity balances.
Figure 3 breaks the dynamics down into their yearonyear impacts. The annual change in public debt is shown via the line graph and the bar graph disaggregates the effect of each of the contributory factors. A positive item reflects an increase in the debttoGDP ratio, while a negative item reflects a decrease in the debttoGDP ratio.
Figure 3: The debt dynamics
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
The gross debt ratio increased in the first half of the period and the largest increases occurred in fiscal years 2009 and 2011, which is consistent with the effects of the GFC and the Canterbury earthquakes. Figure 3 illustrates the relatively large primary balance effect across this period. In 2009, the effects of the GFC are noticed. The primary deficit accounts for the largest increase (approximately 7 percentage points of GDP). In 2011, the net increase of approximately 8 percentage points is mainly attributed to the primary deficit. From 2012 to 2018 gross debttoGDP either grows at a lower positive rate (2012 and 2015) or reduces.
Coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics
Figure 4 plots the coefficient on automatic debt dynamics (∅) and real interest (r) and growth (g) rates for each year of the past decade. As set out in Section 2.1.3, a value of ∅ that is less than one implies favourable automatic debt dynamics. Our estimates for the past decade show that, while close to the critical value of one, ∅ exceeded one for multiple years. The effect of the interestgrowth differential is the most unfavourable in 2009 due to negative real GDP growth.
Figure 4: Automatic debt dynamics (ø)  Real interest and growth (r and g)
Source: Author's calculations
The estimated values for ∅ indicate relatively favourable automatic debt dynamics for New Zealand since 2008.This reflects the low global interest rates that were experienced in the postGFC years. Interest rates on U.S. bonds have been and are still low, which reflects the effects of the GFC and quantitative easing (Blanchard 2019). Declining global real interest rates have affected public debt dynamics globally. New Zealand has followed the global trend with declining tenyear bond rates on government debt, as illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5: US Government and New Zealand Government nominal tenyear bond rates
Source: Federal Reserve Board, RBNZ, Haver
Debt stabilising primary balance
As a final measure of sustainability, Figure 6 plots the debt stabilising primary balance and the actual primary balance across the period. We see that the primary balance measure for 2009 to 2012 is below the debt stabilising primary balance, which coincides with the increase in debttoGDP we observe over these years. From 2013 onwards, the primary balance exceeds the debt stabilising primary balance in every year excluding 2015, which is consistent with the reduction in gross debttoGDP that we observe for each year apart from 2015.
Figure 6: Primary balance & debt stabilising primary balance
Source: Author's calculations
From 2008 to 2012, we observed an increase in the gross debt ratio. The increase is attributable to the primary balance (deficit) effects of the GFC and the Canterbury earthquakes. A more sustainable debt path emerges from 2013 to 2018, driven by the primary balance (surpluses) and aided by the favourable automatic debt dynamics. This is consistent with the Government's approach to building fiscal space in the postGFC years by decreasing expendituretoGDP and reducing debt. Declining global interest rates, which reflect the effects of the GFC and quantitative easing, have led to favourable automatic debt dynamics across the period (where r < g) so the public debt burden decreases, all else equal.
4.2 The forecasts: 2019 to 2023#
In this section we apply the Treasury's latest economic and fiscal forecasts (HYEFU 2018 at the time of writing) to the debt dynamics framework. The economic and fiscal forecasts are included as exogenous inputs into the FSM and the debt dynamics framework.
HYEFU 2018 forecasts that the economy will expand at a pace that is close to its full capacity, supported by population growth, government spending, accommodative monetary policy and trading partner growth. Real GDP growth is expected to increase to 3.0 percent, on average, over 2019 and 2020, and is forecast to grow at a solid pace for the remaining forecast years. The unemployment rate is projected to remain around 4.0 percent over the forecast horizon, below the Treasury's estimate of the mediumterm sustainable rate. As growth picks up, continued labour market tightness is expected to underpin a rise in wage growth and contribute to a sustained increase in inflation. (HYEFU 2018). In line with the postGFC years, interest rates are forecast to remain low. In addition, primary surpluses are forecast for each year apart from 2022, partly driven by an increase in taxtoGDP over the 2018 HYEFU forecasts.
Over the fiveyear forecasts, and as a percentage of GDP, both the gross debt and net debt ratio are expected to decline, as illustrated by Figure 7.
Figure 7: Core Crown debttoGDP
Source: Author using data from the Treasury
Debt decomposition
Table 4 sets out the cumulative debt decomposition for the baseline HYEFU 2018 forecasts.
Public debt decomposition  2019 to 2023 (cumulative) 

Change in core Crown borrowings (gross debt)  8.1% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  8.0% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  5.9% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  2.1% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  2.1% 
Real interest rate  +1.8% 
Real GDP growth  3.9% 
Contribution from real exchange rate depreciation  N.A. 
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0% 
Residual  0.0% 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
We expect the gross debt ratio to decrease by 8.1 percentage points between 2019 and 2023. The primary balance amounts for the largest reduction of 5.9 percentage points. The automatic debt dynamics contribute to a 2.1 percentage point reduction in the gross debt ratio as the growthinterest differential is forecast to be small, yet favourable. The forecast dynamics are illustrated in Figure 8.
