Formats and related files
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister for Biosecurity (M7)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY: Minister of Agriculture
Details of Appropriations#
Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Titles and Scopes of Appropriations by Appropriation Type | Estimates Budget $000 |
Supplementary Estimates Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Departmental Output Expenses |
|||
Biosecurity Policy Advice (M7)This appropriation is limited to policy advice and analysis on biosecurity, and ministerial servicing. |
11,411 | (314) | 11,097 |
Border Biosecurity Risk Management MCOA (M7) |
89,842 | (7,227) | 82,615 |
Border Biosecurity Monitoring and ClearanceThis output class is limited to biosecurity monitoring and clearance programmes that manage the biosecurity risk associated with international trade and travel. |
75,095 | (9,018) | 66,077 |
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and MaintenanceThis output class is limited to the development and maintenance of standards and systems that manage biosecurity risk associated with imports and exports. |
14,747 | 1,791 | 16,538 |
Domestic Biosecurity Risk Management MCOA (M7) |
54,362 | 4,997 | 59,359 |
Biosecurity Incursion Response and Long Term Pest ManagementThis output class is limited to the assessment, containment and possible eradication of suspected risk organisms within New Zealand. |
12,495 | 3,844 | 16,339 |
Domestic Biosecurity SurveillanceThis output class is limited to domestic biosecurity surveillance activities. |
41,867 | 1,153 | 43,020 |
Total Departmental Output Expenses |
155,615 | (2,544) | 153,071 |
Non-Departmental Output Expenses |
|||
Control of TB Vectors (M7)This appropriation is limited to the Crown's contribution to the implementation of the Bovine Tuberculosis National Pest Management Strategy. |
30,505 | (1,240) | 29,265 |
Total Non-Departmental Output Expenses |
30,505 | (1,240) | 29,265 |
Non-Departmental Other Expenses |
|||
Response to the Kiwifruit disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (M7)This appropriation is limited to supporting an industry-led programme for the kiwifruit disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. |
- | 17,500 | 17,500 |
Subscriptions to International Organisations (M7)This appropriation is limited to New Zealand's membership of biosecurity related international organisations. |
330 | - | 330 |
Total Non-Departmental Other Expenses |
330 | 17,500 | 17,830 |
Total Annual and Permanent Appropriations |
186,450 | 13,716 | 200,166 |
Information Supporting the Supplementary Estimates Vote Biosecurity#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister for Biosecurity (M7)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY: Minister of Agriculture
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote
Summary of Financial Activity
2010/11 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supplementary Estimates | |||||
Estimates $000 |
Departmental Transactions $000 |
Non-Departmental Transactions $000 |
Total Transactions $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Appropriations |
|||||
Output Expenses | 186,120 | (2,544) | (1,240) | (3,784) | 182,336 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | N/A | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 330 | - | 17,500 | 17,500 | 17,830 |
Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | N/A | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
186,450 | (2,544) | 16,260 | 13,716 | 200,166 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
|||||
Tax Revenue | - | N/A | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | 850 | N/A | 745 | 745 | 1,595 |
Capital Receipts | - | N/A | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
850 | N/A | 745 | 745 | 1,595 |
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Biosecurity Policy Advice (M7)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates $000 |
Supplementary Estimates $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 11,411 | (314) | 11,097 |
Revenue from Crown | 11,074 | (98) | 10,976 |
Revenue from Other | 337 | (216) | 121 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation will decrease by $314,000 to $11.097 million in 2010/11. This is due to: a reallocation of revenue Crown funded resources between output expenses ($377,000); a decrease in third party funded activity ($147,000); and reduced services to other public sector agencies ($69,000). These changes are offset by: an increase in Government Superannuation Fund employer contributions from 6% to 10.7% funded from revenue Crown ($29,000); and an expense transfer from 2009/10 to meet cost of amalgamation of New Zealand Food Safety Authority ($250,000).
