Information Supporting the Estimates is organised on the basis of sectors, with each Vote and its administering department allocated to one sector (with a small number of exceptions). The Information Supporting the Estimates comprises of sector overview information, together with statements of responsibility; performance information for appropriations in Votes covered by the sector; and statements of forecast service performance and forecast financial statements of departments included in the sector. Statements of Intent of departments included in the sector form part of the supporting information.
Chapters of the Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector volume of the Information Supporting the Estimates 2010/11 are available in Adobe PDF and HTML formats.
Using PDF FilesCover, Contents#
Introduction#
- Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates
- Votes and Departments in Each Sector
- Purpose and Nature of Appropriations
- Guide to Reading Information Supporting the Estimates
- Terms and Definitions
- Useful Links
Sector Overview#
- Ministerial Statements of Responsibility
- Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility
Performance Information for Appropriations in Each Vote#
- Vote Climate Change
- Vote Conservation
- Vote Environment
- Vote Local Government
- Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
Statements of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
- Statement of Common Accounting Policies
- Department of Conservation
- Ministry for the Environment
- Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
Statements of Intent of Departments (separately produced but forming part of this volume)#
- Department of Conservation
- Ministry for the Environment
- Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates provides members of Parliament with information on expected performance to:
- support their examination of the appropriations and other authorities requested by the Government in the first Appropriation Bill for the forthcoming financial year, and
- provide a basis against which they can later assess the actual performance of each individual department and Office of Parliament over that financial year.
The Information Supporting the Estimates is organised into 10 volumes by sector, each of which covers one or more Votes. The scope of each sector and the allocation of Votes to a sector reflect a balancing of three desired characteristics - namely that each volume should, where possible:
- reflect natural sectors
- keep together Votes administered by the same department, and
- keep together Votes allocated to a particular select committee of the House of Representatives for examination.
The number of sectors and coverage of each sector was set in consultation with the Finance and Expenditure Committee. The 10 sectors are:
- Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector
- Education and Science Sector
- Environment Sector
- External Sector
- Finance and Government Administration Sector
- Health Sector
- Justice Sector
- Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector
- Primary Sector
- Social Development and Housing Sector.
Votes and Departments in Each Sector#
Votes by Sector | Departments by Sector |
---|---|
Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector - B.5A Vol.1 |
|
Vote Economic Development | Ministry of Economic Development |
Vote Commerce | |
Vote Communications | |
Vote Consumer Affairs | |
Vote Energy | |
Vote Tourism | |
Vote Transport | Ministry of Transport |
Vote Labour | Department of Labour |
Vote ACC | |
Vote Employment | |
Vote Immigration | |
Education and Science Sector - B.5A Vol.2 |
|
Vote Education | Ministry of Education |
Vote Education Review Office | Education Review Office |
Vote Research, Science and Technology | Ministry of Research, Science and Technology |
Vote Crown Research Institutes (this Vote is administered by the Treasury, which is in the Finance and Government Administration Sector.) | |
Environment Sector - B.5A Vol.3 |
|
Vote Environment | Ministry for the Environment |
Vote Climate Change | |
Vote Conservation | Department of Conservation |
Vote Local Government (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector) | |
Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment | Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment |
External Sector - B.5A Vol.4 |
|
Vote Foreign Affairs and Trade | Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |
Vote Official Development Assistance | |
Vote Defence | Ministry of Defence |
Vote Defence Force | New Zealand Defence Force |
Vote Veterans' Affairs - Defence Force | |
Vote Customs | New Zealand Customs Service |
Finance and Government Administration Sector - B.5A Vol.5 |
|
Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet | Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet |
Vote Communications Security and Intelligence | Government Communications Security Bureau |
Vote Security Intelligence | New Zealand Security Intelligence Service |
Vote State Services | State Services Commission |
Vote Finance | The Treasury |
Vote State-Owned Enterprises | |
Vote Revenue | Inland Revenue Department |
Vote Ministerial Services (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector) | |
Vote Office of the Clerk | Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives |
Vote Ombudsmen | Office of the Ombudsmen |
Vote Parliamentary Service | Parliamentary Service |
Vote Audit | Office of the Auditor-General |
Health Sector - B.5A Vol.6 |
|
Vote Health | Ministry of Health |
Justice Sector - B.5A Vol.7 |
|
Vote Justice | Ministry of Justice |
Vote Courts | |
Vote Corrections | Department of Corrections |
Vote Police | New Zealand Police |
Vote Serious Fraud | Serious Fraud Office |
Vote Attorney-General | Crown Law Office |
Vote Parliamentary Counsel | Parliamentary Counsel Office |
Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector - B.5A Vol.8 |
|
Vote Arts, Culture and Heritage | Ministry for Culture and Heritage |
Vote Sport and Recreation | |
Vote Statistics | Statistics New Zealand |
Vote National Archives | Archives New Zealand |
Vote National Library | National Library of New Zealand |
Vote Māori Affairs | Te Puni Kōkiri |
Vote Treaty Negotiations (this Vote is administered by the Ministry of Justice, which is in the Justice Sector) | |
Vote Pacific Island Affairs | Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs |
Vote Women's Affairs | Ministry of Women's Affairs |
Vote Internal Affairs | Department of Internal Affairs |
Vote Community and Voluntary Sector | |
Vote Emergency Management | |
Vote Racing | |
Primary Sector - B.5A Vol.9 |
|
Vote Agriculture and Forestry | Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry |
Vote Biosecurity | |
Vote Food Safety | |
Vote Fisheries | Ministry of Fisheries |
Vote Lands | Land Information New Zealand |
Social Development and Housing Sector - B.5A Vol.10 |
|
Vote Social Development | Ministry of Social Development |
Vote Senior Citizens | |
Vote Veterans' Affairs - Social Development | |
Vote Youth Development | |
Vote Housing | Department of Building and Housing |
Purpose and Nature of Appropriations#
An appropriation is a statutory authority from Parliament allowing the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure.
Neither the Crown nor an Office of Parliament can legally incur any expense or capital expenditure - as those terms are defined in the Public Finance Act 1989 (PFA) - unless it is expressly authorised by or under an Act of Parliament.
Each appropriation is allocated to, and managed as, one of six types of appropriation.
Limits Created by Appropriations#
Each appropriation has a defined scope that limits the uses or activities for which the expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred. The scope should be sufficient on its own to establish the nature and extent of the authority to incur expenses or capital expenditure. The wording of the appropriation scope should achieve the balance between being sufficiently precise to act as an effective constraint against non-authorised activities and not so specific that it inadvertently limits activity intended to be authorised.
In most cases an appropriation also limits the amount of expenses or capital expenditure that can be incurred, and the time period within which those expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred.
Aside from the very limited exclusions provided for in the PFA, the amount of expense or capital expenditure authorised by an appropriation is measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.
As generally accepted accounting practice does not normally treat GST as an expense, appropriation amounts also generally exclude GST. Prior to 2005/06, however, appropriations included applicable GST. All prior-year appropriation data, such as in the Summary of Trends table in the Estimates and the Summary of Financial Activity Table for each Vote in Information Supporting the Estimates - have been adjusted to exclude GST to allow appropriate comparison.
Responsibility for Appropriations#
Each appropriation is the responsibility of a designated Minister, who controls the right to use that appropriation within the limits authorised by Parliament. A department is also assigned to administer that appropriation in accordance with the Minister's wishes concerning its use.
A Vote is a group of appropriations (and can be a single appropriation) administered by a single department. Different appropriations within a Vote may be the responsibility of different Ministers.
Types of Appropriation#
The PFA provides for six types of appropriation. Four appropriation types authorise the incurring of expenses; one type authorises the incurring of capital expenditure; and the remaining type authorises both.
These appropriation types can be further differentiated by whether the expenses or capital expenditure are departmental or non-departmental transactions.
Appropriation Type | Transaction Status | Description |
---|---|---|
Output Expenses |
Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament in supplying a specified category of outputs (goods and services). |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in purchasing a specified category of outputs (goods and services) from Crown entities or other third parties. | |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in transferring resources (generally to individuals for their personal benefit) for which the Crown receives nothing directly in return. Examples include the Unemployment Benefit, student allowances and various scholarships and awards. |
Borrowing Expenses |
Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to a department or an Office of Parliament, or for public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by a department or an Office of Parliament. In practice, limitations on the rights of departments to borrow or issue securities mean that these are likely to be incurred only by Offices of Parliament. |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to the Crown (excluding departments), or public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by the Crown. Crown debt management is centralised, which means that most debt-servicing expenses appear in Vote Finance. |
|
Other Expenses |
Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament that are not either output expenses or borrowing expenses. Other expenses should be used only for events that cannot be related back to output production, such as redundancy costs arising from a government decision to cease purchasing certain types of outputs, or a loss on sale of assets made surplus by departmental restructuring. |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) that are not structured or managed as output expenses, benefits and unrequited expenses, or borrowing expenses. Other expenses is the residual appropriation type, which should not be used where an appropriation could be better classified or managed as one of the other appropriation types (eg, as output expenses). Examples include disposal of an asset for less than market value, grants to community organisations, subscriptions for membership of international bodies and remuneration of independent statutory officers. |
|
Capital expenditure |
Departmental |
Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament to acquire or develop assets for the use of the department. |
Non-Departmental |
Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) to acquire or develop Crown assets, including the purchase of equity, or making a loan to a person or organisation that is not a department. | |
Expenses or Capital expenditure Incurred by an Intelligence and Security Department |
Departmental |
Authorises both expenses and capital expenditure to be incurred by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service or the Government Communications Security Bureau. |
Types of Output Expense Appropriations#
A number of variations are possible for output expense appropriations. In particular, the constraint on the amount of expense that can be incurred is not always a fixed amount; and an output expense appropriation can cover more than one class of outputs.
Output Expense Appropriation Type and Authority | Description, Constraints on Form and Typical Application |
---|---|
Standard Output Expense Appropriations (section 7(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase a specified class of outputs. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Single output class only: The scope is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of a standard output expense appropriation is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. Typical application: The normal or default form for an output expense appropriation, used for a wide range of outputs for which the flexibility offered by the other types of output expense appropriation is not required. |
Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriations (MCOA) (section 7(3)(b), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying more than one specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase more than one specified class of outputs. A proposed MCOA must be approved by the Minister of Finance before it is presented in the Estimates. The information supporting the Estimates must explain why the Minister has allowed those classes of outputs to be grouped in one appropriation. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Multiple output classes: The scope of an MCOA is determined by the combined scope of each of the output classes included in that appropriation. Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of an MCOA is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. The amount of expense that can be incurred in relation to each component output class is flexible within the total amount of the MCOA, although expenses must be separately forecast and reported for each individual class in the Estimates, Information Supporting the Estimates, Supplementary Estimates and the department's annual report. Typical application: An MCOA is used where it is appropriate to give the responsible Minister or department ongoing discretion over the output mix across two or more classes of outputs. Such discretion will most commonly be sought where the output classes contribute to a common outcome, or use a common or closely related set of inputs or processes, and the circumstances that determine the appropriate output choice or mix are likely to vary during the appropriation period. |
Revenue-Dependent Appropriations (RDA) (section 21(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified a class of outputs (goods and services) that are not paid for directly by the Crown. A proposed RDA must be approved by the Minister of Finance, before it is presented in the Estimates. Each class of outputs for which an RDA is approved is listed in an Appropriation Act for the relevant financial year. Annual only: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year specified. Single output class only: The scope of an RDA is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by amount of revenue earned: The amount of an RDA is limited tothe amount of revenue earned by a department or an Office of Parliament from other departments or from parties other than the Crown during a financial year. The Minister of Finance can further direct a department to incur expenses to a level lower than the amount of revenue earned, though such directions have been rare. Typical application: An RDA provides flexibility to respond to unanticipated changes in the level of external demand for a class of outputs, where the full cost of the outputs is met by external parties and not the Crown. |
Department-to-Department Appropriation (DDA) (section 20(2), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying specified outputs (goods and services) paid for by another department. Creation of a DDA requires an agreement between two departments. Implicitly it also requires the approval of the Minister who will become responsible for the appropriation - namely, the Minister responsible for the supplying department - as the agreement has implications for the scope and risk of that department's operations. Annual or multi-year: The period of a DDA will depend on the negotiated terms of the agreement. Single or multiple output class(es): The scope of a DDA (and hence whether it covers one or more classes of outputs) will depend on the way in which the agreement defines what is to be delivered. In most cases, an agreement that provides for a range of different outputs is better treated as creating several single-class DDAs. Amount limited by departmental agreement: The amount of a DDA is limited to either the amount of revenue earned from the commissioning department, or the cost incurred by the supplying department in providing those outputs (if that cost is less than the amount of revenue earned under the agreement). Typical application: DDAs are intended to make collaboration between departments easier by reducing the time and effort required to obtain / adjust the relevant appropriations while also allowing a commissioning department to retain full control over the resources it provides. The use of a DDA is not confined to bilateral agreements. A set of related DDAs could be used to enable one department to co-ordinate and manage the work of several departments that must work together to contribute to providing an integrated service to third parties, or to pool contributions from several departments to enable another department to provide a specific service to or on behalf of those departments. |
Appropriation Period#
The length of the appropriation period affects how appropriations are presented in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates. Three kinds of appropriation can be distinguished on the basis of period - annual and multi-year (as referred to in the above table on types of output expense appropriations), and permanent:
- Annual Appropriations - Most appropriations listed in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred only during a particular financial year. The annual amounts, for which parliamentary authority is being sought, are shown in bold type in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote. The amounts for RDAs and annual DDAs are forecasts only, and so are not shown in bold type.
- Multi-Year Appropriations (MYAs) - The PFA also permits appropriations that allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred during a specified period that spans the whole or parts of more than one financial year, but no more than five financial years. The details of each MYA, including its commencement date and expiry date, are specified in Details of Multi-Year Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for relevant Votes.
- Permanent Appropriations (sometimes referred to as permanent legislative authorities or PLAs) -Permanent appropriations are authorised by legislation other than an Appropriation Act and continue in effect until revoked by Parliament. Generally the authorising legislation will impose limits on the scope of the appropriation and not its amount. For those appropriations that with limits set in cash terms, section 11(2) of the Public Finance Act 1989 requires that they be reported on an accrual basis. The usual legislative wording allows for expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred for the purpose specified in the legislation “without further appropriation than this section”. Details of permanent appropriations are included in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote for completeness, though the amount specified is a forecast rather than a limit. The amounts of permanent appropriations are therefore not shown in bold type. The scope of a permanent appropriation will reference the relevant section of the authorising legislation.
Guide to Reading Information Supporting theEstimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates for each of the 10 sectors comprises five components, each of which is briefly described, below.
1 Sector Overview Information
The first component of the Information Supporting the Estimates may include a statement, agreed by all Ministers responsible for appropriations in each Vote included in the sector, that presents an overview of the sector and a high-level summary of the government's expectations and priorities. The Overview also includes Ministerial and Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility for the information provided in the Information Supporting the Estimates.
2 Performance Information Relating to Appropriations in Each Vote#
The second component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents performance information relating to each appropriation.
Thetitle pages for each Vote specify the Minister(s) responsible for existing and proposed appropriations in the Vote, and the Responsible Minister for the department. The performance information meets the requirements of sections 15 and 41(1)(e) of the PFA and contains up to six parts. If particular information is not applicable to the Vote or a specific appropriation or type, or is otherwise unavailable, the relevant heading is not included.
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
The Summary of the Vote comprises:
- Part 1.1 Overview of the Vote - A plain-language summary of the focus of the appropriations through a brief explanation of the Vote. The Overview also appears at the start of the Vote in the Estimates.
- Part 1.2 High-Level Objectives of the Vote - The objectives for the Vote presented through links and relationships and high-level priorities and outcomes to which they contribute. Where applicable, priorities and outcomes are drawn from the priorities and desired outcomes and published strategy documents. Links are also made to specific government strategies. Links may also be made to specific Government objectives.
- Part 1.3 Trends in the Vote - A presentation of the actual and estimated trends in the Vote, comprising:
- Summary of Financial Activity - A table showing financial information over the preceding five years (actual, budgeted or estimated actual), the current year (Budget) and the following three years (estimated) for the type of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts.
- New Policy Initiatives - A table showing how new initiatives (and the associated expenses or capital expenditure) are allocated to appropriations in the Vote. References are included where appropriations in other Votes are affected by the same initiative.
- Analysis of Significant Trends - High-level analysis of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts by type over the nine financial years covered by the Summary of Financial Activity table, explanations of significant changes and may also contain graphical presentations.
- Part 1.4 Reconciliation of Changes in Appropriation Structure - a table providing a reconciliation and explanation of any changes in the structure or classification of appropriations made in the Budget year. These changes are restated for the previous financial year to facilitate comparison.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
This Part provides further detail about appropriations and expected performance for output expenses.
- Part 2.1 Departmental Output Expenses - Intended impacts, outcomes and objectives are presented for departmental output expense appropriations in the Vote. This is followed by information on each appropriation, including its scope, a table showing expenses and revenue (distinguishing the revenue sources between the Crown and others), a statement of reasons for change in the appropriation (if material), and tables detailing performance measures and standards for significant aspects of expected output performance, any conditions on use of appropriation, any memorandum accounts (which record accumulated surpluses and deficits incurred in the provision of outputs on a full cost-recovery basis), and any current and past policy initiatives affecting the appropriation.
- Information on impacts and outcomes or objectives to which the outputs contribute is provided. Further information on the relationships between outputs, impacts, and outcomes or objectives is outlined in Part 1.2 and the Statement of Intent. Conditions on use include administrative criteria and processes contained in legislation, regulation and Government decisions, which may be reference in scope statement or performance measures. The current and past policy initiatives tables provides a five-year history of announced initiatives that impact on the Budget year, the preceding year and the following three years.
