Information Supporting the Estimates is organised on the basis of sectors, with each Vote and its administering department allocated to one sector (with a small number of exceptions). The Information Supporting the Estimates comprises of sector overview information, together with statements of responsibility; performance information for appropriations in Votes covered by the sector; and statements of forecast service performance and forecast financial statements of departments included in the sector. Statements of Intent of departments included in the sector form part of the supporting information.
Formats and related files
Information Supporting the Estimates is organised on the basis of sectors, with each Vote and its administering department allocated to one sector (with a small number of exceptions). The Information Supporting the Estimates comprises of sector overview information, together with statements of responsibility; performance information for appropriations in Votes covered by the sector; and statements of forecast service performance and forecast financial statements of departments included in the sector. Statements of Intent of departments included in the sector form part of the supporting information.
Chapters of the Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector volume of the Information Supporting the Estimates 2009/10 are available in Adobe PDF and HTML formats.
Using PDF FilesCover, Contents#
Introduction#
- Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates
- Votes and Departments in Each Sector
- Purpose and Nature of Appropriations
- Guide to Reading Information Supporting the Estimates
- Terms and Definitions
- Useful Links
Sector Overview#
- Sector Overview Statement
- Ministerial Statements of Responsibility
- Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility
Performance Information for Appropriations in Each Vote#
- Vote Attorney-General
- Vote Corrections
- Vote Courts
- Vote Justice
- Vote Parliamentary Counsel
- Vote Police
- Vote Serious Fraud
Statement of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
- Statement of Common Accounting Policies
- Department of Corrections
- Crown Law Office
- Ministry of Justice
- Parliamentary Counsel Office
- New Zealand Police
- Serious Fraud Office
Statements of Intent of Departments (separately produced but forming part of this volume)#
- Department of Corrections
- Crown Law Office
- Ministry of Justice [Treasury update July 2024: External link no longer active]
- Parliamentary Counsel Office
- New Zealand Police
- Serious Fraud Office
Public Defence Service (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,165 | 2,165 | 7,400 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change in appropriation recognises:
- the Government's decision to appropriate the funding for the Public Defence Service as a permanent function within the Legal Services Agency, to a separate output class in 2008/09, and
- the expansion of the service, beyond the initial two courts of Auckland and Manukau, to include all courts in the Auckland Region.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of cases open at 1 July | 697 | 697 | 721 |
Number of new cases accepted during the year | 2,200-2,600 | 2,649 | 2,200-2,700 |
Number of cases closed during the year | 2,200-2,600 | 2,625 | 2,200-2,700 |
Number of cases open at 30 June | 700-1,000 | 721 | 800-1,000 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expansion of the Public Defence Service and Duty Solicitor (Auckland Region) | 2009 | - | 4,435 | 5,802 | 6,166 | 6,303 |
Making the Public Defence Service Pilot Permanent | 2008 | 2,165 | 2,965 | 3,044 | 3,123 | 3,123 |
Real Estate Agents Authority (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 687 | 687 | 3,392 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Timing of implementation, the Real Estate Agents Authority to be formally established from November 2009.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
The Real Estate Agents Authority will implement new performance measures for the 2010/11 year, as part of its formal establishment from 17 November 2009.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Agents Act 2008 - Funding for Implementation | 2008 | 687 | 3,392 | - | - | - |
Support and Assistance provided by Victim Support to Victims of Crime (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 6,258 | 6,258 | 6,363 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Client Satisfaction | 95% | 85% | 90% |
Requests for financial assistance to attend Court | 300-400 | 210 | 200 |
Requests for financial assistance will be processed within 10 working days of receipt | 95% | 97% | 97% |
Audits of Victim Support Offices will be conducted | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Total number of incidents responded to | 80,000-85,000 | 70,000 | 65,000-75,000 |
Number of victims supported | 100,000-105,000 | 90,000 | 85,000-95,000 |
Number of visits made to all victims | 25,000-28,000 | 17,000 | 17,000-20,000 |
Average time per contact with all victims | 25-30 minutes | 17 minutes | 20 minutes |
Average number of contacts per victim | 2.5-3.5 | 1.4 | 1.2-1.5 |
Number of contacts assisting victims to prepare a victim impact statement | 2,500-3,000 | 2,400 | 2,200-2,500 |
Number of victims of serious incidents supported (see Note 1) | N/A | 10,500 | 10,000-12,000 |
Number of visits made to victims of serious incidents (see Note 1) | N/A | 3,000 | 3,000 |
Average time per contact with victims of serious incidents (see Note 1) | N/A | 25 minutes | 25 minutes |
Average number of contacts per victim of serious crime (see Note 1) | N/A | 3 | 3 |
Number of contacts assisting victims to prepare a victim impact statement | 2,500-3,000 | 2,400 | 2,200-2,500 |
Number of applications from family members and friends of homicide victims receiving counselling | 180-200 | 200 | 190-210 |
Number of counselling sessions provided for families and friends of homicide victims | 550-650 | 650 | 625-675 |
Number of discretionary grants provided to families of homicide victims | 40-45 | 55 | 50-60 |
Number of victims assisted financially to make submissions at parole hearings | 60-75 | 80 | 75-85 |
Number of contacts with victims seeking assistance to make submissions at a parole hearing | 160-170 | 50 | 160-170 |
Number of applications to attend Court Hearings | 300-400 | 250 | 300-400 |
Number of households assessed and provided with security equipment | 80-100 | 180 | 180-200 |
Number of contacts supporting clients to attend RJ or FGC sessions | N/A | 230 | 250 |
Note 1 - New measures for 2009/10.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Justice Sector Reviews of Victims Services | 2008 | (1,673) | (1,000) | (1,000) | (1,000) | (1,000) |
Supporting a Sustainable NGO Social Service Sector | 2008 | - | 2,265 | 1,747 | 1,751 | 1,756 |
Quality Assurance | 2007 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
Complete Restructure of Victim Support and Maintain Service Delivery to Victims | 2006 | 2,402 | 2,670 | 2,870 | 2,820 | 2,820 |
Summary of Service Providers for Non-Departmental Outputs#
Provider | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2008/09 Estimated Actual $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
Reporting Mechanism |
Expiry of Funding Commitment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Legal Services Agency: Administration of the Legal Services Agency Legal Aid | 130,544 | 130,544 | 136,341 | Provider's annual report | - |
Law Commission: Advice from the Law Commission | 5,390 | 5,390 | 4,035 | Provider's annual report | - |
Human Rights Commission: Equity promotion and protection services |
8,913 | 8,913 | 9,113 | Provider's annual report | - |
Independent Police Conduct Authority: Equity promotion and protection services | 2,586 | 2,586 | 3,863 | Provider's annual report | - |
Privacy Commissioner: Equity promotion and protection services | 3,108 | 3,108 | 3,148 | Provider's annual report | - |
Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security: Equity promotion and protection services |
352 | 352 | 124 | Provider's end of year report | - |
Electoral Enrolment Centre (Business Unit of New Zealand Post Ltd): Producing and maintaining Electoral Rolls |
17,866 | 17,866 | 17,589 | Provider's annual report | - |
Electoral Commission: Provision of Electoral Services | 734 | 734 | 1,284 | Provider's annual report | - |
Public Trust: Provision of Protective Fiduciary Services | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 | Provider's annual report | - |
Victim Support: Support and Assistance Provided by Victim Support to Victims of Crime | 5,446 | 5,446 | 5,446 | Section 32A report | - |
Real Estates Agents Authority | 687 | 687 | 3,392 | Provider's annual report | - |
The above table summarises funding to be allocated through Vote Justice to non-departmental providers, along with an indication of the mechanism to be used for reporting actual performance and (where determined) the length of the funding commitment.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective: Contributions to negotiations for Foreshore and Seabed negotiations | Contribution to Foreshore and Seabed Negotiation costs (M42) |
Outcomes: Impact of Crime reduced Impacts: Victims of crime and trauma are supported by information and financial assistance |
Victims' Services |
Impairment of the Offender Levy |
Administrative Assistance for Foreshore and Seabed Arrangements (M42)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 200 | - | 5,900 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Additional funding approved in 2009/10 as result of the Foreshore & Seabed Financial Implications of Ngati Porou and Te Whanau a Apanui Negotiations initiative.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreshore & Seabed Financial Implications of Ngati Porou and Te Whanau a Apanui Negotiations | 2008 | 700 | 5,400 | 4,700 | 1,400 | 1,400 |
Contribution to Foreshore and Seabed Negotiation Costs (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 717 | 508 | 1,389 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Funding was transferred from 2008/09 to 2009/10 to fund the additional costs associated with undertaking the review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act.
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreshore & Seabed Act Review: Terms of Reference, Appointment of Ministerial Panel and Honouring Agreements | 2008 | (700) | 700 | - | - | - |
Foreshore & Seabed Financial Implications of Ngati Porou and Te Whanau a Apanui Negotiations | 2008 | 439 | 89 | 125 | - | - |
Foreshore and Seabed Discussions with Te Rarawa | 2007 | 450 | - | - | - | - |
Impairment of Offender Levy (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 320 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
New funding approved to cover the impairment expense of the Offender Levy. The impairment expense accounts for the difference between the levy money imposed and the levy money expected to be collected.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victims' Services | 2009 | - | 320 | 1,920 | 1,997 | 2,077 |
Victims' Services (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 3,072 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
New funding approved to cover the costs of providing new entitlements and services for victims of serious crime.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victims' Services | 2009 | - | 3,072 | 2,217 | 3,141 | 3,935 |
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Contribution to Foreshore and Seabed Negotiation costs (M42) | Annual report of the Ministry of Justice |
Victims Services | Annual report of the Ministry of Justice |
Impairment of the Offender Levy | Annual report of the Ministry of Justice |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual performance for each non-departmental other expenses appropriation.
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective: To maintain and upgrade capability through the development and maintenance of Ministry property portfolio and Information Technology infrastructure. | Ministry of Justice - Capital Expenditure (M42) |
Ministry of Justice - Capital Expenditure PLA (M42)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | 1,499 | 1,499 | 480 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 100,297 | 100,297 | 94,126 |
Intangibles | 27,409 | 27,409 | 26,389 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
129,205 | 129,205 | 120,995 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | 1,499 | 1,499 | 480 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 100,297 | 100,297 | 94,126 |
Intangibles | 27,409 | 27,409 | 26,389 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
129,205 | 129,205 | 120,995 |
Part 6.2 - Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective: Upgrade of the Human Rights Commission Information Technology infrastructure | Human Rights Commission (M42) |
Objective: Establishment of the Independent Police Conduct Authority | Independent Police Conduct Authority (M42) |
Objective: Upgrade of the implementation of the Legal Services Management System | Legal Services Agency (M42) |
Objective: Establishment of the Sentencing Council | Sentencing Council (M42) |
Human Rights Commission (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 50 | 50 | 45 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Majority of capital expenditure funding for the Infrastructure and Knowledge management initiative was approved in the 2008/09 financial year.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure and Knowledge management | 2007 | 50 | 45 | - | - | - |
Independent Police Conduct Authority (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 257 | 257 | 50 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
New funding for meeting the requirements of the Independent Police Conduct Authority.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meeting the necessary requirements of the Independent Police Conduct Authority | 2009 | - | - | 50 | - | - |
Meeting the future Requirements of the Independent Police Conduct Authority | 2008 | - | 257 | - | - | - |
Legal Services Agency (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 3,737 | 3,737 | 112 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The majority of the capital expenditure approved for the development and implementation of the Legal Services Management System was funded in the 2008/09 year.
Expected Results#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Successful development and implementation of the Legal Services Management System | - | - | Achieved |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Legal Services Management System | 2007 | 3737 | 112 | 60 | - | - |
Public Defence Service Capital Expenditure (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 940 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Capital funding approved for expansion of the Public Defence Service and Duty Solicitor (Auckland Region).
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expansion of the Public Defence Service and Duty Solicitor (Auckland Region) | 2009 | - | 940 | - | - | - |
The Real Estate Agents Authority Capital Expenditure (M42)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 2,078 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Capital transfer of $1.039 million from 2008/09 to 2009/10 due to the establishment of Real Estates Agents Authority to be formally established from November 2009.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Agents Act 2008 - Funding for Implementation | 2008 | 1,039 | 1,039 | - | - | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Human Rights Commission (M42) | Provider's annual report |
Independent Police Conduct Authority (M42) | Provider's annual report |
Legal Services Agency (M42) | Provider's annual report |
Sentencing Council (M42) | Provider's annual report |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual results for each non-departmental capital expenditure appropriation.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Parliamentary Counsel#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Attorney-General (M5)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Parliamentary Counsel Office
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE: Attorney-General
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Attorney-General is responsible for appropriations in Vote Parliamentary Counsel for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- a total of just over $9 million for drafting Government Bills (including amendments) and statutory regulations, and examining and reporting on local Bills and private Bills, and drafting amendments to them
- a total of nearly $12 million for supplying printed copies of Government Bills and Government Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs), pamphlet copies of Acts and Statutory Regulations, and annual volumes of Acts and Statutory Regulations, compiling reprints of Acts and Statutory Regulations with their amendments incorporated and publishing them, publishing the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations in Force in printed form, and in electronic form on the Internet free of charge and providing them for sale at designated bookshops and by subscription, providing free public access via the Internet to an electronic database of legislation, including Bills and SOPs, and maintaining the electronic database of legislation in an up-to-date form
- a total of $979,000 for capital investment in the New Zealand Legislation system (the Parliamentary Council Office's (PCO) integrated drafting and publishing system for New Zealand legislation) - formerly the Public Access to Legislation (PAL) system.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Objectives of the Vote#
Vote Parliamentary Counsel contributes to parliamentary democracy under the rule of law by supporting Parliament and the executive in their law-making roles, and contributes to the Government's objectives by:
- drafting changes in the law that are necessary to implement Government policies, and
- making the law accessible to the public.
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 14,586 | 13,787 | 15,151 | 18,108 | 19,012 | 19,012 | 20,666 | - | 20,666 | 21,132 | 21,165 | 21,207 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Expenditure | 1,688 | 2,232 | 1,764 | 3,436 | 4,068 | 3,668 | 4,083 | - | 4,083 | 3,378 | 3,136 | 3,575 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
16,274 | 16,019 | 16,915 | 21,544 | 23,080 | 22,680 | 24,749 | - | 24,749 | 24,510 | 24,301 | 24,782 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
New Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings | Access to Legislation Departmental output expenses | (1,000) | (0.250) | - | - | - |
Savings | Law Drafting Services Departmental output expenses | (1,000) | (0.150) | - | - | - |
Total Initiatives | (2,000) | (0.400) | - | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
Significant changes in departmental appropriations in Vote Parliamentary Counsel are discussed briefly below.
In the 2007/08 year, additional departmental output expenditure funding of $3.374 million was provided for the implementation of the New Zealand Legislation system. Funding was also provided for ongoing support of the New Zealand Legislation system for the 2008/09 year and outyears.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objectives of appropriation: Delivering the Government's legislation programme. Outcomes: high quality and timely legislative drafting and efficient use of resources, revising or introducing quality standards to assess performance and benchmarking against other drafting offices. Impacts: improved consistency and quality of drafted legislation, procedures streamlined to improve efficiency, revised or new satisfaction surveys carried out, relevant comparisons made between the Parliamentary Counsel Office and overseas drafting offices. |
Parliamentary Counsel Office: Law Drafting Services output class |
Objectives of appropriation: Ensuring that New Zealand legislation is readily accessible to the public in a timely manner, and in an accurate and authoritative form. Outcomes: free public access to an electronic database of New Zealand legislation, maintaining the electronic database of legislation, enabling appropriate organisations to use tools within the New Zealand Legislation system, publishing legislation in printed and electronic forms, responding to public enquiries from the New Zealand Legislation website, reprinting of legislation, an officialised New Zealand Legislation website, public access to historical legislation, technical simplification of the New Zealand Legislation system, and efficient use of shared services within the parliamentary campus. Impacts: reliable public access to the New Zealand Legislation website, cost effective and improved New Zealand Legislation system, prompt publishing of legislation, timely responses to public enquiries, reprinting the most appropriate legislation, more legislation on the New Zealand Legislation website is officialised, free public access to historical legislation is available electronically, improvement in cost effectiveness and performance of the New Zealand Legislation system, and cost effective use of shared services and resources. |
Parliamentary Counsel Office: Access to Legislation output class |
Access to Legislation (M5)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 10,632 | 10,632 | 11,417 |
Revenue from Crown | 10,546 | 10,546 | 11,321 |
Revenue from Other | 86 | 86 | 96 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
There have been minimal changes to this appropriation.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Free public access to the New Zealand Legislation website is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week as per the Service Level Agreement with Unisys | 99% | 99% | 99% |
Legislative Authoring, Content Management, and Publication system availability for Parliamentary Counsel Office, Office of the Clerk, and Inland Revenue Department staff, Planned upgrades necessitate system outages at times | 92% | 92% | 92% |
Legislation is published in printed and electronic forms within set timeframes | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Enquiries sent through the New Zealand Legislation website will be responded to within one working day of receipt | N/A | 80% | 80% |
Enquiries sent through the New Zealand Legislation website will be responded to within five working days of receipt | N/A | 100% | 100% |
The Attorney-General is satisfied that the quality standard has been achieved | The Attorney General is satisfied | The Attorney General is satisfied | The Attorney General is satisfied |
The reprints of Acts and Statutory Regulations listed on the annual reprints programme are compiled and published within the timeframes listed on the Parliamentary Counsel Office website | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Sections 4, 10, 12, 14 of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989. | These sections detail the Parliamentary Counsel Office's responsibilities for the printing, publishing, and sale of legislation. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implementation of the New Zealand Legislation system and ongoing support for the system | 2007/08 | 4,709 | 4,747 | 4,770 | 4,754 | 4,764 |
Funding personnel costs and additional bound volumes for rewritten parts of the Income Tax Act 2004 | 2007/08 | 13 | - | - | - | - |
Public Access to Legislation (PAL) Project | 2004/05 | 2,310 | 2,310 | 2,310 | 2,310 | 2,310 |
Law Drafting Services (M5)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 8,380 | 8,380 | 9,249 |
Revenue from Crown | 8,261 | 8,261 | 9,108 |
Revenue from Other | 119 | 119 | 141 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There have been minimal changes to this appropriation.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
All Bills on the annual legislative programme in categories 1 and 2 (which are Bills that must be passed in the current year) are drafted | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Between 50 and 70 Government Bills are drafted and amendments to the same number of Bills are drafted during their passage through the House | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Between 300 and 400 Statutory Regulations are drafted | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Instructing departments and agencies are satisfied that the quality and timeliness standards have been achieved, as determined from overall responses to the departmental satisfaction survey | 90% | 90% | 90% |
The Attorney-General is satisfied that the quality and timeliness standards have been achieved | The Attorney General is satisfied | The Attorney General is satisfied | The Attorney General is satisfied |
Select Committees are satisfied that the quality standard has been achieved, as determined from overall responses to a survey | N/A | Select Committees are satisfied | Select Committees are satisfied |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recruitment of additional staff to enhance strategic management and administrative capabilities of the PCO | 2007/08 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Funding personnel costs | 2007/08 | 800 | 797 | 797 | 797 | 797 |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective: To maintain the capability that the Legislation system delivers. | Parliamentary Counsel Office - Capital Expenditure. |
Parliamentary Counsel Office - Capital Expenditure PLA (M5)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Intangibles | 3,700 | 3,300 | 3,560 |
Other | 350 | 350 | 505 |
Total Appropriation |
4,068 | 3,668 | 4,083 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Intangibles | 3,700 | 3,300 | 3,560 |
Other | 350 | 350 | 505 |
Total Appropriation |
4,068 | 3,668 | 4,083 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This increase in appropriation is to invest in the New Zealand Legislation system (formerly known as the PAL asset) to ensure the system will continue to meet the ongoing requirements for legislative drafting and publication.
Expected Results
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Implementation and ongoing maintenance and support of the New Zealand Legislation system | $3.7 million | $3.3 million to be spent | $3.56 million to be spent |
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Police#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Police (M51)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: New Zealand Police
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR NEW ZEALAND POLICE: Minister of Police
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Police is responsible for appropriations in the Vote for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- a total of $3.077 million for Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing
- a total of $103.806 million for General Crime Prevention Services
- a total of $92.776 million for Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order
- a total of $416.395 million for Police Primary Response Management
- a total of $383.058 million for Investigations
- a total of $103.944 million on Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process
- a total of $284.473 million for the Road Safety Programme
- a total of $4.100 million in non-departmental appropriations for reimbursing telecommunication providers the costs incurred in making their legacy networks compliant with the requirements of the Telecommunications (Interception Capability) Act 2004 and for contribution to the United Nations Drug Control Programme.