Figure 8: The debt dynamics
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
The gross debt ratio is projected to decline in each year excluding a small increase in 2022. The largest reductions are expected to occur in 2019 and 2023 and would be driven by the forecast primary surpluses. The growthinterest differential is favourable across the period.
Coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics
HYEFU 2018 forecasts low interest rates across the period. This is consistent with global forecasts. In New Zealand, real GDP growth is forecast to increase in the first three years of the period, underpinned by – among other things – low interest rates.
We estimate favourable values of ø for each year of the forecasts (i.e. values of less than one). This means that, for each year r < g (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Automatic debt dynamics (ø)  Real interest and growth (r and g)
Source: Author's calculations
Debt stabilising primary balance
Due to the favourable automatic debt dynamics, the debt stabilising primary balance is negative across all the forecast years. The forecast primary balance exceeds the debt stabilising primary balance in each forecast year excluding fiscal year 2022 when a primary deficit is forecast. Smaller primary surpluses could (ceterus paribus) be run in most years without destabilising debt.
Figure 10: Primary balance & debt stabilising primary balance
Source: Author's calculations
Across the period, the gross debt ratio is expected to steadily decrease. Forecast primary surpluses will have the most pronounced effect on the gross debt ratio, while the automatic debt dynamics are forecast to be favourable and will thus enable further reduction.
The primary surplus is the main driver of New Zealand's forecast debt reduction over the period (cumulatively 6 percent of GDP). Fiscal policy can affect real GDP growth via aggregate demand in the shortterm. The effect of the fiscal position on real growth has been reflected in the HYEFU 2018 forecasts to the extent that it is accounted for in the forecasting process.
4.3 The projections: 2024 to 2033#
In the HYEFU 2018 FSM, most economic variables are at their trend growth rates by the end of the forecasts. Real GDP growth is projected to between 2.1 percent and 2.3 percent across the projections. The longterm assumption for the unemployment rate is 4.3 percent, which is achieved in 2026, and the longterm government bond rate is expected to reach a longterm stable rate of 5.3 percent by 2028.
After an initial decline, the Treasury projects gross and net debt levels to increase incrementally for each year of the projections, though by 2032 the gross and net debt ratios are still slightly lower than the 2023 ratios.
Figure 11: Core Crown debttoGDP
Source: Author using data from the Treasury.
Debt decomposition
Table 5 sets out the cumulative debt decomposition for the baseline projections.
Public debt decomposition  2024 to 2033 (cumulative) 

Change in core Crown borrowings (gross debt)  0.6% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  0.6% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  2.0% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  +1.3% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  +1.3% 
Real interest rate  +6.5% 
Real GDP growth  5.2% 
Contribution from real exchange rate depreciation  N.A. 
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0% 
Residual  0.0% 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
The level of gross debt is projected to decrease by a cumulative 0.6 percentage points from 2024 to 2033. The primary balance is projected to contribute to a reduction of the gross debt ratio of two percentage points, while the automatic debt dynamics are expected to contribute to a small increase in the gross debt ratio (1.3 percentage points).
Figure 12: The debt dynamics
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
The Treasury projects the gross debt ratio to decrease each year until 2027. Debt reduction is driven by (decreasing) primary surpluses for the first four years of the projections, and this is supported by the favourable debt dynamics in the first three years of projections. From 2027 onwards, small primary deficits and slightly unfavourable automatic debt dynamics contribute to the projected increase in the gross debt ratio.
Coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics
Figure 13 shows ø is on an upward trend as real GDP growth remains within a band of 2.1 and 2.3 percent, and government bond rates converge to their longrun historical average of 5.3 percent in nominal terms (real rate of 3.3 percent). From 2026 onwards, the real borrowing rate is projected to be greater than real GDP growth, which means that ø is greater than one. To keep debt on a sustainable track from 2026 – all other things equal – primary surpluses will be required.
Figure 13: Automatic debt dynamics (ø)  Real interest and growth (r and g)
Source: Author's calculations
Debt stabilising primary balance
In the context of unfavourable automatic debt dynamics from 2026, primary surpluses will be required to stabilise debttoGDP. Figure 14 shows that the projected primary balance falls below the projected debt stabilising balance from 2026. This supports the increase in the debt ratio that we see from 2027.
Figure 14: Primary balance & debt stabilising primary balance
Source: Author's calculations
Although the gross debt ratio is expected to be 0.6 percentage points lower by the end of the projections, from 2027 onwards, deteriorating primary surpluses and increasingly unfavourable automatic debt dynamics are reflected in the upward trend in the debt ratio. Therefore, in order to stabilise debt, primary surpluses will be required from fiscal year 2026. Although the rate of increase in gross debttoGDP is small (0.3 percentage point increase from 2027 onwards), there is a shift in the overall trajectory of debt to a path that is less sustainable.