- For MCOA, an explanation is provided as to why the classes of outputs have been grouped under a single appropriation, and the scope statement, expenses and revenue, and performance information is presented for each output class.
- Information provided for MYAs enables the original appropriation to be reconciled to the adjusted level if changes have been approved or are proposed, and the balance remaining to be derived taking account of actual or estimated expenses incurred to date.
- The appropriation scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards match information required to be included in a department's Statement of Forecast Service Performance with respect to departmental output expense appropriations used by the department.
- Part 2.2 Non-Departmental Output Expenses - This sub-part contains comparable information to that presented in Part 2.1 on departmental output expense appropriations. The main differences are that details of third parties’ other revenue is not relevant and a summary of service providers is included.
- The service providers table shows Crown entities and non-governmental organisations providing outputs funded through the Vote, and (where applicable) the mechanism for reporting actual performance to Parliament and the expiry of the Government's resource commitment. The reporting mechanisms are typically an entity's annual report or a report by the responsible Minister required by section 32A of the PFA. Where the provider is a Crown entity that is required to produce a Statement of Intent, its annual report may contain more detailed performance information at the output class or output level. ‘Section 32A' reports include a statement of service performance in relation to the appropriation.
Part 3 - Details for Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses#
Part 3 provides performance information about appropriations for benefits and other unrequited expenses incurred by the Crown. No departmental transactions arise under this appropriation type.
- Part 3.2 Non-Departmental Benefits and Other Expenses - Information on each appropriation includes impacts and outcomes intended to be achieved, a scope statement, expense components, reasons for material changes, any conditions of use, and details of any current and past policy initiatives over the five years up to and including the Budget year.
Part 4 - Details for Borrowing Expenses#
This Part provides detail about appropriations for borrowing expenses. No departmental borrowing expense appropriations exist at present.
- Part 4.2 Non-Departmental Borrowing Expenses - The set of performance information is the same as that for non-departmental benefits and other expenses, except that conditions on use are no specified.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5 provides detail about appropriations for:
- Part 5.1 Departmental Other Expenses - It is uncommon for this category of appropriation to be utilised. In the few cases where it occurs, the performance information is the same as that for non-departmental other expense appropriations except for a summary of reporting mechanisms.
- Part 5.2 Non-Departmental Other Expenses- Information on other expenses incurred by the Crown covers intended impacts and outcomes, appropriation scope, expenses analysed by component, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, expected results and standards, any conditions on use, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of mechanisms for reporting actual performance to Parliament.
Part 6 - Details and Expectations of Capital Expenditure#
This Part provides further details about appropriations for capital expenditure.
- Part 6.1 Departmental Capital Expenditure - The purchase or development of assets by a department is made under a permanent appropriation authorised by section 24(1) of the PFA. Capital expenditure is defined in section 2 as the cost of assets acquired or developed, including tangible, intangible or financial assets, and any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventories. The appropriation appears in the Vote that contains appropriations that are the responsibility of the department's Responsible Minister.
- Information is provided on intended impacts and outcomes of the appropriation, its scope, expenditure analysed by standard asset categories, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, and expected results. The scope statement is in a standard form for all departments. The performance information relates to the department as a whole and is not limited to any specific capital injection.
- Part 6.2 Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure - Performance information for capital expenditure incurred by the Crown is the same as that for departmental capital expenditure except for not detailing asset categories and the addition of any conditions on use of the appropriation, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of the mechanism for reporting to Parliament.
- The scope statement indicates the form of interest or asset acquired by the Crown, such as a capital injection (equity), loan or shares.
The following table summarises the performance information that is required for a ‘standard' appropriation in each sub-part.
Standard Appropriations | Part 2.1 | Part 2.2 | Part 3.1 | Part 3.2 | Part 4.1 | Part 4.2 | Part 5.1 | Part 5.2 | Part 6.1 | Part 6.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For each sub-part: | ||||||||||
Intended impacts, outcomes or objectives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
For each appropriation: | ||||||||||
Scope of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Expenses and revenue | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Expenses | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A |
Capital expenditure | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ |
Reasons for change in appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Output performance measures and standards | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Expected results | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Conditions on use of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
Memorandum account | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Current and past policy initiatives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
Summary of service providers | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Reporting mechanism | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | N/A | √ |
Information on reasons for change, conditions on use, current and past policy initiatives, and reporting mechanisms appears where applicable or material. Memorandum accounts are relevant only in Part 2.1. Some variations exist for non-standard appropriations, including MCOAs in Parts 2.1 and 2.2 and MYAs in Parts 2.1, 2.2, 5.2 and 6.2. Furthermore performance information may not be available for some appropriations.
3 Statement of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
The third component of the Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations comprises the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department included in the sector, by reference to material already set out in Part 2.1 of Votes containing appropriations proposed to be used by the department.
4 Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
The fourth component of the Information Supporting the Estimates begins with a Statement of Common Accounting Policies applicable to all departments. The forecast financial statements for the forthcoming financial year for each department covered by the sector includes a:
- Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income
- Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds
- Forecast Statement of Financial Position
- Statement of Forecast Cash Flows
- Statement of Significant Assumptions.
Each department will include a Statement of Entity- Specific Accounting Policies detailing policies for any matters not addressed by the Statement of Common Accounting Policies (such as a “going concern” statement) or where its policies are more specific than the common policies (such as capitalisation thresholds and estimated useful lives of individual classes of assets). Notes to the Financial Statements provide additional details to assist interpretation of the accounts and to meet disclosure requirements outlined in legislation and accounting standards.
5 Statements of Intent of Departments#
The final component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents the Statements of Intent of the departments covered by each sector. These statements contain the information required by section 40 of the PFA. They focus on the medium term and generally cover:
- Nature and scope of the department's functions - A brief high-level description of the department's functions, addressing its role(s) and purpose and how it intends fulfilling them.
- Strategic direction - impacts and outcomes - A brief high-level overview of the department's strategic direction covering both the impacts and outcomes the department is seeking to achieve (or contribute to) and the strategic environment in which the department operates through, in particular, its responses to the government's priorities.
- Operating intentions - Information that describes how the department intends to achieve (or contribute to) those desired impacts and outcomes through its operations. This section should also include the main measures and standards the department will use to assess and demonstrate what it has achieved, including measures of outcome achievement, impact and cost effectiveness.
- Managing in a changeable operating environment - Information on the risks to achievement of the desired outcomes and priorities, and the department's mitigation strategies.
- Assessing organisational health and capability - The department's intentions for building and strengthening its internal capability, including its responses to the development goals for the State Services and its strategic approach to managing its asset base and forecast capital expenditure in the medium term. If capital expenditure is significant, it is in a separate section.
- Additional information and statutory reporting requirements - As required either by the responsible Minister or Minister of Finance, or by specific legislation.
Terms and Definitions#
The table below contains terms that are used in the Estimates and the Information Supporting the Estimates.
Appropriation | An appropriation is a parliamentary authorisation for the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure. |
---|---|
Appropriation scope | One of the defining terms of an appropriation that establishes limits on the activities for which the Crown or an Office of Parliament is authorised to incur expenses or capital expenditure under that appropriation. |
Capital expenditure | The cost of assets acquired or developed including any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventory. |
Crown revenue | Revenue earned on behalf of the Crown. These flows are accounted for as revenue to the Crown rather than as departmental revenue. |
DDA | Department-to-department appropriations, which are authorised by section 20(2) of the Public Finance Act 1989. |
Department | Generally references to Departments also include an Office of Parliament as provided in section 26E(4) of the Public Finance Act 1989. |
Expenses | Amounts consumed or losses of service potential or future economic benefits, other than those relating to capital withdrawals, in a financial year. [An accrual concept measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.] |
GST | Goods and services tax. Appropriations are stated GST exclusive. |
MCOA | Multi-class output expense appropriation. |
MYA | Multi-year appropriation. |
N/A | Not applicable. |
Outcomes | States or conditions of society, the economy or the environment, including changes in those states or conditions. |
Outputs | Goods or services supplied by departments and other entities to external parties. Outputs are a variety of types, including policy advice, administration of contracts and grants, and the provision of specific services. |
PFA | Public Finance Act 1989. |
PLA | Permanent Legislative Authority - the traditional term for an appropriation authorised for an indefinite period by legislation other than an Appropriation Act (also known as a permanent appropriation). |
Minister | The Minister responsible for specific appropriations being sought within a Vote. As several Ministers may now hold appropriations within a single Vote, each appropriation will have a tag (M1, M2 etc) identifying the Minister responsible for that line item. |
RDA | Revenue-dependent appropriations, which are authorised by section 21(1) of the PFA 1989. |
Responsible Minister | The Minister responsible for the financial performance of a department or Crown entity. In relation to an Office of Parliament, the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, and the Parliamentary Service, the Speaker is the Responsible Minister. |
Revenue from the Crown | Revenue earned by a department from the Crown for the provision of outputs to or on behalf of the Crown. These flows are accounted for as departmental revenue. Revenue from the Crown is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
Revenue from Others | Revenue earned by a department from other departments and from third parties. Revenue from other departments is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
Vote | A grouping of one or more appropriations that are the responsibility of one or more Ministers of the Crown and are administered by one department. |
Useful Links#
The suite of Budget 2010 documents can be accessed in the Budgets section of the website: www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2010. Documents providing guidance on the PFA and the public sector financial management system can be accessed in the Public Finance Overviews section of the Treasury's website: www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/publicfinance.
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Chatham Islands Council | Annual Report of the Chatham Islands Council |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual performance for each non-departmental other expenses appropriation.
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.2 - Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Communities are supported by fair and responsive local government and other organisations | Capital Investment - Lake Taupo |
Capital Investments - Lake Taupo (M49)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 34 | 34 | 34 |
Loan to the Auckland Transition Agency (M49)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 30,473 | 30,473 | 40,793 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in this appropriation is due to a higher level of funding in 2010/11.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Establishment of a single local authority for Auckland from 1 November 2010 | New measure | New measure | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Budget 2010 | Subject to a loan agreement being established between the Crown and the Auckland Transition Agency under Section 65L of the Public Finance Act 1989. Liability for the loan is transferred to the Auckland Council on 1 November 2010. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Loan Facility for The Auckland Transition Agency | 2009/10 | 23,073 | 11,293 | - | - | - |
Additional capital funding for Auckland Transition Agency | 2009/10 | 7,400 | 29,500 | - | - | - |
Local Government Debt Vehicle (M49)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 5,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
New appropriation with effect from 1 July 2010.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Successful establishment of an entity to act as a Single Debt Vehicle for Local Authority Borrowing that will enable local authorities to reduce their cost of borrowing. | New measure | New measure | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Budget 2010 | Subject to local authorities formally requesting an initial, repayable, contribution from the Crown. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Provision of capital funding to establish a single debt vehicle for local government borrowing | 2010/11 | - | 5,000 | - | - | - |
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Speaker of the House of Representatives (M78)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR PARLIAMENTARY COMMISSIONER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Speaker of the House of Representatives
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Speaker of the House of Representatives is responsible for appropriations in Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment for the 2010/11 financial year covering the following:
- a total of just under $2.600 million for providing reports and advice to the House of Representatives.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Objectives of the Vote
The Commissioner has seven statutory functions under the Environment Act to investigate environmental issues, processes, and public agencies. As an Officer of Parliament, the Commissioner has a unique opportunity to provide Parliament with independent advice in its consideration of any matters that may have an impact on the quality of the environment. The Commissioner is required to deliver one output, Reports and Advice. This output is produced through four areas of activity:
- working with Parliament through advice to select committees and inquiries for the House of Representatives, and through effectiveness, and accountability reporting
- reviewing and investigating through environmental investigations and targeted inquiries
- communicating and informing by monitoring environmental matters, engagement with stakeholders, presentation of investigations, and interaction with the media
- encouraging preventive measures and remedial actions for the protection of the environment, through the above activities.
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity
2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 2,477 | 2,804 | 2,051 | 2,230 | 2,490 | 2,490 | 2,340 | - | 2,340 | 2,340 | 2,340 | 2,340 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | - | - | 244 | 251 | 256 | 256 | 256 | - | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 |
Capital Expenditure | - | - | 56 | 598 | 66 | 66 | 71 | - | 71 | 72 | 72 | 72 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
2,477 | 2,804 | 2,351 | 3,079 | 2,812 | 2,812 | 2,667 | - | 2,667 | 2,668 | 2,668 | 2,668 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends
The departmental appropriations in Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, which are detailed in the Summary of Financial Activity above, show significant changes discussed briefly below.
In 2008 an operating capital swap resulted in a decrease of $450,000 for 2008/09 only. Outyear funding for operating expenses remained unchanged at $2.490 million.
In 2009 there was no increase in departmental appropriation.
In 2010 there was a decrease in departmental appropriation of $150,000 after the removal of the function to carry out an annual audit of the Electricity Commission. The Commission is to be disestablished as part of legislation before the House. The annual appropriation for 2010/11 for Vote Parliamentary Commission for the Environment, Output expense Reports and Advice will now be of $2.340 million.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses
Reports and Advice (M78)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,490 | 2,490 | 2,340 |
Revenue from Crown | 2,487 | 2,487 | 2,337 |
Revenue from Other | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
In 2010 there was a decrease in departmental appropriation of $150,000 after the removal of the function to carry out an annual audit of the Electricity Commission. The Commission is to be disestablished as part of legislation before the House. The annual appropriation for 2010/11 for Vote Parliamentary Commission for the Environment, Output expense Reports and Advice will now be of $2.340 million.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Evaluate outcomes from projects | 100% for major projects | 100% for major projects | 100% for major projects |
Content review and internal peer review | 100% of all reports and briefings | 100% of all reports and briefings | 100% of all reports and briefings |
External peer review for technical accuracy | 100% for major projects | 100% for major projects | 100% for major projects |
Advice to Parliament delivered within agreed timeframes | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Proportion of recommendations:
|
65% 100% |
65% 100% |
65% 100% |
All types of queries given initial response within 10 working days | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Complaints and inquiries resolved to completion within 9 months | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.1 - Departmental Other Expenses
Remuneration of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment PLA (M78)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 256 | 256 | 256 |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Replacement of office equipment. | Departmental capital. |
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment - Capital Expenditure PLA (M78)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 66 | 66 | 71 |
Intangibles | - | - | - |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
66 | 66 | 71 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 66 | 66 | 71 |
Intangibles | - | - | - |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
66 | 66 | 71 |
Statements of Forecast Service Performance#
The Statements of Forecast Service Performance of agencies included in the Environment Sector comprise the service performance information for all departmental output expense appropriations that are proposed to be used by those agencies. In this context, service performance information comprises the scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards for each class of outputs within those departmental appropriations, as set out in Part 2.1 of the Performance Information for Appropriations in Each Vote.
The following table identifies the classes of outputs incorporated in the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department and Office of Parliament in the Environment Sector.
Department | Composition of Statement of Forecast Service Performance |
---|---|
Department of Conservation | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Conservation. |
Ministry for the Environment |
The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in:
|
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the class of outputs within the departmental output expense appropriation in Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. |
Statement of Common Accounting Policies#
These accounting policies have been applied in the forecast financial statements of all departments and Offices of Parliament except as outlined in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies for individual departments or Offices of Parliament.
These forecast financial statements are prepared in accordance with section 41(1)(a)-(f) of the Public Finance Act 1989. The purpose of the forecast financial statements is to facilitate Parliament's consideration of appropriations for, and planned performance of, departments and offices of Parliament. Use of this information for other purposes may not be appropriate. It is not intended that these forecast financial statements be updated subsequent to publication.
Statement of Compliance
These forecast financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2010 comply with FRS-42 Prospective Financial Statements.
Specific Accounting Policies#
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these statements. These statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis. The measurement base applied is historical cost modified by the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities as identified in this statement of accounting policies.
The accrual basis of accounting has been used unless otherwise stated. These financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars, which is the entity's functional currency. All financial information presented has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
Judgements and Estimations
The preparation of forecast financial statements in conformity with FRS-42 requires judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and these variations may be material.
Revenue
Revenue is derived through the provision of outputs to the Crown and from services to third parties. Revenue is recognised in the forecast statement of financial performance when earned.
Leases
Operating Leases
Where substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor, leases are classified as operating leases.
Lease payments under operating leases are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Finance Leases
Leases which effectively transfer to the department substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the leased items are classified as finance leases. These are capitalised at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. The leased assets and the corresponding lease liabilities are recognised in the statement of financial position. The leased assets are depreciated over the period the department is expected to benefit from their use. The interest expense component of finance lease payments is recognised in the statement of financial performance.
Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, other than land and buildings, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Land and buildings are stated at fair value as determined by an independent registered valuer. Fair value is determined using market-based evidence. Land and buildings are revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that carrying value is not materially different from fair value at the end of the reporting period. Additions between revaluations are recorded at cost. Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis so as to allocate the cost (or valuation) of an item of property, plant and equipment, less any estimated residual value, over its estimated useful life.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Leasehold improvements are capitalised and the cost is amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Items under construction are not depreciated. The total cost of a capital project is transferred to the appropriate asset class on its completion and then depreciated.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets with finite useful lives (such as computer software) are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Amortisation is charged to the statement of financial performance on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested at least annually for impairment. Where there is an active market for an intangible asset, the asset is recorded at a revalued amount, being fair value less any subsequent accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash on hand and funds on deposit with banks with an original maturity of 3 months or less.
Debtors and Other Receivables
Debtors and other receivables are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate, less impairment charges. Allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired.