The Department expects to collect a total of $82.800 million of Crown revenue in 2009/10, largely arising from traffic infringement fees.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
---|---|---|
|
Confident, safe and secure communities |
|
|
Less actual crime and road trauma, fewer victims |
|
|
A world-class Police service |
|
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 941,642 | 1,018,642 | 1,131,242 | 1,246,453 | 1,373,507 | 1,373,589 | 1,387,529 | - | 1,387,529 | 1,413,424 | 1,416,802 | 1,420,260 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 4 | - | 2 | - | 3,110 | 3,110 | 10 | 4,100 | 4,110 | 1,867 | 110 | 110 |
Capital Expenditure | 74,399 | 73,995 | 84,641 | 111,797 | 126,400 | 126,400 | 111,600 | - | 111,600 | 73,200 | 64,000 | 64,000 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
1,016,045 | 1,092,637 | 1,215,885 | 1,358,250 | 1,503,017 | 1,503,099 | 1,499,139 | 4,100 | 1,503,239 | 1,488,491 | 1,480,912 | 1,484,370 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | 90,158 | 79,446 | 82,538 | 85,325 | 82,800 | 82,800 | N/A | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
90,158 | 79,446 | 82,538 | 85,325 | 82,800 | 82,800 | N/A | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 | 82,800 |
New Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing Departmental Output Expense |
- | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 |
Police Primary Response Management Departmental Output Expense |
- | 1,454 | 1,281 | 1,324 | 1,371 | |
General Crime Prevention Services Departmental Output Expense |
- | 345 | 304 | 314 | 325 | |
Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order Departmental Output Expense |
- | 354 | 312 | 323 | 334 | |
Investigations Departmental Output Expense |
- | 1,350 | 1,190 | 1,230 | 1,274 | |
Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process Departmental Output Expense |
- | 354 | 313 | 322 | 334 | |
Road Safety Programme Departmental Output Expense |
- | 998 | 879 | 909 | 941 | |
Departmental Capital Injection | - | 3,167 | - | - | - | |
Additional Police Staff | Police Primary Response Management Departmental Output Expense |
- | 8,634 | 16,935 | 18,294 | 19,295 |
General Crime Prevention Services Departmental Output Expense |
- | 2,048 | 4,017 | 4,339 | 4,576 | |
Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order Departmental Output Expense |
- | 2,107 | 4,134 | 4,465 | 4,710 | |
Investigations Departmental Output expense |
- | 8,019 | 15,731 | 16,994 | 17,923 | |
Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process Departmental Output Expense |
- | 2,107 | 4,134 | 4,466 | 4,710 | |
Departmental Capital Injection | - | 7,895 | 12,114 | - | - | |
Taser Implementation | Police Primary Response Management Departmental Output Expense |
- | 1,603 | 369 | 369 | 561 |
General Crime Prevention Services Departmental Output Expense |
- | 381 | 88 | 88 | 134 | |
Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order Departmental Output Expense |
- | 392 | 90 | 90 | 137 | |
Investigations Departmental Output expenses |
- | 1,490 | 343 | 343 | 522 | |
Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process Departmental Output Expense |
- | 391 | 90 | 90 | 138 | |
Road Safety Programme Departmental Output Expense |
- | 1,101 | 254 | 254 | 386 | |
Departmental Capital Injection | - | 521 | - | - | - | |
A Fresh Start to Young Offenders | General Crime Prevention Services Departmental Output Expense |
- | 575 | 575 | 575 | 575 |
Departmental Capital Injection | - | 1,000 | - | - | - | |
Total Departmental Expenses | - | 33,717 | 51,051 | 54,801 | 58,259 | |
Total Capital Injection | - | 12,583 | 12,114 | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
Operating Flows
The funding will increase further by $34.192 million by the year 2012/13 primarily for the additional Police staff by December 2011 and reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts.
The increase in funding in 2009/10 is largely directed to:
- additional Police staff nationally including 300 to South Auckland
- reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- implementation of taser.
Over the last five years the increase in funding for Vote Police has been largely directed to:
- increase in staff capacity of an extra 1,000 sworn and 250 non-sworn staff
- meet the wage round settlements in 2003, 2006 and 2008
- maintain the current level of Police service delivery affected by cost pressures
- meet additional capital charge resulting from property revaluation
- fund Communications Centres capability
- reduce organised crime
- deploy Police personnel to the Solomon Islands, to Timor-Leste on United Nations Integrated Mission and to Papua New Guinea: Bougainville Community Policing.
Capital Injection
The new initiatives will give a further capital contribution of $12.114 million in 2010/11 mainly for the additional police staff and to replace the radio network.
The increase in the capital contribution of $12.583 million in 2009/10 is largely directed to:
- additional Police staff nationally including 300 to South Auckland
- reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- give fresh start to young offenders.
Over the last five years the major factors that have influenced the level of capital contributions were:
- developing infrastructure to match the increase in staff
- implementing rapid identification technology, providing stab resistant body armour and replacing general purpose rifles
- building a new custodial facility at Rotorua Police Station
- enhancing Police security infrastructure to a level necessary to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of Police data
- upgrading and replacing Police breath testing equipment in line with the Government's policy of lower blood alcohol
- road policing devices: hand-held evidential breath testing devices, oral fluid drug testing devices, commercial vehicle investigating unit, portable scales, automatic number plate recognition and e-ticketing devices
- replacing the Police land mobile radio network with a digital radio network.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Outcome: Confident, safe and secure communities Impact: Increased community and iwi participation creating increased sense of community safety |
General Crime Prevention Services |
Impact: Safety achieved through working partnerships | Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order |
Outcome: Less actual crime and road trauma, fewer victims Impact: Police respond in a timely and effective way to incidents |
Police Primary Response Management |
Impact: Reduced road death and trauma through evidence based road policing | Road Safety programmes |
Impact: Thorough investigations with excellent outcomes for victims of crime | Investigations |
Impact: The most appropriate form of resolution is applied | Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process |
Outcome: A world-class Police service Impact: Improving quality of leadership & capability |
Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing |
Impact: Safer events in public places, protected diplomats and other VIPs | Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order |
Impact: Innovative solutions developed through maximising technological capability | Police Primary Response Management |
Case Resolution and Support to Judicial Process (M51)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 101,441 | 101,441 | 103,944 |
Revenue from Crown | 99,636 | 99,636 | 102,139 |
Revenue from Other | 1,805 | 1,805 | 1,805 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- implementing taser
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- savings through line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of prosecutions | 125,000 to 135,000 | 145,000 to 155,000 | 145,000 to 155,000 |
Number of diversions | 8,000 to 10,000 | 14,500 to 15,500 | 14,500 to 15,500 |
Number of youth apprehensions resolved by way of Family Group Conference | 1,800 to 2,200 | 2,000 to 2,500 | 2,000 to 2,500 |
Percentage of prima facie cases established for informations laid | 99% | 99% | 99% |
Percentage of files with Victim Impact Statements, where the statement is no older than 28 days when it is required for sentencing | 100% | 85% | 85% |
Percentage of hearings that do not proceed on the date agreed between the Police and Court for reasons that are the responsibility of the Police | Less than 0.5% | Less than 0.5% | Less than 0.5% |
Percentage of recorded offences resolved: Dwelling Burglary |
Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2008/09 |
Percentage of recorded offences resolved: Public Place violence Offences |
Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2008/09 |
Percentage of recorded offences resolved: Family Violence Offences |
- | - | 95% |
Percentage of recorded offences resolved: Motor Vehicle Theft Offences |
Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2007/08 | Equal to or better than 2008/09 |
Number of court documents executed | 50,000 to 60,000 | 65,000 to 75,000 | 65,000 to 75,000 |
Number of complaints upheld relating to the execution of court documents | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 |
Number of prisoners held | 125,000 to 140,000 | 155,000 to 165,000 | 155,000 to 165,000 |
Number of complaints upheld relating to the custody and escort of prisoners | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 |
Number of deaths of persons in custody | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Number of Electronic Monitoring (EM) bail applications assessed | 600 to 750 | 600 to 750 | 600 to 750 |
Number of Electronically Monitored bailees | 125 to 175 | 125 to 175 | 125 to 175 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taser Implementation | 2009/10 | - | 391 | 90 | 90 | 138 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 354 | 313 | 322 | 334 |
Savings through line by line review | 2009/10 | - | (1038) | (402) | (402) | (402) |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (35) | - | - | - |
2008 Wage round | 2008/09 | 3,046 | 3,537 | 3,537 | 3,537 | 3,537 |
Revised output costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | 19,444 | 19,444 | 19,444 | 19,444 | 19,444 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security Infrastructure | 2008/09 | 61 | 121 | 195 | 269 | 269 |
Road Safety Budget Bids 2007: Digital Radio | 2008/09 | 112 | 169 | 302 | 568 | 568 |
CYPF Act 1989, Amendment Bill (No.6) Information Technology | 2008/09 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 170 | 333 | 522 | 553 | 553 |
Increase in staff | 2007/08 | 10,150 | 12,423 | 14,600 | 14,915 | 15,159 |
Rotorua Custodial Facility | 2006/07 | 568 | 568 | 568 | 568 | 568 |
Prison Muster E-bail | 2005/06 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 3,200 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 249 | 249 | 249 | 249 | 249 |
Total | 37,004 | 39,720 | 42,622 | 43,317 | 43,621 |
General Crime Prevention Services (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 101,361 | 101,361 | 103,806 |
Revenue from Crown | 98,283 | 98,283 | 100,728 |
Revenue from Other | 3,078 | 3,078 | 3,078 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- replacing the Police Land Mobile Radio Network
- implementing taser
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- giving a fresh start to young offenders
- savings through line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of households on the neighbourhood support register | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 240,000 | 240,000 |
Percentage of the public that agree that the Police are responsive to the needs of the community | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Percentage of the public that agree that the Police are involved in community activities | 60% | 60% | 60% |
The Organised and Financial Crime Agency of New Zealand (OFCANZ) has built community resilience to organised crime through public and private sector engagement | Benchmark to be established in 2009/10 | Benchmark to be established in 2009/10 | Benchmark to be established in 2009/10 |
Number of youth apprehensions dealt with through: warnings/cautions |
10,000 to 11,000 | 10,500 to 11,500 | 10,500 to 11,500 |
Number of youth apprehensions dealt with through: alternative action |
23,000 to 27,000 | 23,000 to 27,000 | 23,000 to 27,000 |
Number of youths referred to Youth Development programmes | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 1,600 to 1,900 | 1,600 to 1,900 |
Number of vetting services provided | 475,000 to 500,000 | 460,000 to 500,000 | 460,000 to 500,000 |
Percentage of vetting applications processed within 30 working days | 95% | 95% | 95% |
Number of complaints upheld for processing errors of vetting applications | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 |
Number of applications for firearms licences processed | 48,000 to 53,000 | 38,000 to 48,000 | 38,000 to 48,000 |
Number of firearms licences revoked | 250 to 350 | 400 to 600 | 400 to 600 |
Number of firearms licences revoked in response to actions under the Domestic Violence Act 1995 | 50 to 150 | 50 to 150 | 50 to 150 |
Number of days taken to process 90% of firearms licence applications | New measure in 2009/10 | 60 days | 60 days |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Fresh Start to Young Offenders | 2009/10 | - | 575 | 575 | 575 | 575 |
Savings through Line by Line review | 2009/10 | - | (1,008) | (391) | (391) | (391) |
Taser Implementation | 2009/10 | - | 381 | 88 | 88 | 134 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 354 | 304 | 314 | 325 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (50) | - | - | - |
2008 Wage Round | 2008/09 | 3,138 | 3,662 | 3,662 | 3,662 | 3,662 |
Revised Output costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | (9,999) | (9,999) | (9,999) | (9,999) | (9,999) |
Road Safety Budget bids 2007 | 2008/09 | 157 | 238 | 426 | 426 | 426 |
Strengthening Maori Wardens: Enhancing Capacity | 2008/09 | 198 | 452 | 602 | 602 | 602 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security Infrastructure | 2008/09 | 61 | 139 | 223 | 308 | 308 |
CYPF Act 1989, Amendment Bill (No.6) Information Technology | 2008/09 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 222 | 433 | 679 | 720 | 720 |
Increase in staff | 2006/07 | 13,688 | 15,922 | 17,905 | 18,206 | 18,443 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 363 | 363 | 363 | 363 | 363 |
Family Safety Teams | 2005/06 | 1,565 | 1,565 | 1,565 | 1,565 | 1,565 |
Enhanced Youth Aid | 2005/06 | 2,991 | 2,991 | 2,991 | 2,991 | 2,991 |
Total | 12,390 | 16,024 | 18,999 | 19,436 | 19,730 |
Investigations (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 372,808 | 372,808 | 383,058 |
Revenue from Crown | 370,038 | 370,038 | 380,288 |
Revenue from Other | 2,770 | 2,770 | 2,770 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- replacing the Police land mobile network
- implementing taser
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- savings through line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
The recorded crime rate of: Dwelling burglaries reported per 10,000 population |
98 | 98 | 98 |
The recorded crime rate of: Public place violence offences per 10,000 population |
120 | 140 | 140 |
The recorded crime rate of: Motor vehicle theft offences per 10,000 population |
60 | 60 | 60 |
Number of cases referred for prosecution action by informations laid | 165,000 to 190,000 | 195,000 to 200,000 | 195,000 to 200,000 |
Number of family violence incidents recorded | 38,000 | 38,000 | 38,000 |
Number of family violence offences recorded | 33,000 | 33,000 | 33,000 |
Number of family violence death review investigations undertaken and completed | - | - | 30 |
Number of Family Violence Death Reviews commenced within 7 days of an event occurring and completed within 60 days | - | - | 30 |
Percentage of family violence repeats in a year as defined by: i. All ethnicities ii. Maori iii. Pacific Peoples iv. Caucasians |
- | - | i. 49% ii. 58% iii. 46% iv. 51% |
Number of prisoner fingerprints taken | 90,000 to 95,000 | 90,000 to 95,000 | 90,000 to 95,000 |
Number of DNA Databank samples taken | 9,000 to 10,000 | 10,500 to 11,500 | 10,500 to 11,500 |
Number of identifications from scene of crime fingerprints | - | - | 2,000 to 2,500 |
Number of identifications from scene of crime DNA samples | 1,500 to 2,500 | 1,500 to 2,500 | 2,000 to 2,500 |
Percentage of people who have reported offences that are advised of results or updated on the investigation within 21 days of reporting that offence | 100% | 90% | 90% |
Time taken to attend 97% of burglaries | - | - | 57 hours |
Percentage of homicide offences resolved versus homicide offences recorded | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of Victim Support Groups that are satisfied with the Police provision of services in relation to initial response and criminal investigation | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Number of multi-agency taskforce operations commenced by OFCANZ | - | - | Benchmark to be established in 2009/10 |
Number of multi-agency taskforce operations concluded by OFCANZ | - | - | Benchmark to be established |
Number of non-criminal investigations relating to: Recorded incidents involving persons with mental illness |
7,500 to 8,000 | 9,000 to 9,500 | 9,000 to 9,500 |
Number of non-criminal investigations relating to: Reports of sudden deaths |
5,600 to 5,900 | 4,500 to 5,500 | 4,500 to 5,500 |
Number of non-criminal investigations relating to: Reports of missing persons |
16,000 to 17,000 | 14,000 to 15,000 | 14,000 to 15,000 |
Number of complaints upheld under this output | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 | Fewer than 3 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings through Line by line review | 2009/10 | - | (3,949) | (1,529) | (1,529) | (1,529) |
Taser Implementation | 2009/10 | - | 1,490 | 343 | 343 | 522 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 1,350 | 1,190 | 1,230 | 1,274 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (159) | - | - | - |
2008 Wage Round | 2008/09 | 11,307 | 13,158 | 13,158 | 13,158 | 13,158 |
Revised output costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | 7,649 | 7,649 | 7,649 | 7,649 | 7,649 |
Road Safety Budget Bids 2007 | 2008/09 | 517 | 782 | 1,397 | 1,397 | 1,397 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security | 2008/09 | 199 | 400 | 641 | 884 | 884 |
CYPF Act 1989, Amendment Bill (No.6) Information Technology | 2008/09 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 728 | 1,423 | 2,230 | 2,366 | 2,366 |
Increase in staff | 2005/06 | 46,642 | 55,123 | 63,379 | 64,585 | 65,514 |
Coroners Act Review | 2005/06 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 1,171 | 1,171 | 1,171 | 1,171 | 1,171 |
Total | 69,032 | 79,257 | 90,448 | 92,073 | 93,225 |
Police Primary Response Management (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 409,665 | 409,665 | 416,395 |
Revenue from Crown | 406,149 | 406,149 | 412,879 |
Revenue from Other | 3,516 | 3,516 | 3,516 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- replacing the Police land mobile Network
- implementing taser
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- savings through line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of 111 calls presented | 750,000 to 800,000 | 750,000 to 800,000 | 750,000 to 800,000 |
Number of non-emergency calls presented at Communications Centres | 1,060,000 to 1,160,000 | 1,060,000 to 1,160,000 | 1,060,000 to 1,160,000 |
Percentage of randomly surveyed callers who expressed satisfaction with Communications Centre's response to calls | Result equal to or better than 2007/08 | Result equal to or better than 2007/08 | Result equal to or better than 2008/09 |
Percentage of 111 calls answered within 10 seconds of being presented to the Communications Centres | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of non-emergency calls answered within 30 seconds of being presented to the Communications Centres | 80% | 80% | 80% |
Number of *555 calls presented | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 280,000 to 300,000 | 280,000 to 300,000 |
Number of unique Priority One (P1) events created | 100,000 to 150,000 | 100,000 to 150,000 | 100,000 to 150,000 |
Time taken for Police to arrive at 90% of P1 emergency events in urban policing areas | - | - | 25 minutes |
Time taken for Police to arrive at 90% of P1 emergency events in rural policing areas | - | - | 40 minutes |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings through Line by Line review | 2008/09 | - | (4,251) | (1,646) | (1,646) | (1,646) |
Taser Implementation | 2008/09 | - | 1,603 | 369 | 369 | 561 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2008/09 | - | 1,454 | 1,281 | 1,324 | 1,371 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2008/09 | - | (177) | - | - | - |
2008 Wage Round | 2008/09 | 12,292 | 14,306 | 14,306 | 14,306 | 14,306 |
Revised Output costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | 980 | 980 | 980 | 980 | 980 |
Road Safety Budget Bids 2007 | 2008/09 | 568 | 862 | 1,537 | 1,537 | 1,537 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security Infrastructure | 2008/09 | 258 | 513 | 824 | 1,133 | 1,133 |
CYPF Act 1989, Amendment Bill (No.6) | 2008/09 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 801 | 1,566 | 2,457 | 2,605 | 2,605 |
National Assistance Centre | 2007/08 | 3,691 | 3,691 | 3,691 | 3,691 | 3,691 |
Increase in staff | 2005/06 | 53,396 | 62,577 | 71,456 | 72,740 | 73,741 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 1,279 | 1,279 | 1,279 | 1,279 | 1,279 |
Communications Centres Capability and Capacity | 2005/06 | 11,383 | 11,383 | 11,383 | 11,383 | 11,383 |
Total | 84,669 | 95,807 | 107,938 | 109,722 | 110,962 |
Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 3,035 | 3,035 | 3,077 |
Revenue from Crown | 3,021 | 3,021 | 3,063 |
Revenue from Other | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Police Advice is provided in accordance with the work programme agreed with the Minister (Policy) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Percentage of Policy papers that the Minister is satisfied with in regard to the following characteristics:
|
100% | 100% | 100% |
The Commissioner is satisfied with policy advice in that it conforms to the following characteristics:
|
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Number of items of Ministerial correspondence referred to the Police for draft reply | 400 to 600 | 550 to 850 | 550 to 850 |
Number of Parliamentary Questions referred to the Police for draft response | 1,100 to 1,300 | 660 to 1,200 | 660 to 1,200 |
Percentage of draft responses to Parliamentary Questions that are provided within the timeframes specified | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (1) | - | - | - |
2008 wage Round | 2008/09 | 92 | 107 | 107 | 107 | 107 |
Revised output Costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | 934 | 934 | 934 | 934 | 934 |
Road Safety Budget Bids 2007 | 2008/09 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security Infrastructure | 2008/09 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 13 |
Increase in staff | 2006/07 | 314 | 320 | 324 | 459 | 445 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Total | 1,355 | 1,397 | 1.411 | 1,549 | 1,550 |
Road Safety Programme (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 286,085 | 286,085 | 284,473 |
Revenue from Crown | 282,908 | 282,908 | 282,071 |
Revenue from Other | 3,177 | 3,177 | 2,402 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- replacing the Police land mobile network
- Budget 2007 road policing initiatives; Police Infringement Bureau (PIB) System upgrade; lower blood alcohol limit: driver drug blood testing; speed camera expansion; operating rating system; road policing intel analysts and community initiatives
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- implementing taser
- savings through line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of Compulsory Breath Tests conducted | More than 1,900,000 | More than 1,900,000 | More than 1,900,000 |
Number of Mobile Breath Tests conducted | More than 700,000 | More than 700,000 | More than 700,000 |
Number of commercial vehicles stopped by mobile patrols and weighbridges | 180,000 to 220,000 | 86,000 | 86,000 |
All strategic road policing delivered in accordance with Risk Targeted Patrol Plans (RTPP) with regard to the Fatal 5 factors:
|
100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of all commercial vehicles stopped for which vehicle inspection reports are completed | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of all schools contacted by Police Education Officers and/or in receipt of school road safety education sessions | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Number of crashes attended and reported to New Zealand Transport Agency:
|
330 to 370 | 370 to 400 | 370 to 400 |
Number of crashes attended and reported to New Zealand Transport Agency:
|
2,000 to 2,200 | 2,000 to 2,200 | 2,000 to 2,200 |
Number of crashes attended and reported to New Zealand Transport Agency:
|
8,000 to 9,000 | 9,000 to 10,000 | 9,000 to 10,000 |
Number of crashes attended and reported to New Zealand Transport Agency:
|
26,000 to 29,000 | 29,000 to 32,000 | 29,000 to 32,000 |
Number of traffic incidents, blockages and breakdowns recorded | 80,000 to 90,000 | 80,000 to 90,000 | 80,000 to 90,000 |
Number of complaints upheld against the Police relating to attendance at traffic emergencies and disasters | Fewer than 5 | Fewer than 5 | Fewer than 5 |
Number of unique Priority One (P1) traffic events created | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 30,000 to 40,000 | 30,000 to 40,000 |
Time taken for Police to arrive at 90% of P1 traffic emergency events in urban policing areas | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 25 minutes | 25 minutes |
Time taken for police to arrive at 90% of P1 traffic emergency events in rural policing areas | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 40 minutes | 40 minutes |