It is important to reinforce the uncertainty that underlies the projections. Economic and fiscal variables converge to longrun average rates. However, in the case of interest rates, history may not be a good guide. Blanchard (2019) finds that, although the gap between interest rates and growth rates is expected to narrow, many forecasts and market signals have interest rates remaining below growth rates for a long time. While it is outside the scope of this paper to discuss the longterm history, we do find evidence that low rates have persisted over recent years (see Figure 5). Whether rates will continue to remain low or will return to levels consistent with longterm averages, is an important question. If rates remain low, it would change the perspective on public debt dynamics in New Zealand as it may alleviate concerns about public debt dynamics in the projection period.
The projections also have characteristics that could make it more difficult to achieve primary surpluses in projected years, when compared to the forecasts. Firstly, the projections assume that taxtoGDP stabilises, while no such constraints are placed on tax forecasts (taxtoGDP increased by one percentage point of GDP over the 2018 HYEFU forecasts). Secondly, the projections account for an ageing population, and the public pension expenses lift by around one quarter of a percentage point of GDP over the forecast years, but by more than 1 percentage point of GDP over the projected years. While these are technical assumptions, the flattening of taxtoGDP in projections and significant lift in public pension costs provide impediments over projections to attaining primary surpluses that are either not present (flat tax to GDP) or less significant (the rise of pension expenses) in forecasts.
4.4 Scenario analysis#
The Treasury prepares alternative forecast tracks that illustrate how the economy may evolve if some of the main economic forecasts are altered. As a final measure, the debt dynamics are analysed under an alternative forecast track. In the selected downside scenario, which is from the HYEFU 2018 forecasts, declining trade volumes weigh directly on global growth, lowering the demand for New Zealand exports, while weaker sentiment lowers business investment, consumption, and global commodity prices. The overall impact of the scenario sees GDP growth falling in nominal and real terms, affecting tax revenue and the fiscal position. (New Zealand Treasury, 2018e)s
Figure 15: Core Crown debt to GDP
Source: Author using data from the Treasury.
Debt decomposition
Table 6 sets out the cumulative effect of the underlying drivers of gross debt under the downside scenario, compared to the baseline scenario.
Public debt decomposition (cumulative)  2019 to 2023 Baseline 
2019 to 2023 Downside 

Change in core Crown borrowings (gross debt)  8.1%  6.0% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  8.0%  5.5% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  5.9%  3.6% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  2.1%  1.9% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  2.1%  1.9% 
Real interest rate  1.8%  1.9% 
Real GDP growth  3.9%  3.8% 
Contribution from real exchange rate depreciation  N.A.  N.A. 
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0%  0.0% 
Residual  0.0%  0.5% 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
The gross debt ratio is forecast to decrease by 6 percentage points under the downside scenario. The automatic debt dynamics amount to a small reduction in gross debt (1.9 percentage points) as the growthinterest differential is forecast to be small, yet favourable, across this alternative forecast horizon. The primary balance effect is less under the downside scenario compared to the baseline, which reflects the weaker forecast fiscal position.
Figure 16: The debt dynamics
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
Coefficient on the automatic debt dynamics
The effect of the automatic debt dynamics is small; however, it is projected to deteriorate across the projection horizon and its effect on the accumulation of debt increases over time. The value of this variable under the alternative scenario is less favourable in 2019 and 2020, though it reverts to a similar level (and less than one) from 2021 onwards. This is illustrated in Figure 17.
Figure 17: Automatic debt dynamics (ø)  Real interest and growth (r and g)
Source: Author's calculations
Debt stabilising primary balance
The primary balance is forecast to exceed the debt stabilising primary balance under the downside scenario for every year excluding 2020 and 2022. As expected, the forecast primary balance is weaker under the downside scenario. This is illustrated in Figure 18.
Figure 18: Primary balance & debt stabilising primary balance
Source: Author's calculations
Based on the downside scenario, the gross debt ratio is forecast to decrease by 6 percentage points between 2023 and 2032 (compared to 8.1 percentage points under the baseline forecasts). The effects of the downside scenario on the debt dynamics is primarily via the weaker forecast primary balance measure.
Notes
 [10] Cumulative by adding the yearly impact for each contributory factor for the duration of the review period.
 [11] New Zealand's Debt Management currently focus on New Zealand Dollar issuances in the domestic market. Foreign currency denominated issuances were paid down over the previous decade to nil. The 2018/19 borrowing programme forecasts do not include any foreign currency debt issuances.
5 Conclusion#
The analysis in this paper contributes to the literature on debt dynamics by developing a model to study New Zealand's public debt dynamics in history, for the fiveyear forecast horizon, and for the mediumterm projections. The model decomposes the change in the public debttoGDP ratio into four key components: the primary balance, real GDP growth, real interest rates and exchange rate effects. This model can be applied consistently to inform New Zealand's fiscal policy process on the dynamics of public debt.
We find that there is asymmetry of the effect of primary balances and the automatic debt dynamics on New Zealand's public debt ratio. The primary balance is the greater contributor to public debt levels (whether adding to it or reducing it), and the automatic debt dynamics (the interestgrowth differential and the effect of exchange rate depreciation) are relatively benign. This trend may continue. Declining global real interest rates have affected public debt dynamics, and New Zealand has followed the global trend with declining tenyear bond rates on government debt. The Treasury forecasts low rates to persist into the fiveyear forecast horizon.