Inventories
Inventories held for sale or use in the production of goods and services on a commercial basis are recorded at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of purchased inventory is determined using the weighted average cost method.
Inventories held for distribution for public benefit purposes are recorded at cost (calculated using the weighted average cost method) adjusted when applicable for any loss of service potential. Where inventories are acquired at no cost, or for nominal consideration, the cost is the current replacement cost at the date of acquisition.
Employee Entitlements
Pension Liabilities
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution retirement plans are recognised in the statement of financial performance as they fall due.
Other Employee Entitlements
Employee entitlements to salaries and wages, annual leave, sick leave, long service leave, retiring leave and other similar benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance when they accrue to employees. Employee entitlements to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Long-term employee entitlements are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Termination Benefits
Termination benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance only when there is a demonstrable commitment to either terminate employment prior to normal retirement date or to provide such benefits as a result of an offer to encourage voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Other termination benefits are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Onerous Contracts
Where the benefits to be derived from a contract are lower than the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligation under the contract, a provision is recognised. The provision is stated at the present value of the future net cash outflows expected to be incurred in respect of the contract.
Foreign Currency
Foreign currency transactions are reported at the New Zealand dollar exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Statement of Cash Flows
The following are definitions of the terms used in the statement of cash flows:
- cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in transit, bank accounts and deposits with an original maturity of no more than three months
- investing activities are those activities relating to the acquisition and disposal of non-current assets
- financing activities comprise capital injections by, or repayment of capital to, the Crown, and
- operating activities include all transactions and other events that are not investing or financing activities.
Taxation
Departments and Offices of Parliament are exempt from income tax as public authorities. Accordingly no charge for income tax has been provided for.
Goods and Services Tax
These forecast financial statements are GST exclusive, except for receivables and payables in the statement of financial position, which are stated on a GST inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as input tax, then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense.
The net amount of GST owing to or from the Inland Revenue Department at balance date is included as part of receivables or payables (as appropriate) in the statement of financial position.
Commitments
Future expenses and liabilities to be incurred on contracts that have been entered into at balance date are disclosed as commitments to the extent that there are equally unperformed obligations.
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Contingent liabilities are disclosed if the possibility that they will crystallise is not remote. Contingent assets are disclosed if it is probable that the benefits will be realised.
Changes in Accounting Policies#
Any changes in accounting policies since the date of the last audited financial statements prepared under New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice are described in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies. The last audited financial statements (30 June 2009) were prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS (New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards) as appropriate for public benefit entities.
Forecast Financial Statements Department of Conservation#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2011
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 280,629 | 269,944 | 277,749 | 274,351 | |
Department(s) | 2,248 | 2,685 | 2,910 | 2,910 | |
Other revenue | 29,594 | 33,572 | 34,265 | 33,347 | |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 312,471 | 306,201 | 314,924 | 310,608 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 141,382 | 141,939 | 141,937 | 142,044 | |
Operating | 1 | 105,408 | 97,799 | 99,652 | 100,601 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 25,102 | 30,363 | 27,500 | 27,363 | |
Capital charge | 36,264 | 36,500 | 40,500 | 41,000 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 2,547 | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 310,703 | 306,601 | 309,589 | 311,008 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | (400) | (400) | 5,335 | (400) | |
Other comprehensive income | 1,568 | - | 1 | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 3,336 | (400) | 5,336 | (400) |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 336,269 | 442,524 | 429,719 | 433,693 | |
Revaluation reserve | 109,800 | 109,803 | 108,777 | 108,778 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 446,069 | 552,327 | 538,496 | 542,471 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 3,336 | (400) | 5,336 | (400) | |
Repayment of surplus | (4,445) | - | (1,935) | - | |
Capital contribution | 94,876 | 23,754 | 574 | 41,587 | |
Capital withdrawal | (1,340) | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 92,427 | 23,354 | 3,975 | 41,187 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 429,719 | 465,878 | 433,693 | 474,880 | |
Revaluation reserve | 108,777 | 109,803 | 108,778 | 108,778 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 538,496 | 575,681 | 542,471 | 583,658 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 40,327 | 26,169 | 12,871 | 25,053 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 50,218 | 45,375 | 49,197 | 45,828 | |
Prepayments | 1,193 | 1,276 | 1,193 | 1,193 | |
Inventories | 1,092 | 1,077 | 1,090 | 1,090 | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 92,830 | 73,897 | 64,351 | 73,164 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 2 | 494,290 | 532,722 | 518,362 | 543,305 |
Intangible assets | 3 | 7,493 | 6,669 | 6,832 | 9,129 |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 501,783 | 539,391 | 525,194 | 552,434 | |
Total Assets | 594,613 | 613,288 | 589,545 | 625,598 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 20,600 | 10,752 | 14,067 | 10,868 | |
Repayment of surplus | 4,445 | - | 1,935 | - | |
Employee entitlements | 12,913 | 13,154 | 12,912 | 12,912 | |
Other current liabilities | 2,734 | 2,262 | 2,735 | 2,735 | |
Total Current Liabilities | 40,692 | 26,168 | 31,649 | 26,515 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 15,425 | 11,439 | 15,425 | 15,425 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 15,425 | 11,439 | 15,425 | 15,425 | |
Total Liabilities | 56,117 | 37,607 | 47,074 | 41,940 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 429,719 | 465,878 | 433,693 | 474,880 | |
Revaluation reserve | 108,777 | 109,803 | 108,778 | 108,778 | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 538,496 | 575,681 | 542,471 | 583,658 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 594,613 | 613,288 | 589,545 | 625,598 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 284,622 | 275,058 | 279,191 | 278,081 | |
Department(s) | 1,640 | 2,685 | 4,034 | 2,910 | |
Other | 31,002 | 33,303 | 32,722 | 32,986 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (102,657) | (98,995) | (105,431) | (103,729) | |
Employees | (139,604) | (142,169) | (140,637) | (140,744) | |
Capital charge | (36,264) | (36,500) | (40,500) | (41,000) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | 1,097 | (447) | (4,053) | (2,371) | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 4 | 39,836 | 32,935 | 25,326 | 26,133 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 1,996 | - | - | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
5 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | (49,551) | (45,639) | (46,854) | (43,503) | |
Intangible assets | - | (3,500) | (1,483) | (5,100) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (47,555) | (49,139) | (48,337) | (48,603) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 18,733 | 18,754 | - | 36,587 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (2,447) | (810) | (4,445) | (1,935) | |
Capital withdrawal | (1,340) | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | 14,946 | 17,944 | (4,445) | 34,652 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 7,227 | 1,740 | (27,456) | 12,182 | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 33,100 | 24,429 | 40,327 | 12,871 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 40,327 | 26,169 | 12,871 | 25,053 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and the Estimates of Appropriation relating to Vote Conservation presented by the Government. They reflect decisions made by the Government during the 2010/11 budget process up to the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions upon which this financial information has been prepared are as follows:
- The department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year (primary underlying assumption).
- Personnel and operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2009/10 is used as the opening position for the 2010/11 forecasts.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2009/10 actual financial statements include unforeseen events such as fires or floods on conservation land.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Department of Conservation has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Department of Conservation, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Department of Conservation is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Department of Conservation is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Director-General and Chief Financial Officer on 19 April 2010. The Chief Financial Officer is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, plant and equipment
Apart from land and buildings the following classes of assets are revalued at least every five years by independent registered valuers. These assets are stated at fair value using the following methods:
- Visitor assets - optimised depreciated replacement cost.
- Vessels - market-based evidence where available, or depreciated replacement cost.
- Infrastructure assets - optimised depreciated replacement cost.
- Fencing assets - optimised depreciated replacement cost.
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
- IT Equipment/Hardware - $5,000.
- All other property, plant and equipment - $5,000.
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
Capital Item | Estimated useful life |
---|---|
Buildings | 20-40 years |
Furniture, computers, other office equipment | 5 years |
Vehicles | 6 years and 8 months (With a 30% salvage value) |
Plant and field equipment | 10 years |
Radio equipment | 5-10 years |
Other Categories | |
Visitor Assets | |
Campsites and amenity areas | 10-50 years |
Signs | 10 years |
Tracks | 7.5 - 15 years |
Roads (surface only) | 25-50 years |
Buildings | 20-50 years |
Structures | 25-100 years |
Vessels | |
Engines | 10 years |
Hulls | 15 years |
Infrastructure | |
Industrial fire equipment | 45 years |
Landscaping | 44 years |
Roads | 10-100 years |
Sewerage works | 64 years |
Solid waste works | 38 years |
Stream control | 98 years |
Water supply | 60 years |
Fences | |
Fences | 25-40 years |
Intangible Assets
Capitalisation thresholds applied are:
- Purchased software - $5,000.
- Internally developed software - $5,000.
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
Capital Item | Estimated useful life |
---|---|
Purchased software | 5 years |
Internally developed software | 5 years |
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Consultants' fees | 2,538 | 1,942 | 1,976 | 2,004 |
Overseas travel | 629 | 1,045 | 1,063 | 1,078 |
Domestic travel | 4,641 | 6,930 | 5,374 | 5,451 |
Other | 97,600 | 87,882 | 91,239 | 92,068 |
105,408 | 97,779 | 99,652 | 100,601 |
Note 2 - Property, plant and equipment#
Land $000 |
Buildings $000 |
Leasehold improvements $000 |
Plant & equipment $000 |
Other $000 |
Total $000 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost or revaluation | ||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2010 | 14,286 | 145,734 | - | 134,520 | 674,801 | 969,341 |
Additions by purchase | - | 4,600 | - | 4,563 | 35,340 | 44,503 |
Additions internally developed | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Transfer from Crown | 5,000 | - | - | - | 5,000 | |
Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance as at 30 June 2011 | 19,286 | 150,334 | - | 139,083 | 710,141 | 1,018,844 |
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses | ||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2010 | - | 78,273 | - | 37,512 | 335,194 | 450,979 |
Depreciation expense | - | 1,990 | - | 7,792 | 14,778 | 24,560 |
Eliminate on disposal | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Eliminate on revaluation | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Transfers between classes | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Impairment losses | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance as at 30 June 2011 | - | 80,263 | - | 45,304 | 349,972 | 475,539 |
Carrying amount as at 30 June 2011 | 19,286 | 70,071 | - | 93,779 | 360,169 | 543,305 |
Note 3 - Intangible assets#
Acquired software $000 |
Internally generated software $000 |
Other $000 |
Total $000 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Cost | ||||
Balance as at 1 July 2010 | 2,462 | 13,220 | - | 15,682 |
Additions by purchase | 1,000 | - | - | 1,000 |
Additions internally developed | - | 4,100 | - | 4,100 |
Disposals | - | - | - | - |
Balance as at 30 June 2011 | 3,462 | 17,320 | - | 20,782 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses | ||||
Balance as at 1 July 2010 | 1,064 | 7,786 | - | 8,850 |
Amortisation expense | 400 | 2,403 | - | 2,803 |
Disposals | - | - | - | - |
Impairment losses | - | - | - | - |
Balance as at 30 June 2011 | 1,464 | 10,189 | - | 11,653 |
Carrying amount as at 30 June 2011 | 1,998 | 7,131 | - | 9,129 |
Note 4 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus/(deficit) | 1,768 | (400) | 5,335 | (400) |
Add/ (less) non-cash items | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation expense | 25,102 | 30,363 | 27,500 | 27,363 |
Other non-cash items | 2,547 | - | - | - |
Total non-cash items | 27,649 | 30,363 | 27,500 | 27,363 |
Add/ (less) items classified as investing or financing activities | ||||
(Gains)/ losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - |
Total items classified as investing or financing activities | - | - | - | - |
Add/ (less) movements in working capital items | ||||
(Inc)/ Dec in receivables and prepayments | 4,808 | 4,845 | 1,021 | 3,369 |
(Inc)/ Dec in inventories | (15) | - | 2 | - |
(Inc)/ Dec in creditors and payables | 2,608 | (1,873) | (11,481) | (2,264) |
Inc/ (Dec) in provisions | 3,018 | - | 2,949 | (1,935) |
Net movements in working capital items | 10,419 | 2,972 | (7,509) | (830) |
Net cash from operating activities | 39,836 | 32,935 | 25,326 | 26,133 |
Note 5 - Capital expenditure#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Land & Buildings | 5,512 | 4,190 | 6,116 | 4,600 |
Plant and Equipment | 7,259 | 8,779 | 5,023 | 4,563 |
Other | ||||
Visitor Assets | 29,523 | 27,700 | 30,400 | 29,090 |
Motor vehicles and vessels | 4,593 | 4,800 | 4,498 | 4,450 |
Furniture and office equipment | 2,664 | 170 | 817 | 800 |
Total other | 36,780 | 32,670 | 35,715 | 34,340 |
Intangibles | - | 3,500 | 1,483 | 5,100 |
Total capital expenditure | 49,551 | 49,139 | 48,337 | 48,603 |
Forecast Financial Statements Ministry for the Environment#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2011
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 63,570 | 68,475 | 58,738 | 62,883 | |
Department(s) | 544 | 426 | 626 | 430 | |
Other revenue | 1,906 | 4,134 | 6,139 | 16,856 | |
Gains | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 66,020 | 73,040 | 65,508 | 80,174 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 27,983 | 27,689 | 28,589 | 27,689 | |
Operating | 1 | 35,000 | 43,462 | 35,256 | 50,650 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 980 | 1,501 | 1,275 | 1,381 | |
Capital charge | 383 | 383 | 383 | 449 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | 676 | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 65,022 | 73,035 | 65,503 | 80,169 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 998 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 3,712 | 5,101 | 5,101 | 5,992 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 3,712 | 5,101 | 5,101 | 5,992 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 998 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Repayment of surplus | (998) | (5) | (5) | (5) | |
Capital contribution | 1,389 | 891 | 891 | 10 | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 1,389 | 891 | 891 | 10 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 5,101 | 5,992 | 5,992 | 6,002 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 5,101 | 5,992 | 5,992 | 6,002 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 8,197 | 12,224 | 13,532 | 14,338 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 4,312 | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
Prepayments | 182 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 12,691 | 12,824 | 14,132 | 14,938 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 1,557 | 1,432 | 1,235 | 1,116 | |
Intangible assets | 1,835 | 2,432 | 2,407 | 1,730 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 3,392 | 3,864 | 3,642 | 2,846 | |
Total Assets | 16,083 | 16,688 | 17,774 | 17,784 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 6,546 | 8,340 | 8,340 | 8,340 | |
Repayment of surplus | 998 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Employee entitlements | 2,401 | 1,522 | 2,401 | 2,401 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 9,945 | 9,867 | 10,746 | 10,746 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 1,037 | 829 | 1,036 | 1,036 | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | 1,037 | 829 | 1,036 | 1,036 | |
Total Liabilities | 10,982 | 10,696 | 11,782 | 11,782 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 5,101 | 5,992 | 5,992 | 6,002 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 5,101 | 5,992 | 5,992 | 6,002 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 16,083 | 16,688 | 17,774 | 17,784 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 60,153 | 68,475 | 62,155 | 62,883 | |
Department(s) | 652 | 426 | 713 | 430 | |
Other | 2,089 | 4,208 | 6,447 | 16,856 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (36,233) | (42,815) | (33,896) | (50,813) | |
Employees | (26,724) | (27,526) | (28,427) | (27,526) | |
Capital charge | (383) | (383) | (383) | (449) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | (626) | - | 461 | - | |
Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | (1,072) | 2,385 | 7,070 | 1,381 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (370) | (375) | (242) | (375) | |
Intangible assets | (1,349) | (1,111) | (1,391) | (210) | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (1,719) | (1,481) | (1,628) | (580) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | 1,389 | 891 | 891 | 10 | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (8,889) | (5) | (998) | (5) | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | (7,500) | 886 | (107) | 5 | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | (10,291) | 1,790 | 5,335 | 806 | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 18,488 | 10,434 | 8,197 | 13,532 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 8,197 | 12,224 | 13,532 | 14,338 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year focusing on the Government's priorities. These priorities include the reform of the Resource Management Act, implementation of the Emissions Trading Scheme, improving New Zealand's freshwater management, and establishment of the Environmental Protection Authority.
- Personnel costs are based on 320 full time equivalent staff which takes into account staff turnover.
- Operating costs are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
- The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revisions and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
- Estimated year end information for 2009/10 is used as the opening position for the 2010/11 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 1 April 2010.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2010/11 actual financial statements include:
- Changes to the baseline budget through new initiatives, or technical adjustments.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Ministry for the Environment has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Ministry for the Environment, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Ministry for the Environment is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Ministry for the Environment is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Secretary for the Environment on 15 April 2010. The Secretary for the Environment is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Rental Income
Rental income is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives granted are recognised evenly over the term of the lease as a reduction in total rental income.
Leases
Finance leases
The Ministry for the Environment is not permitted to enter into finance leases under the Public Finance Act 1989.
Expenses
Grants/subsidies
Where grants and subsidies are discretionary until payment, the expense is recognised when the payment is made. Otherwise, the expense is recognised when the specific criteria have been fulfilled and notice has been given to the Crown.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
- IT equipment/hardware - $1,500.
- All other property, plant and equipment - $1,500.
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
- Furniture and fittings - 5 to 8 years.
- Office equipment - 5 years.
- Computer hardware - 3 to 4 years.
Intangible Assets
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
- Purchased software - $1,500.
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
- Purchased software - 3 years.
- Purchased software licences - 3 to 8 years.
Cost Allocation
The Ministry derives the costs of outputs using a cost allocation system. Direct costs are charged directly to the Ministry's outputs. Indirect costs are charged to outputs based on a primary cost driver of salaried full-time equivalent staff.