Number of traffic prosecutions | 80,000 | 80,000 to 90,000 | 80,000 to 90,000 |
Number of complaints upheld relating to the execution of road policing court documents | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings through Line by Line review | 2009/10 | - | (2,917) | (1,130) | (1,130) | (1,130) |
Taser Implementation | 2009/10 | - | 1,101 | 254 | 254 | 386 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 998 | 879 | 909 | 941 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (123) | - | - | - |
2008 Wage Round | 2008/09 | 8,517 | 9,828 | 9,828 | 9,828 | 9,828 |
Revised Output Costing - Transfer of funds between Outputs | 2008/09 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 |
Lower Breath/Blood Alcohol Limit | 2008/09 | 844 | 686 | 686 | 686 | 686 |
Driver Drug Blood Testing | 2008/09 | 650 | 650 | 650 | 650 | 650 |
Speed Camera Expansion | 2008/09 | 1,102 | 1,586 | 1,627 | 1,670 | 1,670 |
Operator Rating System | 2008/09 | 468 | 303 | 303 | 303 | 303 |
Road Policing Intel Analysts | 2008/09 | 521 | 641 | 664 | 688 | 688 |
Community Initiatives | 2008/09 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 |
Road Safety 2007 Budget Bids | 2007/08 | 2,288 | 1,880 | 2,020 | 2,020 | 2,020 |
Increase in staff | 2007/08 | 8,195 | 8,534 | 9,276 | 9,419 | 9,419 |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 559 | 1,092 | 1,712 | 1,816 | 1,816 |
Car as a Police Station | 2006/07 | 1,342 | 1,882 | 1,882 | 1,882 | 1,882 |
Commercial Vehicle Investigation Unit | 2006/07 | 2,013 | 2,064 | 2,064 | 2,064 | 2,064 |
Crash Attendance and Investigation | 2006/07 | 4,545 | 4,869 | 4,869 | 4,869 | 4,869 |
Police Infringement Bureau system upgrade | 2006/07 | 947 | 952 | 952 | 952 | 952 |
Rural Patrols | 2006/07 | 1,994 | 2,055 | 2,055 | 2,055 | 2,055 |
Urban Arterial | 2006/07 | 362 | 375 | 375 | 375 | 375 |
Digital Camera Replacement | 2006/07 | 884 | 884 | 884 | 884 | 884 |
Electronic Ticketing | 2006/07 | 597 | 698 | 698 | 698 | 698 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 1,080 | 1,080 | 1,080 | 1,080 | 1,080 |
Total | 37,792 | 40,002 | 42,512 | 42,856 | 43,020 |
Specific Crime Prevention Services and Maintenance of Public Order (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 99,112 | 99,194 | 92,776 |
Revenue from Crown | 81,056 | 81,056 | 80,931 |
Revenue from Other | 18,056 | 18,138 | 11,845 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The change provides for:
- increasing staff
- meeting the 2008 wage round
- reducing the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts
- extending deployment to the Solomon Islands
- savings through the line by line review.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of bail curfew checks recorded | 250,000 to 300,000 | 160,000 to 180,000 | 160,000 to 180,000 |
Number of bail/ parole breaches of curfew detected | 12,000 to 14,000 | 16,000 to 18,000 | 16,000 to 18,000 |
Number of Public Demonstration operations where an operation order has been prepared | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 70 - 110 | 70 - 110 |
Number of Public event operations where an operation order has been prepared | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09 | 480 - 520 | 480 - 520 |
Number of personal (VIP) security operations where an operation order has been prepared | Benchmark to be established in 2008/09. | 100 - 140 | 100 - 140 |
Number of complaints upheld under this output | Fewer than 5 | Fewer than 5 | Fewer than 5 |
Number of persons deployed annually | 85 | 85 | 85 |
Number of capacity building programmes and projects planned annually | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings through Line by Line review | 2009/10 | - | (1,037) | (402) | (402) | (402) |
Taser Implementation | 2009/10 | - | 392 | 90 | 90 | 137 |
Reduce the waiting time in Auckland criminal courts | 2009/10 | - | 354 | 312 | 323 | 334 |
Contribution to Identity Verification Service | 2009/10 | - | (48) | - | - | - |
Pitcairn Island Community Policing | 2008//09 | 100 | 100 | - | - | - |
2008 wage Round | 2008/09 | 2,753 | 2,882 | 2,882 | 2,882 | 2,882 |
Support to Cook Islands National Police | 2008/09 | 620 | 668 | - | - | - |
Deployment to Tonga | 2008/09 | 1,448 | - | - | - | - |
Revised Output Costing - Transfer of funds between outputs | 2008/09 | (19,092) | (19,092) | (19,092) | (19,092) | (19,092) |
CYPF Act 1989, Amendment Bill (No.6) Information Technology | 2008/09 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Information Technology: Enhanced Security Infrastructure | 2008/09 | 50 | 101 | 162 | 223 | 223 |
Special Training to Indonesian Police & Community Policing of Papua province | 2008/09 | 478 | 65 | - | - | - |
Solomon Islands Deployment | 2007/08 | 5,429 | 5,429 | 1,358 | - | - |
Deployment on UNMIT to Timor-Leste | 2007/08 | 3,915 | 994 | - | - | - |
Replacement of the Police Land Mobile Radio Network | 2007/08 | 233 | 455 | 713 | 757 | 757 |
Afghanistan Police Assistance | 2006/07 | 770 | 770 | 770 | 770 | 770 |
Increase in staff | 2005/06 | 12,820 | 15,226 | 17,396 | 17,713 | 17,958 |
Pacific Island Chiefs of Police | 2005/06 | 552 | 552 | 552 | 552 | 552 |
Deployment to Bougainville: Papua New Guinea | 2005/06 | 2,692 | 1,400 | 1,400 | 1,400 | 1,400 |
Pacific People Domestic Violence | 2005/06 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Niue Police Assistance | 2005/06 | 186 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
Holidays Act 2003 | 2005/06 | 352 | 352 | 352 | 352 | 352 |
Total | 14,312 | 10,689 | 7,619 | 6,694 | 6,997 |
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.1 - Departmental Other Expenses#
Compensation for Confiscated Firearms (M51)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compensation paid to owners of firearms confiscated under the provisions of section 28(4) of the Arms Act 1983 | 1985 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses#
Telecommunications Interception Capability (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 3,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Crown's obligations to reimburse telecommunication providers for the cost of upgrading their networks to comply with the provisions of Telecommunications (Interception Capability) Act.
Expected Results
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Compliance with the Act | Not Applicable | 100% | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Telecommunications (Interception Capability) Act obligations | 2007/08 | 3,000 | 4,000 | 1,757 | - | - |
United Nations Drug Control Programme (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contribution to United Nations Drug Control Programme | 2005/06 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
New Zealand Police - Capital Expenditure PLA (M51)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 121,400 | 125,775 | 109,600 |
Intangibles | 5,000 | 625 | 2,000 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
126,400 | 126,400 | 111,600 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 121,400 | 125,775 | 109,600 |
Intangibles | 5,000 | 625 | 2,000 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
126,400 | 126,400 | 111,600 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Forecast capital expenditure for 2009/10 is lower than 2008/09 as a number of significant property developments Gisborne Station, Whangarei and Manukau Hub - stage 2 have been completed.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Serious Fraud#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Police (M51)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Serious Fraud Office
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE: Minister of Police
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Police is responsible for appropriations in Vote Serious Fraud for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- a total of over $5 million for the detection, investigation and prosecution of cases of suspected serious or complex fraud offending brought to the attention of, or detected by, the Serious Fraud Office
- a total of nearly $2 million to implement and operate the non-conviction based forfeiture provisions of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009
- a total of $520,000 on the purchase or development of assets by and for the use of the Serious Fraud Office.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Contribution of Appropriations to Government Priorities and Outcomes#
Appropriations | Government Priorities | Government Outcomes |
---|---|---|
Investigation and Prosecution of Complex or Serious Fraud | Reduce the occurrence, impact, and harm of serious financial crime | Fewer fraudsters Less serious financial crime Reduced impact of serious financial crime on victims Increased public confidence in the delivery of justice and the rule of law Increased trust in New Zealand as an honest capital market and a safe place to do business |
Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets | Reduce the occurrence, impact, and harm of serious financial crime | Fewer fraudsters Less serious financial crime Reduced impact of serious financial crime on victims Increased public confidence in the delivery of justice and the rule of law Increased trust in New Zealand as an honest capital market and a safe place to do business |
The appropriations in Vote Serious Fraud will contribute to the Government priorities to reduce the occurrence, impact, and harm of serious financial crime by:
- improving the possibility of serious financial crime being detected, investigated, and prosecuted
- continuing to deliver a world class conviction rate
- continuing to improve SFO responsiveness to victims
- continuing to develop close working relationships with the Police, Organised and Financial Crime Agency (OFCANZ), and other public service departments to identify and achieve shared goals, and proactively to share good practice
- pursuing a prevention programme based on education and deterrence
- proactively address staff recruitment and retention issues, and ensure staff have the right equipment.
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 4,607 | 4,795 | 4,880 | 5,057 | 5,770 | 5,770 | 7,369 | - | 7,369 | 7,369 | 7,369 | 7,369 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Expenditure | 398 | 36 | 177 | 42 | 705 | 689 | 520 | - | 520 | 80 | 63 | - |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
5,005 | 4,831 | 5,057 | 5,099 | 6,475 | 6,459 | 7,889 | - | 7,889 | 7,449 | 7,432 | 7,369 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
The departmental output expense baseline was increased from 2007/08 to fund the new output expense Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets and provide additional funding ($300,000 in 2007/08 increasing to $600,000 in outyears) to maintain capability under the Investigation and Prosecution of Complex or Serious Fraud output expense.
Expenditure against the Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets output expense has been minimal due to the delay in enactment of enabling legislation - the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Bill. Baseline operational funding of $1.890 million has been provided for the Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets output expense from 2009/10. Work is being undertaken with the Police and the Organised and Financial Crime Agency (OFCANZ) to develop a combined approach to the implementation of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009.
A capital injection of $690,000 was provided in 2008/09 to enable the Serious Fraud Office to reconfigure office accommodation to better utilise space and provide capacity to accommodate additional resources, whether they be required for civil forfeiture, organised crime work, corruption or for other temporary or permanent reasons; and for an upgrade of Information Technology Systems.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Outcomes
|
Investigation and Prosecution of Complex or Serious Fraud |
Outcomes
|
Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets |
Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets (M51)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 100 | 100 | 1,890 |
Revenue from Crown | 100 | 100 | 1,890 |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The implementation of this output class, for which operational funding was provided from 2007/08, was subject to the passage of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Bill which was enacted in 2009.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of cases where investigation is commenced | 10-30 | - | 5-10 |
Percentage of cases investigated to enable the Director of Serious Fraud to decide on forfeiture orders completed within 12 months | 80% | - | 80% |
Progress of all cases is reviewed at least monthly by the Director | 100% | - | 100% |
Investigation and Prosecution of Complex or Serious Fraud (M51)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 5,670 | 5,670 | 5,479 |
Revenue from Crown | 5,560 | 5,560 | 5,360 |
Revenue from Other | 110 | 110 | 119 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Additional funding was provided in 2008/09, through a transfer from the Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets output expense appropriation, to maintain the capability of the Serious Fraud Office to deliver against this output expense.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Percentage of the time victims are treated with courtesy and compassion, and their dignity and privacy is respected | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of complaints assessed within 14 days to determine whether they meet the criteria of the Serious Fraud Office Act | N/A | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of cases assessed within six months to determine whether to proceed to a full investigation | N/A | 90% | 90% |
Number of full investigations completed to the point where the Director of Serious Fraud decides whether or not criminal charges should be laid | 20-30 | 20 | 15-25 |
Number of prosecution cases concluded | 15-20 | 15 | 15-20 |
Percentage of cases investigated to enable the Director of Serious Fraud to decide whether to prosecute the alleged offender(s) completed within 12 months | 80% | 80% | 80% |
Progress of all cases is reviewed at least monthly by the Director | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of cases going to committal | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Maintain percentage of early guilty pleas | N/A | above 50% | above 50% |
Maintain conviction rate | N/A | 90% | 90% |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective - supports the operations of the Serious Fraud Office | Serious Fraud Office - Capital Expenditure |
Serious Fraud Office - Capital Expenditure PLA (M51)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 705 | 689 | 510 |
Intangibles | - | - | 10 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
705 | 689 | 520 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 705 | 689 | 510 |
Intangibles | - | - | 10 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
705 | 689 | 520 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
A capital injection of $690,000 was provided in 2008/09 to enable the Serious Fraud Office to upgrade office accommodation and Information Technology Assets.
Expected Results
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
All capital expenditure for the Serious Fraud Office supports the operations of the activities of the office | Meet | Meet | Meet |
Statements of Forecast Service Performance#
The Statements of Forecast Service Performance of departments included in the Justice Sector comprise the service performance information for all departmental output expense appropriations that are proposed to be used by those departments. In this context, service performance information comprises the scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards for each class of outputs within those departmental appropriations, as set out in Part 2.1 of the Performance Information for appropriations in each Vote.
The following table identifies the classes of outputs incorporated in the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department in the Justice Sector. In one instance, this includes reference to classes of outputs within appropriations presented in a Vote in another sector.
Department | Composition of Statement of Forecast Service Performance |
---|---|
Department of Corrections | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Corrections. |
Crown Law Office | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Attorney-General. |
Ministry of Justice |
The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in:
|
Parliamentary Counsel Office | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Parliamentary Counsel. |
New Zealand Police | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Police. |
Serious Fraud Office | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Serious Fraud. |
Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
Statement of Common Accounting Policies#
These accounting policies have been applied in the forecast financial statements of all departments and Offices of Parliament except as outlined in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies for individual departments or Offices of Parliament.
These forecast financial statements are prepared in accordance with section 41(1)(a)-(f) of the Public Finance Act 1989. The purpose of the forecast financial statements is to facilitate Parliament's consideration of appropriations for, and planned performance of departments and offices of Parliament. Use of this information for other purposes may not be appropriate. It is not intended that these forecast financial statements be updated subsequent to publication.
Statement of Compliance
These forecast financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2009 comply with FRS-42 Prospective Financial Statements.
Specific Accounting Policies#
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these statements. These statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis. The measurement base applied is historical cost modified by the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities as identified in this statement of accounting policies.
The accrual basis of accounting has been used unless otherwise stated. These financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars, which is the entity's functional currency. All financial information presented has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
Judgements and Estimations#
The preparation of forecast financial statements in conformity with FRS-42 requires judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and these variations may be material.
Revenue#
Revenue is derived through the provision of outputs to the Crown and from services to third parties. Revenue is recognised in the forecast statement of financial performance when earned.
Leases#
Operating Leases
Where substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor, leases are classified as operating leases.
Lease payments under operating leases are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Finance Leases
Leases which effectively transfer to the department substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the leased items are classified as finance leases. These are capitalised at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. The leased assets and the corresponding lease liabilities are recognised in the statement of financial position. The leased assets are depreciated over the period the department is expected to benefit from their use. The interest expense component of finance lease payments is recognised in the statement of financial performance.
Borrowing Costs#
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.
Property, Plant and Equipment#
Property, plant and equipment, other than land and buildings, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Land and buildings are stated at fair value as determined by an independent registered valuer. Fair value is determined using market-based evidence. Land and buildings are revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that carrying value is not materially different from fair value at the end of the reporting period. Additions between revaluations are recorded at cost. Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Depreciation#
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis so as to allocate the cost [or valuation] of an item of property, plant and equipment, less any estimated residual value, over its estimated useful life.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Leasehold improvements are capitalised and the cost is amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Items under construction are not depreciated. The total cost of a capital project is transferred to the appropriate asset class on its completion and then depreciated.
Intangible Assets#
Intangible assets with finite useful lives (such as computer software) are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Amortisation is charged to the statement of financial performance on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested at least annually for impairment.
Where there is an active market for an intangible asset, the asset is recorded at a revalued amount, being fair value less any subsequent accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
Cash and Cash Equivalents#
Cash includes cash on hand and funds on deposit with banks with a maturity of 3 months or less from date of acquisition.
Debtors and Other Receivables#
Debtors and other receivables are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate, less impairment charges. Allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired.
Inventories#
Inventories held for sale or use in the production of goods and services on a commercial basis are recorded at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of purchased inventory is determined using the weighted average cost method.
Inventories held for distribution for public benefit purposes are recorded at cost (calculated using the weighted average cost method) adjusted when applicable for any loss of service potential. Where inventories are acquired at no cost, or for nominal consideration, the cost is the current replacement cost at the date of acquisition.
Employee Entitlements#
Pension Liabilities
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution retirement plans are recognised in the statement of financial performance as they fall due.
Other Employee Entitlements
Employee entitlements to salaries and wages, annual leave, sick leave, long service leave, retiring leave and other similar benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance when they accrue to employees. Employee entitlements to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Long-term employee entitlements are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Termination Benefits
Termination benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance only when there is a demonstrable commitment to either terminate employment prior to normal retirement date or to provide such benefits as a result of an offer to encourage voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Other termination benefits are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Onerous Contracts#
Where the benefits to be derived from a contract are lower than the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligation under the contract, a provision is recognised. The provision is stated at the present value of the future net cash outflows expected to be incurred in respect of the contract.
Foreign Currency#
Foreign currency transactions are reported at the New Zealand dollar exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Statement of Cash Flows#
The following are definitions of the terms used in the statement of cash flows:
- cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in transit, bank accounts and deposits with a maturity of no more than three months from date of acquisition
- investing activities are those activities relating to the acquisition and disposal of non-current assets
- financing activities comprise capital injections by, or repayment of capital to, the Crown, and
- operating activities include all transactions and other events that are not investing or financing activities.
Taxation#
Departments and Offices of Parliament are exempt from income tax as public authorities. Accordingly no charge for income tax has been provided for.
Goods and Services Tax#
These forecast financial statements are GST exclusive, except for receivables and payables in the statement of financial position, which are stated on a GST inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as input tax, then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense.
The net amount of GST owing to or from the Inland Revenue Department at balance date is included as part of receivables or payables (as appropriate) in the statement of financial position.
Commitments#
Future expenses and liabilities to be incurred on contracts that have been entered into at balance date are disclosed as commitments to the extent that there are equally unperformed obligations.
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets#
Contingent liabilities are disclosed if the possibility that they will crystallise is not remote. Contingent assets are disclosed if it is probable that the benefits will be realised.
Changes in Accounting Policies#
Any changes in accounting policies since the date of the last audited financial statements prepared under New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice are described in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies. The last audited financial statements (30 June 2008) were prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS (New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards) as appropriate for public benefit entities.