Since 2008, the primary balance had the largest effect on gross public debt levels in New Zealand. In the years immediately following the GFC and Canterbury earthquakes, public debt rose sharply, however the Government's response to higher debt led to a reduction in gross debt from 2013. Across the forecast years (2019 to 2023), the gross debt ratio is expected to steadily decrease due to primary surpluses.
The mediumterm projections (2024 to 2033) show a slightly different trend. Although the gross debt ratio is expected to be slightly lower by 2033, based on current fiscal settings, we project a deteriorating primary surplus and increasingly unfavourable automatic debt dynamics. We caveat this by saying that the deteriorating debt dynamics are driven by the underlying projection assumption that government 10year bond rates will return to their historical average of 5.3 percent, while real GDP growth reverts to ontrend growth (and eventually r > g). While it is outside the scope of this paper to discuss the projection assumption for longterm government bond rates, there is global evidence that bond yields are remaining low, and thus it is important to reinforce the uncertainty that underlies the forecasts and projections. If rates remain low, it would alleviate any concern about public debt dynamics in the projection period.
The abstractions used in this analysis suffer from some limitations. Changes in GDP do not affect the taxtoGDP ratio or expenditure to GDP levels beyond the forecast years. Further development work on the FSM could incorporate some macroeconomic feedbacks, though the model does not feature multiple and simultaneous feedback mechanisms to the macroeconomic and fiscal variables.
Further, this method does not specify a threshold level of sustainable debt. The debt path is deemed to be sustainable so long as public debttoGDP declines, although debt levels should also be sufficiently low. While a public debttoGDP ratio that is stable or in decline implies solvency if interest rates exceed the GDP growth rate, it may be problematic to assume sustainablility if debt is stabilised at a high rate.
References#
Anaya, P., and Pienkowski, A. (2015) “What Really Drives Public Debt: A Holistic Approach.” International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/WhatReallyDrivesPublicDebtAHolisticApproach43030
Barrett, P. (2018) “InterestGrowth Differentials and Debt Limits in Advanced Economies” Fiscal Affairs Department https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/04/11/InterestGrowthDifferentialsandDebtLimitsinAdvancedEconomies45794
Bartolini, L., and Cottarelli, C. (1994), “Government Ponzi Games and the Sustainability of Public Deficits under Uncertainty” Ricerche Economiche, Vol. 48, pp. 122
Bassanetti, A., Cottarelli, C., and Presbitero, A. (2016) "Lost and Found: Market Access and Public Debt Dynamics" International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/LostandFoundMarketAccessandPublicDebtDynamics44498
Blanchard, O. (2019) "Public Debt: Fiscal and Welfare Costs in a Time of Low Interest Rates," Policy Briefs PB192, Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb192.html
Blanchard, O., Chouraqui, J., Hagemann, R., and Sartor, N. (1990) “The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy: New Answers to an Old Question,” National Bureau of Economic Research http://www.nber.org/papers/r1547
Blanchard, O., and Leigh, D. (2013) “Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers.” National Bureau of Economic Research http://www.nber.org/papers/w18779
Buckle, B., and Cruickshank, A. (2013) “The Requirements for LongRun Fiscal Sustainability” New Zealand Treasury Working Paper https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201307/twp1320.pdf
Cecchetti, S., Mohanty, M., and Zampolli, F. (2011) “The Real Effects of Debt”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Symposium 2011: Achieving Maximum LongRun Growth, pp. 14596.
Cherif, R., and Hasanov, F. (2012) “Public Debt Dynamics: The Effects of Austerity, Inflation, and Growth Shocks” International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12230.pdf
Chung, H., and Leeper, E. (2007) “What Has Financed Government Debt,” National Bureau of Economic Research https://www.nber.org/papers/w13425.pdf
Creedy, J., and Scobie, G. (2015) “Debt Projections and Fiscal Sustainability with Feedback Effects” New Zealand Treasury https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/wp/debtprojectionsandfiscalsustainabilityfeedbackeffectswp1511#formats
D'Erasmo, P, Mendoza, G., and Zhang, J. (2016) "What is a Sustainable Public Debt?" Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~egme/pp/HandbookDraft.pdf
Escolano, J. (2010) "A Practical Guide to Public Debt Dynamics, Fiscal Sustainability, and Cyclical Adjustment of Budgetary Aggregates”, Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/TNM/Issues/2016/12/31/APracticalGuidetoPublicDebtDynamicsFiscalSustainabilityandCyclicalAdjustmentof23498
European Commission (2017) “Debt Sustainability Monitor 2016” http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/eeip/pdf/ip047_en.pdf
IMF (2011) “Modernizing the Framework for Fiscal Policy and Public Debt Sustainability Analysis” https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2011/080511.pdf
IMF (2012) “Taking Stock: A Progress Report on Fiscal Adjustment,” IMF Fiscal Monitor, October, pp. 724 http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2012/02/fmindex.htm
IMF (2013a) "Staff Guidance Note for Public Debt Sustainability Analysis in MarketAccess Countries" http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/050913.pdf