'Direct costs' are those costs directly attributed to an output. 'Indirect costs' are those costs that cannot be directly associated with a specific output.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Operating expenses include: | ||||
Consultants (including contractors) fees | 20,591 | 21,843 | 12,411 | 14,350 |
Audit fees | 154 | 145 | 135 | 140 |
International travel | 1,176 | 1,200 | 651 | 1,200 |
Domestic travel | 1,234 | 1,650 | 1,049 | 1,825 |
Training | 438 | 800 | 427 | 800 |
Recruitment costs | 357 | 350 | 312 | 400 |
Network operating costs | 911 | 1,450 | 1,026 | 1,450 |
Operating leases and property costs | 2,039 | 3,200 | 2,938 | 3,250 |
Contributions and sponsorship | 3,123 | 4,928 | 3,036 | 1,591 |
Administration of the Waste Act Recoverable Costs | - | 2,260 | 1,385 | 1,306 |
Administration of the RMA Call-ins and applications to the EPA Recoverable Costs | - | - | 5,667 | 16,035 |
Other | 4,977 | 5,636 | 6,219 | 8,303 |
Total | 35,000 | 43,462 | 35,256 | 50,650 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus / (deficit) | 998 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Add / (less) non-cash items | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation expense | 980 | 1,501 | 1,275 | 1,381 |
Total non-cash items |
980 | 1,501 | 1,275 | 1,381 |
Add / (less) items classified as investing or financing activities | ||||
(Gains) / losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | 679 | (5) | (5) | (5) |
Total items classified as investing or financing activities |
679 | (5) | (5) | (5) |
Add / (less) movements in working capital items | ||||
(Inc) / Dec in debtors and other receivables | (3,754) | 74 | 4,273 | - |
(Inc) / Dec in prepayments | (28) | - | 82 | - |
Inc / (Dec) in creditors and other payables | (1,033) | 810 | 1,440 | - |
Inc / (Dec) in employee entitlements | 880 | - | - | - |
Net movements in working capital items |
(3,935) | 884 | 5,795 | - |
Add / (less) movements in non-current liabilities | ||||
Inc / (Dec) in employee entitlements | 206 | - | - | - |
Net cash from operating activities | (1,072) | 2,385 | 7,070 | 1,381 |
Forecast Financial Statements Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2011
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
Crown | 2,829 | 2,738 | 2,743 | 2,593 | |
Department(s) | - | - | - | - | |
Other revenue | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
Gains | - | - | - | - | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Total Income | 2,829 | 2,741 | 2,746 | 2,596 | |
Expenses |
|||||
Personnel | 1,384 | 1,726 | 1,466 | 1,527 | |
Operating | 1 | 954 | 851 | 1,116 | 930 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 97 | 117 | 117 | 92 | |
Capital charge | 46 | 47 | 47 | 47 | |
Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | - | - | - | |
Total Expenses | 2,481 | 2,741 | 2,746 | 2,596 | |
Net Surplus / (Deficit) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
Total Comprehensive Income | 348 | - | - | - |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
General funds | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
Comprehensive income for the period | 348 | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | (256) | - | - | - | |
Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other | (92) | - | - | - | |
Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | - | - | - | - | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
General funds | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 547 | 204 | 260 | 319 | |
Debtors and other receivables | 1 | - | - | - | |
Prepayments | 14 | - | - | - | |
Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Assets | 562 | 204 | 260 | 319 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | 472 | 469 | 443 | 406 | |
Intangible assets | 77 | 18 | 55 | 30 | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non- current Assets | 549 | 487 | 498 | 436 | |
Total Assets | 1,111 | 691 | 758 | 755 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
Creditors and other payables | 158 | 30 | 88 | 80 | |
Repayment of surplus | 256 | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | 83 | 47 | 56 | 61 | |
Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Current Liabilities | 497 | 77 | 144 | 141 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
Employee entitlements | - | - | - | - | |
Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Non-current Liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
Total Liabilities | 497 | 77 | 144 | 141 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
General funds | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 | |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
Total Taxpayers' Funds | 614 | 614 | 614 | 614 | |
Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 1,111 | 691 | 758 | 755 |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note | Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Crown | 2,829 | 2,738 | 2,743 | 2,593 | |
Department(s) | - | - | - | - | |
Other | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
Suppliers | (954) | (851) | (1,171) | (897) | |
Employees | (1,348) | (1,726) | (1,493) | (1,522) | |
Capital charge | (46) | (47) | (47) | (47) | |
Goods and services tax (net) | - | - | - | - | |
Other operating activities | (128) | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Operating Activities | 353 | 117 | 35 | 130 | |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment | (487) | (66) | (66) | (71) | |
Intangible assets | (111) | - | - | - | |
Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Investing Activities | (598) | (66) | (66) | (71) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
Repayment of surplus | - | - | (256) | - | |
Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
Net Cash from Financing Activities | - | - | (256) | - | |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | (245) | 51 | (287) | 59 | |
Cash at the beginning of the year | 792 | 153 | 547 | 260 | |
Cash at the end of the year | 547 | 204 | 260 | 319 |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of outputs agreed with the speaker of the House of Representatives and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised. The main assumptions are as follows:
- The Commissioner's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Personnel costs are based on 18 staff positions (17.8 full time equivalents).
- Operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2009/10 is used as the opening position for the 2010/11 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 1 July 2009.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2010/11 actual financial statements include technical adjustments or changes to the Permanent Legislative Authority.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by Dr Jan Wright, Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment on 13 April 2010. The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, Plant and Equipment
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
- IT equipment / hardware - $1,000.
- All other property, plant and equipment - $1,000.
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
- Leasehold improvements (office fit-out) - 10 years (10%).
- IT equipment / hardware - 4 years (25%).
- Furniture, fittings and fixtures - 10 years (10%).
- Other office equipment - 5 years (20%).
Intangible Assets
Capitalisation thresholds applied are:
- Purchased software - $1,000.
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
- Purchased software - 3 years (33%).
- Developed software - 4 years (25%).
Cost Allocation
The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment has one output only. All costs are allocated directly to that output.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Audit fees | 19 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
Operating lease payments | 165 | 242 | 242 | 242 |
Advertising and publicity | 4 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Consultancy | 359 | 249 | 485 | 485 |
Maintenance | 93 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
Other | 290 | 232 | 229 | 229 |
Total |
930 | 851 | 1084 | 1084 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2011#
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
In 2009 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus/(deficit) | 257 | - | - | - |
Add/(less) non-cash items: | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation expense | 113 | 117 | 117 | 117 |
Total non-cash items | 370 | 117 | 117 | 117 |
Add/(less) items classified as investing or financing activities: | ||||
(Gains)/losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 8 | - | - | - |
Add/(less) movements in working capital items: | ||||
(Inc)/dec in debtors and other receivables | 51 | - | (14) | (16) |
(Inc)/dec in prepayments | 40 | - | (31) | - |
Inc/(dec) in creditors and other payables | (195) | - | (10) | 8 |
Inc/(dec) in provisions | - | - | - | - |
Inc/(dec) in employee entitlements | 12 | - | (27) | (5) |
Net movements in working capital items | (84) | - | (82) | 13 |
Net cash from operating activities |
286 | 117 | 35 | 130 |
Ministerial Statements of Responsibility#
Each of us is satisfied that the information on future operating intentions provided by our respective departments and included in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Environment Sector is in accordance with sections 38, 40 and 41 of the Public Finance Act 1989 and is consistent with the policies and performance expectations of the government.
Hon Dr Nick Smith 19 April 2010 |
Hon Kate Wilkinson 19 April 2010 |
Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility#
Ministry for the Environment
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Environment Sector relating to the Ministry for the Environment and for the Votes for which the Ministry for the Environment is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Ministry for the Environment's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2010/11 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Dr Paul Reynolds 16 April 2010 |
Rochelle Davis 16 April 2010 |
Department of Conservation
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Environment Sector relating to the Department of Conservation and for the Vote for which the Department of Conservation is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Department of Conservation's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2010/11 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Alastair Morrison 16 April 2010 |
Christeen Mackenzie 16 April 2010 |
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Environment Sector relating to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment and for the Vote for which the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2010/11 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Dr Jan Wright 16 April 2010 |
Sarah Clark 16 April 2010 |
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Climate Change#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister for Climate Change Issues (M12)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry for the Environment
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Minister for the Environment
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister for Climate Change Issues is responsible for appropriations in Vote Climate Change for the 2010/11 financial year covering the following:
- a total of nearly $29 million over the period of four years for the development of a national carbon accounting system
- a total of nearly $12 million for policy advice in relation to international negotiations under the Kyoto Protocol, development and implementation of the Emissions Trading Scheme and other climate change policy measures
- a total of nearly $1,034 million for the allocation of New Zealand emission units to the NZ economy
- a total of $300,000 for New Zealand's contribution to the Climate Change Development Fund to support international projects addressing climate change impacts
- a total of $127,000 for New Zealand's contribution to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- a total of nearly $8 million for the issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative participants, and
- a total of over $2 million for the purchase of Projects to Reduce Emissions (PRE) emission units by the Crown from the PRE portfolio.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations
Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
---|---|---|
Investing in productive infrastructure, removing red tape and improving regulation | Unlocking resources (Statement to Parliament February 2010) | Policy Advice - Climate Change (M12) Allocation of New Zealand Units (M12) Climate Change Development Fund (M12) Framework Convention on Climate Change (M12) Issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative Participants (M12) Kyoto Protocol - Forecast Liability (M12) Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (M12) Purchase of PRE Units (M12) |
Supporting business innovation and trade | Constructive contributor to global efforts to secure an international climate change agreement (Statement to Parliament February 2010) | Policy Advice - Climate Change (M12) |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity
2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 24,458 | 28,489 | 39,607 | 21,068 | 21,167 | 19,567 | 20,894 | - | 20,894 | 20,494 | 19,794 | 14,175 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 117,640 | 6,132 | 10,448 | 17,237 | 144,471 | 143,064 | - | 1,042,218 | 1,042,218 | 387,213 | 745,269 | 827,238 |
Capital Expenditure | 1,242 | 1,221 | 2,000 | 140 | 2,269 | 1,065 | - | 2,248 | 2,248 | 1,231 | 1,252 | - |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
143,340 | 35,842 | 52,055 | 38,445 | 167,907 | 163,696 | 20,894 | 1,044,466 | 1,065,360 | 408,938 | 766,315 | 841,413 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | 368,103 | 809,798 | 46,060 | 46,060 | N/A | 377,539 | 377,539 | 378,456 | 579,088 | 826,811 |
Capital Receipts | 1,226 | 1,252 | 1,377 | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
1,226 | 1,252 | 369,480 | 809,798 | 46,060 | 46,060 | N/A | 377,539 | 377,539 | 378,456 | 579,088 | 826,811 |
Analysis of Significant Trends
Part 1.4 - Reconciliation of Changes in Appropriation Structure#
2009/10 Appropriations in the 2009/10 Structure |
2009/10 (Current) $000 |
Appropriations to which Expenses (or Capital Expenditure) have been Moved from or to |
Amount Moved $000 |
2009/10 Appropriations in the 2010/11 Structure |
2009/10 (Restated) $000 |
2010/11 $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Departmental Output Expenses |
||||||
Carbon Monitoring Programme | - | Transferred to: Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (Change in title only) |
- | Land Use and Carbon Analysis System | - | - |
Explanations of the reasons for changing the appropriation structure are noted in the details of each appropriation in Parts 2-6.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: National and international reporting requirements are met. |
Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (M12) |
End outcomes: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use natural resources sustainably. Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. |
Policy Advice - Climate Change (M12) |
Impacts: New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions meet international agreements in an economically efficient and environmentally effective way. Appropriate recognition of New Zealand's interests in negotiations on future climate change action by the international community. Increased community and infrastructure resilience to climate change and weather related events. The evidence base for providing a clear picture of New Zealand's environmental performance, incorporating social and economic perspectives, is strengthened. |
|
For further information on the intended impacts, outcomes and objectives of the departmental output expense appropriations please see the Statement of Intent for the Ministry for the Environment. |
Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (M12)
Scope of Appropriation and Expenses
Type, Title, Scope and Period of Appropriations | Appropriations, Adjustments and Use | $000 |
---|---|---|
Departmental Output Expenses |
||
Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (M12)This appropriation is limited to developing a national carbon accounting system that will contribute to meeting of New Zealand's greenhouse gas reporting obligations under the Kyoto Protocol and the UNFCCC. Commences: 1 July 2010 Expires: 30 June 2014 |
Original Appropriation | 28,981 |
Adjustments for 2008/09 | - | |
Adjustments to 2009/10 | - | |
Adjusted Appropriation | 28,981 | |
Actual to 2008/09 Year End | - | |
Estimated Actual for 2009/10 | - | |
Estimated Actual for 2010/11 | 9,300 | |
Estimated Appropriation Remaining | 19,681 |
Revenue
Budget $000 |
|
---|---|
Revenue from the Crown to end of 2010/11 | 9,300 |
Revenue from Others to end of 2010/11 | - |
Total Revenue | 9,300 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation was established during the year to replace the Carbon Monitoring Programme.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Land use and Land Use Change and Forestry portion of National Inventory Report is completed in accordance with UN guidance and tabled by 15 April each year. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Developing a national carbon accounting system that will contribute to meeting of New Zealand's greenhouse gas reporting obligations under the Kyoto Protocol and the UNFCCC. | 2010/11 | - | 9,300 | 8,900 | 8,200 | 2,581 |
Policy Advice - Climate Change (M12)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 12,344 | 11,344 | 11,594 |
Revenue from Crown | 12,289 | 11,289 | 11,539 |
Revenue from Other | 55 | 55 | 55 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in the appropriation is due to the reduction in funding for the Review of the Emissions Trading Scheme from 2010/11 and the discontinuation of the Carbon Neutral Public Service programme.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Implementing New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme: |
|||
Regulations for the waste and synthetic gases sector are complete. | N/A | N/A | 30 September 2010 |
All free allocation of emission units to industrial activities and fishing quota owners complete. | N/A | N/A | May 2011 |
Advise on New Zealand's international negotiating position under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol, including post-2012 commitments: |
|||
Percentage of international submissions and negotiating milestones for New Zealand's international position on climate change that meet required deadlines. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Project and report New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions and removals for the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol and beyond: |
|||
New Zealand's annual greenhouse gas inventory is accepted by international institutions as meeting UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol reporting requirements. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Projected emissions meet financial reporting standards. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
All policy outputs: |
|||
Percentage of advice that recommends actions for the Minister or Cabinet. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Percentage of advice that is certified by managers, as part of the sign-out process, as meeting the quality standards (below). | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Percentage of Regulatory Impact Statements that go through independent quality assurance processes. | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of all Regulatory Impact Statements that fully meet quality assurance criteria. | N/A | 80% | At least 80% |
Ministerial servicing: |
|||
Complete parliamentary questions within required timeframes and quality standards. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Complete ministerial correspondence within agreed timeframes. | 95% | 90% | 95% |
The policy advice and analysis:
- identifies the problem, relevant options, costs and benefits, and risks
- is rigorous, logical, factually accurate and provides supporting evidence
- demonstrates that it is based on appropriate consultation and engagement across government and with affected parties
- is practical, action-oriented and considers implementation
- demonstrates an understanding of the needs of the target audience
- is clear, concise, professional and presented in plain language, and
- is provided within agreed timeframes and budgets.
Note - All aspects of the standards may not apply to specific pieces of policy advice, given considerations of urgency or the particular nature of the advice to be provided. For instance, some of our work is second-opinion advice on other departments' proposals often undertaken under tight time pressures.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Review of the Emissions Trading Scheme. | 2009/10 | 2,100 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,600 |
Ongoing NZETS Policy Development, International Negotiations and Linkages to ETS. | 2009/10 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 |
Implementation of Climate Change Adaptation Measures. | 2008/09 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Moving the Public Sector towards Carbon Neutrality (now discontinued). | 2007/08 | 2,100 | - | - | - | - |
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions meet international agreements in an economically efficient and environmentally effective way. |
Allocation of New Zealand Units (M12) |
End outcome: Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impact: Increased community and infrastructure resilience to climate change and weather related events. |
Climate Change Development Fund (M12) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: Appropriate recognition of New Zealand's interests in negotiations on future climate change action by the international community. |
Framework Convention on Climate Change (M12) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions meet international agreements in an economically efficient and environmentally effective way. |
Issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative Participants (M12) |
Allocation of New Zealand Units (M12)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 139,648 | 139,648 | 1,033,977 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This increase in appropriation is due to the implementation of an intensity-based approach to free allocation to emissions-intensive, trade exposed industries, and allocation to the fishing and forestry sectors. This appropriation was re-forecast to be in line with the preliminary projected balance of emissions units including changes to underlying assumptions during the first commitment period (2008-2012) of the Kyoto Protocol (also known as the net position report). This included the impact of changes in assumptions underlying the Emissions Trading Scheme, including carbon price and an increase in the estimated uptake of post-1989 foresters.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
All who are eligible under the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme and claim an allocation receive New Zealand Units. | 1 sector | 1 sector | 3 sectors |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Changes to reflect the increased uptake in relation to post-1989 forestry. | 2009/10 | 100,000 | 500,000 | - | (223,000) | - |
Changes from moderated Emissions Trading Scheme to implement intensity-based allocation to industry. | 2009/10 | - | (72,000) | (70,000) | (35,000) | - |
Changes from moderated Emissions Trading Scheme for allocation to the fishing sector. | 2009/10 | - | 4,000 | - | - | - |
A New Zealand Emission Trading Scheme 2007 Decisions. | 2008/09 | 477,000 | 477,000 | 477,000 | 477,000 | - |
Climate Change Development Fund (M12)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 300 | 300 | 300 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Percentage of funding distributed to international projects addressing climate change according to priority criteria (leverage, impact, continuity, consistency, visibility). | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Framework Convention on Climate Change (M12)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 227 | 227 | 127 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is due to an additional contribution finishing at the end of 2009/10.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
New Zealand's financial commitment to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is met. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative Participants (M12)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 4,296 | 2,889 | 7,814 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation in 2010/11 reflects an allowance for forecast changes in exchange rates and carbon prices for NZ AAUs to be claimed by Permanent Forest Sink Initiative participants in that financial year.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
All eligible participants in the Permanent Forest Sink Initiative that claim them, receive New Zealand Assigned Amount Units for increases in carbon stocks within their eligible forests covenanted under the initiative. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Regulations | Eligibility criteria |
---|---|
Forest (Permanent Forest Sink) Regulations 2007 under the Forests Act 1949. | Eligibility criteria for participants are set out in sections 3 to 5 of the Forests (Permanent Forest Sink) Regulations 2007 (SR 2007/354) (as at 14 April 2008). |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appropriations for the Issue of NZ AAUs under the Permanent Forest Sink Initiative. | 2008/09 | 3,437 | 6,250 | 9,062 | 11,875 | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Allocation of Units | Section 32A Report |
Contribution to Climate Change Development Fund | Not required |
Framework Convention on Climate Change | Not required |
Issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative participants | Section 32A Report |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual performance for each non-departmental other expenses appropriation.