Forecast Financial Statements Department of Corrections #
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 886,003 | 930,778 | 933,613 | 1,031,949 | |
Department(s) | 7,765 | 7,929 | 9,119 | 7,529 | |
Other revenue | 32,888 | 25,998 | 34,198 | 25,998 | |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 926,656 | 964,705 | 976,930 | 1,065,476 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 443,020 | 458,466 | 459,880 | 516,651 | |
Operating | 1 | 230,109 | 245,774 | 257,028 | 296,843 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 117,888 | 126,451 | 122,378 | 108,718 | |
Capital charge | 130,641 | 134,014 | 131,244 | 143,264 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 1,770 | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 923,428 | 964,705 | 970,530 | 1,065,476 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | 6,400 | - | |
Other comprehensive income | (1,211) | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 2,017 | - | 6,400 | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 1,449,377 | 1,519,977 | 1,519,977 | 1,501,883 | |
Revaluation reserve | 280,973 | 279,070 | 277,495 | 277,495 | |
Other reserves | - | - | 2,267 | 2,267 | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 1,730,350 | 1,799,047 | 1,799,739 | 1,781,645 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 2,017 | - | 6,400 | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (3,228) | - | (6,400) | - | |
Capital contribution | 70,600 | (21,094) | 65,747 | 323,348 | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | (83,841) | (66,471) | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 69,389 | (21,094) | (18,094) | 256,877 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 1,519,977 | 1,498,883 | 1,501,883 | 1,758,760 | |
Revaluation reserve | 277,495 | 279,070 | 277,495 | 277,495 | |
Other reserves | 2,267 | - | 2,267 | 2,267 | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 1,799,739 | 1,777,953 | 1,781,645 | 2,038,522 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 164,761 | 13,576 | 137,348 | 95,514 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 5,692 | 7,229 | 5,729 | 5,729 | |
Prepayments | 1,988 | 2,125 | 2,125 | 2,125 | |
Inventories | 5,911 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,658 | |
Other current assets | 1,510 | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 179,862 | 28,530 | 150,802 | 109,026 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 1,698,464 | 1,803,693 | 1,697,442 | 1,988,258 | |
Intangible assets | 36,363 | 37,789 | 43,700 | 46,637 | |
Other non-current assets | 45,230 | 47,070 | 45,230 | 45,230 | |
Total Non- current Assets | 1,780,057 | 1,888,552 | 1,786,372 | 2,080,125 | |
Total Assets | 1,959,919 | 1,917,082 | 1,937,174 | 2,189,151 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 84,274 | 77,779 | 77,779 | 77,779 | |
Repayment of surplus | 3,228 | - | 6,400 | - | |
Employee entitlements | 59,840 | 50,950 | 60,950 | 62,450 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 147,342 | 128,729 | 145,129 | 140,229 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | 546 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 12,292 | 10,400 | 10,400 | 10,400 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 12,838 | 10,400 | 10,400 | 10,400 | |
Total Liabilities | 160,180 | 139,129 | 155,529 | 150,629 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 1,519,977 | 1,498,883 | 1,501,883 | 1,758,760 | |
Revaluation reserve | 277,495 | 279,070 | 277,495 | 277,495 | |
Other reserves | 2,267 | - | 2,267 | 2,267 | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 1,799,739 | 1,777,953 | 1,781,645 | 2,038,522 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 1,959,919 | 1,917,082 | 1,937,174 | 2,189,151 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 886,003 | 930,778 | 933,613 | 1,031,949 | |
Department(s) | 7,725 | 7,929 | 9,096 | 7,529 | |
Other | 34,180 | 25,998 | 34,184 | 25,998 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (216,739) | (249,724) | (268,149) | (301,001) | |
Employees | (426,703) | (453,016) | (456,712) | (511,051) | |
Capital charge | (130,641) | (134,014) | (131,244) | (143,264) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | 4,085 | - | (6,585) | - | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | 157,910 | 127,951 | 114,203 | 110,160 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 1,381 | 1,600 | - | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | 430 | - | 1,510 | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (98,676) | (183,741) | (106,018) | (389,799) | |
Intangible assets | (9,860) | (9,650) | (15,786) | (12,672) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (106,725) | (191,791) | (120,294) | (402,471) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 70,600 | (21,094) | 65,747 | 323,348 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (13,522) | (7,500) | (3,228) | (6,400) | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | (83,841) | (66,471) | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | 57,078 | (28,594) | (21,322) | 250,477 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 108,263 | (92,434) | (27,413) | (41,834) | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 56,498 | 106,010 | 164,761 | 137,348 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 164,761 | 13,576 | 137,348 | 95,514 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These statements have been compiled on the basis of government policies and the Department of Corrections' output agreements with the Minister of Corrections at the time the statements were finalised.
The 2008/09 budgeted figures are based on management's judgements, estimates and assumptions of the final 2008/09 outcome and is used as the opening position for 2009/10 forecasts. Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
The capital charge rate for the year ending 30 June 2010 is assumed to be 7.5% per annum.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Department of Corrections has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Department of Corrections, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
The Department of Corrections is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting the Department of Corrections is a public benefit entity.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, plant and equipment
The capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
Asset Category |
Capitalisation Amount |
---|---|
IT Equipment / Hardware | $3,000 other than personal computers, printers and laptops which are capitalised at cost. |
All other property, plant and equipment | $3,000 |
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
Asset Category |
Useful Lives |
---|---|
Buildings | 3 to 50 years |
Leasehold improvement | 10 years |
IT Equipment / Hardware | 3 to 10 years |
Motor vehicles | 5 to 8 years |
Furniture and office equipment | 3 to 5 years |
Other categories | 5 to 10 years |
Intangible assets
The capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
Asset Category |
Capitalisation Amount |
---|---|
Purchase software | $3,000 |
Internally developed software | $3,000 |
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
Asset Category |
Useful Lives |
---|---|
Purchased software | 3 to 10 years |
Internally developed software | 3 to 10 years |
Cost Allocation
Direct costs are charged to outputs based on actual consumption or activity analysis. Pre established ratios have been used in some instances.
Indirect costs are allocated to outputs based on appropriate resource consumption and/or activity analysis.
Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets held for sale are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction, not through continuing use. Non-current assets held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Any impairment losses for write-downs of non-current assets held for sale are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Any increases in fair value (less costs to sell) are recognised up to the level of any impairment losses that have been previously recognised.
Non-current assets (including those that are part of a disposal group) are not depreciated or amortised while they are classified as held for sale. Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale continue to be recognised.
Biological assets
The Department recognises biological assets or agriculture produce when, and only when:
- the Department controls the assets as a result of past events
- it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to the Department, and
- the fair value or costs of the asset can be measured reliably
Biological Assets managed for harvesting into agricultural produce are recorded at fair value less point of sale costs, with any realised gains or losses reported in the Statement of Financial Performance.
The Department's valuations incorporate any material point of sale costs in the valuation.
The Department's biological assets are forests and livestock.
Forests
Forestry assets are independently revalued annually at fair value less estimated point of sale costs. Fair value is determined based on the present value of expected net cash flows discounted at a current market determined pre-tax rate.
Gains or losses arising on initial recognition of biological assets at fair value less estimated point of sale costs and from a change in fair value less estimated point of sale costs are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
The costs to maintain the forestry assets are included in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Livestock
Livestock assets are recorded at fair value less point of sale costs.
Gains and losses due to changes in the per head value of the livestock at balance date are taken to the Statement of Financial Performance.
Gains and losses due to changes in livestock numbers are taken directly to the Statement of Financial Performance.
Any material differences in fair value are taken to Statement of Financial Performance.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Operating lease rentals | 13,416 | 13,649 | 17,600 | 17,600 |
Audit fees to auditors for audit of the financial statements | 284 | 302 | 318 | 318 |
Audit fees for NZ IFRS transition | 18 | 27 | - | - |
Fees to auditors for other services provided | 133 | - | - | - |
Facilities maintenance | 51,012 | 54,770 | 54,462 | 54,462 |
Offender management costs | 37,314 | 42,823 | 45,395 | 72,963 |
Computer costs | 11,004 | 16,596 | 10,379 | 10,379 |
Contract management | 15,342 | 11,078 | 22,152 | 22,152 |
Administration | 37,247 | 36,614 | 39,921 | 38,247 |
Bad debts | 83 | 5 | (13) | (13) |
Other operating costs | 62,081 | 69,910 | 66,814 | 80,735 |
Biological assets revaluation | 294 | - | - | - |
Loss on sale of fixed assets | 1,881 | - | - | - |
Total |
230,109 | 245,774 | 257,028 | 296,843 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net Surplus/(deficit) | 3,228 | - | 6,400 | - |
Depreciation and amortisation | 117,888 | 126451 | 122,378 | 108,718 |
Inc/(dec) in non-current employee benefit liabilities | 5,696 | - | - | - |
Inc/(dec) in non-cash items | 176 | - | - | - |
Total non-cash items | 123,760 | 126,451 | 122,378 | 108,718 |
Inc/(dec) in receivables | 1,169 | - | - | - |
Inc/(dec) in inventory | (69) | - | 311 | (58) |
Inc/(dec) in prepayment | (345) | (500) | (174) | - |
Inc/(dec) in creditors and payables | 20,090 | - | (14,746) | 1,500 |
Inc/(dec) in provisions | 1,561 | 500 | 34 | - |
Inc/(dec) in current employee benefit liabilities | 6,545 | 1,500 | - | - |
Working capital movements - net | 28,951 | 1,500 | (14,575) | 1,442 |
Add/(less) investing activity items | - | - | - | - |
Net loss/(gain) on sale or disposal of biological assets | 294 | - | - | - |
Net loss/(gain) on sale or disposal of intangible assets | - | - | - | - |
Net loss/(gain) on sale or disposal of physical assets | 1,677 | - | - | - |
Total investing activity items | 1,971 | - | - | - |
Net cash flow from operating activities |
157,910 | 127,951 | 114,203 | 110,160 |
Forecast Financial Statements Crown Law Office#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 40,812 | 42,214 | 42,864 | 41,799 | |
Department(s) | 20,469 | 21,110 | 22,900 | 22,900 | |
Other revenue | 55 | - | 50 | 50 | |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 61,336 | 63,324 | 65,814 | 64,749 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 16,892 | 18,990 | 18,064 | 19,000 | |
Operating | 1 | 40,728 | 43,167 | 46,577 | 44,306 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 844 | 1,022 | 1,018 | 1,288 | |
Capital charge | 97 | 145 | 155 | 155 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 58,561 | 63,324 | 65,814 | 64,749 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | - | - | |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 2,775 | - | - | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 1,001 | 1,640 | 1,767 | 2,637 | |
Revaluation reserve | 296 | 296 | 296 | 296 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 1,297 | 1,936 | 2,063 | 2,933 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 2,775 | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (2,775) | - | - | - | |
Capital contribution | 639 | - | - | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 127 | - | 870 | (870) | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 766 | - | 870 | (870) | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 1,767 | 1,640 | 2,637 | 1,767 | |
Revaluation reserve | 296 | 296 | 296 | 296 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 2,063 | 1,936 | 2,933 | 2,063 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 7,260 | 3,970 | 4,058 | 2,999 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 4,350 | 1,535 | 3,800 | 3,800 | |
Prepayments | 205 | 200 | 216 | 200 | |
Inventories | - | 1,640 | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 11,815 | 7,345 | 8,074 | 6,999 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 2,654 | 2,188 | 2,509 | 2,150 | |
Intangible assets | 49 | 612 | 1,580 | 1,594 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 2,703 | 2,800 | 4,089 | 3,744 | |
Total Assets | 14,518 | 10,145 | 12,163 | 10,743 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 4,703 | 3,958 | 4,139 | 3,658 | |
Repayment of surplus | 2,775 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 1,090 | 980 | 986 | 980 | |
Other current liabilities | 3,625 | 3,004 | 3,852 | 3,675 | |
Total Current Liabilities | 12,193 | 7,942 | 8,977 | 8,313 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 262 | 267 | 253 | 367 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 262 | 267 | 253 | 367 | |
Total Liabilities | 12,455 | 8,209 | 9,230 | 8,680 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 1,767 | 1,640 | 2,637 | 1,767 | |
Revaluation reserve | 296 | 296 | 296 | 296 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 2,063 | 1,936 | 2,933 | 2,063 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 14,518 | 10,145 | 12,163 | 10,743 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 40,812 | 42,214 | 42,864 | 41,799 | |
Department(s) | 20,639 | 21,110 | 23,450 | 22,900 | |
Other | 55 | - | 50 | 50 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (41,125) | (42,940) | (47,269) | (46,150) | |
Employees | (16,840) | (19,099) | (17,627) | (18,560) | |
Capital charge | (97) | (145) | (155) | (155) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | 133 | - | (204) | - | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | 3,577 | 1,140 | 1,109 | (116) |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (339) | (397) | (735) | (429) | |
Intangible assets | (2) | (570) | (1,670) | (514) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (341) | (967) | (2,405) | (943) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 639 | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (361) | - | (1,906) | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | 278 | - | (1,906) | - | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 3,514 | 173 | (3,202) | (1,059) | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 3,746 | 3,797 | 7,260 | 4,058 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 7,260 | 3,970 | 4,058 | 2,999 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These Forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finanlised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The activities of the Crown Law Office will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Personnel costs are based on 213 staff positions (199.64 full time equivalents).
- Operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 21 April 2009.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2009/10 actual financial statements include:
- changes to the baseline budget through new initiatives, or technical adjustments
- changes in service demand, as the services provided by Crown Law are demand driven.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Crown Law Office has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Crown Law Office, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Crown Law Office is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Crown Law Office is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Chief Executive of Crown Law Office on 21 April 2009. The Chief Executive of Crown Law Office is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, Plant and Equipment
The capitalisation threshold for property, plant and equipment is $1,000.
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below.
- Computer equipment / Hardware - 3 years
- Office equipment - 5 years
- Furniture and fittings - 5 years
- Leasehold improvements - up to 9 years
- Library - 10 years
Intangible Assets
The capitalisation threshold for computer software is $1,000.
Amortisation
The estimated useful life for computer software is 3 years.
Cost Allocation
Crown Law has determined the cost of outputs using the cost allocation system outlined below.
Direct costs are those costs directly attributed to an output. Indirect costs are those costs that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner, with a specific output.
Direct costs are charged directly to outputs. Indirect costs are charged to outputs based on cost drivers and related activity/usage information. Depreciation and capital charge are charged on the basis of asset utilisation. Personnel costs are charged on the basis of actual time incurred. Other indirect costs are assigned to outputs based on the proportion of direct staff costs for each output.
There have been no changes in cost accounting policies since the date of the last audited financial statements.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Operating expenses include: |
||||
Crown Solicitor's fees | 33,321 | 34,905 | 34,560 | 34,060 |
Consultants' fees | 310 | 550 | 666 | 500 |
Overseas Travel | 159 | 100 | 165 | 100 |
Domestic Travel | 446 | 541 | 722 | 550 |
Other | 6,545 | 7,071 | 10,664 | 7,587 |
Total operating expenses |
40,723 | 43,167 | 46,777 | 42,797 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of net surplus to net cash flows from operating activities for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus / (deficit) |
2,775 | - | - | - |
Add / (less) non-cash items |
||||
Depreciation and amortisation expense | 844 | 1,022 | 1,018 | 1,288 |
Other (Memorandum Account) | - | - | - | (870) |
Total non-cash Items |
844 | 1,022 | 1,018 | 418 |
Add / (less) items classified as investing or financing activities |
||||
(Gains) / losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - |
Other | - | - | - | - |
Total items classified as investing or financing activities |
- | - | - | - |
Add / (less) movements in working capital items |
||||
(Increase) / decrease in debtors and other receivable | (471) | (42) | 550 | - |
(Increase) / decrease in prepayments | 16 | 16 | (11) | 16 |
(Increase) / decrease in creditors and other payables | 322 | 435 | (359) | (481) |
(Increase) / decrease in current provisions | - | (283) | 228 | 177 |
(Increase) / decrease in employee entitlements | 80 | (8) | (104) | 6 |
Net Movements in working capital items |
(53) | 118 | 304 | (282) |
Add / (less) movements in non-current liabilities |
||||
(Increase) / decrease in non-current employee entitlements | 11 | - | (9) | (114) |
Net movements in non-current liabilities |
11 | - | (9) | (114) |
Net Cash from Operating Activities |
3,577 | 1,140 | 1,313 | 116 |
Forecast Financial Statements Ministry of Justice#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 401,263 | 441,892 | 445,137 | 449,489 | |
Department(s) | 5,513 | 5,697 | 5,708 | 5,796 | |
Other revenue | 1 | 33,097 | 33,357 | 36,342 | 34,561 |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 439,873 | 480,946 | 487,187 | 489,846 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 2 | 194,849 | 207,964 | 213,933 | 202,750 |
Operating | 3 | 152,616 | 171,271 | 162,205 | 170,248 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 49,741 | 54,100 | 58,116 | 61,822 | |
Capital charge | 4 | 40,103 | 47,611 | 50,883 | 55,026 |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 83 | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 437,392 | 480,946 | 485,137 | 489,846 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | 2,050 | - | |
Other comprehensive income | 42,648 | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 45,129 | - | 2,050 | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 509,901 | 610,894 | 611,077 | 666,529 | |
Revaluation reserve | 23,741 | 23,741 | 66,389 | 66,389 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 533,642 | 634,635 | 677,466 | 732,918 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 45,129 | - | 2,050 | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (2,481) | - | - | - | |
Capital contribution | 100,993 | 41,514 | 53,402 | 25,602 | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 183 | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 143,824 | 41,514 | 55,452 | 25,602 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 611,077 | 652,408 | 666,529 | 692,131 | |
Revaluation reserve | 66,389 | 23,741 | 66,389 | 66,389 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 677,466 | 676,149 | 732,918 | 758,520 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 108,764 | 60,621 | 101,013 | 68,051 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 5 | 53,099 | 44,317 | 43,100 | 43,100 |
Prepayments | 2,697 | 3,600 | 2,697 | 2,697 | |
Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | 9 | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 164,560 | 108,547 | 146,810 | 113,848 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 6 | 507,405 | 520,422 | 562,871 | 609,925 |
Intangible assets | 62,891 | 99,953 | 78,146 | 89,860 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 570,296 | 620,375 | 641,017 | 699,785 | |
Total Assets | 734,856 | 728,922 | 787,827 | 813,633 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 17,285 | 15,473 | 17,285 | 17,489 | |
Repayment of surplus | 2,481 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 9,023 | 7,800 | 9,023 | 9,023 | |
Other current liabilities | 22,195 | 24,200 | 22,195 | 22,195 | |
Total Current Liabilities | 50,984 | 47,473 | 48,503 | 48,707 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 6,406 | 5,300 | 6,406 | 6,406 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 6,406 | 5,300 | 6,406 | 6,406 | |
Total Liabilities | 57,390 | 52,773 | 54,909 | 55,113 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 611,077 | 652,408 | 666,529 | 692,131 | |
Revaluation reserve | 66,389 | 23,741 | 66,389 | 66,389 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 677,466 | 676,149 | 732,918 | 758,520 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 734,856 | 728,922 | 787,827 | 813,633 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 406,264 | 451,892 | 455,136 | 449,489 | |
Department(s) | 5,585 | 5,697 | 5,708 | 5,796 | |
Other | 34,186 | 33,357 | 36,342 | 34,561 | |
Interest | 80 | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (133,270) | (149,449) | (142,383) | (150,410) | |
Employees | (192,508) | (207,964) | (213,933) | (202,750) | |
Capital charge | (40,043) | (47,611) | (50,883) | (55,026) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | 1,418 | - | - | 204 | |
Other operating activities | (19,163) | (21,822) | (19,822) | (19,838) | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 7 | 62,549 | 64,100 | 70,165 | 62,026 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 65 | 368 | 368 | 405 | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (61,859) | (93,638) | (101,796) | (94,606) | |
Intangible assets | (6,570) | (27,679) | (27,409) | (26,389) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (68,364) | (120,949) | (128,837) | (120,590) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 100,993 | 41,514 | 53,402 | 25,602 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (8,685) | (2,730) | (2,481) | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | 92,308 | 38,784 | 50,921 | 25,602 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 86,493 | (18,065) | (7,751) | (32,962) | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 22,271 | 78,686 | 108,764 | 101,013 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 108,764 | 60,621 | 101,013 | 68,051 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been complied on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial Expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Ministry of Justice has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Ministry of Justice, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
The Ministry of Justice is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting, the Ministry of Justice is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Secretary of Justice on 20 April 2009. The Secretary of Justice is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of consideration received.
Revenue Crown is recognised on the basis of the supply of outputs to the Crown.
Department and Other Revenue is from the supply of goods and services to other government departments and third parties.
Revenue from filing and similar fees is recognised when the obligation to pay the fee is incurred.
Rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives granted are recognised evenly over the term of the lease as a reduction in total rental income.
Interest income is accrued using the effective interest rate method.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Asset Capitalisation
Property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost of purchase.
These are capitalised:
- if purchased individually and the cost price is greater than $3,000
- if purchased as a group and the combined value is greater than $5,000.
Capital work in progress is recognised as costs are incurred. Depreciation is not recorded until the asset is fully acceptance tested, operational and therefore capitalised.