IMF (2013b) “What Is Debt Sustainability?” “Fiscal Sustainability,” and “External Sustainability” Financial Programming and Policies, Chapters 810. https://courses.edx.org/assetv1:IMFx+DSAx+2015_T3+type@asset+block/IMF_DSA_Background_Information.pdf
IMF (2014) “IMF Manual Government Finance Statistics Manual 2014” https://www.imf.org/external/Pubs/FT/GFS/Manual/2014/gfsfinal.pdf
IMF (2016) “Assessing Fiscal Space: An Initial Consistent Set of Considerations” https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2016/111816.pdf
IMF (2017a) “New Zealand IMF Country Report No. 17/111” https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2017/05/08/NewZealand2017ArticleIVConsultationPressReleaseStaffReportandStatementbythe44891
IMF (2017b) “Part 1: Principles of Debt Sustainability” Debt Sustainability Analysis https://courses.edx.org/assetv1:IMFx+DSAx+1T2017+type@asset+block/DSAx_Part1_transcripts_all.pdf
IMF (2018). “Capitalizing on Good Times” IMF Fiscal Monitor https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2018/04/06/fiscalmonitorapril2018
Kumar, M. , and Woo, J. (2010) "Public Debt and Growth" https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1434.pdf
Ley, E. (2010) "Fiscal (and External) Sustainability" World Bank http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEBTDEPT/Resources/4689801207588563500/48646981207588597197/FSPrimer.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2005) “A Guide to the Public Finance Act” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/200709/guidepfa.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2016) “He Tirohanga Mokopuna 2016 Statement on the LongTerm Fiscal Position” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201611/ltfs16htm.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2017) “Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update 2017” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201802/hyefu17.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2018a) “He Puba Hao Patiki 2018 Investment Statement Investing for Wellbeing” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201803/is18hphpwellbeing.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2018b) “Budget Economic and Fiscal Update 2018” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201805/befu18.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2018c) “Fiscal Strategy Model  BEFU 2018” https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/fsm/fiscalstrategymodelbefu2018
New Zealand Treasury (2018d) “Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) 2018 Projection Assumptions to 2031/32” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201805/fsmprojectionsbefu18.pdf
New Zealand Treasury (2018e) “Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update 2018” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201812/hyefu18.pdf
Pescatori, A., Sandri, D., and Simon, J. (2014) "Debt and Growth: Is there a Magic Threshold?" International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1434.pdf
Philip, R., Bose, D., and Sullivan, R. (2017) “Returning to surplus: New Zealand's PostGFC Fiscal Consolidation Experience” New Zealand Treasury Working Paper https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/wp/returningsurplusnewzealandspostgfcfiscalconsolidationexperiencehtml
Piscetek, M., and Bell, M. (2016) “Demographic, Economic and Fiscal Assumptions and Modelling Methods in the 2016 LongTerm Fiscal Model” https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/201611/ltfs16bgdefamm.pdf
Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2018) “Exchange rates and TWI  B1” https://rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/b1
Vanlaer, W., Garcia, C., Ndirangu, L., Vereeck, L., and Marnefffe, W. (2017) “Debt dynamics in Belgium: towards Maastricht convergence” https://pet2017paris2.sciencesconf.org/148934/document
World Bank (2005) “Public debt and its determinants in Market Access Countries Results form 15 Country Case Studies” http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEBTDEPT/Resources/4689801225740508953/MACCaseStudiesMar05.pdf
Appendix 1: The solvency condition#
The steps to derive the solvency condition are to i) start with the flow budget constraint (substitution over time), and ii) impose the transversality condition (noPonzi game condition).
The flow budget constraint:
D_{t}+1 and D_{t} denote the stock of government debt in periods t + 1 and t respectively, R_{t}+1 is government revenue in period t + 1 and G_{t}_{+1} is noninterest expenditure in the same period. i_{t+1}D_{t} equals interest payments on debt in period t + 1 based on debt D_{t} in period t + 1. OT_{t}_{+1} reflects other flows (i.e. bank capitalisation).[12]
The overall budget balance is the difference between revenue and expenditure (including interest expenditure). Therefore (and if we assume OT_{t}_{+1} equals zero):
Where PB_{t}_{+1} equals the primary balance in period t + 1. We then solve for D_{t}_{+1}. This rearrangement of the budget constraint provides us with an evolution of debt formula:
From this, iterate forward, starting from D_{t}_{+1} = D_{1} derive the intertemporal budget constraint for t = 2 and t = 3, as follows (note the iteration is based on an assumption of a constant interest rate over the years):
Then derive the intertemporal budget constraint for t=N
To obtain the solvency condition, divide both sides by (1 + i)^{N}:
Solve for D_{0}:
Then, take the limit as N → ∞ and impose the transversality condition (noPonzi game condition):
The solvency condition becomes:
If the transversality condition holds, then on average over the infinite horizon primary balances are needed to ensure the solvency condition is met. For the transversality condition to hold, debt cannot grow at a rate equal to or higher than the interest rate.