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.2 - Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions meet international agreements in an economically efficient and environmentally effective way. |
Purchase of PRE Units (M12) |
Purchase of PRE Units (M12)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,269 | 1,065 | 2,248 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is due to the timing of the purchase of PRE units under the committed contracts which span into outyears beyond the final year of funding.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Purchase of emission units from Projects to Reduce Emissions (PRE) participants within the requirements of sale and purchase agreements. | N/A | 28,392 units | 56,679 units |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchase of up to 800,000 PRE Emission Units. | 2008/09 | 3,500 | 3,500 | - | - | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Allocation of Units | Section32A Report |
Contribution to Climate Change Development Fund | Not required |
Framework Convention on Climate Change | Not required |
Issue of New Zealand Assigned Amount Units to Permanent Forest Sink Initiative participants | Section 32A Report |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual results for each non-departmental capital expenditure appropriation.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Conservation#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Conservation (M16)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Department of Conservation
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION: Minister of Conservation
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Conservation is responsible for appropriations in the Vote for the 2010/11 financial year covering the following:
- working with communities to protect natural and historic resources ($15 million)
- services to control weed and animal pests on lands administered by the department in relation to regional pest management strategies ($3 million)
- the protection and conservation management of historic heritage ($5.603 million)
- management of natural heritage including the maintenance, restoration and protection of ecosystems, habitats and species ($158.737 million)
- recreational facilities and services, and the management of business concessions ($128.908 million)
- policy advice, services to the Minister of Conservation and statutory bodies, and provision of statutory planning ($5.606 million)
- identification and implementation of protection for natural and historic places, management services of natural and historic places, and funding for projects for the New Zealand Biodiversity funds ($33.200 million)
- a total of $769,000 for assistance to the Southland District Council for additional community infrastructure arising from increased visitor numbers
- a total of $3.433 million for other expenses to be incurred by the Crown, and
- departmental capital expenditure of $49.603 million and non-departmental capital expenditure of $19.347 million.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations
Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
---|---|---|
Building a Growing Economy | New Zealanders gain environmental, social and economic benefits from healthy functioning ecosystems, from recreation opportunities, and from living our history | Management of Natural Heritage |
Management of Historic Heritage | ||
Regional Pest Management Strategy | ||
Management of Recreational Opportunities | ||
Recreational Opportunities Review | ||
Conservation with Community | ||
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning |
Objectives of the Vote
The Department of Conservation (DOC) is the central government organisation charged with promoting conservation of the natural and historic heritage of New Zealand on behalf of, and for the benefit of, present and future New Zealanders.
Much of DOC's work takes place on the more than 8 million hectares of conservation land and 33 marine reserves (covering almost 1.28 million hectares), and 6 marine mammal sanctuaries that it manages on behalf of New Zealanders. The conservation land makes up about one-third of the country, and includes national parks, high country parks, forest parks, offshore and subantarctic islands, and historic sites.
DOC is responsible for encouraging recreation opportunities on the lands and waters it manages. To that end, it provides and manages historic sites and visitor facilities, including walking, biking and four-wheel-drive tracks, huts, campsites and visitor centres.
DOC works within the statutory concessions framework to authorise tourism operators and other third party activities and uses on public conservation lands and waters. These include grazing, mining, and telecommunication sites.
Some of DOC's functions go beyond the boundaries of public conservation lands and waters. It protects marine mammals, indigenous freshwater fisheries, recreational fisheries and freshwater habitats, and is responsible for conserving indigenous wildlife wherever it lives. It advocates generally for the conservation of natural and historic resources, provides conservation information, and promotes the economic, environmental and social benefits of conservation.
DOC works across the central government sector, primarily but not exclusively through the natural resources sector group. It works with tangata whenua, landowners, regional and local government, businesses, science providers, recreation, outdoor and conservation organisations, and community groups.
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity
2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 274,925 | 290,217 | 316,206 | 363,264 | 330,681 | 323,289 | 317,308 | 33,969 | 351,277 | 332,736 | 336,531 | 338,662 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 8,852 | 11,197 | 10,433 | 4,026 | 4,579 | 3,751 | - | 3,433 | 3,433 | 3,133 | 3,133 | 3,133 |
Capital Expenditure | 26,306 | 32,079 | 86,969 | 50,256 | 70,352 | 66,352 | 49,603 | 19,347 | 68,950 | 52,366 | 52,366 | 52,366 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
310,083 | 333,493 | 413,608 | 417,546 | 405,612 | 393,392 | 366,911 | 56,749 | 423,660 | 388,235 | 392,030 | 394,161 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | 16,578 | 18,203 | 17,530 | 19,725 | 23,213 | 25,313 | N/A | 16,124 | 16,124 | 15,624 | 15,624 | 15,624 |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
16,578 | 18,203 | 17,530 | 19,725 | 23,213 | 25,313 | N/A | 16,124 | 16,124 | 15,624 | 15,624 | 15,624 |
Analysis of Significant Trends
Total Vote: All Appropriations
The departmental and non-departmental appropriations in Vote Conservation include the following significant changes.
There has been a general increase in gross output appropriations over the period 2005/06 to 2010/11, reflecting changes to both departmental and non-departmental outputs from Crown and other revenue. There has been a baseline reduction of $13.500 million per annum from 2009/10 to 2013/14. Other significant changes have included the following:
Departmental output expenses
- The New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy (NZBS) was adopted by the Government in February 2000 (with a funding package approved in that year's budget to assist implementation). Its goal is halting the decline in New Zealand's indigenous Biodiversity by 2020. This package, which covers a number of Votes including Biosecurity, Conservation, Environment and Fisheries, increased each year over the first five years.
- The funding in 2002 for the costs associated with the recognition of recreational and other assets that were previously undervalued or unrecognised in the departmental balance sheet.
- In 2005/06 the transfer of funding within Vote Biosecurity - Conservation to Vote Conservation and Vote Biosecurity - Agriculture and Forestry.
Capital expenditure
Funding for the ongoing costs associated with the recognition of recreational and other assets that were previously undervalued or unrecognised in the Departmental balance sheet. These assets were brought onto the balance sheet by way of capital injection. The capital injections are scheduled from 2007/08 as a proxy for the amount of depreciation that the Department would have accumulated had it inherited the assets at the start of their lifespan.
Crown revenue and receipts
The increase in Concessions revenue has been primarily driven by increases in revenue from tourism concessions, reflecting the national increases in international visitor arrivals through the period.
The main items making up the increase in Vote Conservation's total appropriations from 2009/10 to 2010/11 of $18.048 million are the following:
- expense and capital transfers of $42.688 million from 2009/10 to 2010/11
- partly offset by the one off purchase of Queen Mary Hospital for $9 million in 2009/10, and
- partly offset by $7.079 million received from the Office of Treaty Settlements regarding Port Nicholson in 2009/10 (also explains the decrease in Non-tax revenue from 2009/10 to 2010/11).
Performance Improvement Actions
The Department has identified 3 work-streams to improve the efficiency, effectiveness of departmental work, and alignment with the Government's priorities:
Initiative | Performance Indicators |
---|---|
Develop and implement new commercial model | Improved revenue leading to increased re-investment in conservation outcomes |
Implement optimisation of species and ecosystem management within existing funding | Increase in number of species and ecosystems under active management |
Develop and implement optimisation within visitor management to re-prioritise existing funding to areas of highest visitor demand | Increase in number and frequency of visitation |
Increase in visitor satisfaction with experience |
Part 1.4 - Reconciliation of Changes in Appropriation Structure#
2009/10 Appropriations in the 2009/10 Structure |
2009/10 (Current) $000 |
Appropriations to which Expenses (or Capital Expenditure) have been Moved from or to |
Amount Moved $000 |
2009/10 Appropriations in the 2010/11 Structure |
2009/10 (Restated) $000 |
2010/11 $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Departmental Other Expenses |
||||||
Purchase and Development of Reserves | 9,652 | Transferred to Purchase and Development of Reserves under Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure | (9,652) | - | - | |
Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure |
||||||
New appropriation created to more correctly reflect the true nature of the fund's usage | 9,652 | Purchase and Development of Reserves | 9,652 | 6,800 | ||
Total Changes in Appropriations |
9,652 | - | 9,652 | 6,800 |
Explanations of the reasons for changing the appropriation structure are noted in the details of each appropriation in Parts 2-6.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
The diversity of our natural heritage is maintained and restored. | Management of Natural Heritage |
Conservation with the Community | |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning | |
Our history is protected and brought to life. | Management of Historic Heritage |
Conservation with the Community | |
Management of Recreational Opportunities | |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning | |
More people engage with conservation and value its benefits | Conservation with the Community |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning | |
More people participate in recreation. | Management of Recreational Opportunities |
Recreational Opportunities Review | |
Conservation with the Community | |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning | |
More business opportunities delivering increased economic prosperity and conservation gain. | Management of Natural Heritage |
Conservation with the Community | |
Management of Recreational Opportunities | |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning | |
Statutory obligations and other government functions are met. | Management of Natural Heritage |
Regional Pest Management Strategy | |
Management of Recreational Opportunities | |
Conservation with the Community | |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning |
For further information on the intended impacts, outcomes and objectives of the departmental output expense appropriations please see the Statement of Intent for Department of Conservation.
Conservation with the Community (M16)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 15,933 | 15,878 | 15,048 |
Revenue from Crown | 14,630 | 14,630 | 13,745 |
Revenue from Other | 1,303 | 1,400 | 1,303 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Participation |
|||
Number of workday equivalents contributed by people volunteering. | 22,921 | 28,300 | 27,167 |
Number of partnerships run during the year. | 426 | 446 | 474 |
Number of partners surveyed who rate their contribution to conservation as moderate or significant with a target of 80%. | 190 | 225 >95% |
222 >90% |
Number of partnerships that involve tangata whenua with a target of greater than 30%. | 128 | 129 (29%) |
126 (27%) |
Education and Communication |
|||
Number of knowledge and skill sharing (education) initiatives to be provided during year. | 365 | 406 | 446 |
Number of participants surveyed who rate the initiative as partly effective or effective at meeting its objectives with a target of 70%. | 512 | 1,031 >95% |
665 >95% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government | ||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (359) | (454) | (344) | (197) | (51) |
Previous Government | ||||||
Department Capability | 2007/08 | 224 | 289 | 289 | 289 | 289 |
Crown Contribution to Regional Pest Management Strategies (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,958 | 2,958 | 3,006 |
Revenue from Crown | 2,958 | 2,958 | 3,006 |
Revenue from Other | - | 7 | - |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of regional pest management strategies with completed Crown exacerbator weed and pest programmes. | 16 | 16 | 13 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government | ||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (36) | (45) | (34) | (20) | (5) |
Previous Government | ||||||
Support for Regional Pest Management Strategies | 2008/09 | 889 | 889 | 889 | 889 | 889 |
Maintain Capability | 2007/08 | 32 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 |
Management of Historic Heritage (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 5,616 | 5,046 | 5,603 |
Revenue from Crown | 5,139 | 5,139 | 5,126 |
Revenue from Other | 477 | 153 | 477 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Historic and Cultural Heritage Restoration | |||
Number of historic heritage assets for which remedial work is completed to standard during the year. | 46 | 46 | 36 |
Number of historic heritage assets for which regular maintenance work is on track to standard during the year. | 742 | 788 | 1,004 |
Number of historic or cultural heritage assessment reports completed to standard during the year. | 76 | 63 | 44 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (139) | (177) | (134) | (77) | (20) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Department Capability | 2007/08 | 88 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 |
Management of Natural Heritage (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 157,254 | 156,074 | 158,737 |
Revenue from Crown | 146,879 | 146,879 | 146,562 |
Revenue from Other | 10,375 | 10,000 | 12,175 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Fire Control | |||
Number of Conservancies operating within a fire response/action plan published in accordance with National Departmental Fire Plan. | 11 | 10 | 9 |
Number of Conservancies operating within the Fire Plan of a Rural Fire District. | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Conservation Services Programme | |||
The Conservation Services programme will meet its agreed performance criteria and milestones. | Agreed performance criteria and milestones | Agreed performance criteria and milestones | Agreed performance criteria and milestones |
Restoration | |||
Number of restoration programmes undertaken that met the criteria for success set out in their programme plan. | 46 | 48 | 52 |
Pest and Weed Control | |||
Hectares of land under sustained possum control. | 1,055,300 | 1,022,200 | 1,069,522 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for possums. | 305,800 | 307,412 | 234,451 |
Number of possum operations undertaken that met their targets for operational success. | 123 | 114 | 94 |
Hectares of land under sustained deer control. | 794,400 | 720,495 | 722,203 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for deer. | 359,600 | 360,114 | 363,872 |
Hectares of land under sustained goat control. | 2,399,700 | 2,183,475 | 2,240,806 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for goat. | 1,358,000 | 1,462,209 | 1,441,715 |
Number of other terrestrial animal pest operations undertaken that met the criteria for success set out in their programme plan (number that meet their criteria for success set out in their programme plan will be reported at year end). | 45 | 43 | 42 |
Number of aquatic animal pest eradication operations undertaken in treatable sites that met the criteria for success set out in their programme plan (success criteria is measured two years after operation is run). | 2 | 11 | 3 |
Number of island biosecurity programmes where a pest-free status has been maintained. | 87 | 86 | 87 |
Number of Weed-led weed control projects undertaken (number that meet their criteria for success set out in their programme plan will be reported at year end). | 97 | 91 | 107 |
Hectares of land under sustained weed control using a Site-led approach. |
1,599,900 | 1,595,286 | 1,749,431 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for weeds using a Site-led approach. |
531,600 | 528,586 | 502,204 |
Legal Protection of Areas and Marine Protection | |||
Hectares of terrestrial environment legally protected during the year. | 40,837 | 40,493 | 56,556 |
Hectares of marine areas legally protected during the year: | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - |
|
930 | 930 | 530 |
|
930 | - | 930 |
Hectares of marine areas gazetted and under sustained management during the year. | 1,279,704 | 1,279,704 | 1,279,704 |
Species Management | |||
Number of 'acutely threatened', species or subspecies that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
45 | 48 | 42 |
Number of 'chronically threatened', species or subspecies that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
14 | 15 | 18 |
Number of 'at risk', species or subspecies that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
11 | 10 | 9 |
Number of reclassified 'at risk' vascular plant and bird species or subspecies that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. (Includes only vascular plants and birds for 2009/10.) |
57 | 54 | 52 |
Number of reclassified 'threatened' vascular plant and bird species or subspecies that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. (Includes only vascular plants and birds for 2009/10.) |
120 | 118 | 130 |
Number of 'acutely threatened' species or subspecies that will have achieved improved understanding of status and threats through survey, monitoring and research. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
38 | 41 | 54 |
Number of 'chronically threatened' species or subspecies that will have achieved improved understanding of status and threats through survey, monitoring and research. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
23 | 25 | 28 |
Number of 'at risk' species or subspecies that will have achieved improved understanding of status and threats through survey, monitoring and research. (Excludes vascular plants and birds from 2009/10.) |
13 | 14 | 13 |
Number of reclassified 'at risk' vascular plant and bird species or subspecies that will have achieved improved understanding of status and threats through survey, monitoring, and research. (Includes only vascular plants and birds for 2009/10.) |
47 | 48 | 52 |
Number of reclassified 'threatened' vascular plant and bird species or subspecies that will have achieved improved understanding of status and threats through survey, monitoring, and research. (Includes only vascular plants and birds for 2009/10.) |
138 | 147 | 164 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (6,146) | (7,314) | (7,861) | (8,589) | (9,316) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Departmental Salary Funding | 2008/09 | 1,775 | 1,775 | 1,775 | 1,775 | 1,775 |
Intensive Integrated Biodiversity Management | 2007/08 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
Meeting Treaty Settlement Objectives | 2007/08 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Department Capability | 2007/08 | 2,122 | 2,739 | 2,739 | 2,739 | 2,739 |
Management of Recreational Opportunities (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 124,587 | 123,905 | 128,908 |
Revenue from Crown | 102,815 | 102,815 | 107,136 |
Revenue from Other | 25,572 | 25,415 | 21,772 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Asset Management | |||
Number of huts meeting required service standard with a target of 90% to standard. | 880 | 879 | 895 |
Kilometres of tracks meeting required service standard in each Visitor Group with a target of 40% to standard. | 7,407 | 8,469 | 8,966 |
Number of structures meeting the required service standard with a target of 98%. | 12,681 | 12,487 | 12,436 |
Recreation Opportunities Management | |||
Number of visitor recreation and interpretation publications meeting publication standard with a target of 90%. | 295 | 301 | 309 |
Recreation Concessions | |||
Number of one-off recreation concessions managed. | 530 | 489 | 492 |
Number of longer term recreation concession permits, licences, leases and easements managed. | 1,126 | 1,120 | 1,108 |
Number of recreation longer-term concession permits, licenses, leases, and easements monitored annually with a target of 15% of the number managed. |
357 | 260 | 333 |
Number of one-off other resource use concessions managed. | 148 | 130 | 131 |
Number of longer-term other resource use concession permits, licences, leases and easements managed. | 2,916 | 2,918 | 2,972 |
Number of other longer-term resource use concessions monitored annually with a target of 15% of the number managed. | 499 | 511 | 441 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (2,843) | (3,499) | (3,155) | (2,697) | (2,240) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Departmental Salary Funding | 2008/09 | 1,484 | 1,484 | 1,484 | 1,484 | 1,484 |