The carrying amounts of plant, property and equipment are reviewed at least annually to determine if there is any indication of impairment. Where an asset's recoverable amount is less than its carrying amount, it will be reported at its recoverable amount and an impairment loss will be recognised. Losses resulting from impairment are reported in the Statement of Financial performance, unless the asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case any impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
Asset Revaluation
Land and buildings are stated at fair value as determined by an independent registered valuer as at 30 June. Fair value is determined using market-based evidence. Revaluations are performed on a yearly basis although land and buildings are only physically inspected every three years. The last physical inspection was completed on 30 June 2006.
Any surplus on revaluation of a class of land or buildings is transferred directly to the applicable property, plant and equipment revaluation reserve within taxpayers' funds unless it offsets a previous decrease in value recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance, in which case, it is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
A decrease in value relating to a class of land or buildings is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance where it exceeds the surplus previously transferred to revaluation reserves.
Accumulated depreciation at revaluation date is eliminated against the gross carrying amount so that the carrying amount after revaluation equals the revalued amount.
Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of these assets after allowing for residual values (where appropriate by asset category). The estimated useful life of major asset categories is as follows:
Asset category | Asset life (years) | Residual value |
---|---|---|
Buildings | Up to 65 | Nil |
Fit-out/Leasehold Improvements | Up to 15 | Nil |
Computer Equipment | 4 - 7 | Nil |
Furniture and Fittings, Office Equipment | 5 | Nil |
Motor Vehicles | 5 | 30% of cost or fair value |
Land and work in progress are not depreciated. The total cost of work in progress is transferred to the appropriate asset class on its completion and depreciated accordingly.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the remaining life of the lease or the estimated remaining lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment
Where property, plant or equipment is disposed of, the gain or loss recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance is calculated as the difference between the sale price and the carrying amount. If an asset is sold that has contributed to the revaluation reserve, the related portion of the reserve is transferred to the general fund within taxpayers' funds.
Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets held for sale are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. Non-current assets held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Any impairment losses for write-downs of non-current assets held for sale are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Any increases in fair value (less costs to sell) are recognised up to the level of any impairment losses that have been previously recognised.
Non-current assets held for sale are not depreciated or amortised while they are classified as held for sale.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are initially recorded at cost. The cost of an internally generated intangible asset represents expenditure incurred in the development phase of the asset only.
Intangible assets with finite lives are subsequently recorded at cost less any amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged to the Statement of Financial Performance on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. Estimated useful lives are:
Asset category | Asset life (years) |
---|---|
Acquired Software | 4 - 7 |
Internally Generated Software | 4 - 7 |
Realised gains and losses arising from the disposal of intangible assets are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance in the period in which the transaction occurs. Unrealised gains and losses from changes in the value of intangible assets are recognised as at balance date. To the extent that a gain reverses a loss previously charged to the Statement of Financial Performance, the gain is credited to the Statement of Financial Performance. Otherwise, gains are credited to an asset revaluation reserve for that asset. To the extent that there is a balance in the asset revaluation reserve for the intangible asset a revaluation loss is debited to the reserve. Otherwise losses are reported in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Employee Entitlements
Provision is made in respect of the Ministry's liability for annual, long service, sick and retirement leave. Annual leave has been calculated on an actual entitlement basis at current rates of pay. Sick leave is recognised to the extent that absences in the coming year are expected to be greater than the entitlements earned in the coming year. Long service and retiring leave provisions have been calculated on an actuarial basis, based on the present value of expected future entitlements.
Superannuation
Obligations for contributions to the State Sector Retirement Scheme, Kiwisaver and the Government Superannuation Fund are accounted for as defined contribution schemes and are recognised as an expense in the Statement of Financial Performance as incurred.
Cost Allocation
The Ministry derives the costs of outputs using a cost allocation system outlined below.
Cost allocation policy
Direct costs are charged to output classes as and when they occur. Indirect costs are accumulated and allocated to output classes based on cost drivers such as assessment of personnel time, building area occupied, or asset utilisation, which reflect an appropriate measure of resource consumption usage. Costs identified to overhead areas are accumulated and allocated to output classes based on resource consumption usage where possible (such as full time equivalent staff numbers) or in proportion to the direct and indirect charges made to the output class.
Criteria for direct and indirect costs
Direct costs are those costs that can be directly attributable to an output.
Indirect costs are those that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner to a specific output.
Commitments
Commitments are future payments and expenditure to be incurred on capital and operating contracts that have been entered into at balance date and are valued at known cost.
Contingent Liabilities
Contingent liabilities and contingent assets are recorded at the point at which the contingency is evident. Contingent liabilities are disclosed if the possibility that they will crystallise is not remote.
Income Tax
Government departments are exempt from income tax as public authorities. Accordingly, no charge for income tax has been provided for.
Tax (GST)
The Statement of Financial Position is exclusive of GST, except for accounts payable and accounts receivable, which are GST inclusive. All other statements are GST exclusive.
The amount of GST owed to or from the Inland Revenue Department at balance date, being the difference between Output GST and Input GST, is shown as a current asset or current liability as appropriate in the Statement of Financial Position.
Financial Instruments
The Ministry is party to financial instruments as part of its normal operations. These include bank accounts, debtors, creditors and foreign currency forward contracts. Apart from foreign currency forward contracts, all financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position and all revenues and expenses in relation to financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Financial Assets
Debtors and other receivables are recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Loans and receivables issued with duration less than 12 months are recognised at their nominal value, unless the effect of discounting is material. Allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired. Interest, impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in transit, bank accounts and deposits with a maturity of no more than three months from date of acquisition.
Financial Liabilities
Other financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value less transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method (refer interest expense policy). Financial liabilities entered into with duration less than 12 months are recognised at their nominal value. Amortisation and, in the case of monetary items, foreign exchange gains and losses, are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance as is any gain or loss when the liability is derecognised.
Derivatives
Derivative financial instruments are recognised both initially and subsequently at fair value. They are reported as either assets or liabilities depending on whether the derivative is in a net gain or net loss position respectively. The Ministry has not adopted hedge accounting.
Movements in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Leases
Finance leases
Finance leases are leases, which effectively transfer to the Ministry substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item. These leases are capitalised at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. The leased asset and corresponding lease liabilities are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position. The leased assets are depreciated over the period the Ministry is expected to benefit from their use.
Operating leases
Operating lease payments, where the lessors effectively retain substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased items, are classified as operating leases. Lease payments under an operating lease are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. Leasehold improvements are capitalised, and the cost is amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Lease incentives received are recognised evenly over the term of the lease as a reduction in rental expense.
Taxpayers' Funds
Taxpayers' funds represent the Crown's net investment in the Ministry. Taxpayers' funds is disaggregated and classified as general funds and property, plant and equipment revaluation reserves.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Revenue Other
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Filing Fees | 26,173 | 27,000 | 27,000 | 27,000 |
Other | 2,153 | 1,751 | 3,840 | 2,100 |
State sector retirement saving scheme recovery | 2,662 | 3,500 | 3,841 | 3,800 |
Rent received | 507 | 161 | 161 | 161 |
Interest | 1,602 | 945 | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Total |
33,097 | 33,357 | 36,342 | 34,561 |
Note 2 - Personnel Costs#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Wage and salary | 162,710 | 193,290 | 196,268 | 182,164 |
Employer contributions to defined contribution plans | 3,211 | 3,908 | 4,626 | 4,933 |
Other | 28,928 | 10,766 | 13,039 | 15,653 |
Total |
194,849 | 207,964 | 213,933 | 202,750 |
Note 3 - Operating Expenses#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Audit fees | 332 | 300 | 332 | 348 |
Consultant expenses/Professional Services | 32,850 | 21,490 | 19,490 | 19,490 |
Rental and leasing costs | 14,640 | 16,527 | 15,524 | 17,019 |
Other operating costs | 104,794 | 132,954 | 126,859 | 133,391 |
Total |
152,616 | 171,271 | 162,205 | 170,248 |
Note 4 - Capital Charge#
The Ministry pays a capital charge to the Crown on its taxpayers' funds as at 30th June and 31st December each year. The capital charge rate for the year ended 30 June 2010 is 7.5% (2009 7.5%).
Note 5 - Debtors and Receivables#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Sundry Debtors | 3,099 | 4,317 | 3,100 | 3,100 |
Debtor Crown | 50,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 |
Total |
53,099 | 44,317 | 43,100 | 43,100 |
Note 6 - Property, Plant and Equipment#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Land (At valuation) | 159,727 | 144,009 | 161,226 | 161,701 |
Buildings (At valuation) | 262,965 | 309,049 | 348,215 | 382,354 |
Plant & Equipment | 22,051 | 8,679 | 23,509 | 37,672 |
Other | 62,662 | 58,685 | 29,921 | 28,198 |
Total |
507,405 | 520,422 | 562,871 | 609,925 |
Note 7 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus/(deficit) | 2,481 | - | 2,050 | - |
Add/(less) non-cash items | ||||
Depreciation and Amortisation expense | 49,741 | 54,100 | 58,116 | 61,822 |
Total non-cash items | 52,222 | 54,100 | 60,166 | 61,822 |
Add/(less) movements in working capital items | ||||
Decrease in debtors and other receivables | 8,045 | 10,000 | 9,999 | - |
Increase in creditors and payables | 2,282 | - | - | 204 |
Net movements in working capital items | 10,327 | 10,000 | 9,999 | 204 |
Net cash from operating activities |
62,549 | 64,100 | 70,165 | 62,026 |
Forecast Financial Statements Parliamentary Counsel Office#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 20,446 | 20,807 | 18,807 | 20,429 | |
Department(s) | 163 | 189 | 160 | 181 | |
Other revenue | 12 | 35 | 45 | 56 | |
Gains | 4 | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 20,625 | 21,031 | 19,012 | 20,666 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 7,859 | 9,468 | 8,544 | 9,431 | |
Operating | 1 | 7,971 | 7,636 | 6,911 | 7,417 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,345 | 2,951 | 2,525 | 2,786 | |
Capital charge | 933 | 976 | 1,032 | 1,032 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 18,108 | 21,031 | 19,012 | 20,666 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 2,517 | - | - | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 12,327 | 13,764 | 13,764 | 14,138 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 12,327 | 13,764 | 13,764 | 14,138 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 2,517 | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (2,517) | - | - | - | |
Capital contribution | 1,437 | 374 | 374 | 979 | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 1,437 | 374 | 374 | 979 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 13,764 | 14,138 | 14,138 | 15,117 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 13,764 | 14,138 | 14,138 | 15,117 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5,425 | 3,902 | 2,200 | 2,028 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 732 | - | - | - | |
Prepayments | 164 | 19 | 19 | 19 | |
Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 6,321 | 3,921 | 2,219 | 2,047 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 813 | 11,713 | 719 | 822 | |
Intangible assets | 10,858 | - | 12,495 | 13,689 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 11,671 | 11,713 | 13,214 | 14,511 | |
Total Assets | 17,992 | 15,634 | 15,433 | 16,558 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 944 | 418 | 418 | 418 | |
Repayment of surplus | 2,517 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 354 | 577 | 464 | 610 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 3,815 | 995 | 882 | 1,028 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 413 | 501 | 413 | 413 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 413 | 501 | 413 | 413 | |
Total Liabilities | 4,228 | 1,496 | 1,295 | 1,441 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 13,764 | 14,138 | 14,138 | 15,117 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 13,764 | 14,138 | 14,138 | 15,117 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 17,992 | 15,634 | 15,433 | 16,558 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 20,446 | 20,807 | 18,807 | 20,429 | |
Department(s) | (504) | 189 | 892 | 181 | |
Other | 12 | 35 | 45 | 56 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (8,298) | (7,922) | (8,104) | (7,825) | |
Employees | (7,862) | (9,004) | (8,022) | (8,877) | |
Capital charge | (933) | (976) | (1,032) | (1,032) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | - | - | - | - | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2,861 | 3,129 | 2,586 | 2,932 | |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 33 | - | - | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (3,436) | (674) | (3,668) | (4,083) | |
Intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (3,403) | (674) | (3,668) | (4,083) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 1,437 | 374 | 374 | 979 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (2,616) | - | (2,517) | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | (1,179) | 374 | (2,143) | 979 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | (1,721) | 2,829 | (3,225) | (172) | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 7,146 | 1,073 | 5,425 | 2,200 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 5,425 | 3,902 | 2,200 | 2,028 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year. Our primary objective is the drafting of bills and publishing legislation.
- Personnel costs are based on 86 staff positions (79.9 full time equivalents).
- Operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Parliamentary Counsel Office has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Parliamentary Counsel Office, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Parliamentary Counsel Office is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Parliamentary Counsel Office is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised by the Chief Parliamentary Counsel on 3 April 2009. The Chief Parliamentary Counsel is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, Plant and Equipment
Capitalisation thresholds applied for all assets are $1,000.
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
- Leasehold improvements - 6 years
- IT Equipment / Hardware - 3 years
- Motor vehicles - 3 years
- Furniture and office equipment - 5 years
Intangible Assets
New Zealand Legislation System software is stated at fair value as determined by an independent registered valuer. This software is revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that carrying value is not materially different from fair value at the end of the reporting period. Additions between revaluations are recorded at cost.
Capitalisation thresholds applied for all software are $1,000.
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
- New Zealand Legislation System software - 5 to 10 years
Cost Allocation
The Counsel has derived the costs of outputs using a cost allocation system outlined below:
Cost allocation policy
Direct costs are charged directly to significant activities. Indirect costs are charged to significant activities based on cost drivers and related activities/usage information.
Criteria for direct and indirect costs
"Direct Costs" are those costs directly attributed to an output.
"Indirect Costs" are those costs that cannot be identified, in an economically feasible manner, with a specific output.
Direct costs assigned to outputs
Direct costs are charged directly to outputs. Depreciation and capital charge are charged on the basis of asset utilisation. Personnel costs are charged by actual time incurred. Property and other premises expenses, such as maintenance, are allocated on the basis of floor area occupied for the production of each output.
Basis for assigning indirect and corporate costs to outputs
Indirect costs are assigned to outputs based on a proportion of direct staff costs used for each output.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Consultant's fees | 725 | 350 | 255 | 370 |
Overseas travel | 62 | 60 | 60 | 45 |
Domestic travel | 13 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Other | 7,171 | 7,220 | 6,590 | 6,996 |
Total |
7,971 | 7,636 | 6,911 | 7,417 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus/(deficit) | 2,517 | - | - | - |
Add/(less) non-cash items | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,345 | 2,951 | 2,525 | 2,786 |
Inc/(Dec) in non-current employee entitlements | (88) | - | - | - |
Total non-cash items | 1,257 | 2,951 | 2,786 | |
Add/(less) working capital movements | ||||
Inc/(Dec) in debtors and prepayments | (705) | - | 877 | - |
(Inc)/ Dec in creditors and payables | (302) | - | (937) | - |
Inc/(Dec) in current employee entitlements | 98 | 178 | 121 | 146 |
Net working capital movements |
(909) | 178 | 61 | 146 |
Add/(less) investing activity items | ||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (4) | - | - | - |
Total investing activity items | (4) | - | - | - |
Net cash flow from operating activities | 2,861 | 3,129 | 2,586 | 2,932 |
Forecast Financial Statements New Zealand Police#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 3 | 1,222,756 | 1,288,004 | 1,341,091 | 1,362,099 |
Department(s) | 17,391 | 15,270 | 22,686 | 16,512 | |
Other revenue | 12,674 | 11,816 | 9,812 | 8,918 | |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | 7 | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 1,252,828 | 1,315,090 | 1,373,589 | 1,387,529 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 900,536 | 960,470 | 979,770 | 984,029 | |
Operating | 1 | 253,161 | 250,303 | 293,381 | 298,209 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 59,448 | 65,695 | 64,196 | 64,751 | |
Capital charge | 34,159 | 38,622 | 36,242 | 40,540 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | (851) | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Total Expenses | 1,246,453 | 1,315,100 | 1,373,599 | 1,387,539 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 6,375 | (10) | (10) | (10) |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 324,985 | 360,364 | 361,511 | 418,931 | |
Revaluation reserve | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 446,589 | 481,968 | 483,115 | 540,535 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 6,375 | (10) | (10) | (10) | |
Repayment of surplus | (6,375) | - | - | - | |
Capital contribution | 34,469 | 44,650 | 57,430 | 63,068 | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 2,057 | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 36,526 | 44,640 | 57,420 | 63,058 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 361,511 | 405,004 | 418,931 | 481,989 | |
Revaluation reserve | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 483,115 | 526,608 | 540,535 | 603,593 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 31,995 | 145,715 | 30,000 | 30,000 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 120,041 | 13,770 | 106,851 | 128,377 | |
Prepayments | 6,222 | 3,347 | 6,228 | 6,228 | |
Inventories | 38 | 160 | 40 | 40 | |
Other current assets | - | 24,053 | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 158,296 | 187,045 | 143,119 | 164,645 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 2 | 609,112 | 630,046 | 671,455 | 722,504 |
Intangible assets | 29,854 | - | 27,445 | 22,245 | |
Other non-current assets | 1,717 | - | 1,717 | 1,717 | |
Total Non- current Assets | 640,683 | 630,046 | 700,617 | 746,466 | |
Total Assets | 798,979 | 817,091 | 843,736 | 911,111 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 81,433 | 64,073 | 80,065 | 80,381 | |
Repayment of surplus | 14,650 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 104,404 | 105,606 | 103,136 | 107,137 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 200,487 | 169,679 | 183,201 | 187,518 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 115,377 | 120,804 | 120,000 | 120,000 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 115,377 | 120,804 | 120,000 | 120,000 | |
Total Liabilities | 315,864 | 290,483 | 303,201 | 307,518 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 361,511 | 405,004 | 418,931 | 481,989 | |
Revaluation reserve | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | 121,604 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 483,115 | 526,608 | 540,535 | 603,593 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 798,979 | 817,091 | 843,736 | 911,111 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 1,208,800 | 1,337,731 | 1,352,701 | 1,342,796 | |
Department(s) | 17,515 | 15,490 | 22,816 | 16,512 | |
Other | 11,252 | 11,816 | 9,810 | 9,108 | |
Interest | 7 | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (250,002) | (403,940) | (292,245) | (300,566) | |
Employees | (890,470) | (809,234) | (976,425) | (980,027) | |
Capital charge | (34,159) | (38,661) | (36,242) | (40,540) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | (489) | - | (1,046) | 249 | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 62,454 | 113,202 | 79,369 | 47,532 | |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 2,841 | 3,000 | 2,270 | 1,000 | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (108,982) | (126,985) | (121,414) | (109,600) | |
Intangible assets | - | - | (5,000) | (2,000) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (106,141) | (123,985) | (124,144) | (110,600) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 34,469 | 44,650 | 57,430 | 63,068 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | - | - | (14,650) | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | 34,469 | 44,650 | 42,780 | 63,068 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | (9,218) | 33,867 | (1,995) | - | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 41,213 | 111,848 | 31,995 | 30,000 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 31,995 | 145,715 | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The New Zealand Police has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of New Zealand Police, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
New Zealand Police is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting New Zealand Police is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by Howard Broad, Commissioner of Police on 22 April 2009. New Zealand Police is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Land and buildings are recorded at fair value. Fair value is determined by an independent valuer using market-based evidence, unless insufficient market-based evidence exists, in which case they are valued at optimised depreciated replacement cost.
Land and buildings are revalued at least every five years. Additions between revaluations are recorded at cost.
Beca Valuation Ltd revalued land and buildings as at 30 June 2006.
Any revaluation surplus arising on the revaluation of a class of asset is transferred directly to the asset revaluation reserve. A revaluation deficit in excess of the asset revaluation reserve balance for the class of fixed asset is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance in the period in which it arises.
Capital work in progress is valued at historical cost and on completion will be transferred to the appropriate asset category.
Other property, plant and equipment is initially recorded at cost.
Individual items of equipment costing less than $5,000 are expensed in the year that they are purchased, with the exception of desktop computer equipment. All desktop computer equipment is capitalised.
Provision is made for any permanent impairment in the value of non-current assets.
Artefacts and relics held in the Police Museum are recorded at nil value.
Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis at the following rates:
Asset Category | Rates of Depreciation |
---|---|
Freehold Land | Not depreciated |
Buildings | 2.5 - 10% |
Plant and equipment | 15 - 50% |
Vessels | 4.5 - 25% |
Furniture / fittings | 10% |
Motor vehicles | 17% |
Communication and computer assets | 20 - 25% |
Software | 20 - 25% |
Depreciation commences in the month of acquisition and is not charged in the month of sale.
Monetary assets and liabilities held or owing in foreign currency are translated to New Zealand dollars at the closing exchange rate. The resulting unrealised exchange gains or losses are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Police derives revenue through the provision of outputs to the Crown, and for services to third parties. Such revenue is recognised when earned and is reported in the financial period to which it relates.