Appendix 2: The debt dynamics#
With no foreign currency denominated debt#
We start with the flow budget constraint[13]:
In order to measure the debt burden in a more meaningful sense over time, the level of debt stock is expressed as a ratio of GDP. Therefore, we divide the flow budget constraint by nominal GDP (Y) at time t + 1:
No capitalisation reflects the contemporaneous ratios. We also set Y_{t}_{+1} equal to (1 + g_{t}_{+1})(1 + π_{t}_{+1})Y_{t}, where: g equals the real growth rate of the economy and π equals domestic inflation as measured by the change in the GDP deflator:
Express the final contemporaneous ratio with no capitalisation:
Apply the Fisher equation to link nominal and real interest rates:
Where r_{t}_{+1} equals the real interest rate at time t + 1 and ∅ reflects the automatic debt dynamics. The government budget constraint becomes
Which can be written as:
Next derive the change in the debttoGDP ratio. Deduct d_{t} from both sides and factor:
Notice that:
Therefore:
This is the key debt dynamics law of motion equation and can be rewritten as:
And if we assume certain factors are constant over time it can be written as:
Debt stabilising primary balance
To calculate the debt stabilising primary balance, we equalise the debttoGDP levels for the current period and the previous period:
d_{t}_{+1} = d_{t}
Substitute this into the equation for the law of motion equation:
Solve for pb_{t}_{+1} to obtain the debt stabilising primary balance pb_{t}_{+1}*:
Therefore, the debt stabilising primary balance simply equals the debt dynamics.
With foreign currency denominated debt#
We begin with the flow budget constraint, but with the additional feature that a government borrows from abroad as well as domestically (IMF 2017b):
Where equals domestic currency denominated debt and equals foreign currency denominated debt. The nominal exchange rate (e_{t}_{+1}) is defined as domestic currency per dollar. An increase in e_{t}_{+1} over e_{t} means a depreciation of the domestic currency.
Therefore, the flow budget constraint becomes:
Where equals the nominal interest rate on domestic currency denominated debt and equals the nominal interest rate on foreign currency denominated debt. Other debt creating flows is shown as 0_{t}_{+1}.
We can rewrite this expression to account for the share of domestic versus foreign debt and the rate of depreciation of currency:
Where and ε_{t}_{+1} = the rate of exchange rate depreciation
Therefore, this equation replaces domestic and foreign debt by their shares: (1  α_{t}) and α_{t}, respectively. We then obtain debttoGDP ratios and use no capitalisation to denote contemporaneous ratios:
Let Y_{t}_{+1} equal (1 + g_{t}_{+1})(1 + π_{t}_{+1})Y_{t}. Therefore:
We can rewrite this to reflect a weighted average interest rate, which then gives us the following key equations for debt dynamics:
Where:
i^{w} = weighted average of domestic and foreign nominal interest rate
i^{f} = nominal interest rate on foreign currency denominated debt
ε = change in the exchange rate (local currency per USD/foreign currency)
We then rewrite the coefficient on d_{t} as follows:
Therefore we can rewrite the evolution of debttoGDP equation as:
We next find the change in the debttoGDP ratio. Deduct d_{t} from both sides and then factor the equation. We are left with:
Expressed as:
Where:
Where:
If we subtract the ratios it becomes:
If we then isolate the various components that lead to the change in debt, we then expand:
Simplify as follows:
We then rearrange to set up for the final equation which breaks down the contributory components to the automatic debt dynamics:
If the coefficient on automatic debt dynamics is substituted into the equation for the change in debttoGDP, we get an equation for the change in debt that is disaggregated into the effects of its various components:
Where:
= contribution of the effective real interest rate
= (less) the contribution of the real GDP growth
= contribution of exchange rate effects[14]
Debt stabilising primary balance
To calculate the debt stabilising primary balance because the debttoGDP level is to remain unchanged:
d_{t}+1 = d_{t}
Solve for the debt stabilising primary balance (we assume no other debt creating flows or residual). Again, the debt stabilising primary balance equals the automatic debt dynamics.