Te Araroa Track Development | 2007/08 | 510 | 875 | - | - | - |
Department Capability | 2007/08 | 1,778 | 2,295 | 2,295 | 2,295 | 2,295 |
Policy Advice, Servicing the Minister and Statutory Bodies, and Statutory Planning (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 5,858 | 5,328 | 5,606 |
Revenue from Crown | 5,328 | 5,328 | 5,076 |
Revenue from Other | 530 | 200 | 530 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Policy Advice | |||
Policy advice will be provided in accordance with the work programme and to the quality standards agreed with the Minister. | As agreed with the Minister | As agreed with the Minister | As agreed with the Minister |
Ministerial Services | |||
Number of departmental submissions sent to the Minister. | 350-400 | 350-400 | 350-400 |
Number of ministerial Official Information Act requests received (range). | 60-70 | 60-70 | 60-70 |
Number of Parliamentary Questions received (range) with 100% meeting the ministerial deadline. | 300-350 | 200-250 | 200-250 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (127) | (161) | (122) | (70) | (18) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Meeting Treaty Settlement Objectives | 2007/08 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Department Capability | 2007/08 | 87 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 112 |
Recreational Opportunities Review (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 400 | 400 | 400 |
Revenue from Crown | - | - | - |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Part 2.2 - Non-Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
The diversity of our natural heritage is maintained and restored. | Identification and Implementation of Protection for Natural and Historic Places |
Management Services - Natural and Historic Places | |
NZ Biodiversity Funds | |
Our history is protected and brought to life. | Identification and Implementation of Protection for Natural and Historic Places |
Management Services - Natural and Historic Places | |
Moutoa Gardens/Pakaitorere | |
More people engage with conservation and value its benefits. | NZ Biodiversity Funds |
More people participate in recreation. | Stewart Island Infrastructure |
Identification and Implementation of Protection for Natural and Historic Places (M16)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 12,231 | 8,856 | 20,010 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The main reason for the increase in appropriation is due to expense transfers from 2009/10 to 2010/11. These are necessary due to delays inherent in the nature of the funds' activities.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Nature Heritage Fund | |||
Protection of Indigenous Ecosystems on Private Land |
|||
Number of successful purchases. | 6 purchases | 6 purchases | 2 |
Number of successful covenants. | 2 covenants | 2 covenants | 1 |
Hectares of indigenous ecosystem protected. | 1,000 | 1,000 | 500 |
Protection of Indigenous Ecosystems in Maori Ownership on South Island Landless Natives Act (SILNA) Land |
|||
Number of trusts and blocks approved for protection of indigenous ecosystems. | 3 trusts | 3 trusts | 4 |
Number of trusts and blocks approved for protection of indigenous ecosystems. | 10 blocks of SILNA land | 10 blocks of SILNA land | 4 |
Hectares of indigenous ecosystem protected. | 1,521 | 1,521 | 818 |
Nga Whenua Rahui (new measure 2010/11, no comparative data 2009/10) |
|||
Number of restoration programmes undertaken that met the criteria for success set out in their programme plan. | - | - | 6 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for possums. | - | - | 4,000 |
Number of possum operations undertaken that met their targets for operational success. | - | - | 3 |
Hectares of land receiving treatment for goats. | - | - | 40,000 |
Number of other terrestrial animal pest operations undertaken that met the criteria for success set out in their programme plan. | - | - | 5 |
Number of acutely threatened species that will have improved security for one or more populations as a result of active species conservation programmes. | - | - | 1 |
Number of kawenata (covenants) approved in each of the 3 most threatened LENZ environments - (current baseline of 128 kawenata, covering140,000 hectares with 97,000 hectares in acutely threatened category). | - | - | Reported at year end |
Queen Elizabeth II National Trust |
|||
Recommended Areas for Protection or Similar Quality |
|||
Number of New Covenant approvals (range). | 200 - 220 | 170 | 160 |
Hectares for Covenant approvals (range). | 5,000 - 5,500 | 3,400 | 3,200 |
Number of Covenant registrations (range). | 200 - 220 | 150 | 200 |
Hectares for Covenant registrations (range). | 5,000 - 5,500 | 3,000 | 4,000 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (1,000) | (1,000) | (1,000) | (1,000) | (1,000) |
Management Services - Natural and Historic Places (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,506 | 1,506 | 1,506 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust Properties |
|||
Number of properties managed in accordance with approved operative management plans (range). | 28 - 30 | 29 | 29 |
Area (hectares - range). | 1,582 - 1,730 | 1,686 | 1,686 |
Perpetual Trustee Role for Registered Open Space Covenant |
|||
Number of monitoring visits to registered covenants (registered covenants monitored not less than once every 24 months (range). | 1,350 - 1,485 | 1,500 | 1,645 |
Area (hectares - range). | 33,750 - 37,125 | 37,500 | 41,125 |
Moutoa Gardens/Pakaitore (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 23 | 23 | 23 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Maintain key assets of the reserve at a suitable standard. | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
NZ Biodiversity Funds (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 4,315 | 3,315 | 11,661 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriations is due to expense transfers from 2009/10 to 2010/11. All Non-Departmental biodiversity projects experience a lag between committing to expenditure and completion of projects due to the private landowner / community group involvement in projects (and also climatic influences).
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Advice projects funded | 30 | 30 | 37 |
Condition projects funded | 70 | 70 | 55 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Baseline Reduction | 2009/10 | (2,000) | - | - | - | - |
Previous Government |
||||||
Community Biodiversity Funds | 2008/09 | 2,000 | - | - | - | - |
Stewart Island Infrastructure (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 769 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The change in appropriation is due to an expense transfer from 2009/10 to 2010/11. There have been delays in commencing this project.
Summary of Service Providers for Non-Departmental Outputs#
Provider | 2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Estimated Actual $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
Reporting Mechanism |
Expiry of Funding Commitment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Queen Elizabeth II National Trust | 3,274 | 3,274 | 3,274 | Annual Report | Ongoing |
Nature Heritage Fund | 2,313 | 1,913 | 12,420 | Section 32A Report | Ongoing |
Nga Whenua Rahui | 7,506 | 4,531 | 5,178 | Section 32A Report | Ongoing |
Moutoa Gardens/Pakaitore | 23 | 23 | 23 | Section 32A Report | Ongoing |
NZ Biodiversity Funds | 4,315 | 3,315 | 11,661 | Section 32A Report | Ongoing |
The decrease in appropriation from 2009/10 to 2010/11 regarding Nga Whenua Rahui is due to expense transfers from 2008/09 to 2009/10.
The increase in appropriation from 2009/10 to 2010/11 regarding Nature Heritage Fund and NZ Biodiversity Funds is due to expense transfers from 2009/10 to 2010/11. The Nature Heritage Fund expense transfer relates primarily to the South Island Landless Natives Act 1906 (SILNA) policy review.
The above table summarises funding to be allocated through Vote Conservation to non-departmental providers, along with an indication of the mechanism to be used for reporting actual performance and (where determined) the length of the funding commitment.
The above table summarises funding to be allocated through Vote Conservation to non-departmental providers, along with an indication of the mechanism to be used for reporting actual performance and (where determined) the length of the funding commitment.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
To maintain heritage of historic buildings and to provide interpretation and allow access to the public. | Depreciation - Crown Buildings |
To maintain infrastructural assets on Conservation Estate. | Depreciation Infrastructure |
To meet Crown's legislative obligation when esplanade reserves are created under section 289 of the Local Government Act 1974. |
Compensation Payments |
To support initiatives to protect traditional Maori knowledge relating to New Zealand's indigenous biodiversity. | Matauranga Maori Fund |
To meet Crown obligations for rates on conservation land. | Payment of Rates on Properties for Concessionaires |
To provide for bad debts against crown revenue. | Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts |
To provide redress to local authorities for land vested in the Crown under the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. | Redress payments under Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 |
To further New Zealand's interests in international conservation issues. | Subscriptions to International Organisations |
To meet Crown's legislative obligation when coastal marine areas are vested. | Vested Coastal Marine Areas Compensation |
To provide access to Lake Waikaremoana for conservation purposes. | Waikaremoana Lakebed Lease |
For further information on the intended impacts, outcomes and objectives of the non-departmental other expense appropriations please see the Statement of Intent for Department of Conservation.
Compensation Payments (M16)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Compensation payments are met in accordance with the legislation | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Depreciation - Crown Buildings (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 800 | 800 | 800 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Historic buildings are maintained. | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Interpretation and public access of historic buildings is provided | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Depreciation - Infrastructure (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 134 | 134 | 134 |
Matauranga Maori Fund (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,128 | 500 | 854 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is due to expense transfers from 2008/09 to 2009/10.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Number of new Matauranga Kuri Taiao projects approved that assist collection and revival of matauranga Maori | - | - | 12 |
Number of new Matauranga Kuri Taiao projects approved that assist transmission and retention of matauranga Maori | - | - | 12 |
Number of new Matauranga Kuri Taiao projects approved that relate to the use of matauranga Maori | - | - | 12 |
Payment of Rates on Properties for Concessionaires (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 839 | 639 | 839 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Rates are paid to local authority in a timely manner. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Debts related to Crown revenue are reviewed and appropriate provision made. | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Subscriptions to International Organisations (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 405 | 405 | 405 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Subscriptions are made to international conservation organisations. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Vested Coastal Marine Areas Compensation (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Compensation payments are met in accordance with the relevant legislation. | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Waikaremoana Lakebed Lease (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 241 | 241 | 241 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Lease is paid in accordance with the lease agreement. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Effectively manage visitor assets through replacement, upgrade and maintenance. The capital expenditure supports the Department's production of agreed outputs. | Department of Conservation - Capital Expenditure PLA |
Department of Conservation - Capital Expenditure PLA (M16)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 48,854 | 48,854 | 44,503 |
Intangibles | 1,483 | 1,483 | 5,100 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
50,337 | 50,337 | 49,603 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 48,854 | 48,854 | 44,503 |
Intangibles | 1,483 | 1,483 | 5,100 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
50,337 | 50,337 | 49,603 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in expenditure on Property, Plant and Equipment is mainly due to decreased spending in the following asset classes:
- buildings ($1.516 million)
- plant field and radio equipment ($984,000),and
- visitor assets ($2.310 million).
The increase in expenditure on Intangibles is due to increased spending on the Natural Heritage Management System.
Part 6.2 - Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
To protect heritage values on acquired or leasehold land, through legal and physical protection. | Crown Land Acquisitions |
To protect the current infrastructure at Milford Sound from flood damage and allow its redevelopment and expansion, to preserve and enhance its tourism value. | Milford Flood Protection |
To protect heritage values on acquired or leasehold land, through legal and physical protection. | Purchase and Development of Reserves |
Crown Land Acquisitions (M16)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 9,510 | 9,510 | 500 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation from 2009/10 to 2010/11 is due to the purchase of Queen Mary Hospital ($9 million) in 2009/10.
Milford Flood Protection (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 853 | 853 | 12,047 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Major capital works underway in 2010/11.
Purchase and Development of Reserves (M16)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 9,652 | 5,652 | 6,800 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation previously was classified as a Non-Departmental Other Expense but has now been reclassified into the correct appropriation type. The 2009/10 appropriation included a carry forward of the trust balance of $5.773 million from 2008/09. There has been a capital transfer of $5 million from 2009/10 to 2010/11.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Purchase of property for conservation purposes. | Achieve | Achieve | Achieve |
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Environment#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister for the Environment (M29)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry for the Environment
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Minister for the Environment
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister for the Environment is responsible for appropriations in Vote Environment for the 2010/11 financial year covering the following:
- a total of nearly $41 million for the Ministry for the Environment to provide advice on environmental policies, issues and the implementation of government decisions
- a total of nearly $17 million for the Ministry for the Environment to deal with and determine ministerial call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority under Part 6AA of the Resource Management Act 1991
- a total of over $10 million for the implementation and operation of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 by the Environmental Risk Management Authority
- a total of nearly $14 million for services provided by other third parties (investigation, management and remediation services related to contaminated sites being the most significant)
- a total of over $25 million in funding and grants to third parties for environment initiatives (waste minimisation initiatives and restoration of Rotorua Lakes being the most significant)
- a total of $510,000 for subscriptions and memberships to international environmental agreements and programmes
- a total of over $13 million for the Waikato River Clean-up Fund and Waikato River co-governance and co-management arrangements
- a total of over $1 million for the Crown's contribution to assist with the installation of clean and energy efficient heating with a focus on the homes of low income earners
- a total of $15 million for the payments to territorial local authorities for their proportion of the Waste Disposal Levy as prescribed under the Waste Minimisation Act 2008
- a total of $585,000 for capital expenditure by the Ministry for the Environment, mainly for the development and purchase of new software.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations
Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
---|---|---|
Investing in productive infrastructure, removing red tape and improving regulation | Better regulation (Statement to Parliament February 2010) | Environmental Policy Advice (M29) Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Assessment and Management (M29) |
Investing in productive infrastructure, removing red tape and improving regulation | Unlocking resources (Statement to Parliament February 2010) | Environmental Policy Advice (M29) Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund (M29) Contestable Waste Minimisation Fund (M29) Delivery of Environmental Management Programmes (M29) Lake Taupo Protection Programme (M29) Legal and Environment Centre Grants (M29) Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority (M29) Promotion of Sustainable Land Management (M29) Rotorua Lakes Restoration Programme (M29) Sustainable Management Fund (M29) Waikato River co-governance (M29) Waikato River Co-management (M29) Waikato River Clean-up Fund (M29) Warm Homes Grants and Assistance (M29) Waste Disposal Levy Disbursements to Territorial Local Authorities Waste Minimisation (M29) |
Supporting business innovation and trade | Actively representing New Zealanders overseas and strengthening our engagement in our region (Statement to Parliament February 2010) | Environmental Policy Advice (M29) Environmental assistance to the Pacific Islands (M29) International Subscriptions (M29) United Nations Environment Programme (M29) |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity
2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 51,023 | 53,274 | 55,252 | 63,622 | 68,627 | 62,627 | 59,275 | 24,159 | 83,434 | 74,640 | 74,630 | 74,630 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 1,558 | 1,630 | 2,563 | 28,742 | 128,607 | 45,859 | - | 54,874 | 54,874 | 52,384 | 52,384 | 49,084 |
Capital Expenditure | 1,036 | 1,440 | 1,150 | 2,179 | 1,525 | 1,525 | 585 | - | 585 | 575 | 575 | 575 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
53,617 | 56,344 | 58,965 | 94,543 | 198,759 | 110,011 | 59,860 | 79,033 | 138,893 | 127,599 | 127,589 | 124,289 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | 469 | 727 | 676 | 578 | 30,400 | 30,400 | N/A | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 |
Capital Receipts | 645 | 643 | 643 | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
1,114 | 1,370 | 1,319 | 578 | 30,400 | 30,400 | N/A | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 | 30,400 |
New Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority. | Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority Departmental Output Expense |
- | 16,800 | 16,600 | 16,600 | 16,600 |
Analysis of Significant Trends
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcomes: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impacts: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. New Zealand's highest priority contaminated sites are being progressed towards remediation or are remediated. |
Delivery of Environmental Management Programmes (M29) |
End outcome: Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impact: Waste is minimised and disposal decreased to protect the environment from harm and provide environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits. |
Environmental assistance to the Pacific Islands (M29) |
End outcomes: New Zealand is able to capitalise on its natural environmental advantages. New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impacts: New Zealanders have credible decision-making processes for freshwater, and land use affecting water, that provide for healthy ecosystems and optimise New Zealand's economic, social and cultural well-being. Growth in New Zealand's capability to exploit economic and environmental opportunities for agencies, institutions and firms. Environmental hazards posed by the importation, manufacture, management (eg, transport, storage and handling) and disposal of hazardous substances and new organisms are sufficiently and efficiently managed. The urban planning system is streamlined, integrated and more effective so that it delivers on the environmental and socio-economic outcomes sought. Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. Treaty settlements align well with broader natural resources policy. The evidence-base for providing a clear picture of New Zealand's environmental performance, incorporating social and economic perspectives, is strengthened. |
Environmental Policy Advice (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Impact: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. |
Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications to the Environmental Protection Authority (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Impact: Waste is minimised and disposal decreased to protect the environment from harm and provide environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits. |
Waste Minimisation (M29) |
For further information on the intended impacts, outcomes and objectives of the departmental output expense appropriations please see the Statement of Intent for the Ministry for the Environment.