Cash is defined as including petty cash holdings and bank accounts.
Foreign currency transactions are converted to New Zealand dollars using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Where a forward exchange contract has been used to establish the price of a transaction, the forward exchange rate specified in that foreign exchange contract is used to convert that transaction to New Zealand dollars. Consequently, no exchange gain or loss resulting from the difference between the forward exchange contract rate and the spot exchange rate on the date of settlement is recognised.
Monetary assets and liabilities held or owing in foreign currency are translated to New Zealand dollars at the closing exchange rate. The resulting unrealised exchange gains or losses are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Police is party to financial instruments as part of its normal operations. Financial instruments used by Police consist of bank accounts, Crown receivables, accounts receivable, accounts payable and foreign currency forward contracts. Police enters into the foreign currency forward contracts to hedge currency transactions. Apart from foreign currency forward contracts, all financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position. Revenue and expenses in relation to all financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.
Costs are allocated to output expenses based upon activity profiles assigned to staff positions. For support services which do not directly deliver outputs, the allocation of cost is based on an assessed consumption of that service. Actual salary rates are used for costing, rather than average salary rates as were applied previously. Service delivery has not changed as a result of this cost allocation policy change.
Provision is made in respect of Police's liability for annual leave, shift workers' leave, long service leave, retirement leave and time off in lieu. Provisions for annual leave, shift workers' leave and time off in lieu have been measured on nominal values on an actual entitlement basis using current rates of pay.
Provisions for long service leave and retirement leave have been measured on an actuarial basis based on the present value of expected future entitlements.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Operating expenses include: |
||||
Consultants' fee | 3,926 | 2,466 | 3,479 | 3,500 |
Travel - overseas | 6,398 | 6,058 | 6,154 | 6,500 |
Travel - domestic | 17,441 | 16,088 | 17,378 | 18,000 |
Others | 225,396 | 225,691 | 266,370 | 270,209 |
Total |
253,161 | 250,303 | 293,381 | 298,209 |
Note 2 - Property, Plant & Equipment#
Property, Plant & Equipment 2009/10
Land | Buildings | Plant & Equipment | Vehicles | Furniture & Fittings | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost |
||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2009 | 137,985 | 404,444 | 375,394 | 130,823 | 16,084 | 1,064,730 |
Additions | - | 44,600 | 46,000 | 19,000 | - | 109,600 |
Disposals | - | - | - | 20,000 | - | 20,000 |
Balance as at 30 June 2010 | 137,985 | 449,044 | 421,394 | 129,823 | 16,084 | 1,154,330 |
Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2009 | - | 39,517 | 276,933 | 62,862 | 13,963 | 393,275 |
Depreciation for the year | - | 19,374 | 22,753 | 15,166 | 308 | 57,551 |
Depreciation on disposals | - | - | - | 19,000 | - | 19,000 |
Balance as at 30 June 2010 | - | 58,891 | 299,686 | 58,978 | 14,271 | 431,826 |
Book value as at 30 June 2010 | 137,985 | 390,153 | 121,708 | 70,845 | 1,813 | 722,504 |
Property, Plant & Equipment 2008/09
Land | Buildings | Plant & Equipment | Vehicles | Furniture & Fittings | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost |
||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2008 | 137,985 | 352,744 | 332,194 | 126,593 | 16,084 | 965,600 |
Additions | - | 51,700 | 43,200 | 26,500 | - | 121,400 |
Disposals | - | - | - | 22,270 | - | 22,270 |
Balance as at 30 June 2009 | 137,985 | 404,444 | 375,394 | 130,823 | 16,084 | 1,064,730 |
Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2008 | - | 25,986 | 254,342 | 62,516 | 13,644 | 356,488 |
Depreciation for the year | - | 13,531 | 22,591 | 20,346 | 319 | 56,787 |
Depreciation on disposals | - | - | - | 20,000 | - | 20,000 |
Balance as at 30 June 2009 | - | 39,517 | 276,933 | 62,862 | 13,963 | 393,275 |
Book value as at 30 June 2009 | 137,985 | 364,927 | 98,461 | 67,961 | 2,121 | 671,455 |
Note 3 - Other Non-Current Assets#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Buildings | 367 | 367 | 367 | 367 |
Land | 1,350 | 1,350 | 1,350 | 1,350 |
Total |
1,717 | 1,717 | 1,717 | 1,717 |
The property at 351-361 Church Street, Palmerston North is held for sale. The sale is expected to be completed by 30 June 2011.
Note 4 - Reconciliation of Net surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus | 6,375 | (10) | (10) | (10) |
Add (less) non-cash items: |
||||
Depreciation and amortisation expenses | 59,448 | 65,695 | 64,196 | 64,751 |
Total non-cash items | 59,448 | 65,695 | 64,196 | 64,751 |
Add (less) items classified as investing or financial activities: |
||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of property | (1,028) | - | - | - |
Add (less) movements in working capital items: |
||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 8,345 | 47,517 | (889) | 317 |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | (1,298) | - | 128 | 190 |
(Increase) decrease in employee entitlements | 7,353 | - | 3,236 | 4,000 |
(Increase) decrease in debtors Crown | (15,701) | - | 13,037 | (21,716) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories | (3) | - | 2 | - |
(Increase) decrease in prepayments | (3,048) | - | (6) | - |
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses | 2,011 | - | (325) | - |
Net working capital movements | (2,341) | 47,517 | 15,183 | (17,209) |
Net cash flows from operating activities | 62,454 | 113,202 | 79,369 | 47,532 |
Forecast Financial Statements Serious Fraud Office#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 5,152 | 7,250 | 5,660 | 7,250 | |
Department(s) | 108 | 120 | 101 | 110 | |
Other revenue | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
Gains | - | - | 6 | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 5,261 | 7,379 | 5,776 | 7,369 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 3,385 | 4,139 | 3,630 | 4,131 | |
Operating | 1 | 1,492 | 3,005 | 1,947 | 2,916 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 135 | 184 | 164 | 241 | |
Capital charge | 29 | 51 | 29 | 81 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 16 | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 5,057 | 7,379 | 5,770 | 7,369 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | 6 | - | |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 204 | - | 6 | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 387 | 387 | 387 | 1,077 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 387 | 387 | 387 | 1,077 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 204 | - | 6 | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (204) | - | (6) | - | |
Capital contribution | - | 290 | 690 | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | - | 290 | 690 | - | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 387 | 677 | 1,077 | 1,077 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 387 | 677 | 1,077 | 1,077 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 681 | 693 | 700 | 418 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 29 | 34 | 25 | 25 | |
Prepayments | 18 | 3 | 18 | 18 | |
Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 728 | 730 | 743 | 461 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 236 | 365 | 739 | 1,013 | |
Intangible assets | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 241 | 367 | 741 | 1,020 | |
Total Assets | 969 | 1,097 | 1,484 | 1,481 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 217 | 302 | 230 | 233 | |
Repayment of surplus | 204 | - | 6 | - | |
Employee entitlements | 155 | 118 | 171 | 171 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 576 | 420 | 407 | 404 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 6 | - | - | - | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 6 | - | - | - | |
Total Liabilities | 582 | 420 | 407 | 404 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 387 | 677 | 1,077 | 1,077 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 387 | 677 | 1,077 | 1,077 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 969 | 1,097 | 1,484 | 1,481 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 5,151 | 7,250 | 5,661 | 7,250 | |
Department(s) | 127 | 114 | 101 | 110 | |
Other | 2 | 9 | 12 | 9 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (1,561) | (3,022) | (2,001) | (2,956) | |
Employees | (3,313) | (4,096) | (3,564) | (4,088) | |
Capital charge | (29) | (51) | (29) | (81) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | 1 | 8 | 11 | - | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | 378 | 212 | 191 | 244 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 25 | - | 31 | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (56) | (290) | (689) | (510) | |
Intangible assets | - | - | - | (10) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (31) | (290) | (658) | (520) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | - | 290 | 690 | - | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (22) | - | (204) | (6) | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | (22) | 290 | 486 | (6) | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 325 | 212 | 19 | (282) | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 356 | 481 | 681 | 700 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 681 | 693 | 700 | 418 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Bill will be enacted making the Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Assets output class fully operational in 2009/10. Otherwise the department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 31 March 2009.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2009/10 actual financial statements include:
- changes to the baseline budget through new initiatives, or technical adjustments.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Serious Fraud Office has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Serious Fraud Office, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
The Serious Fraud Office is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting the Serious Fraud Office is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Minister of Police on 22 April 2009. The Chief Executive and Director of the Serious Fraud Office is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Capitalisation Threshold
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets or groups of assets purchased at a cost of $1,000 (excluding GST) or greater are capitalised.
Depreciation and Amortisation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are set out below.
- Office furniture and equipment 5 years
- Motor vehicles 6 years
- IT Equipment / Hardware 3 years
- Computer software 3 years
Cost Allocation
The Serious Fraud Office has derived the costs of outputs shown in these statements using a cost allocation system which is outlined below.
Direct costs are those costs directly attributed to an output. Indirect or overhead costs are those costs that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner, with a specific output.
Direct costs are charged directly to outputs. Indirect costs are assigned to outputs based on the proportion of staff time spend on each output.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Operating expenses include: | ||||
Consultants' fees | 111 | 50 | 40 | 40 |
Overseas travel | 52 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
Domestic travel | 247 | 240 | 245 | 245 |
Rental and leasing cost | 427 | 465 | 504 | 504 |
Other | 655 | 2,205 | 1,113 | 2,082 |
Total operating expenses |
1,492 | 3,005 | 1,947 | 2,916 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2010#
2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus/ (deficit) | 204 | - | 6 | - |
Add/ (less) non-cash items | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation expense | 135 | 184 | 164 | 241 |
Total non-cash items | 135 | 184 | 164 | 241 |
Add/ (less) items classified as investing or financing activities | ||||
(Gains)/ losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | 16 | - | (6) | - |
Total items classified as investing or financing activities | 16 | - | (6) | - |
Add/ (less) movements in working capital items | ||||
(Inc)/ Dec in debtors and other receivables | 19 | (6) | 4 | - |
(Inc)/ Dec in prepayments | (15) | - | - | - |
Inc/ (Dec) in creditors and other payables | (24) | 34 | 13 | 3 |
Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | 43 | - | 10 | - |
Net movements in working capital items | 23 | 28 | 27 | 3 |
Net cash from operating activities |
378 | 212 | 191 | 244 |
Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates provides members of Parliament with information on expected performance to:
- support their examination of the appropriations and other authorities requested by the Government in the first Appropriation Bill for the forthcoming financial year, and
- provide a base against which they can later assess the actual performance of each individual department and Office of Parliament over that financial year.
The Information Supporting the Estimates is organised into 10 volumes by sector, each of which covers one or more Votes. The scope of each sector and the allocation of Votes to a sector reflect a balancing of three desired characteristics - namely that each volume should, where possible:
- reflect natural sectors
- keep together Votes administered by the same department, and
- keep together Votes allocated to a particular select committee of the House of Representatives for examination.
The number of sectors and coverage of each sector is set in consultation with the Finance and Expenditure Committee. The 10 sectors are:
- Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector
- Education and Science Sector
- Environment Sector
- External Sector
- Finance and Government Administration Sector
- Health Sector
- Justice Sector
- Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector
- Primary Sector
- Social Development and Housing Sector.
Votes and Departments in Each Sector#
Votes by Sector | Departments by Sector |
---|---|
Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector - B.5A Vol.1 | |
Vote Economic Development Vote Commerce Vote Communications Vote Consumer Affairs Vote Energy Vote Tourism |
Ministry of Economic Development |
Vote Transport | Ministry of Transport |
Vote Labour Vote ACC Vote Employment Vote Immigration |
Department of Labour |
Education and Science Sector - B.5A Vol.2 | |
Vote Education | Ministry of Education |
Vote Crown Research Institutes (this Vote is administered by the Treasury, which is in the Finance and Government Administration Sector.) | |
Vote Education Review Office | Education Review Office |
Vote Research, Science and Technology | Ministry of Research, Science and Technology |
Environment Sector - B.5A Vol.3 | |
Vote Environment Vote Climate Change |
Ministry for the Environment |
Vote Conservation | Department of Conservation |
Vote Local Government (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the National Identity Sector) | |
Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment | Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment |
External Sector - B.5A Vol.4 | |
Vote Foreign Affairs and Trade Vote Official Development Assistance |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |
Vote Defence | Ministry of Defence |
Vote Defence Force Vote Veterans' Affairs - Defence Force |
New Zealand Defence Force |
Vote Customs | New Zealand Customs Service |
Finance and Government Administration Sector - B.5A Vol.5 | |
Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet | Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet |
Vote Communications Security and Intelligence | Government Communications Security Bureau |
Vote Security Intelligence | New Zealand Security Intelligence Service |
Vote State Services | State Services Commission |
Vote Finance Vote State-Owned Enterprises |
The Treasury |
Vote Revenue | Inland Revenue Department |
Vote Ministerial Services (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the National Identity Sector) | |
Vote Office of the Clerk | Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives |
Vote Ombudsmen | Office of the Ombudsmen |
Vote Parliamentary Service | Parliamentary Service |
Vote Audit | Office of the Auditor-General |
Health Sector - B.5A Vol.6 | |
Vote Health | Ministry of Health |
Justice Sector - B.5A Vol.7 | |
Vote Justice Vote Courts |
Ministry of Justice |
Vote Corrections | Department of Corrections |
Vote Police | New Zealand Police |
Vote Serious Fraud | Serious Fraud Office |
Vote Attorney-General | Crown Law Office |
Vote Parliamentary Counsel | Parliamentary Counsel Office |
Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector - B.5A Vol.8 | |
Vote Arts, Culture and Heritage Vote Sport and Recreation |
Ministry for Culture and Heritage |
Vote Statistics | Statistics New Zealand |
Vote National Archives | Archives New Zealand |
Vote National Library | National Library of New Zealand |
Vote Māori Affairs | Te Puni Kōkiri |
Vote Treaty Negotiations (this Vote is administered by the Ministry of Justice, which is in the Justice Sector) | |
Vote Pacific Island Affairs | Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs |
Vote Women's Affairs | Ministry of Women's Affairs |
Vote Internal Affairs Vote Community and Voluntary Sector Vote Emergency Management Vote Racing |
Department of Internal Affairs |
Primary Sector - B.5A Vol.9 | |
Vote Agriculture and Forestry Vote Biosecurity |
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry |
Vote Fisheries | Ministry of Fisheries |
Vote Food Safety | New Zealand Food Safety Authority |
Vote Lands | Land Information New Zealand |
Social Development and Housing Sector - B.5A Vol.10 | |
Vote Social Development Vote Senior Citizens Vote Veterans' Affairs - Social Development Vote Youth Development |
Ministry of Social Development |
Vote Housing | Department of Building and Housing |
Purpose and Nature of Appropriations#
An appropriation is a statutory authority from Parliament allowing the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure.
Neither the Crown nor an Office of Parliament can legally incur any expense or capital expenditure - as those terms are defined in the Public Finance Act 1989 (PFA) - unless it is expressly authorised by or under an Act of Parliament.
Limits Created by Appropriations#
Each appropriation is allocated to, and managed as, one of six types of appropriation.
Each appropriation has a defined scope that limits the uses or activities for which the expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred. The scope should be sufficient on its own to establish the nature and extent of the authority to incur expenses or capital expenditure. The wording of the appropriation scope should achieve the balance between being sufficiently precise to act as an effective constraint against non-authorised activities and not so specific that it inadvertently limits activity intended to be authorised.
In most cases an appropriation also limits the amount of expenses or capital expenditure that can be incurred, and the time period within which those expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred.
Aside from the very limited exclusions provided for in the PFA, the amount of expense or capital expenditure authorised by an appropriation is measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.
As generally accepted accounting practice does not normally treat GST as an expense, appropriation amounts also generally exclude GST. Prior to 2005/06, however, appropriations included applicable GST. All prior-year appropriation data, such as in the Summary of Trends table in the Estimates and the Summary of Financial Activity Table for each Vote in Information Supporting the Estimates - have been adjusted to exclude GST to allow appropriate comparison.
Responsibility for Appropriations#
Each appropriation is the responsibility of a designated Minister, who controls the right to use that appropriation within the limits authorised by Parliament. A department is also assigned to administer that appropriation in accordance with the Minister's wishes concerning its use.
A Vote is a group of appropriations (and can be a single appropriation) administered by a single department. Different appropriations within a Vote may be the responsibility of different Ministers.
Types of Appropriation#
The PFA provides for six types of appropriation. Four appropriation types authorise the incurring of expenses; one type authorises the incurring of capital expenditure; and the remaining type authorises both.
These appropriation types can be further differentiated by whether the expenses or capital expenditure are departmental or non-departmental transactions.
Appropriation Type | Transaction Status | Description |
---|---|---|
Output Expenses | Departmental | Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament in supplying a specified category of outputs (goods and services). |
Non-Departmental | Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in purchasing a specified category of outputs (goods and services) from Crown entities or other third parties. | |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in transferring resources (generally to individuals for their personal benefit) for which the Crown receives nothing directly in return. Examples include the Unemployment Benefit, student allowances and various scholarships and awards. |
Borrowing Expenses | Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to a department or an Office of Parliament, or public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by a department or an Office of Parliament. In practice, limitations on the rights of departments to borrow or issue securities mean that these are likely to be incurred only by Offices of Parliament. |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to the Crown (excluding departments), or public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by the Crown. Crown debt management is centralised, which means that most debt-servicing expenses appear in Vote Finance. |
|
Other Expenses | Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament that are not either output expenses or borrowing expenses. Other expenses should be used only for events that cannot be related back to output production, such as redundancy costs arising from a government decision to cease purchasing certain types of outputs, or a loss on sale of assets made surplus by departmental restructuring. |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) that are not structured or managed as output expenses, benefits and unrequited expenses, or borrowing expenses. Other expenses is the residual appropriation type, which should not be used where an appropriation could be better classified or managed as one of the other appropriation types (eg, as output expenses). Examples include disposal of an asset for less than market value, grants to community organisations, subscriptions for membership of international bodies and remuneration of independent statutory officers. |
|
Capital expenditure | Departmental | Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament to acquire or develop assets for the use of the department. |
Non-Departmental | Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) to acquire or develop Crown assets, including the purchase of equity, or making a loan to a person or organisation that is not a department. | |
Expenses or Capital expenditure incurred by an intelligence and security department | Departmental | Authorises both expenses and capital expenditure to be incurred by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service or the Government Communications Security Bureau. |
Types of Output Expense Appropriations#
A number of variations are possible for output expense appropriations. In particular, the constraint on the amount of expense that can be incurred is not always a fixed amount; and an output expense appropriation can cover more than one class of outputs.
Output Expense Appropriation Type and Authority | Description, Constraints on Form and Typical Application |
---|---|
Standard Output Expense Appropriations (section 7(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase a specified class of outputs. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Single output class only: The scope is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of a standard output expense appropriation is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. Typical application: The normal or default form for an output expense appropriation, used for a wide range of outputs for which the flexibility offered by the other types of output expense appropriation is not required. |
Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriations (MCOA) (section 7(3)(b), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying more than one specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase more than one specified class of outputs. A proposed MCOA must be approved by the Minister of Finance before it is presented in the Estimates. The information supporting the Estimates must explain why the Minister has allowed those classes of outputs to be grouped in one appropriation. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Multiple output classes: The scope of an MCOA is determined by the combined scope of each of the output classes included in that appropriation. Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of an MCOA is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. The amount of expense that can be incurred in relation to each component output class is flexible within the total amount of the MCOA, although expenses must be separately forecast and reported for each individual class in the Estimates, Information Supporting the Estimates, Supplementary Estimates and the department's annual report. Typical application: An MCOA is used where it is appropriate to give the responsible Minister or department ongoing discretion over the output mix across two or more classes of outputs. Such discretion will most commonly be sought where the output classes contribute to a common outcome, or use a common or closely related set of inputs or processes, and the circumstances that determine the appropriate output choice or mix are likely to vary during the appropriation period. |
Revenue-Dependent Appropriations (RDA) (section 21(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified a class of outputs (goods and services) that are not paid for directly by the Crown. A proposed RDA must be approved by the Minister of Finance, before it is presented in the Estimates. Each class of outputs for which an RDA is approved is listed in an Appropriation Act for the relevant financial year. Annual only: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year specified. Single output class only: The scope of an RDA is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by amount of revenue earned: The amount of an RDA is limited tothe amount of revenue earned by a department or an Office of Parliament from other departments or from parties other than the Crown during a financial year. The Minister of Finance can further direct a department to incur expenses to a level lower than the amount of revenue earned, though such directions have been rare. Typical application: An RDA provides flexibility to respond to unanticipated changes in the level of external demand for a class of outputs, where the full cost of the outputs is met by external parties and not the Crown. |
Department-to-Department Appropriation (DDA) (section 20(2), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying specified outputs (goods and services) paid for by another department. Creation of a DDA requires an agreement between two departments. Implicitly it also requires the approval of the Minister who will become responsible for the appropriation - namely, the Minister responsible for the supplying department - as the agreement has implications for the scope and risk of that department's operations. Annual or multi-year: The period of a DDA will depend on the negotiated terms of the agreement. Single or multiple output class(es): The scope of a DDA (and hence whether it covers one or more classes of outputs) will depend on the way in which the agreement defines what is to be delivered. In most cases, an agreement that provides for a range of different outputs is better treated as creating several single-class DDAs. Amount limited by departmental agreement: The amount of a DDA is limited to either the amount of revenue earned from the commissioning department, or the cost incurred by the supplying department in providing those outputs (if that cost is less than the amount of revenue earned under the agreement). Typical application: DDAs are intended to make collaboration between departments easier by reducing the time and effort required to obtain / adjust the relevant appropriations while also allowing a commissioning department to retain full control over the resources it provides. The use of a DDA is not confined to bilateral agreements. A set of related DDAs could be used to enable one department to co-ordinate and manage the work of several departments that must work together to contribute to providing an integrated service to third parties, or to pool contributions from several departments to enable another department to provide a specific service to or on behalf of those departments. |
Appropriation Period#
The length of the appropriation period affects how appropriations are presented in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates. Three kinds of appropriation can be distinguished on the basis of period - annual and multi-year (as referred to in the above table on types of output expense appropriations), and permanent:
- Annual Appropriations - Most appropriations listed in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred only during a particular financial year. The annual amounts, for which parliamentary authority is normally sought, are shown in bold type in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote. The amounts for RDAs and annual DDAs are forecasts only, and so are not shown in bold type.