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Estimates Standard |
Supplementary Estimates Standard |
Total Standard |
Development and provision of biosecurity-related policy advice |
|||
It is important to receive an independent assessment of the quality of MAF policy advice and MAF will submit a sample of work to the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) for review at least once a year. | |||
NZIER's mean rating of MAF policy advice on a scale of 1 to 10 | New Measure | 7 | 7 |
The Cabinet Office measures the timeliness and 'structural quality' (length and presence of summaries) of all papers that are submitted to Cabinet or Cabinet Committees. They provide agencies with analysis of how their performance compares to overall averages. | |||
Percentage of MAF Cabinet papers deemed to meet Cabinet Office report back deadlines. | New Measure | 95% | 95% |
The Cabinet Office manual stipulates that "an executive summary must be provided if a paper is more than 4 pages long, or the paper is particularly complex". | |||
Percentage of MAF cabinet papers that include executive summaries when required. | New Measure | 100% | 100% |
The Government requires that regulatory proposals are subject to impact analysis to ensure any proposed regulation is in the public interest. MAF therefore needs to ensure its regulatory advice meets standards of best practice and demonstrates this in the development of regulatory impact statements. Only significant Regulatory Impact Statements are assessed by Treasury. | |||
Percentage of MAF Regulatory Impact Statements assessed by Treasury that meet the regulatory assessment requirements. | New Measure | 100% | 100% |
Complaints about the quality of MAF regulations can be made to the Parliamentary Regulations Review Committee (PRRC) which can, if substantiated, make recommendations to the House under standing orders for changes to MAF's regulations. | |||
Percentage of MAF regulations which the PRRC considers follows good practice and that are not brought to the attention of the House in accordance with Standing Orders. | New Measure | 100% | 100% |
Border Biosecurity Risk Management MCOA (M7)#
Scope of Appropriation#
This output class is limited to biosecurity monitoring and clearance programmes that manage the biosecurity risk associated with international trade and travel.
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and Maintenance
This output class is limited to the development and maintenance of standards and systems that manage biosecurity risk associated with imports and exports.
Explanation for Use of Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriation#
This multi-class output appropriation contains output classes that contribute to preventing harmful organisms from crossing New Zealand's borders, with the assurance that trade and tourism are maintained.
Expenses and Revenue#
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates $000 |
Supplementary Estimates $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Total Appropriation |
89,842 | (7,227) | 82,615 |
Border Biosecurity Monitoring and Clearance | 75,095 | (9,018) | 66,077 |
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and Maintenance | 14,747 | 1,791 | 16,538 |
Revenue from Crown |
57,860 | (5,535) | 52,325 |
Border Biosecurity Monitoring and Clearance | 46,589 | (4,749) | 41,840 |
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and Maintenance | 11,271 | (786) | 10,485 |
Revenue from Other |
31,982 | (824) | 31,158 |
Border Biosecurity Monitoring and Clearance | 28,506 | (5,193) | 23,313 |
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and Maintenance | 3,476 | 4,369 | 7,845 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will decrease by $7.227 million to $82.615 million in 2010/11. This is due to: a reallocation of revenue Crown funded resources between output expenses ($5.629 million); a decrease in third party funded activity ($1 million); and reduced services to other public sector agencies ($692,000). These changes are offset by an increase in Government Superannuation Fund employer contributions from 6% to 10.7% funded from revenue Crown ($94,000).