Delivery of Environmental Management Programmes (M29)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Revenue from Crown | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Percentage of funding allocated according to fund criteria. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of contracted environmental programmes delivered by third parties that are managed and monitored. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Fund criteria | |
---|---|
Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund | Applications should show the contamination poses a health risk, or is close to areas of cultural or national significance; they should show the capability and capacity of the project team and the practicality of the proposed solution; partnerships between parties are reflected; and cost effectiveness is demonstrated. |
Environment Centre Fund | Funds are allocated every three years. Funding is subject to the Centre facilitating, motivating and informing existing and new groups in the community to take action in relation to Ministry and government environmental priorities. |
Environmental Legal Assistance Fund | An independent panel assesses groups' applications for reimbursement of certain legal costs for cases and makes recommendations to the Ministry for the Environment. The panel supports groups where (inter alia) the matter is of environmental public interest; it affects the wider community; it focuses on the protection or enhancement of environmental qualities; there is an imbalance between the level or quality of evidence and case management because of a lack of financial resources, and the group has shown why financial assistance is needed. |
Resource Management Act Education and Advisory Services Fund | Funds are allocated to service providers that have relevant qualifications, skills and experience in providing comprehensive Resource Management Act advisory services, have skills and experience in producing educational resources for adults, can be easily identified by the community as a key provider of this service, can provide informed, up-to-date and consistent advice and support to all on the Resource Management Act in a fair and equitable way, are independent (and have no conflicts of interest, or can manage them), provide value for money, and can provide advice through a variety of media. |
Sustainable Management Fund | Applications should show outcomes, project deliverables, define community actions and partnerships, and the wider benefits. |
Environmental assistance to the Pacific Islands (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 48 | 48 | 51 |
Revenue from Crown | - | - | - |
Revenue from Other | 48 | 48 | 51 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation is due to an expense transfer of $51,000 to 2010/11. The completion date for this project has been extended to 31 January 2011.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Volume of scrap metal removed from the Cook Islands. | 520 tonnes | 100 tonnes | 920 tonnes |
Environmental Policy Advice (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 38,442 | 36,442 | 39,610 |
Revenue from Crown | 37,866 | 35,866 | 39,230 |
Revenue from Other | 576 | 576 | 380 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation is primarily due to an expense transfer of $3 million from 2009/10 to manage and deliver the new and increased activities in areas of resource management reform and New Start for Freshwater. However, this increase is largely offset by a transfer of $2.667 million to Non-Departmental Output Expense: Lake Taupo Protection Project to align with the other similar projects being funded from Non-Departmental Other Expenses.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Develop and implement (in conjunction with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) the government's 'New Start for Fresh Water' policy programme. | |||
Percentage of priority deliverables agreed by Cabinet for the 2010/11 year delivered in accordance with the Ministry's quality policy advice standards. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Co-ordinate and advise on the 10 work streams that comprise Phase Two of the resource management reforms and on wider work on the future of resource management frameworks. | |||
Advice provided to Cabinet in accordance with Cabinet guidelines. | N/A | N/A | By 30 August 2010 |
Advise on and support the establishment of an expanded Environmental Protection Authority as part of Phase Two of the resource management reforms. | |||
Environmental Protection Authority legislation is prepared for introduction to the House of Representatives and is supported through all stages of the House in accordance with Cabinet directions. | N/A | N/A | Legislation is passed by 28 February 2011 |
Implement decisions for improving the assessment of New Zealand's environmental performance through the proposed Environmental Reporting Act. | |||
Advice provided in accordance with the Ministry's quality policy advice standards. | N/A | N/A | Achieved |
All policy outputs | |||
Percentage of advice that recommends actions for the Minister or Cabinet | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Percentage of advice that is certified by managers, as part of the sign-out process, as meeting the quality standards (below) | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Percentage of Regulatory Impact Statements that go through independent quality assurance processes | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of all Regulatory Impact Statements that fully meet quality assurance criteria | N/A | 80% | At least 80% |
Ministerial servicing | |||
Percentage of parliamentary questions completed within required timeframes and quality standards. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of ministerial correspondence completed within agreed timeframes. | 95% | 96% | 95% |
The policy advice and analysis:
- identifies the problem, relevant options, costs and benefits, and risks
- is rigorous, logical, factually accurate and provides supporting evidence
- demonstrates that it is based on appropriate consultation and engagement across government and with affected parties
- is practical, action-oriented and considers implementation
- demonstrates an understanding of the needs of the target audience
- is clear, concise, professional and presented in plain language
- is provided within agreed timeframes and budgets.
Note - All aspects of the standards may not apply to specific pieces of policy advice, given considerations of urgency or the particular nature of the advice to be provided. For instance, some of our work is second-opinion advice on other departments' proposals often undertaken under tight time pressures.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reform of the RMA and the creation of an Environmental Protection Authority. | 2009/10 | 3,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
Fresh Water Quality and Allocation. | 2009/10 | 900 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
Funding to support the Waikato River Treaty Settlement. | 2008/09 | 1,300 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Plan Changes for Aquaculture. | 2008/09 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
Options for Foreshore and Seabed Negotiations Capacity. | 2007/08 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
Public Space Recycling. | 2007/08 | 1,000 | - | - | - | - |
Households Sustainable Living Programme. | 2007/08 | 2,000 | - | - | - | - |
Sustainable Procurement and Business Partnerships for Sustainable Procurement. | 2007/08 | 1,364 | 414 | 414 | 414 | 414 |
Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 16,800 |
Revenue from Crown | - | - | - |
Revenue from Other | - | - | 16,800 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation was approved during the year and has resulted from combining two appropriations ie, Resource Management Act Call-ins and Applications to the Environmental Protection Authority. The appropriation for 2010/11 reflects the cost of handling continuing call-ins for Hauauru ma Raki, Turitea Wind Farms and new call-ins Tauhara Geothermal project and Waterview and the anticipated applications to the Environmental Protection Authority.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Resource Management Call-ins | |||
Percentage of applications processed in accordance with statutory timeframes. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Number of decisions overturned on judicial review. | N/A | N/A | 0 |
Applications to the Environmental Protection Authority | |||
Percentage of applications to the Environmental Protection Authority assessed for national significance and a recommendation made to the Minister within 20 working days. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Percentage of applications to the Environmental Protection Authority processed within nine months. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Number of decisions overturned on judicial review. | N/A | N/A | 0 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Processing of Resource Management Call-ins and applications made to the Environmental Protection Authority. | 2010/11 | - | 16,800 | 16,600 | 16,600 | 16,600 |
Waste Minimisation (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 2,260 | 2,260 | 1,714 |
Revenue from Crown | 2,260 | 2,260 | 1,714 |
Revenue from Other | - | - | - |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation reflects the forecast of a lower administration fee in 2010/11 as the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 continues to be implemented.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Percentage of disposal facility operators that provide their waste deposit information and payments in accordance with statutory timeframes. | N/A | 97% | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funding transfer from Contestable Waste Minimisation Fund. | 2010/11 | - | 849 | 849 | 849 | 849 |
Implementing the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. | 2009/10 | 2,260 | 865 | 865 | 865 | 865 |
Part 2.2 - Non-Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcome: Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impact: New Zealand's highest priority contaminated sites are being progressed towards remediation or are remediated. |
Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund (M29) |
End outcome: Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impact: Environmental hazards posed by the importation, manufacture, management (eg, transport, storage and handling) and disposal of hazardous substances and new organisms are sufficiently and efficiently managed. |
Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Assessment and Management (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: New Zealanders have credible decision-making processes for freshwater, and land use affecting water, that provide for healthy ecosystems and optimise New Zealand's economic, social and cultural well-being. |
Lake Taupo Protection Programme (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. |
Promotion of Sustainable Land Management (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Impact: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. |
Sustainable Management Fund (M29) |
Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund (M29)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 5,775 | 1,775 | 7,078 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation reflects the timing of the costs associated with the work relating to the clean-up of the Tui Mine at Te Aroha.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of new agreements with Local Government Entities and/or landowners progressing priority Contaminated Site clean-ups | N/A | 8 | 1 |
Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Assessment and Management (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 10,170 | 10,170 | 10,170 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
ERMA New Zealand processes all applications to import or use hazardous substances or new organisms according to statutory processes and within statutory timeframes (as prescribed by sections 52 and 59 of the HSNO Act). | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ERMA New Zealand provides compliance reports to the Minister within timeframes specified in the monitoring agreement agreed with the Ministry for the Environment. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Improving Capacity and Capability in the HSNO Act Hazardous Substances Regime. | 2008/09 | 1,158 | 1,158 | 1,158 | 1,158 | 1,158 |
Lake Taupo Protection Programme (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 2,667 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation was established during the year and reflects an expense transfer from Departmental Output Expense: Environmental Policy Advice to align with other similar projects being funded from Non-Departmental Other Expenses.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
The Lake Taupo Protection Programme is undertaken in accordance with the Lake Taupo Protection Trust annual Statement of Intent approved by the Lake Taupo Protection Project Joint Committee. | Achieved | Achieved |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funding for the Lake Taupo Protection Programme. | 2006/07 | - | 2,667 | 2,667 | 2,667 | 2,667 |
Promotion of Sustainable Land Management (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 400 | 400 | 400 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Landcare Trust undertakes work on sustainable land management and training in line with its contractual obligations. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Sustainable Management Fund (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 4,311 | 4,311 | 3,844 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is line with Government decisions.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Number of community groups, iwi, businesses and local government that are supported in taking practical actions that produce long-term environmental benefits. | 53 | 53 | 35 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transfer of funds from Te Puni Kokiri | 2009/10 | 400 | - | - | - | - |
Summary of Service Providers for Non-Departmental Outputs#
Provider | 2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Estimated Actual $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
Reporting Mechanism |
Expiry of Funding Commitment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crown Entities | |||||
ERMA | |||||
Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Assessment and Management. | 10,170 | 10,170 | 10,170 | ERMA's Annual Report | - |
Non-Government Organisations (types) | |||||
Non-government organisations and local government that receive funding to assist in the clean up of contaminated land within New Zealand. | 5,775 | 1,775 | 7,078 | Section 32A Report | - |
Community, industry, iwi and/or local government that receive funding for projects which result in practical action that produces long-term environmental benefit. | 4,311 | 4,311 | 3,844 | Section 32A Report | - |
Lake Taupo Protection Project Joint Committee through the Lake Taupo Protection Trust | - | - | 2,667 | Section 32A Report | - |
The above table summarises funding to be allocated through Vote Environment to non-departmental providers, along with an indication of the mechanism to be used for reporting actual performance and (where determined) the length of the funding commitment.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use natural resources sustainably. Impact: Waste is minimised and disposal decreased to protect the environment from harm and provide environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits. |
Contestable Waste Minimisation Fund (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand is able to capitalise on its natural environmental advantages. Impact: Growth in New Zealand's capability to exploit international economic and environmental opportunities for agencies, institutions and firms. |
International Subscriptions (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use natural resources sustainably. Impact: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. |
Legal and Environment Centre Grants (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: New Zealanders have credible decision-making processes for freshwater, and land use affecting water, that provide for healthy ecosystems and optimise New Zealand's economic, social and cultural well-being. |
Rotorua Lakes Restoration Programme (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand is able to capitalise on its natural environmental advantages. Impact: Growth in New Zealand's capability to exploit international economic and environmental opportunities for agencies, institutions and firms. |
United Nations Environment Programme (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: Treaty settlements align well with broader natural resources policy. |
Waikato River Clean-up Fund (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: Treaty settlements align well with broader natural resources policy. |
Waikato River co-governance (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's air, water, land and built communities are healthy. Impact: Treaty settlements align well with broader natural resources policy. |
Waikato River Co-Management (M29) |
End outcome: Risks to people, the economy and the environment from pollution, contamination and other environmental hazards are minimised. Impact: Effective and efficient management of natural and physical resources through improved environmental governance and streamlined resource management processes. |
Warm Homes Grants and Assistance (M29) |
End outcome: New Zealand's natural resources are managed effectively and New Zealanders use resources sustainably. Impact: Waste is minimised and disposal decreased to protect the environment from harm and provide environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits. |
Waste Disposal Levy Disbursements to Territorial Local Authorities (M29) |
Contestable Waste Minimisation Fund (M29)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 12,740 | 12,740 | 13,286 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation in 2010/11 has been based on the forecasts of the level of Waste Disposal Levy expected to be collected each year.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Percentage of successfully funded projects that have approved project plans, signed funding deeds, and are delivering on their project milestones by December 2010. | N/A | N/A | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funding transferred to Waste Minimisation Fund. | 2010/11 | - | (849) | (849) | (849) | (849) |
Implementing the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. | 2009/10 | 12,740 | 14,135 | 14,135 | 14,135 | 14,135 |
International Subscriptions (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 117 | 117 | 117 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Percentage of New Zealand's financial and participatory requirements for subscriptions to International Environmental Agreements that are met. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Legal and Environment Centre Grants (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Funding is distributed, according to set criteria, to groups to help remove some of the barriers to public participation in resource management processes, particularly in the legal environment. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Rotorua Lakes Restoration Programme (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 6,675 | 6,675 | 10,350 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The increase in appropriation is due to re-phasing of the contribution timing within the Rotorua Lakes Funding Deed as agreed with Environment Bay of Plenty.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Funding is distributed to Environment Bay of Plenty and Rotorua District Council to maintain and improve the water quality of Rotorua lakes in accordance with the approved annual work programme. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rotorua Lakes Protection and Restoration Action Programme. | 2008/09 | 7,200 | 10,350 | 13,200 | 11,200 | 4,900 |
United Nations Environment Programme (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 393 | 393 | 393 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
New Zealand's financial and participatory requirements for membership of the United Nations Environment Programme are met. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Waikato River Clean-up Fund (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 14,000 | - | 7,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is in line with the scheduled funding under the Deed of Settlement with Waikato-Tainui. The initial clean-up funds payments to Waikato River Authority were payable in 2009/10. However, due to delays in the date of the enactment of the Waikato Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement bill it is possible that these payments will now be made in 2010/11.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
The Crown's obligation under the Deed of Settlement with Waikato-Tainui to periodically settle sums on the Trustees of the Waikato River Clean-Up Trust has been met. | Agreed sum paid on the due date | Not achieved | Agreed sum paid on the due date |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waikato-Tainui Financial Recommendations. | 2008/09 | 7,000 | 7,000 | 7,000 | 7,000 | 7,000 |
Waikato River co-governance (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | - | - | 1,250 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation was established during the year.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
The Crown's obligation in respect of ensuring the Waikato River Authority is supported with appropriate secretariat resources has been met. | N/A | N/A | Agreed sum paid upon receipt of invoice from an acceptable contract |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funding for the governance and operational costs of Waikato River Authority. | 2010/11 | - | 1,250 | 910 | 910 | 910 |
Waikato River Co-Management (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 35,500 | 7,500 | 5,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is due to initial co-management payments to Waikato-Tainui, Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, Te Arawa and Maniapoto iwi under the Waikato-Tainui Treaty settlement being payable in 2009/10. However, due to delays in the date of the enactment of the Waikato Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement bill it is possible that these payments will now be made in 2010/11.The funding in 2010/11 and outyears is to support the on-going co-management arrangements in relation to the Waikato River.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
The Crown's obligation under the Deed of Settlement with Waikato-Tainui to settle sums on the trustees of the five Waikato River iwi (Waikato-Tainui, Maniapoto, Ngati Tuwharetoa, Affiliate Te Arawa iwi/hapu, Raukawa), has been met. | Agreed sum paid on the due date | Agreed sum paid on the due date | Agreed sum paid on the due date |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waikato-Tainui Financial Recommendations. | 2008/09 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Funding for Waikato River Co-Management Implementation. | 2008/09 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Deed for Co-Management of the Upper Waikato River - Waikato River Update: Negotiations and Finance Package. | 2008/09 | 13,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
Warm Homes Grants and Assistance (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
EECA will deliver Clean Heat grants to homeowners on low incomes in areas of poor air quality so that they can upgrade to cleaner, more energy-efficient, heating devices. | 650 homes | 650 homes | 650 homes |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EnergyWise Package: Warm Homes Programme. | 2007/08 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Waste Disposal Levy Disbursements to Territorial Local Authorities (M29)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 |
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Percentage of Territorial Authorities that are paid the accurate share of the levy revenue by the 20th of the relevant month. | N/A | 100% | 100% |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implementing the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. | 2009/10 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 |
Reporting Mechanisms#
Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
---|---|
Contestable Waste Minimisation Fund | Section 32A Report |
International Subscriptions | Not reported |
Legal and Environment Centre Grants | Not reported |
Rotorua Lakes Restoration Programme | Section 32A Report |
United Nations Environment Programme | Not reported |
Waikato River Clean-up Fund | Section 32A Report |
Waikato River co-governance | Section 32A Report |
Waikato River Co-Management | Section 32A Report |
Warm Homes Grants and Assistance | Section 32A Report |
Waste Disposal Levy Disbursements to Territorial Local Authorities | Section 32A Report |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual performance for each non-departmental other expenses appropriation.