- Multi-Year Appropriations (MYAs) - The PFA also permits appropriations that allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred during a specified period that spans the whole or parts of more than one financial year, but no more than five financial years. The details of each MYA, including its commencement date and expiry date, are specified in Details of Multi-Year Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for relevant Votes.
- Permanent Appropriations (sometimes referred to as permanent legislative authorities or PLAs) -Permanent appropriations are authorised by legislation other than an Appropriation Act and continue in effect until revoked by Parliament. Generally the authorising legislation will impose limits on the scope of the appropriation and not its amount. For those appropriations that with limits set in cash terms, section 11(2) of the Public Finance Act 1989 requires that they be reported on an accrual basis. The usual legislative wording allows for expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred for the purpose specified in the legislation “without further appropriation than this section”. Details of permanent appropriations are included in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote for completeness, though the amount specified is a forecast rather than a limit. The amounts of permanent appropriations are therefore not shown in bold type. The scope of a permanent appropriation will reference the relevant section of the authorising legislation.
Guide to Reading Information Supporting the Estimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates for each of the 10 sectors comprises five components, each of which is briefly described, below.
1 Sector Overview Information#
The first component of the Information Supporting the Estimates may include a statement, agreed by all Ministers responsible for appropriations in each Vote included in the sector, that presents an overview of the sector and a high-level summary of the government's expectations and priorities. The Overview also includes Ministerial and Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility for the information provided in the Information Supporting the Estimates.
2 Performance Information Relating to Appropriations in Each Vote#
The second component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents performance information relating to each appropriation.
The title pages for each Vote specify the Minister(s) responsible for existing and proposed appropriations in the Vote, and the Responsible Minister for the department. The performance information meets the requirements of sections 15 and 41(1)(e) of the PFA and contains up to six parts. If particular information is not applicable to the Vote or a specific appropriation or type, or is otherwise unavailable, the relevant heading is not included.
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
The Summary of the Vote comprises:
- Part 1.1 Overview of the Vote - A plain-language summary of the focus of the appropriations through a brief explanation of the Vote. The Overview also appears at the start of the Vote in the Estimates.
- Part 1.2 High-Level Objectives of the Vote - The objectives for the Vote presented through links and relationships and high-level priorities and outcomes to which they contribute. Where applicable, priorities and outcomes are drawn from the priorities and desired outcomes and published strategy documents. Links are also made to specific government strategies. Links may also be made to specific Government objectives.
- Part 1.3 Trends in the Vote - A presentation of the actual and estimated trends in the Vote, comprising:
- Summary of Financial Activity - A table showing financial information over the preceding five years (actual, budgeted or estimated actual), the current year (Budget) and the following three years (estimated) for the type of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts.
- New Policy Initiatives - A table showing how new initiatives (and the associated expenses or capital expenditure) are allocated to appropriations in the Vote. References are included where appropriations in other Votes are affected by the same initiative.
- Analysis of Significant Trends - High-level analysis of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts by type over the nine financial years covered by the Summary of Financial Activity table, explanations of significant changes and may also contain graphical presentations.
- Part 1.4 Reconciliation of Changes in Appropriation Structure - a table providing a reconciliation and explanation of any changes in the structure or classification of appropriations made in the Budget year. These changes are restated for the previous financial year to facilitate comparison.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
This Part provides further detail about appropriations and expected performance for output expenses.
- Part 2.1 Departmental Output Expenses - Intended impacts, outcomes and objectives are presented for departmental output expense appropriations in the Vote. This is followed by information on each appropriation, including its scope, a table showing expenses and revenue (distinguishing the revenue sources between the Crown and others), a statement of reasons for change in the appropriation (if material), and tables detailing performance measures and standards for significant aspects of expected output performance, any conditions on use of appropriation, any memorandum accounts (which record accumulated surpluses and deficits incurred in the provision of outputs on a full cost-recovery basis), and any current and past policy initiatives affecting the appropriation.
- Information on impacts and outcomes or objectives to which the outputs contribute is provided. Further information on the relationships between outputs, impacts, and outcomes or objectives is outlined in Part 1.2 and the Statement of Intent. Conditions on use include administrative criteria and processes contained in legislation, regulation and Government decisions, which may be reference in scope statement or performance measures. The current and past policy initiatives tables provides a five-year history of announced initiatives that impact on the Budget year, the preceding year and the following three years.
- For MCOA, an explanation is provided as to why the classes of outputs have been grouped under a single appropriation, and the scope statement, expenses and revenue, and performance information is presented for each output class.
- Information provided for MYAs enables the original appropriation to be reconciled to the adjusted level if changes have been approved or are proposed, and the balance remaining to be derived taking account of actual or estimated expenses incurred to date.
- The appropriation scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards match information required to be included in a department's Statement of Forecast Service Performance with respect to departmental output expense appropriations used by the department.
- Part 2.2 Non-Departmental Output Expenses - This sub-part contains comparable information to that presented in Part 2.1 on departmental output expense appropriations. The main differences are that details of third parties’ other revenue is not relevant and a summary of service providers is included.
- The service providers table shows Crown entities and non-governmental organisations providing outputs funded through the Vote, and (where applicable) the mechanism for reporting actual performance to Parliament and the expiry of the Government's resource commitment. The reporting mechanisms are typically an entity's annual report or a report by the responsible Minister required by section 32A of the PFA. Where the provider is a Crown entity that is required to produce a Statement of Intent, its annual report may contain more detailed performance information at the output class or output level. ‘Section 32A' reports include a statement of service performance in relation to the appropriation.
Part 3 - Details for Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses#
Part 3 provides performance information about appropriations for benefits and other unrequited expenses incurred by the Crown. No departmental transactions arise under this appropriation type.
- Part 3.2 Non-Departmental Benefits and Other Expenses - Information on each appropriation includes impacts and outcomes intended to be achieved, a scope statement, expense components, reasons for material changes, any conditions of use, and details of any current and past policy initiatives over the five years up to and including the Budget year.
Part 4 - Details for Borrowing Expenses#
This Part provides detail about appropriations for borrowing expenses. No departmental borrowing expense appropriations exist at present.
- Part 4.2 Non-Departmental Borrowing Expenses - The set of performance information is the same as that for non-departmental benefits and other expenses, except that conditions on use are no specified.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5 provides detail about appropriations for:
- Part 5.1 Departmental Other Expenses - It is uncommon for this category of appropriation to be utilised. In the few cases where it occurs, the performance information is the same as that for non-departmental other expense appropriations except for a summary of reporting mechanisms.
- Part 5.2 Non-Departmental Other Expenses- Information on other expenses incurred by the Crown covers intended impacts and outcomes, appropriation scope, expenses analysed by component, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, expected results and standards, any conditions on use, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of mechanisms for reporting actual performance to Parliament.
Part 6 - Details and Expectations of Capital Expenditure#
This Part provides further details about appropriations for capital expenditure.
- Part 6.1 Departmental Capital Expenditure - The purchase or development of assets by a department is made under a permanent appropriation authorised by section 24(1) of the PFA. Capital expenditure is defined in section 2 as the cost of assets acquired or developed, including tangible, intangible or financial assets, and any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventories. The appropriation appears in the Vote that contains appropriations belonging to the department's Responsible Minister.
- Information is provided on intended impacts and outcomes of the appropriation, its scope, expenditure analysed by standard asset categories, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, and expected results. The scope statement is in a standard form for all departments. The performance information relates to the department as a whole and is not limited to any specific capital injection.
- Part 6.2 Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure - Performance information for capital expenditure incurred by the Crown is the same as that for departmental capital expenditure except for not detailing asset categories and the addition of any conditions on use of the appropriation, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of the mechanism for reporting to Parliament.
- The scope statement indicates the form of interest or asset acquired by the Crown, such as a capital injection (equity), loan or shares.
The following table summarises the performance information that is required for a ‘standard' appropriation in each sub-part.
Standard Appropriations | Part 2.1 | Part 2.2 | Part 3.1 | Part 3.2 | Part 4.1 | Part 4.2 | Part 5.1 | Part 5.2 | Part 6.1 | Part 6.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For each sub-part: | ||||||||||
Intended impacts, outcomes or objectives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
For each appropriation: | ||||||||||
Scope of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Expenses and revenue | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Expenses | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A |
Capital expenditure | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ |
Reasons for change in appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Output performance measures and standards | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Expected results | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Conditions on use of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
Memorandum account | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Current and past policy initiatives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
Summary of service providers | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Reporting mechanism | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | N/A | √ |
Information on reasons for change, conditions on use, current and past policy initiatives, and reporting mechanisms appears where applicable or material. Memorandum accounts are relevant only in Part 2. Some variations exist for non-standard appropriations, including MCOAs in Parts 2.1 and 2.2 and MYAs in Parts 2.2, 5.2 and 6.2. Furthermore performance information may not be available for some appropriations.
3 Statement of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
The third component of the Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations comprises the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department included in the sector, by reference to material already set out in Part 2.1 of Votes containing appropriations proposed to be used by the department.
4 Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
The fourth component of the Information Supporting the Estimates begins with a Statement of Common Accounting Policies applicable to all departments. The forecast financial statements for the forthcoming financial year for each department covered by the sector includes a:
- Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income
- Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds
- Forecast Statement of Financial Position
- Statement of Forecast Cash Flows
- Statement of Significant Assumptions.
Each department will include a Statement of Entity- Specific Accounting Policies detailing policies for any matters not addressed by the Statement of Common Accounting Policies (such as a “going concern” statement) or where its policies are more specific than the common policies (such as capitalisation thresholds and estimated useful lives of individual classes of assets). Notes to the Financial Statements provide additional details to assist interpretation of the accounts and to meet disclosure requirements outlined in legislation and accounting standards.
5 Statements of Intent of Departments#
The final component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents the Statements of Intent of the departments covered by each sector. These statements contain the information required by section 40 of the PFA. They focus on the medium term and generally cover:
- Nature and scope of the department's functions - A brief high-level description of the department's functions, addressing its role(s) and purpose and how it intends fulfilling them.
- Strategic direction - impacts and outcomes - A brief high-level overview of the department's strategic direction covering both the impacts and outcomes the department is seeking to achieve (or contribute to) and the strategic environment in which the department operates through, in particular, its responses to the government's priorities.
- Operating intentions - Information that describes how the department intends to achieve (or contribute to) those desired impacts and outcomes through its operations. This section should also include the main measures and standards the department will use to assess and demonstrate what it has achieved, including measures of outcome achievement, impact and cost effectiveness.
- Managing in a changeable operating environment - Information on the risks to achievement of the desired outcomes and priorities, and the department's mitigation strategies.
- Assessing organisational health and capability - The department's intentions for building and strengthening its internal capability, including its responses to the development goals for the State Services and its strategic approach to managing its asset base and forecast capital expenditure in the medium term. If capital expenditure is significant, it is in a separate section.
- Additionalinformationand statutory reporting requirements - As required either by the responsible Minister or Minister of Finance, or by specific legislation.
Terms and Definitions#
The table below contains terms that are used in the Supplementary Estimates and the Information Supporting the Supplementary Estimates.
Appropriation | An appropriation is a parliamentary authorisation for the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure. |
---|---|
Appropriation scope | One of the defining terms of an appropriation that establishes limits on the activities for which the Crown or an Office of Parliament is authorised to incur expenses or capital expenditure under that appropriation. |
Capital expenditure | The cost of assets acquired or developed including any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventory. |
Crown revenue and capital receipts | Flows accounted for as revenue and capital receipts on behalf of the Crown rather than as departmental revenue. |
DDA | Department-to-department appropriation - as authorised by section 20(2) of the PFA. |
Department | Generally references to Departments also include an Office of Parliament as provided in section 26E(4) of the PFA. |
Expenses | Amounts consumed or losses of service potential or future economic benefits, other than those relating to capital withdrawals, in a financial year. Expenses are an accrual concept measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice. |
GST | Goods and services tax. Appropriations are stated GST- exclusive. |
MCOA | Multi-class output expense appropriation. |
MYA | Multi-year appropriation. |
N/A | Not applicable. |
Outcomes | States or conditions of society, the economy or the environment, including changes in those states or conditions. |
Outputs | Goods or services supplied by departments and other entities to external parties. Outputs are a variety of types, including policy advice, administration of contracts and grants, and the provision of specific services. |
PFA | Public Finance Act 1989 |
PLA | Permanent legislative authority - a traditional term for a permanent appropriation, ie, one that is authorised for an indefinite period by legislation other than an Appropriation Act. |
Minister | The Minister responsible for specific appropriations being sought within a Vote. As several Ministers may now hold appropriations within a single Vote, each appropriation will have a tag (M1, M2, etc) identifying the Minister responsible for that line item. |
RDA | Revenue-dependent appropriation - as authorised by section 21(1) of the PFA 1989. |
Responsible Minister | The Minister responsible for the financial performance of a department or Crown entity. In relation to an Office of Parliament, the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, and the Parliamentary Service, the Speaker is the Responsible Minister. |
Revenue from the Crown | Revenue earned by a department from the Crown for the provision of outputs to or on behalf of the Crown. These flows are accounted for as departmental revenue. Revenue from the Crown is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
Revenue from Others | Revenue earned by a department from other departments and from third parties. Revenue from other departments is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
Vote | A grouping of one or more appropriations that are the responsibility of one or more Ministers of the Crown and are administered by the one department. |
Useful Links#
The suite of Budget 2009 documents can be accessed in the Budgets section of the website: www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2009. Documents providing guidance on the PFA and the public sector financial management system can be accessed in the Public Finance Overviews section of the Treasury's website: www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/publicfinance.
Sector Overview#
Sector Overview Statement#
Sector Outcomes
The sector's overall outcome is ‘A Safe and Just Society' for New Zealand. For this outcome to be achieved, communities need to be safe and individuals need to feel secure and that they live in a society where civil and democratic rights and obligations are upheld. The interdependent nature of the sector means that agencies need to work together and share information, as decisions made in one part of the system often impact on other parts of the system.
The justice sector outcomes reflect how justice sector agencies contribute to a safe and just society. These outcomes are:
- Crime Reduced
- Offenders Held to Account
- Impact of Crime Reduced
- Trusted Justice System
- Accessible Justice Services
- Internationally Connected
- Durable Settlements of Treaty Claims
- Effective Constitutional Arrangements
Medium-Term Priorities
Six medium term priorities have been identified for the justice sector, as follows:
- Crime Reduced - Improving public safety
- Crime Reduced - Addressing the drivers of offending and re-offending
- Crime Reduced - Addressing Māori over-representation in the criminal justice system
- Impact of Crime Reduced - Improving the responsiveness of the justice system to victims
- Offenders Held to Account - Improving the functioning and efficiency of criminal court processes
- Trusted Justice System - Improved satisfaction with justice sector services
Focusing on activities that contribute to the priority areas is expected to lead to the biggest gains for the sector in the medium term. Key trends and issues within each medium term priority follow.
Improving Public Safety#
Why is this a priority?
The first priority of any justice system is to protect its citizenry. Crime has an obvious impact on physical wellbeing, and also has a large economic cost. However, the threat of crime also has an impact on quality of life. Anxiety about being victimised can limit people's lifestyles and their freedom to participate fully in society.
Although reducing the incidence of crime is a longer term priority in its own right, the justice sector can contribute to public safety through its own activities, including holding offenders to account and imposing appropriate consequences for their behaviour, improving police visibility in the community and enhancing the tools at their disposal, and enhancing prison security.
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
An improvement in public safety will not only result from a reduction in recorded crime, but also where increased confidence in the activities of the justice sector lead to a reduction in fear of crime. The New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey asks respondents to rate how fear of crime affects the quality of life. The impact of fear of crime was scored on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no effect and 10 is total effect on quality of life.
The survey showed that in 2005, 40% of New Zealanders said that fear of crime had a moderate or high impact on the quality of their life (a score of 4 or above), while 7% scored it at 8-10. The graph below shows what proportion of each of various subgroups of respondents is highly affected by the fear of crime.
Figure 1 - Groups whose quality of life is highly affected by fear of crime
Percentage of those greatly affected by fear of crime - ie, those who gave a response of 8 to 10 on a scale of 10
Addressing the Drivers of Offending and Re-offending#
Why is this a priority?
To achieve a significant and enduring impact on the incidence of crime, the justice sector must address the factors that lead to offending in the first place. This means developing an understanding of and where possible responses to the drivers of crime at several different stages:
- Prior to offending, at the earliest stages of child development
- First offending, generally youth
- Re-offending, post-sentence
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
Success in reducing offending will ultimately be reflected in levels of recorded crime. Although total offences have decreased, largely as the result of a reduction in dishonesty offences, violent crime has increased.
Outcomes from policies that address the pre-offending stage of development will take the longest to flow through. This will rely on co-operation with the education, social development and health sectors, to identify risk factors in childhood and adolescence that, in combination, indicate an increased likelihood of future offending and poor outcomes, while at the same time identifying those protective factors that reduce the likelihood of offending.
For sentenced offenders, the Department of Corrections provides a range of rehabilitative and re-integrative programmes which can lead to significant reductions in re-conviction and re-imprisonment when delivered to appropriately selected offenders. The two figures below show that although there are clear differences in rates of re-conviction and re-imprisonment across different ethnic groups, there has been no significant change in overall trends of re-offending.
Figure 2 - Re-conviction rates, 12 months after release
Figure 3 - Re-imprisonment rates, 12 months after release
Addressing Māori Over-Representation in the Criminal Justice System#
Why is this a priority?
Māori are disproportionately represented as both offenders and victims in New Zealand's criminal justice system. Adjusting for the size of different populations, in 2003 four to five times as many Māori as Europeans were apprehended, prosecuted and convicted. Six to seven times as many Māori were given a custodial sentence or were serving prison sentences, and eleven times as many were remanded in custody awaiting trial. However, Māori are also much more likely than other ethnic groups to be victims of crime. Any reduction in Māori offending that can be achieved will have a significant positive impact on the overall crime rate.
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
Key information on monitoring success in the medium term will be drawn from convictions data, as outlined below.
Figure 4 - Total convictions: all categories
Figure 5 - Total convictions: violence category
Improving the Responsiveness of the Justice System to Victims#
Why is this a priority?
The priorities already outlined above should have the effect of reducing the number of victims of crime. But when crime does occur, the justice sector will work to ensure that the victims of that offending are supported throughout the criminal justice process.
The New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey (2006) reports that only about a third of offences are reported to Police, although reporting rates vary by type of offence. The impact of crime is also unevenly spread: 60% of New Zealanders reported no victimisations in 2005, but 6% reported five or more victimisations. Those who were less well off, both economically and socially, were more likely to be victimised, creating a further source of inequity.
Improving the victim notification system, victims' rights and information accessibility in the justice system, will improve the responsiveness of the justice system to victims.
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
The next New Zealand Crime and Safety survey was launched early in 2009, and will provide updated information on the extent of victimisation and how victims view the effectiveness of the support available to them.
The justice sector is engaged in a number of initiatives to improve responsiveness to victims. The Enhancing Victims Rights review aims to identify key legislative, policy and operational changes that can be made across a range of agencies to better support victims through the process.