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Estimates Standard |
Supplementary Estimates Standard |
Total Standard |
Border Biosecurity Systems Development and Maintenance |
|||
Import Systems Development and Maintenance |
|||
A Standard is developed by government in consultation with stakeholders. It articulates a list of requirements that must be met and procedures that must be carried out for particular types of goods to enter New Zealand. Certain standards can be classified as 'high importance' if the risks addressed pose a greater threat than others to New Zealand's biosecurity. | |||
The number of incursions of notifiable pests that occurred because of an inaccurate or unclear standard. | New measure | 0 | 0 |
A new standard format has been introduced to ensure standards are more easily understood by importers and other stakeholders. | |||
15% of the current 350 standards are completed in the new format and in accordance with the Border Systems Manual by July 2011. | New measure | Complete | Complete |
Export Systems Development and Maintenance |
|||
MAF is responsible for ensuring exported New Zealand goods do not contain potential biosecurity risks. If a biosecurity risk found in another country is proved to have come from goods imported from New Zealand then all future goods of that type from New Zealand could be blocked or 'closed'. | |||
Number of market closures due to assurance systems failures. | New measure | 0 | 0 |
Ensuring all New Zealand Export Certificates meet the importing country's requirements is vital to ensuring New Zealand exporters maintain or extend their market access. | |||
Percentage of export certificates meeting importing country requirements. | New measure | 95-100% | 95-100% |
Border Biosecurity Monitoring and Clearance |
|||
Profiling and Intelligence |
|||
MAF will maintain an effective Biosecurity system that prevents the introduction and establishment of serious notifiable organisms that can be managed. | |||
Number of incursions of notifiable organisms through pathways that can be managed. | New measure | 0 | 0 |
Passenger and aircraft clearance |
|||
Percentage of MAF end user survey respondents rating satisfaction with MAF's quality of service when crossing border as 4 or better on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 represents poor and 5 represents excellent). | New measure | 75-85% | 75-85% |
Percentage of passengers that comply with biosecurity requirements across New Zealand airports. | New measure | 98.5-100% | 98.5-100% |
Vessels and Goods Clearance |
|||
Number of sea vessels arriving in New Zealand. | New measure | 6,500-7,000 | 6,500-7,000 |
Number of sea vessels inspected by MAF. | New measure | 2,700-2,900 | 2,700-2,900 |
Number of Containers (loaded and empty) entering New Zealand. | New measure | 550,000-600,000 | 550,000-600,000 |
Number of cargo consignments (via air and sea) imported in to New Zealand which are of interest to MAF. | New measure | 80,000-120,000 | 80,000-120,000 |
Number of cargo consignments inspected by MAF. | New measure | 50,000-60,000 | 50,000-60,000 |
Goods entering New Zealand require a Biosecurity Authority Clearance Certificate (BACC) to obtain biosecurity clearance. BACCs are also used to direct goods for additional inspection, treatment or other measures required of the importer. | |||
Number of BACC applications received by MAF. | New measure | 180,000-200,000 | 180,000-200,000 |
Import companies are surveyed annually to determine if they are satisfied with the level of service being provided by MAF. | |||
Percentage rating satisfaction with overall service as 4 or better on a scale where 1 represents poor performance and 5 represents excellent performance. | New measure | 70-75% | 70-75% |
Mail Clearance |
|||
Number of mail items processed. | New measure | 38,000,000-41,000,000 | 38,000,000-41,000,000 |
Number of mail items inspected. | New measure | 80,000-90,000 | 80,000-90,000 |
Percentage of AO and Parcel class mail items through the Auckland International Mail Centre that comply with biosecurity requirements. | New measure | 96-98% | 96-98% |
Mail and courier companies are surveyed annually to determine if they are satisfied with the level of service being provided by MAF. | |||
Percentage of mail and courier companies satisfied with level of service provided by MAF. | New measure | 75-85% | 75-85% |
Facilities Approvals and Assurance |
|||
Percentage of scheduled facility assessments against required standard completed. | New measure | 90-100% | 90-100% |
Percentage of facility inspections resulting in a 'pass'. | New measure | 70-80% | 70-80% |
Facility operators are surveyed annually to judge whether their interactions with MAF have been satisfactory. | |||