Appendix 3: Assumptions & variables#
History: 2008 to 2018#
Units & scale  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  

Core Crown borrowings  Billions NZD  37.34  50.55  58.58  76.89  84.68  84.87  89.09  95.65  95.04  94.11  98.295 
Real GDP  Billions NZD  197.13  193.85  195.50  197.78  203.15  207.64  213.21  221.57  229.94  237.631  244.155 
Nominal GDP  Billions NZD  189.01  189.51  196.73  205.80  215.12  218.76  236.65  245.02  257.74  273.276  287.705 
GDP deflator  Annual % growth  5.2%  2.0%  2.9%  3.4%  1.8%  0.5%  5.4%  0.4%  1.4%  2.6%  2.5% 
Real GDP growth  Annual % growth  2.4%  1.7%  0.8%  1.2%  2.7%  2.2%  2.7%  3.9%  3.8%  3.3%  2.7% 
Primary balance measure  Billions NZD  1.120  6.583  5.824  16.887  5.159  2.539  1.546  1.348  2.293  3.031  1.174 
Effective nominal interest rate on core Crown borrowings (weighted average interest rate)  Ratio (percent)  6.5%  5.8%  3.9%  4.4%  4.4%  4.3%  4.2%  4.3%  3.8%  3.7%  3.7% 
Effective real interest rate on core Crown gross debt  Ratio (percent)  1.2%  3.8%  0.9%  0.9%  2.5%  4.9%  1.1%  4.7%  2.4%  1.1%  1.2% 
Foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.587  0.867  0.697  0.698  0.263  0.104  0.093  0.460  0.011  0.000  0.000 
Interest payments on foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.040  0.048  0.041  0.036  0.027  0.011  0.009  0.007  0.002  0.000  0.00 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/USD  1.3130  1.5330  1.4430  1.2080  1.2710  1.2850  1.1390  1.4660  1.4080  1.365  N.A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/JPY  0.012  0.016  0.016  0.015  0.016  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/GBP  2.62  2.54  2.17  1.94  1.97  1.96  1.94  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Source: The Treasury (HYEFU 2018), New Zealand Debt Management (NZDM), Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ)
The forecasts: 2019 to 2023#
Units & scale  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  

Core Crown borrowings  Billions NZD  91.739  93.84  92.994  98.08  95.097 
Real GDP  Billions NZD  251.269  259.093  266.113  272.651  278.998 
Nominal GDP  Billions NZD  300.168  316.827  333.118  348.736  364.287 
GDP deflator  Annual % growth  1.4%  2.4%  2.4%  2.2%  2.1% 
Real GDP growth  Annual % growth  2.9%  3.1%  2.7%  2.5%  2.3% 
Primary balance measure  Billions NZD  9.289  1.283  4.339  1.920  6.101 
Effective nominal interest rate on core Crown borrowings  Ratio (percent)  3.5%  3.4%  3.5%  3.1%  3.2% 
Effective real interest rate on core Crown gross debt  Ratio (percent)  2.1%  1.1%  1.1%  0.9%  1.1% 
Foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Interest payments on foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/USD  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/JPY  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/GBP  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Source: The Treasury (HYEFU 2018), NZDM, RBNZ
The projections: 2024 to 2033#
Units & scale  2024  2025  2026  2027  2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  

Core Crown borrowings  Billions NZD  94.746  96.117  98.894  103.453  108.410  113.867  119.861  126.267  133.144  140.565 
Real GDP  Billions NZD  285.147  291.520  298.132  304.895  311.759  318.634  325.548  332.499  339.514  346.631 
Nominal GDP  Billions NZD  379.762  396.015  413.096  430.916  449.430  468.529  488.268  508.667  529.788  551.711 
GDP deflator  Annual % growth  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0%  2.0% 
Real GDP growth  Annual % growth  2.2%  2.2%  2.3%  2.3%  2.3%  2.2%  2.2%  2.1%  2.1%  2.1% 
Primary balance measure  Billions NZD  3.786  2.349  1.296  0.051  0.058  0.116  0.192  0.108  0.012  0.176 
Effective nominal interest rate on core Crown borrowings  Ratio (percent)  3.6%  3.9%  4.2%  4.6%  4.8%  5.1%  5.4%  5.4%  5.4%  5.4% 
Effective real interest rate on core Crown gross debt  Ratio (percent)  1.6%  1.9%  2.2%  2.5%  2.8%  3.1%  3.4%  3.4%  3.4%  3.4% 
Foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Interest payments on foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/USD  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/JPY  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/GBP  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Source: The Treasury (HYEFU 2018), NZDM, RBNZ
Downside scenario#
Units & scale  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  

Core Crown borrowings  Billions NZD  91.974  95.969  97.114  103.834  102.174 
Real GDP  Billions NZD  250.535  256.300  263.435  270.500  277.380 
Nominal GDP  Billions NZD  298.159  308.410  327.108  344.911  362.147 
GDP deflator  Annual % growth  1.0%  1.1%  3.2%  2.7%  2.4% 
Real GDP growth  Annual % growth  2.6%  2.3%  2.8%  2.7%  2.5% 
Primary balance measure  Billions NZD  8.751  0.434  2.088  3.839  4.527 
Effective nominal interest rate on core Crown borrowings  Ratio (percent)  3.7%  3.5%  3.5%  3.6%  3.1% 
Effective real interest rate on core Crown gross debt  Ratio (percent)  2.7%  2.4%  0.3%  0.9%  0.7% 
Foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Interest payments on foreign currency debt  Billions NZD  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/USD  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/JPY  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Nominal Exchange Rate  end of period  NZD/GBP  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
Source: The Treasury (HYEFU 2018  unpublished), NZDM, RBNZ
Appendix 4: Results#
History: 2008 to 2018#
New Zealand public sector debt dynamics  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  Total 

Change in core Crown borrowings  0.7%  6.9%  3.1%  7.6%  2.0%  0.6%  1.2%  1.4%  2.2%  2.4%  0.3%  13.71% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  0.8%  4.6%  3.0%  8.1%  2.4%  0.1%  0.8%  0.8%  1.4%  1.9%  0.9%  12.96% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  0.6%  3.5%  3.0%  8.2%  2.4%  1.2%  0.7%  0.6%  0.9%  1.1%  0.4%  14.08% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  0.2%  1.2%  0.0%  0.1%  0.0%  1.0%  1.4%  0.3%  0.5%  0.8%  0.5%  1.12% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  0.2%  1.1%  0.0%  0.1%  0.1%  1.0%  1.4%  0.3%  0.5%  0.8%  0.5%  1.16% 
Real interest rate  0.2%  0.8%  0.3%  0.3%  0.9%  1.9%  0.5%  1.7%  0.9%  0.4%  0.4%  7.18% 
Real GDP growth  0.4%  0.3%  0.2%  0.3%  1.0%  0.9%  1.0%  1.4%  1.4%  1.2%  0.9%  8.35% 
Contribution from exchange rate depreciation  0.0%  0.1%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.05% 
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.00% 
Residual  0.1%  2.3%  0.1%  0.5%  0.4%  0.4%  0.4%  0.5%  0.8%  0.5%  0.7%  0.75% 
Debt stabilising primary balance  0.2%  1.2%  0.0%  0.1%  0.0%  1.0%  1.4%  0.3%  0.5%  0.8%  0.5%  
Coefficient on automatic debt dynamics (ø)  0.988  1.056  1.001  0.998  0.998  1.026  0.963  1.008  0.986  0.978  0.985 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations.