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Objective: To ensure the Ministry has the capability with which to deliver its services. | Ministry for the Environment - Capital Expenditure PLA (M29) |
Ministry for the Environment - Capital Expenditure PLA (M29)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 242 | 242 | 375 |
Intangibles | 1,283 | 1,283 | 210 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
1,525 | 1,525 | 585 |
Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
Land | - | - | - |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 242 | 242 | 375 |
Intangibles | 1,283 | 1,283 | 210 |
Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
1,525 | 1,525 | 585 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in appropriation is primarily due to the completion of a significant portion of the development of the New Zealand Carbon Accounting System and the completion of Waste Levy and Waste Minimisation Fund Systems.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
Purchase assets within budget to support the Ministry to achieve its outcomes. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Local Government#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Local Government (M49)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Department of Internal Affairs
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS: Minister of Internal Affairs
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Local Government is responsible for appropriations in the Vote for the 2010/11 financial year covering the following:
Departmental Appropriations
- a total of $183,000 (2% of total departmental appropriations in this Vote) on implementation of the government's decisions on the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Auckland Governance
- a total of $3.513 million (34% of total departmental appropriations in this Vote) for advisory, information, regulatory and support services including administration of statutes, providing information and advice about local government, supporting the Local Government Commission, local government services to offshore islands, providing Lake Taupo Harbourmaster functions, and administering the Rates Rebate Scheme
- a total of $6.641 million (64% of total departmental appropriations in this Vote) on providing policy advice on, and information relating to, local government issues, including ministerial correspondence and questions.
Non-Departmental Appropriations
- a total of $57 million for assisting low-income residential ratepayers with rates rebates
- a total of $2.197 million contribution for the cost of Chatham Islands Council for meeting its statutory responsibilities
- a total of $147,000 for depreciation on Lake Taupo's Crown-owned assets
- a total of $1.500 million grant for the use of Lake Taupo, based upon a 2007 agreement between the Crown and the Tuwharetoa iwi
- a total of $40.793 million loan to the Auckland Transition Agency
- a total of $34,000 for upgrading boating facilities at Lake Taupo
- a total of $5 million capital funding for a Local Government Debt Vehicle.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Contribution of Appropriations to Government Priorities and Outcomes
Appropriations | Government Priorities | Government Outcomes |
---|---|---|
Capital Investments- Lake Taupo Chatham Islands Council Depreciation Implementation of Auckland Governance Reforms Loan to the Auckland Transition Agency Local Government Debt Vehicle Rates Rebate Scheme Services for Local Government MCOA Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board |
Economic growth Better public services Better regulation Investment in infrastructure |
Strong, Sustainable Communities/hapu/iwi |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity
2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
Output Expenses | 9,739 | 11,987 | 11,528 | 13,053 | 12,108 | 11,919 | 10,337 | - | 10,337 | 10,128 | 10,122 | 10,122 |
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | 674 | 43,517 | 44,786 | 52,597 | 55,000 | 47,600 | N/A | 57,000 | 57,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 |
Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other Expenses | 3,732 | 2,040 | 15,687 | 3,456 | 5,114 | 3,260 | - | 3,844 | 3,844 | 3,880 | 3,880 | 3,880 |
Capital Expenditure | 528 | 41 | 17 | 169 | 30,507 | 30,507 | - | 45,827 | 45,827 | 34 | 34 | 34 |
Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
14,673 | 57,585 | 72,018 | 69,275 | 102,729 | 93,286 | 10,337 | 106,671 | 117,008 | 74,042 | 74,036 | 74,036 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Non-Tax Revenue | - | 1,277 | - | - | - | - | N/A | 125 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | 36,900 | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | 1,277 | - | - | - | - | N/A | 125 | 125 | 37,150 | 250 | 250 |
New Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction of funding to meet level of demand | Rates Rebate Scheme | - | (13,000) | (15,000) | (15,000) | (15,000) |
Funding for the Productivity Commission | Services for Local Government MCOA | - | (33) | (65) | (71) | (71) |
Provision of capital funding to establish a single debt vehicle for local government borrowing (see Note 1) | Local Government Debt Vehicle | - | 5,000 | - | - | - |
Loan Facility for the Auckland Transition Agency | Loan to the Auckland Transition Agency | 23,073 | 11,293 | - | - | - |
Additional capital funding for Auckland Transition Agency (see Note 2) | Loan to the Auckland Transition Agency | 7,400 | 29,500 | - | - | - |
Capability Building | Services for Local Government MCOA | 300 | - | - | - | - |
Note 1 - The Crown will receive interest of 5% per annum for this loan.
Note 2 - The Auckland Transition Agency is due to repay this funding to the Crown during the 2011/12 financial year.
Analysis of Significant Trends
Total Vote: All Appropriation
Significant changes in departmental and non-departmental appropriations are discussed briefly below.
- Vote trends in actual expenses and capital expenditure by appropriation type
- Source: Department of Internal Affairs
The movements in departmental and non-departmental appropriations in Vote Local Government are detailed in the Summary of Financial Activity table.
Departmental Output Expenses
The baseline increased in 2006/07 due to expense transfers from 2005/06 to 2006/07 for the Upgrade of Information and Technology Infrastructure, hosting the 2007 Conference of the Commonwealth Local Government Forum, the National Dog Database, the Local Government Commission for the review of the Local Electoral Act 2001 and the Local Government Act 2002, the Auckland Infrastructure review and for an advisory panel to assist the Waitomo District Council.
The increase in 2008/09 is largely due to expense transfers from 2007/08 to 2008/09 for the Upgrade of Information and Technology Infrastructure and Sustainable Accommodation. For 2008/09 and outyears, additional funding was received for the professional development of elected members of councils and co-management of the upper Waikato river.
The decrease in funding from 2009/10 to 2010/11 is mainly due to an expense transfer from 2008/09 to 2009/10 for the implementation of the Royal Commission on Auckland Governance recommendations and one-off funding in 2009/10 only for capability building.
Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses
The baseline increased from 2006/07 onwards to allow for revised income thresholds for entitlements under the Rates Rebate Scheme. Additional funding was provided from 2008/09 for consumer price index adjustments to rate rebates claims.
The estimated actual for 2009/10 reflects the expected level of demand in 2009/10.
Non-Departmental Other Expenses
Funding was provided in 2005/06 for the purchase of land from Chelsea Estate Limited and part of Waitangarua Farm, and in 2007/08 for settlement costs relating to Lake Taupo property rights. Expenditure is relatively stable from 2008/09.
Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure
In 2009/10 and 2010/11 a loan was provided to the Auckland Transition Agency to enable implementation of the Auckland Governance Reforms. In 2010/11, expenditure will increase due to the establishment of a Local Government debt vehicle to enable local councils to raise funds on capital markets more efficiently than at present.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
People engage with and participate in their communities Communities are supported by fair and responsive local government and other organisations |
Services for Local Government MCOA -
|
For further information on the intended impacts, outcomes and objectives of the departmental output expense appropriations, please see the Statement of Intent for the Department of Internal Affairs.
Implementation of Auckland Governance Reforms (M49)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 566 | 566 | 183 |
Revenue from Crown | - | - | - |
Revenue from Other | 566 | 566 | 183 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in this appropriation is mainly due to a reduction in the provision of support services to the Auckland Transition Agency in 2010/11.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Monitor progress of the Auckland Transition Agency and prepare monitoring reports on time to Responsible Ministers. | New measure | New measure | All reports are prepared on time. Ministers are satisfied with the quality of reports. |
Monitoring to ensure Auckland Transition Agency is dissolved 31 October 2010 and arrangement for transferring assets and liabilities are affected in accordance with legislation. | New measure | New measure | Achieved in accordance with legislation |
A project close out report will be prepared in respect of the monitoring associated with the Auckland Transition Agency by 31 December 2010. | New measure | New measure | Achieved on time |
An Auckland Governance Reforms impact evaluation framework is established. | New measure | New measure | Achieved by 31 December 2010 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Implementation of Royal Commission on Auckland Governance Recommendations | 2008/09 | 9,144 | - | - | - | - |
Services for Local Government MCOA (M49)#
Scope of Appropriation
Providing advisory and support services to the Local Government Commission in respect of its statutory functions, providing information to and about local government, administering the Local Government Act 2002 and other statutes, providing operational advice and support to the Minister of Local Government, administering the Local Electoral Act 2001, administering the Rates Rebate Scheme, providing regulatory and boating services for Lake Taupo, including providing the Harbourmaster and managing the Lake Taupo Landing Reserve, governance and management of the National Dog Control Information Database.
Policy Advice - Local Government
Provision of policy advice on, and information relating to, local government issues, including ministerial correspondence and questions.
Explanation for Use of Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriation
Both outputs contribute to the effective governance and support for New Zealand's Local Government sector.
Expenses and Revenue
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation |
11,542 | 11,353 | 10,154 |
Information, Support and Regulatory Services - Local Government | 4,115 | 4,176 | 3,513 |
Policy Advice - Local Government | 7,427 | 7,177 | 6,641 |
Revenue from Crown |
10,637 | 10,637 | 9,247 |
Information, Support and Regulatory Services - Local Government | 3,277 | 3,277 | 2,676 |
Policy Advice - Local Government | 7,360 | 7,360 | 6,571 |
Revenue from Other |
884 | 856 | 886 |
Information, Support and Regulatory Services - Local Government | 818 | 790 | 817 |
Policy Advice - Local Government | 66 | 66 | 69 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in this appropriation is largely due to one-off funding received in 2009/10 for monitoring of the Auckland Transition Agency and an expense transfer from 2008/09 to 2009/10 for the Royal Commission on Auckland Governance.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Information, Support and Regulatory Services - Local Government |
|||
Local Government Commission Advice and Support |
|||
Local Government Commission's satisfaction with the quality of advice and support services provided rated at 3 or above on a scale of 1 to 5 is no less than: | 3 or above | 3 or above | 3 or above |
Percentage of Local Government Commission decisions dispatched to parties within 10 working days of decision, or to such other timetable as instructed by the Commission is: | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Local Government Services |
|||
Percentage of requests for information from the public about the Rates Rebate Scheme responded to within 15 working days is no less than: | 99% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of eligible claims for rates rebates processed within 20 working days is no less than: | 98% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of system availability for the National Dog Database is no less than: | 99% | 99% | 99% |
Activity Information (see Note 2) |
|||
Number of responses to requests for information from the public about the Rates Rebate Scheme. | 300 - 600 | 300 - 600 | 300 - 600 |
Number of rates rebate claims received for processing. | 100,000 - 140,000 | 100,000 - 140,000 | 100,000 - 140,000 |
Regulatory and Boating Services for Lake Taupo |
|||
Percentage of boating facilities and navigational safety equipment to be inspected in accordance with an annual programme to ensure compliance with health and safety standards and Maritime New Zealand (MNZ) regulations respectively will be no less than. | New measure | New measure | 100% |
Compliance with an asset management plan for Lake Taupo will be monitored at least every six months. | New measure | New measure | Achieved |
Percentage of respondents to a survey of key stakeholders who rate their satisfaction with the quality of Lake Taupo regulatory services at 3 or above on a scale of 1-5 is no less than: | 85% | 85% | 85% |
The Lake Taupo Navigational Safety By-law including provision for Infringement Fees will be approved and publicly promulgated by the Lake Taupo Harbourmaster by 1 December 2010: | New measure | New measure | Achieved |
Activity Information (see Note 2) |
|||
Number of downloaded resources from the localcouncils.govt.nz website: | New measure | New measure | 4,000 - 6,000 |
Policy Advice - Local Government |
|||
Local Government Policy Advice |
|||
Percentage of policy advice that is delivered in accordance with agreed policy quality criteria (refer Conditions on Use of Appropriation) | 100% | 100% | 100% |
The Minister's rating of his/her level of satisfaction with the quality of policy advice. | Satisfied or better (see Note 1) |
Satisfied or better (see Note 1) |
Satisfied or better (see Note 1) |
Ministerial Correspondence and Questions |
|||
Percentage of first versions of replies to ministerial correspondence, Official Information Act 1982 requests, Ombudsman's inquiries, and parliamentary questions accepted by the Minister is no less than: | 95% | 95% | 95% |
Percentage of draft responses to ministerial correspondence returned to the Minister's office for signature within 15 working days of receipt from the Minister's office or such other deadlines as may be specifically agreed is no less than: | 95% | 95% | 95% |
Percentage of draft responses to Official Information Act 1982 requests and Ombudsman's inquiries returned to the Minister's office for signature five days prior to the statutory deadline for reply is no less than: | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage of draft replies to parliamentary questions completed within the time frames specified by the Minister is no less than: | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Activity Information (see Note 2) |
|||
Number of replies to ministerial correspondence, Official Information Act 1982 requests and Ombudsman's inquiries and answers to parliamentary questions. | 3,000-3,500 | 3,000-3,500 | 2,200 - 2,700 |
Note 1 - Ratings used in all Ministerial Satisfaction Surveys are: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
Note 2 - Activity information relates to output volume measures that are demand driven and therefore outside the Department's control.
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Purpose | Policy papers should be short (where practicable), succinct and clearly focused on decisions required from Ministers. |
Consistency | The advice takes account of other Government policies and decisions. |
Logic | The assumptions behind the advice are explicit and argument is logical and supported by the facts. |
Accuracy | The facts in the papers are legally and statistically accurate and all material facts and sources are included. Where appropriate, the advice includes sound legal opinion. |
Options | An appropriate range of options is presented; each option is assessed in terms of the benefits and costs for the Government, the economy, the community sector and all other relevant parties. The information provided has sufficient range and depth. |
Consultation | There is evidence of adequate consultation with other government agencies and other affected parties and possible objections to proposals are identified. |
Practicality | The problems of implementation, technical feasibility, timing and consistency with other policies have been considered. Where appropriate, the advice considers the impact on the lives of New Zealanders. |
Presentation | The length and format of Cabinet papers meet Ministerial and Cabinet Office requirements. All papers and briefings are in accordance with the Department's Policy Quality Assurance guidelines. All presentations to Ministers are in accordance with Ministerial preference for style and format. All key facts and recommendations are on the first page. All material is effectively, concisely and clearly presented, has short sentences in plain English, and is free of grammatical or numerical errors. |
Impartiality | The Department of Internal Affairs strives to provide professional, impartial and comprehensive advice to Ministers and to alert Ministers to the possible consequences of following particular policies, whether or not such advice accords with the Ministers' views. |
Memorandum Account
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Use of facilities and access to Lake Taupo by boat users |
|||
Opening Balance at 1 July | 2 | 2 | 84 |
Revenue | 345 | 317 | 345 |
Expenses | 238 | 235 | 335 |
Transfers and Adjustments | - | - | - |
Closing Balance at 30 June | 109 | 84 | 94 |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Funding for the Productivity Commission | 2010/11 | - | (33) | (65) | (71) | (71) |
Capability Building | 2009/10 | 300 | - | - | - | - |
Savings for the National Dogs Database | 2009/10 | (198) | (198) | (198) | (198) | (198) |
Savings for Dog Safety Education | 2009/10 | (250) | (250) | (250) | (250) | (250) |
Savings for Rates Rebate Promotion | 2009/10 | (100) | (100) | (100) | (100) | (100) |
Savings for local and central government interface and facilitation | 2009/10 | (40) | (40) | (40) | (40) | (40) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Optimising Central Government Investment in Local Government | 2008/09 | 800 | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 |
Departmental Personnel Capability | 2005/06 | 594 | 594 | 594 | 594 | 594 |
Facilitation of Central/Local Government Engagement in Community Outcome Process | 2005/06 | 590 | 590 | 590 | 590 | 590 |
Funding to implement a National Dog Database | 2005/06 | 822 | 822 | 822 | 822 | 822 |
Increase in fees for use of Lake Taupo Facilities | 2005/06 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 |
National Awards Scheme for Local Government | 2005/06 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
Updating Thresholds for Entitlements under the Rates Rebate Scheme | 2005/06 | 475 | 475 | 475 | 475 | 475 |
Update of Information and Technology Infrastructure | 2005/06 | 1,406 | 1,406 | 1,406 | 1,406 | 1,406 |
Part 3 - Details for Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses#
Part 3.2 - Non-Departmental Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Communities are supported by fair and responsive local government and other organisations | Rates Rebate Scheme |
Rates Rebate Scheme (M49)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 55,000 | 47,600 | 57,000 |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Rates Rebates Act 1973, section 3 | Rebates are granted on the basis of a formula taking into account income, the number of dependants and the amount of rates owing. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Government |
||||||
Reduction in funding to meet level of demand | 2010/11 | - | (13,000) | (15,000) | (15,000) | (15,000) |
Previous Government |
||||||
Optimising central government investment in local government | 2008/09 | 8,210 | 10,951 | 13,051 | 13,051 | 13,051 |
Updating Thresholds for Entitlements under the Rates Rebate Scheme | 2006/07 | 49,700 | 49,700 | 49,700 | 49,700 | 49,700 |
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
---|---|
Communities are supported by fair and responsive local government and other organisations | Chatham Islands Council Depreciation Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board |
Chatham Islands Council (M49)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 3,467 | 1,613 | 2,197 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in this appropriation is due to a lower level of funding for the Chatham Islands waste management programme in 2010/11.
Expected Results
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
The Chatham Islands Council is well supported and financially solvent | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
The Chatham Islands Council complies with its responsibilities under the Local Government Act 2002 | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous Government |
||||||
Chatham Islands Council Financial Assistance Programme | 2008/09 | 1,613 | 1,878 | 1,914 | 1,914 | 1,914 |
Chatham Islands Council Waste Management Assistance | 2006/07 | 1,451 | 319 | 319 | 319 | 319 |
Depreciation (M49)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 147 | 147 | 147 |
Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board PLA (M49)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
2009/10 | 2010/11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Reference | Conditions |
---|---|
Cabinet decision | Deed between the Crown and the Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board requires an annual payment of $1.500 million by the Crown to the Board for continued access by the people of New Zealand to Lake Taupo. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2009/10 Budgeted $000 |
2010/11 Budget $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
2013/14 Estimated $000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous Government |
||||||
Settlement costs relating to property rights in Lake Taupo | 2007/08 | 1,331 | 1,331 | 1,331 | 1,331 | 1,331 |