Percentage rating satisfaction with overall service as 4 or better on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 represents poor performance and 5 represents excellent performance. | New measure | 70-75% | 70-75% |
Percentage of accurate and complete stakeholder-submitted applications processed within six weeks of receipt. | New measure | 95-100% | 95-100% |
Biosecurity Enforcement |
|||
Investigations of Alleged Breaches of the Biosecurity Act and the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act |
|||
Percentage of complaints received that are correctly evaluated and categorised within the provided timeframe. | New measure | 90% | 90% |
This ensures MAF completes activities requiring investigation responses for both 'Lower Threshold Criminal Behaviour' (category II) and 'Serious Criminal Behaviour' (category III) within reasonable timeframes. | |||
Percentage of Category II - 'Lower Threshold Criminal Behaviour' investigations are 'Marked as Closed' or 'Forwarded for Prosecution' within 6 months of complaint's receipt. | New measure | 75% | 75% |
Percentage of Category III - 'Serious Criminal Behaviour'' investigations are 'Marked as Closed' or 'Forwarded for Prosecution' within 18 months of complaint's receipt. | New measure | 75% | 75% |
Prosecution of Alleged Breaches of the Biosecurity Act and the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act |
|||
Prosecution of offenders is a key tool MAF can use to incentivise compliance. This measure also ensures prosecutions of both 'Lower Threshold Criminal Behaviour' (category II) and 'Organised Illegal Activity' (category III) are carried out in a timely manner. | |||
Percentage of Category II - 'Lower Threshold Criminal Behaviour' files 'Forwarded for Prosecution' are also assessed for 'public good evaluation' within 6 months. | New measure | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of Category III - 'Serious Criminal Behaviour' files 'Forwarded for Prosecution' are also assessed for 'public good evaluation' within 18 months. | New measure | 100% | 100% |
This measure ensures MAF does not unnecessarily take cases to the courts. | |||
Percentage of cases submitted for 'Public Good Assessment' that receive 'Public Good Clearance'. | New measure | 90% | 90% |
Memorandum Account#
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates $000 |
Supplementary Estimates $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Phytosanitary Exports Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | 1,205 | 65 | 1,270 |
Revenue | 2,168 | (655) | 1,513 |
Expenses | (2,168) | 425 | (1,743) |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | - | - |
Closing Balance at 30 June | 1,205 | (165) | 1,040 |
Sea Container Levy Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | 345 | (564) | (219) |
Revenue | 8,375 | (8,375) | - |
Expenses | (8,375) | 8,375 | - |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | 219 | 219 |
Closing Balance at 30 June | 345 | (345) | - |
Risk Screen Levy Screening Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | (1,355) | 452 | (903) |
Revenue | 4,191 | (4,191) | - |
Expenses | (4,191) | 4,191 | - |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | 903 | 903 |
Closing Balance at 30 June | (1,355) | 1,355 | - |
Imported Used Vehicle Inspection Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | (4,208) | 1,203 | (3,005) |
Revenue | 2,458 | (2,458) | - |
Expenses | (2,458) | 2,458 | - |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | 3,005 | 3,005 |
Closing Balance at 30 June | (4,208) | 4,208 | - |
Biosecurity Clearance Fees Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | (837) | 393 | (444) |
Revenue | 7,159 | (7,159) | - |
Expenses | (7,159) | 7,159 | - |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | 444 | 444 |
Closing Balance at 30 June | (837) | 837 | - |
Border Biosecurity Clearance Fees Account |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | - | - | - |
Revenue | - | 25,318 | 25,318 |
Expenses | - | (22,697) | (22,697) |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | (4,571) | (4,571) |
Closing Balance at 30 June | - | (1,950) | (1,950) |
On 1 July a changed fee structure was implemented for border clearance activities to reflect changes in the way the border operates, including the increased focus on a risk based as opposed to an inspection based approach. The Phytosanitary Exports Account which does not relate to border clearance activities is unaffected. The other pre-existing memorandum accounts have been closed and balances transferred to a new memorandum account entitled Border Biosecurity Clearance Fees Account.
Domestic Biosecurity Risk Management MCOA (M7)#
Scope of Appropriation#
This output class is limited to the assessment, containment and possible eradication of suspected risk organisms within New Zealand.
Domestic Biosecurity Surveillance
This output class is limited to domestic biosecurity surveillance activities.
Explanation for Use of Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriation#
This multi-class output appropriation contains output classes that contribute to reducing the unwanted harm caused by organisms already established in New Zealand.
Expenses and Revenue#
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates $000 |
Supplementary Estimates $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Total Appropriation |
54,362 | 4,997 | 59,359 |
Biosecurity Incursion Response and Long Term Pest Management | 12,495 | 3,844 | 16,339 |
Domestic Biosecurity Surveillance | 41,867 | 1,153 | 43,020 |
Revenue from Crown |
51,006 | 6,514 | 57,520 |
Biosecurity Incursion Response and Long Term Pest Management | 12,271 | 4,003 | 16,274 |
Domestic Biosecurity Surveillance | 38,735 | 2,511 | 41,246 |
Revenue from Other |
3,356 | (1,517) | 1,839 |
Biosecurity Incursion Response and Long Term Pest Management | 224 | (159) | 65 |
Domestic Biosecurity Surveillance | 3,132 | (1,358) | 1,774 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $4.997 million to $59.359 million in 2010/11. This is due to: a reallocation of revenue Crown funded resources between output expenses ($3.560 million); an expense transfer from 2009/10 for the write-down of foot and mouth vaccine ($2.200 million); an increase in Government Superannuation Fund employer contributions from 6% to 10.7% funded from revenue Crown ($45,000); transfer from non-departmental other expense 'Response to kiwifruit disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae' for MAF's direct response costs ($2.500 million); and an expense transfer from 2009/10 for the National Animal Identification and Traceability (NAIT) project ($400,000). These changes are offset by: a saving due to Cabinets decision to discontinue the elimination programme for the Mediterranean fanworm ($838,000); a decrease in third party funded activity ($1.445 million); reduced services to other public sector agencies ($72,000); and an expense transfer to 2011/12 for the NAIT project ($1.353 million).
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Estimates Standard |
Supplementary Estimates Standard |
Total Standard |
Domestic Biosecurity Surveillance |
|||
Incursion Investigation and Diagnostics |
|||
Number of notifications of suspected risk organisms diverted by the 0800 hotlines for further expert screening and assessment by MAF staff. | New measure | 2,500 | 2,500 |
Number of incursion investigations where a positive result for a 'New to NZ' or 'Risk Organism' is determined - including those associated with risk goods. | New measure | 200 | 200 |
Percentage of Incursion Investigation Group decisions 'Not to Open an Investigation' that are challenged and have the decision reversed. | New measure | Less than 1% | Less than 1% |
Percentage of processing, testing and reporting carried out in accordance with Laboratory standard operating procedures. | New measure | 100% | 100% |
International Accreditation New Zealand (IANZ) ensures scientific laboratories - and the staff that work within them - meet appropriate competence levels. | |||
NZS/ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation maintained. | New measure | Maintain | Maintain |
Key industry customers are satisfied with the process, and timeframes for receiving a response from laboratory services. | New measure | Overall satisfaction is 70% or greater | Overall satisfaction is 70% or greater |
Percentage of cases where the initial assessment of risk and decision to 'Open an Investigation' is completed within 24 hours of receipt of notification. | New measure | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of Animal Health Laboratory (AHL) exotic disease investigation and response submissions that are closed within 20 working days of receiving samples. | New measure | 50% | 50% |
Percentage of Plant Health Environment Laboratory (PHEL) testing reports that are issued within timeframes agreed in MAF's standard operating procedures. | New measure | 80% | 80% |
Percentage of investigations that reach an investigation outcome decision within 30 working days. Cases taking longer than 30 days will generally relate to either priority decisions or to biological or diagnostic factors. | New measure | 95% | 95% |
Surveillance Programmes |
|||
All services delivered under the Surveillance Procurement Panel meet consistent requirements including clear, agreed, and monitored:
|
New measure | 100% | 100% |
All surveillance programmes are based on best practice and/or meet relevant international standards or requirements (i.e. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) standards). | New measure | 100% | 100% |
Biosecurity Incursion Response and Long Term Pest Management |
|||
Response Preparedness |
|||
Number of Response Programmes. | New measure | 18-23 | 18-23 |
Percentage of responses that have achieved their primary objective. | New measure | 80% | 80% |
It is MAF's responsibility to limit (as much as is practical) the damage caused by a biosecurity risk that has breached New Zealand's borders. | |||
Urgent measures in either the investigation or early response phase will eliminate the biosecurity risk in at least 55 percent of new incursions. | New measure | 55% | 55% |
Long Term Management |
|||
Where response activities have failed to eradicate a pest of national significance, MAF may implement and lead a Long Term Management (LTM) Programme. MAF may also implement a LTM programme for a pest that has been established in NZ for some time, where pest behaviour or spread has resulted in increased and emerging risks at a national scale. LTM programmes generally aim to slow the spread of pests and minimise their impacts. | |||
Number of long term management programmes in place. | New measure | 2 | 2 |
The on-ground delivery of Long Term Management programmes is largely undertaken by partner agencies and organisations, therefore it is important to have a shared understanding of programme outcomes, and clearly identified critical milestones and deliverables so that MAF and partners achieve those outcomes. | |||
All critical long term management programmes milestones are achieved. | New measure | 100% | 100% |
The involvement and ongoing support of other pest management agencies and organisations is critical to the successful delivery of Long Term Management programmes within a collective model. Annual measurement of the didymo and kauri dieback programmes will identify the level of public confidence with the programme. | |||
Programme partners are satisfied with the programme, MAF's leadership of the programme, and the relationships between partners. | New measure | 75% | 75% |
Long Term Management programmes are underpinned by behaviour change messaging to target audiences, eg, river or forest users. Annual didymo programme surveys show a high degree of awareness and compliance with the Check Clean Dry message. The kauri dieback programme is currently being established and an initial benchmarking survey has indicated a relatively low level, eg, 20 - 30%, of awareness and compliance with hygiene messages. | |||
Percentage of target audiences that are aware of pest risks, report uptake of desired behaviours and that have changed their behaviour (ie, taken at least one action) to prevent spread
|
New measure | 30-40% Kauri 80% Other |
30-40% Kauri 80% Other |
Part 2.2 - Non-Departmental Output Expenses#
Control of TB Vectors (M7)#
Scope of Appropriation
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation will decrease by $1.240 million to $29.265 million in 2010/11. Expense transfers are used to align the appropriation to the incurrence of expenditure against annual work programmes that are delayed and extend into the next financial year. Expense transfers of $260,000 from 2009/10 and $1.500 million to 2011/12 were required.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses#
Response to the Kiwifruit disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (M7)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates $000 |
Supplementary Estimates $000 |
Total $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | 17,500 | 17,500 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
In November 2010, the Government approved $25 million in Crown funding, including MAF's direct response costs (excluding staff time), to support the kiwifruit industry-led programme for responding to the kiwifruit disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. A transfer of $2.500 million was made to departmental output expense Domestic Biosecurity Risk Management MCOA to cover MAF's direct response costs. The remaining $22.500 million is payable to the body established by industry "Kiwifruit Vine Health Inc" (KVH) as costs are incurred. An expense transfer of $5 million has been made to 2011/12.
Expected Results
2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Estimates Standard |
Supplementary Estimates Standard |
Total Standard |
|
MAF has developed a funding agreement with Kiwifruit Vine Health Inc (KVH) to ensure the money is allocated to relevant activities. | |||
Kiwi Fruit Vine Health Inc will meet the terms and conditions in the Funding Agreement dated 18 February 2011 for Financial Support to the industry-led programme for responding to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidias (PSA). | New measure | Conditions met | Conditions met |