All values as percentage points of nominal GDP unless otherwise specified. Rounding may lead to differences between yearly and total values.
The forecasts: 2019 to 2023#
New Zealand public sector debt dynamics  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  Total 

Change in core Crown borrowings  3.6%  0.9%  1.7%  0.2%  2.0%  8.1% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  3.4%  1.0%  1.8%  0.1%  2.0%  8.0% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  3.1%  0.4%  1.3%  0.6%  1.7%  5.9% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  0.3%  0.6%  0.45%  0.4%  0.3%  2.1% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  0.3%  0.6%  0.5%  0.4%  0.3%  2.1% 
Real interest rate  0.7%  0.3%  0.3%  0.2%  0.3%  1.8% 
Real GDP growth  1.0%  0.9%  0.8%  0.7%  0.6%  3.9% 
Contribution from exchange rate depreciation             
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0% 
Residual  0.2%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.0%  0.1 % 
Debt stabilising primary balance  0.3%  0.6%  0.5%  0.4%  0.3%  
Coefficient on automatic debt dynamics (ø)  3.1%  0.4%  1.3%  0.6%  1.7% 
Source: The Treasury and author’s calculations
All values as percentage points of nominal GDP unless otherwise specified. Rounding may lead to differences between yearly and total values.
The projections: 2024 to 2033#
New Zealand public sector debt dynamics  2024  2025  2026  2027  2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  Total 

Change in core Crown borrowings  1.2%  0.7%  0.3%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  0.2%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  0.6% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  1.2%  0.7%  0.3%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  0.2%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  0.6% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  1.0%  0.6%  0.3%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  2.0% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  0.2%  0.1%  0.0%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  1.3% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  0.2%  0.1%  0.0%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  1.3% 
Real interest rate  0.4%  0.5%  0.5%  0.6%  0.6%  0.7%  0.8%  0.8%  0.8%  0.8%  6.5% 
Real GDP growth  0.6%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  0.5%  5.2% 
Contribution from exchange rate depreciation                       
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0% 
Residual  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0% 
Debt stabilising primary balance  0.2%  0.1%  0.0%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  0.3%  
Coefficient on automatic debt dynamics (ø)  0.994  0.997  0.999  1.002  1.005  1.009  1.012  1.012  1.012  1.013 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
All values as percentage points of nominal GDP unless otherwise specified. Rounding may lead to differences between yearly and total values.
Downside scenario#
New Zealand public sector debt dynamics  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  Total 

Change in core Crown borrowings  3.3%  0.3%  1.4%  0.4%  1.9%  6.0% 
Identified debtcreating flows (A+B+C)  3.0%  0.2%  1.4%  0.5%  1.8%  5.5% 
Core Crown primary balance (A)  2.9%  0.1%  0.6%  1.1%  1.3%  3.6% 
Automatic debt dynamics (B)  0.0%  0.0%  0.7%  0.7%  0.5%  1.9% 
Contribution from interest rate/growth differential  0.0%  0.0%  0.7%  0.7%  0.5%  1.9% 
Real interest rate  0.8%  0.7%  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  1.9% 
Real GDP growth  0.9%  0.7%  0.8%  0.8%  0.7%  3.8% 
Contribution from exchange rate depreciation             
Other debtcreating flows (C)  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0% 
Residual  0.3%  0.1%  0.1%  0.0%  0.1%  0.5% 
Debt stabilising primary balance  0.0%  0.0%  0.7%  0.7%  0.5%  
Coefficient on automatic debt dynamics (ø)  2.9%  0.1%  0.6%  1.1%  1.3% 
Source: The Treasury and author's calculations
All values as percentage points of nominal GDP unless otherwise specified. Rounding may lead to differences between yearly and total values.