In addition, the Sentencing (Offender Levy) Amendment Bill imposes a levy on all offenders at the point of sentencing, to increase services and support for victims of serious crime.
Improving the Functioning and Efficiency of Criminal Court Processes#
Why is this a priority?
Improving the functioning and efficiency of the criminal court process will contribute to the outcomes of holding offenders to account, minimising the impact of crime on victims, and building a trusted justice system.
Although the courts have already improved the rate at which they dispose of cases, this is being outstripped by increasing demand for criminal court processes, due to faster growth in the number of prosecutions, and the increasing complexity of cases and the duration of trials.
Figure 6 - District Court: criminal summary throughput
For example, the number of District Court criminal jury trials increased 36%, but the number of cases on hand has grown by 56%. Similarly, the number of cases on hand in High Court jury trials has also seen a significant growth in the last two years, driven largely by methamphetamine cases.
Delays in the court process means delayed justice for both victims and offenders. It also has flow-on effects to other parts of the justice sector, such as increased demand for Corrections facilities for those remanded in custody for longer periods.
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
Improvements to court services will be progressed through initiatives to simplify court procedures and the review of legal aid.
Monitoring will be undertaken of key measures, including active cases on hand, and summary throughput.
Figure 7 - Criminal summary throughput, rolling twelve month totals
Improved Satisfaction with Justice Sector Services#
Why is this a priority?
To be effective, the justice sector must be trusted and have the confidence of individuals and communities. Although breakdowns in accepted processes within the system are rare, they have the potential to have life and death consequences, and understandably pose a risk to public trust in the justice system.
Since 1999 there is some evidence which indicates a decline in the level of trust in the criminal justice system.
Figure 8 - Criminal justice groups rated as doing a good or excellent job: 1999 and 2006
Agency | 1999 NZCASS |
2006 NZCASS |
Variance |
---|---|---|---|
Police | 74% | 60% | -14% |
Juries | 63% | 59% | -4% |
Judges | 42% | 47% | 5% |
Criminal Lawyers | 45% | 44% | -1% |
Probation Officers | 50% | 41% | -9% |
Prison Service | 39% | 40% | 1% |
How will the sector demonstrate its success?
The 2009 New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey will provide new information on the changing levels of satisfaction and trust with the criminal justice system. This information will be available in 2010.
Ministerial Statements of Responsibility#
Each of us is satisfied that the information on future operating intentions provided by our respective departments and included in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector is in accordance with sections 38 and 41 of the Public Finance Act 1989 and is consistent with the policies and performance expectations of the government.
Hon Simon Power
Responsible Minister for the Ministry of Justice
22 April 2009
Hon Judith Collins
Responsible Minister for the Department of Corrections
Responsible Minister for the New Zealand Police
Responsible Minister for the Serious Fraud Office
22 April 2009
Hon Christopher Finlayson
Responsible Minister for the Crown Law Office
Responsible Minister for the Parliamentary Counsel Office
22 April 2009
Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility#
Ministry of Justice#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the Ministry of Justice and for the Votes for which the Ministry of Justice is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Ministry of Justice's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities
Belinda Clark
Secretary for Justice and Chief Executive
Ministry of Justice
22 April 2009
Lara Ariell
Chief Financial Officer
Ministry of Justice
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Department of Corrections#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the Department of Corrections and for the Vote for which the Department of Corrections is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Department of Corrections's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Barry Matthews
Chief Executive
Department of Corrections
22 April 2009
John Bole
General Manager Business Information and Planning
Department of Corrections
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
New Zealand Police#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the New Zealand Police and for the Vote for which the New Zealand Police is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the New Zealand Police's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Howard Broad
Commissioner of Police
New Zealand Police
22 April 2009
Bruce Simpson
General Manager Finance and Planning
New Zealand Police
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Serious Fraud Office#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the Serious Fraud Office and for the Vote for which the Serious Fraud Office is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Serious Fraud Office's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Grant Liddell
Director
Serious Fraud Office
22 April 2009
Gib Beattie
Assistant Director
Serious Fraud Office
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Crown Law Office#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the Crown Law Office and for the Vote for which the Crown Law Office is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Crown Law Office's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Dr David Collins QC
Solicitor-General and Chief Executive
Crown Law Office
22 April 2009
Chris Walker
Chief Financial Officer
Crown Law Office
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Parliamentary Counsel Office#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Justice Sector relating to the Parliamentary Counsel Office and for the Vote for which the Parliamentary Counsel Office is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Parliamentary Counsel Office's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
David Noble
Chief Parliamentary Counsel
Parliamentary Counsel Office
22 April 2009
Noel Lee
Corrporate Services Manager
Parliamentary Counsel Office
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Attorney-General#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Attorney-General (M5)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Crown Law Office
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR CROWN LAW OFFICE: Attorney-General
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Attorney-General is responsible for appropriations in the Vote for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- a total of $3.329 million (5% of the Vote) for the conduct of appeals arising from criminal trials on indictment and from Crown appeals against sentence
- a total of $22.900 million (35% of the Vote) on providing legal advice and representation services to central government departments and agencies
- a total of $35.542 million (54% of the Vote) on providing a national Crown prosecution service that undertakes criminal trials on indictment and related appeals
- a total of $2.978 million (5% of the Vote) on providing legal and administrative services to the Attorney-General and Solicitor-General to assist them in the exercise of their statutory functions and responsibilities
- a total of $943,000 (1% of the Vote) on the purchase or development of assets by and for the use of the Crown Law Office, as authorised by section 24 (1) of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Crown Law expects to receive a total of $22.900 million (35% of the Vote) comprising fees and disbursements, from central government departments and agencies for providing legal advice and representation services.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations#
Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
---|---|---|
Justice Sector Outcomes | Offenders Held to Account | Supervision and Conduct of Crown Prosecutions |
Conduct of Criminal Appeals | ||
Trusted Justice System | Conduct of Criminal Appeals | |
Legal Advice and Representation | ||
Supervision and Conduct of Crown Prosecutions | ||
The Exercise of Principle Law Officer Functions | ||
International Connected | The Exercise of Principle Law Officer Functions | |
Legal Advice and Representation | ||
Durable Settlement of Treaty Claims | Legal Advice and Representation | |
Effective Constitutional Arrangements | The Exercise of Principle Law Officer Functions | |
Legal Advice and Representation | ||
Conduct of Criminal Appeals | ||
Supervision and Conduct of Crown Prosecutions |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 47,081 | 50,459 | 56,249 | 58,561 | 65,814 | 65,814 | 64,749 | - | 64,749 | 64,749 | 64,749 | 64,749 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Expenditure | 1,355 | 240 | 594 | 341 | 2,405 | 2,405 | 943 | - | 943 | 465 | 515 | 515 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
48,436 | 50,699 | 56,843 | 58,902 | 68,219 | 68,219 | 65,692 | - | 65,692 | 65,214 | 65,264 | 65,264 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
New Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emergency Cost Pressures in Vote Attorney-General |
Supervision and Conduct of Crown ProsecutionsDepartmental Output Expenses |
750 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Line by Line Review Savings |
The Exercise of the Law Officer FunctionDepartmental Output Expenses |
(100) | (250) | (250) | (250) | (250) |
Total Initiatives | 650 | - | - | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
Total Vote: All Appropriations
Trends in comparative actual and estimated total expenses and capital expenditure are shown in Figure 1 below, including budgeted and estimated actual figures for the preceding year.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Outcome - Offenders held to account Impact - Effective Crown prosecution service |
Conduct of Criminal Appeals |
Outcome - Effective and lawful functioning of New Zealand's Government Impact - Crown's legal interests are protected and its responsibilities are carried out lawfully |
Legal Advice and Representation |
Outcome - Offenders held to account Impact - Effective Crown prosecution service |
Supervision and Conduct of Crown Prosecutions |
Outcome - Effective constitutional arrangements Impact - Democratic government under law and in the public interest |
The Exercise of Principal Law Officer Functions |
Conduct of Criminal Appeals (M5)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 3,444 | 3,444 | 3,329 |
Revenue from Crown | 3,444 | 3,444 | 3,329 |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of appeals disposed of by the Court of Appeal/Supreme Court/Privy Council arising out of criminal trials on indictment, brought by: | |||
|
30 - 35 | 30 - 35 | 30 - 35 |
|
550 - 600 | 550 - 600 | 550 - 600 |
Decisions made on requests for the Solicitor-General to take Crown Appeals in relation to: | |||
|
40 - 50 | 15 - 30 | 15 - 30 |
|
25 - 30 | 25 - 30 | 25 - 30 |
Success rate for sentence appeals brought by the Solicitor-General | Not less than 60% | Not less than 60% | Not less than 60% |
Compliance with court procedures and requirements of the judiciary as specified in the Court of Appeal/Supreme Court Practice Notes | No complaints are received in relation to non-compliance | No complaints are received in relation to non-compliance | No complaints are received in relation to non-compliance |
The hearing of sentence appeals is undertaken in accordance with the schedule of sitting days which are agreed by the court one month in advance | The Crown seeks no requests for adjournment | The Crown seeks no requests for adjournment | The Crown seeks no requests for adjournment |
Decisions to appeal by the Crown are taken in accordance with the statutory deadlines. Written submissions are filed within the timeframe stipulated in the practice notes prepared for the guidance of counsel in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court | Submissions are filed by the Crown by the required date, or within three days of receipt of the appellant's submissions, or if that timeframe is not available then prior to the appeal hearing | Submissions are filed by the Crown by the required date, or within three days of receipt of the appellant's submissions, or if that timeframe is not available then prior to the appeal hearing | Submissions are filed by the Crown by the required date, or within three days of receipt of the appellant's submissions, or if that timeframe is not available then prior to the appeal hearing |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demand Pressures impacting on Criminal Prosecutions and Criminal Appeals | 2007/08 | 125 | 265 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
Legal Advice and Representation (M5)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 22,900 | 22,900 | 22,900 |
Revenue from Crown | - | - | - |
Revenue from Other | 22,900 | 22,900 | 22,900 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of new instructions for legal advice | 450 - 550 | 450 - 500 | 450 - 500 |
Average number of requests for legal advice in progress during the year | 750 - 850 | 750 - 800 | 750 - 800 |
Number of new instructions in respect of litigation matters | 600 - 650 | 600 - 620 | 600 - 620 |
Average number of litigation matters in progress during the year | 2,400 - 2,600 | 2,500 - 2,700 | 2,500 - 2,700 |
Legal advice, including opinions, and representation services will be provided in accordance with Crown Law's Professional Standards: Crown Law Advice and Conduct of Litigation, respectively | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards |
Memorandum Account#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Legal Advice and Representation |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | - | 870 | 870 |
Revenue | 21,110 | 22,900 | 22,900 |
Expenses | 21,110 | 22,900 | 23,770 |
Transfers and Adjustments | 870 | - | - |
Closing Balance at 30 June | 870 | 870 | - |
Supervision and Conduct of Crown Prosecutions (M5)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 36,492 | 36,492 | 35,542 |
Revenue from Crown | 36,492 | 36,492 | 35,542 |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of trials for indictable crime: | |||
|
1,900 - 2,100 | 1,700 - 1,900 | 1,700 - 1,900 |
|
200 - 240 | 200 - 240 | 200 - 240 |
Number of trials for indictable crime, where the complexity of the case requires a significant amount of preparation and court appearance time: | |||
|
150 - 200 | 150 - 180 | 150 - 180 |
|
100 - 140 | 80 - 120 | 80 - 120 |
Number of other criminal matters conducted by the Crown Solicitors: | |||
|
1,500 - 1,600 | 1,400 - 1,500 | 1,400 - 1,500 |
|
2,700 - 2,800 | 2,700 - 2,800 | 2,700 - 2,800 |
|
700 - 800 | 700 - 800 | 700 - 800 |
Prosecution services provided in accordance with prosecution guidelines and case management practices developed by the Solicitor-General and judiciary, respectively | Review of each Crown Solicitor practice on a cyclical basis to determine conformity to guidelines and practices as described in: Supervision of Crown Solicitor Network | Review of each Crown Solicitor practice on a cyclical basis to determine conformity to guidelines and practices as described in: Supervision of Crown Solicitor Network | Review of each Crown Solicitor practice on a cyclical basis to determine conformity to guidelines and practices as described in: Supervision of Crown Solicitor Network |
Number of Crown Solicitors practices to be reviewed | 1 - 2 | 0 | 1 - 2 |
Number of new applications from Crown Solicitors for special fees, classification of counsel and approval of additional counsel | 350 - 450 | 300 - 400 | 300 - 400 |
Applications by Crown Solicitors for special fees, classification of counsel and approval of additional counsel will be considered in accordance with the Crown Solicitors Regulations 1994 and Crown Law's protocols which support the application of the Regulations. The protocols describe the process to be followed, the quality standards relating to the process, and the content and justification required for the applications | Conformity of applications with the Crown Solicitors Regulations 1994, and Crown Law's protocols, which support the application of the regulations, will be assessed at the time the applications are considered. Feedback will be formally communicated to Crown Solicitors as appropriate | Conformity of applications with the Crown Solicitors Regulations 1994, and Crown Law's protocols, which support the application of the regulations, will be assessed at the time the applications are considered. Feedback will be formally communicated to Crown Solicitors as appropriate | Conformity of applications with the Crown Solicitors Regulations 1994, and Crown Law's protocols, which support the application of the regulations, will be assessed at the time the applications are considered. Feedback will be formally communicated to Crown Solicitors as appropriate |
The provision of prosecution services by Crown Solicitors will be reviewed according to a range of quality standards which include:
|
A review of the performance of Crown Solicitors will be undertaken on a cyclical basis by a review panel. The panel will address two main areas:
|
A review of the performance of Crown Solicitors will be undertaken on a cyclical basis by a review panel. The panel will address two main areas:
|
A review of the performance of Crown Solicitors will be undertaken on a cyclical basis by a review panel. The panel will address two main areas:
|
Number of new requests for legal advice or determination of applications received in relation to criminal law issues | 350 - 450 | 300 - 350 | 300 - 350 |
Average number of requests for legal advice or determination of applications in relation to criminal law in progress during the year | 450 - 500 | 450 - 500 | 450 - 500 |
Number of new ministerial and parliamentary questions received | 30 - 40 | 25 - 35 | 25 - 35 |
Legal advice, including opinions, and representation services will be provided in accordance with Crown Law's Professional Standards: Crown Law Advice and Conduct of Litigation, respectively | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards |
Ministerial correspondence and parliamentary questions will be responded to within appropriate time frames | Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases. All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within the required deadlines |
Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases. All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within the required deadlines |
Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases. All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within the required deadlines |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emergency Cost Pressures in Vote Attorney-General | 2008/09 | 750 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Demand Pressures impacting on Criminal Prosecutions and Criminal Appeals | 2007/08 | 2,650 | 3,850 | 3,400 | 3,400 | 3,400 |
The Exercise of Principal Law Officer Functions (M5)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,978 | 2,978 | 2,978 |
Revenue from Crown | 2,928 | 2,928 | 2,928 |
Revenue from Other | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of new applications or requests for advice received for action on behalf of the Attorney-General and Solicitor-General | 200 - 220 | 170 - 190 | 170 - 190 |
Average number of applications or requests for legal advice in progress during the year | 350 - 400 | 350 - 400 | 350 - 400 |
Number of new ministerial and parliamentary questions received | 240 - 260 | 240 - 260 | 240 - 260 |
Legal advice, including opinions, and representation services will be provided in accordance with Crown Law 's Professional Standards: Crown Law Advice and Conduct of Litigation, respectively | Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards Quality, timeliness and effectiveness of services assessed in accordance with the standards agreed with the Attorney-General |
Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards Quality, timeliness and effectiveness of services assessed in accordance with the standards agreed with the Attorney-General |
Conformity with the guidelines set down in the standards as determined by the quality assurance review processes that have been developed to support the application of the standards Quality, timeliness and effectiveness of services assessed in accordance with the standards agreed with the Attorney-General |
Brief the Attorney-General in a timely and relevant way on significant legal matters affecting the Crown | A weekly report will be provided to the Attorney-General advising on significant legal matters involving the Crown | A weekly report will be provided to the Attorney-General advising on significant legal matters involving the Crown | A weekly report will be provided to the Attorney-General advising on significant legal matters involving the Crown |
Ministerial correspondence and parliamentary questions will be responded to within appropriate time frames | Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within required deadlines |
Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within required deadlines |
Replies to ministerial correspondence will be completed within 20 working days of receipt in 90% of cases All responses to parliamentary questions will be provided within required deadlines |
Memorandum Account#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Senior Counsel Applications |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | - | - | - |
Revenue | - | 50 | 50 |
Expenses | - | 50 | 50 |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | - | - |
Closing Balance at 30 June | - | - | - |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Line by Line Review Saving | 2008/09 | (100) | (250) | (250) | (250) | (250) |
Increase in the Appropriation for Exercise of Law Officer Function: Unavoidable Demand Pressures 2007/08 | 2007/08 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1,900 |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective - To maintain and upgrade capability through routine replacement/improvement of Crown Law's leasehold, office equipment, computer hardware, furniture and fittings, and computer software | Crown Law Office - Capital Expenditure |
Crown Law Office - Capital Expenditure PLA (M5)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 735 | 735 | 429 |
Intangibles | 1,670 | 1,670 | 514 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
2,405 | 2,405 | 943 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 735 | 735 | 429 |
Intangibles | 1,670 | 1,670 | 514 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
2,405 | 2,405 | 943 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The higher intangible expenditure in 2008/09 is due to the financial software system replacement project.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Corrections#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Corrections (M18)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Department of Corrections
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS : Minister of Corrections
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Corrections is responsible for appropriations in Vote Corrections for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- $590.571 million (55.43% of the Vote) on the provision of custodial services for offenders sentenced to imprisonment
- $151.683 million (14.23% of the Vote) on the management and delivery of sentences and orders served in the community
- $122.278 million (11.48% of the Vote) on the provision of custodial services for remand prisoners (people waiting trial, and offenders convicted but not yet sentenced)
- $74.710 million (7.01% of the Vote) on the provision of prison and community-based responsivity and rehabilitative programmes, reintegrative services and psychological services designed to address the underlying causes of criminal re-offending
- $63.810 million (5.99% of the Vote) on the provision of information about offenders to the judiciary and the New Zealand Parole Board to inform their respective decision-making processes, the administration of home leave for prisoners, and the provision of victim notification services
- $39.648 million (3.72% of the Vote) on the provision of prisoner employment, including the provision and administration of work experience and training opportunities designed to help address the underlying causes of criminal re-offending
- $12.351 million (1.16% of the Vote) on the provision of transportation for prisoners to and from court and the supervision of prisoners while at court
- $5.614 million (0.53% of the Vote) on the provision of services to the New Zealand Parole Board relating to the provision of administrative, financial and secretariat services
- $4.811 million (0.45% of the Vote) the provision of ministerial services, the development of policies and the provision of policy advice.
The Department of Corrections does not expect to collect any Crown revenue in 2009/10.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Objectives of the Vote#
Vote Corrections directly supports the following Government priorities:
- Ensuring sentence compliance and holding offenders to account.
- Managing the impact of an increasing offender population whilst ensuring the safety and wellbeing of staff.
- Measures that reduce re-offending.
Vote Corrections contributes to these priorities through its End and Intermediate Outcomes, and Appropriations.
Corrections End Outcomes | Corrections Intermediate Outcomes | Corrections Appropriations |
---|---|---|
Compliance with Sentences and Orders is Ensured | Offenders complete the correct imposed sentence and order Offenders comply with specific restrictions and requirements |
Sentences and Orders Served in the Community (M18) Prison-based Custodial Services (MCOA) (M18) Prisoner Transportation and Courtroom Supervision (M18) Prisoner Employment (M18) |
Offenders are Managed Safely and Humanely | Offenders are not harmed Offenders are treated fairly Offenders' legitimate needs are met |
Sentences and Orders Served in the Community (M18) Prison-based Custodial Services (MCOA) (M18) Prisoner Transportation and Courtroom Supervision (M18) Prisoner Employment (M18) |
Sentence Options are used Effectively | Judiciary and New Zealand Parole Board make informed decisions | Information Services (M18) Services to the New Zealand Parole Board (M18) |
Re-offending is Reduced | Offenders' rehabilitation needs are addressed Offenders acquire employment-relevant skills and qualifications Offenders' re-integrative needs are addressed |
Prisoner Employment (M18) Rehabilitation Programmes and Reintegrative Services (M18) |
Victims of Crime are Supported | Eligible victims are notified | Information Services (M18) |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 537,694 | 653,874 | 765,941 | 924,049 | 976,930 | 970,530 | 1,065,476 | - | 1,065,476 | 1,121,252 | 1,122,005 | 1,136,047 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Expenditure | 244,540 | 432,840 | 338,220 | 90,549 | 128,686 | 128,686 | 402,471 | - | 402,471 | 152,557 | 136,850 | 103,050 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure |