Information Supporting the Estimates is organised on the basis of sectors, with each Vote and its administering department allocated to one sector (with a small number of exceptions). The Information Supporting the Estimates comprises of sector overview information, together with statements of responsibility; performance information for appropriations in Votes covered by the sector; and statements of forecast service performance and forecast financial statements of departments included in the sector. Statements of Intent of departments included in the sector form part of the supporting information.
Formats and related files
Information Supporting the Estimates is organised on the basis of sectors, with each Vote and its administering department allocated to one sector (with a small number of exceptions). The Information Supporting the Estimates comprises of sector overview information, together with statements of responsibility; performance information for appropriations in Votes covered by the sector; and statements of forecast service performance and forecast financial statements of departments included in the sector. Statements of Intent of departments included in the sector form part of the supporting information.
Chapters of the Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector volume of the Information Supporting the Estimates 2009/10 are available in Adobe PDF and HTML formats.
Using PDF FilesCover, Contents#
Introduction#
- Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates
- Votes and Departments in Each Sector
- Purpose and Nature of Appropriations
- Guide to Reading Information Supporting the Estimates
- Terms and Definitions
- Useful Links
Sector Overview#
- Ministerial Statements of Responsibility
- Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility
Performance Information for Appropriations in Each Vote#
- Vote Crown Research Institutes
- Vote Education Review Office
- Vote Education
- Vote Research, Science and Technology
Statement of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
- Statement of Common Accounting Policies
- Ministry of Education
- Education Review Office
- Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
Statements of Intent of Departments (separately produced but forming part of this volume)#
- Ministry of Education
- Education Review Office [Treasury update July 2024: External link no longer active]
- Ministry of Research, Science and Technology [Treasury update July 2024: External link no longer active]
Redevelopment of Whitireia Community Polytechnic Porirua Campus (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | - | - | 1,080 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase in appropriation in 2009/10 is owing to the timing of asset disposals upon which the capital injection is dependent.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whitireia Community Polytechnic - Trades Training Facilities and Health Service Block | 2008/09 | - | 1,080 | - | - | - |
School Support Project (M26)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 1,880 | 1,880 | 1,880 |
Schools Furniture and Equipment (M26)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 19,989 | 19,989 | 23,903 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase in appropriation in 2009/10 is owing to different levels of expenditure on new schools, classroom replacement and other initiatives between the two years.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Century Building Programme | 2009/10 | - | 6,133 | 5,994 | 5,048 | - |
| 2009 School Staffing Improvements for New Entrants | 2009/10 | - | 297 | 820 | 334 | - |
| 2008/09 School Property Business Case | 2009/10 | - | 2,790 | 940 | - | - |
| School Property Business Case | 2007/08 | 7,326 | 4,670 | - | - | - |
| School Staffing Improvements | 2007/08 | 1,095 | 657 | - | - | - |
| 2006/07 School Property Business Case | 2005/06 | 2,212 | - | - | - | - |
UCOL Whanganui Campus Redevelopment (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,800 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase in appropriation is owing to a difference in the phasing of expenditure between the years in the agreed funding profile for the initiative.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future Model for Tertiary Education in Whanganui | 2006/07 | 1,000 | 1,800 | - | - | - |
University of Auckland Institute for Innovation in Biotechnology (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 6,000 | 6,000 | 2,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The decrease in appropriation in 2009/10 is owing to a re-phasing of expenditure between the years to meet contract specifications.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partnerships for Excellence Projects | 2004/05 | 6,000 | 2,000 | - | - | - |
Wananga and Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics Infrastructure Fund (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 3,494 | 3,494 | 1,888 |
| Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics sector | 2,397 | 2,397 | 1,400 |
| Wananga sector | 1,097 | 1,097 | 488 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The decrease in appropriation is owing to a difference in phasing of expenditure between the years in the agreed funding profile for the initiative.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard $000 |
Estimated Actual Standard $000 |
Budget Standard $000 |
|
| Development of document management systems. | - | - | 1,400 |
| Improved management information systems for institution-wide data management and reporting, including key performance indicators. | 922 | 922 | 488 |
| Replacement of assets directly related to engineering and trades. | 1,000 | 1,000 | - |
| Information technology upgrades to link into shared and collaborative systems. | 400 | 400 | - |
| Implementation of new library and learning commons. | 398 | 398 | - |
| Development of online student management and support systems. | 370 | 370 | - |
| Development of real time assessment tool. | 205 | 205 | - |
| Development of information systems for multi campus environments. | 199 | 199 | - |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Only projects approved by Cabinet will be funded through this appropriation. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wananga and Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics Infrastructure Fund | 2008/09 | 3,494 | 1,888 | - | - | - |
WelTec Financial Assistance (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 350 | 350 | 4,150 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase in appropriation is owing to the institution expecting to meet the criteria for converting its Crown loan to equity during this year.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response to Wellington Institute of Technology Business Case | 2006/07 | 350 | 4,150 | - | - | - |
Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki (M68)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Capital Expenditure#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | - | - | 4,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase in appropriation is owing to a transfer to 2009/10 of an underwrite facility not required in 2008/09.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki: Crown Loan Request | 2005/06 | - | 4,000 | - | - | - |
| Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki: Report Back on Government Interventions | 2006/07 | 400 | - | - | - | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
| Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
|---|---|
| College of Education Mergers (M68) | Annual report of the individual tertiary education institutions |
| Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics Distinctive Contributions (M68) | Annual report of the Tertiary Education Commission, annual reports of individual tertiary education institutions where applicable |
| Investment in Te Wananga o Aotearoa (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| National Assessment Tool for Adult Literacy, Numeracy and Language (M68) | Annual report of the Tertiary Education Commission |
| Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology Visual Arts and Media Block (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| NZQA Technology (M26) | Annual report of the New Zealand Qualifications Authority |
| Property Disposal Incentives Scheme (M26) | Annual reports of individual schools where applicable |
| Quality Reinvestment Programme (M68) | Annual report of the Tertiary Education Commission, annual reports of individual tertiary education institutions where applicable |
| Redevelopment of Whitireia Community Polytechnic Porirua Campus (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| School Support Project (M26) | Annual reports of individual schools where applicable |
| Schools Furniture and Equipment (M26) | Annual reports of individual schools where applicable |
| UCOL Whanganui Campus Redevelopment (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| University of Auckland Institute for Innovation in Biotechnology (M68) | Annual report of the Tertiary Education Commission, annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| Wananga and Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics Infrastructure Fund (M68) | Annual report of the Tertiary Education Commission, annual reports of individual tertiary education institutions where applicable |
| WelTec Financial Assistance (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
| Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki (M68) | Annual report of the tertiary education institution |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual results for each non-departmental capital expenditure appropriation.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Research, Science and Technology#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Research, Science and Technology (M56)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY OF RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY : Minister of Research, Science and Technology
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Research, Science and Technology is responsible for appropriations in Vote Research, Science and Technology (RST) for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
Departmental Appropriations
A total of nearly $15 million (2% of the Vote) for advice on research, science and technology that supports New Zealand's knowledge base and its capacity to innovate, and for managing Vote RST contracts and agreements, and delivering on the outcome for science and technology transforming New Zealanders' lives.
Non-Departmental Appropriations
A total of $730 million (98% of the Vote) contributes toward Government's priority for getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Research, science and technology (RS&T) is important to New Zealanders' quality of life and New Zealand's future. RS&T is responsible for producing ideas and knowledge that drive innovation. Those ideas are taken up and applied, not just in commercial products that fuel economic growth, but throughout society by enhancing New Zealanders' health and lifestyle, and in understanding how to make the most of our natural resources and protect our environment.
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations#
The Government is committed to New Zealand science. It recognises the vital role science plays in providing evidence for quality decision making, creating new knowledge to drive economic growth, and enriching our society. It also seeks measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology.
Gearing the science system for a higher level of performance will require change. The Government has outlined its key priorities that will guide any changes. These are:
- simplicity in the mechanisms for science funding and delivery
- clarity of roles in the science system
- efficiency and measurability in delivery, and
- relevance of science for New Zealand's needs.
The appropriations within Vote RST contribute to the Government priority of getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology.
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
| 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
| Output Expenses | 541,025 | 615,809 | 635,095 | 618,028 | 548,671 | 547,496 | 13,791 | 568,139 | 581,930 | 582,573 | 576,026 | 576,026 |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Expenses | 454 | 1,974 | 5,504 | 3,245 | 135,510 | 135,010 | - | 161,403 | 161,403 | 145,621 | 146,454 | 145,804 |
| Capital Expenditure | 17,324 | 7,245 | 2,774 | 4,180 | 5,084 | 5,084 | 730 | 1,000 | 1,730 | 16,345 | 480 | 600 |
| Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
558,803 | 625,028 | 643,373 | 625,453 | 689,265 | 687,590 | 14,521 | 730,542 | 745,063 | 744,539 | 722,960 | 722,430 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
| Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
New Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marsden Fund | Marsden Fund (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 |
| Health Research | Health Research (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 |
| Crown Research Institute (CRI) Capability Fund | CRI Capability Fund (M56) Other expense to be incurred by the Crown |
- | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Prime Minister's Prizes for Science | Engaging New Zealanders with Science and Technology (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Information Technology System for the Foundation for Research Science and Technology | Research and Development Facilitation and Promotion Service (M56) Non-departmental output class |
(1,000) | - | - | - | - |
| Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (M56) Capital Expenditure |
- | 1,000 | - | - | - | |
| Kiwi Advanced Research and Education Network (KAREN) | Research and Education Advanced Network Limited (M56) Capital Expenditure |
- | - | 16,000 | - | - |
| Reversing Unfunded 2008 Budget Commitments for Economic Transformation: Innovation | Environmental Research (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | (13,888) | (6,000) | (6,000) | (6,000) |
| Marsden Fund (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | - | (1,000) | (4,000) | (4,000) | |
| New Economy Research Fund (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | (1,778) | (5,000) | (7,000) | (7,000) | |
| Research for Industry (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | (8,611) | (4,998) | (6,918) | (6,918) | |
| Sustainable Energy Development (M56) Non-departmental output class |
- | - | - | (4,000) | (4,000) | |
| Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund (M56) Other expense to be incurred by the Crown |
- | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) | |
| International Investments Opportunities Fund (M56) Other expense to be incurred by the Crown |
- | (889) | - | - | - | |
| Technology New Zealand (M56) Other expense to be incurred by the Crown |
- | (9,200) | (750) | (250) | - | |
| Vote RST Departmental Savings | Advice on Shaping the Science System (M56) Policy Advice (funded by Revenue Crown) Departmental Output Expenses |
- | (180) | (250) | (250) | (250) |
| Total | (1,000) | (8,546) | 23,002 | (3,168) | (3,168) |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
Total Vote: All Appropriations
Significant changes in departmental and non-departmental appropriations in Vote RST, are discussed briefly below.
- Vote trends in actual expenses and capital expenditure by appropriation type
- Source: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
Output Trends 2004/05 to 2009/10
Appropriations for departmental output expenses have risen from $12.873 million in 2004/05 to $13.791 million in 2009/10. Most of this increase occurred in the Policy Advice output expense. MoRST has applied the increase to support its leadership role in the science system, increase evaluation, and to support new strategies such as the New Zealand Biotechnology Strategy and the RST International Linkages Strategy.
In 2006/07 the Policy Advice and Contract Management output expenses were combined into a multi-class output appropriation Advice on Shaping the Science System. This change was made to enhance the flexibility in managing the funding that sits within the Policy Advice and Contract Management outputs.
Between 2004/05 and 2009/10, two departmental output expenses have been discontinued or transferred to other Votes:
- In 2005/06 the Growth and Innovation Advisory Board departmental output expense ($1.268 million) was transferred from Vote RST to Vote Economic, Industry and Regional Development.
- The departmental output expense APEC Science Ministers' Meeting existed over the period 2002/03 and 2004/05 to provide for the meeting held in Christchurch in March 2004.
Output Expenses - Non-Departmental
Significant trends in comparative actual and estimated expenses for non-departmental output expense appropriations under this Vote are shown in Figure 1.
The steady growth over the period 2004/05 to 2007/08 reflects the investment being made in science outputs and to develop private sector research and development. The drop from 2008/09 is a consequence of a change in appropriation type for some output expenses. This change in appropriation type was due to the activity being in the nature of a grant scheme. Grant schemes are another expense whereas the output expenses relate to research outputs by research providers.
Other Expenses to be Incurred for the Crown
Significant trends in comparative actual and estimated expenses for other expenses to be incurred for the Crown appropriations under this Vote are shown in Figure 1.
The increase in 2008/09 is a result of a change in appropriation type from non-departmental output expense for six appropriations (Advanced Network, Crown Research Institute (CRI) Capability Fund, International Investment Opportunities Fund, Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund, Supporting Promising Individuals, and Technology New Zealand). Their common factor was that each appropriation comprised grant schemes to assist individuals or organisations with their research and development aspirations.
Capital Expenditure
During the period 2004/05 to 2005/06, activity by New Zealand Venture Investment Fund Limited was funded through Vote RST. This was transferred to Vote Economic, Industry and Regional Development in November 2005. Since 2005/06, capital expenditure has involved injections into Crown Research Institutes through the Equity Investment Fund, a cash injection for the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST) for development of information and technology systems, and investment in the Measurement Standards Laboratory at Industrial Research Limited.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Impact - Strategic Priority One - Simplifying the science system. |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Impact - Strategic Priority Two - Improving economic growth through research and development (R and D). |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
| Objective - To provide scientific and technical advice. Impact - Develop and maintain processes that provide scientific and technical advice and information, including direction setting and emerging technologies. |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
| Objective - To provide advice on New Zealand's Research Science and Technology system. Impact - Develop and maintain processes that provide advice and information on matters relating to research, science and technology undertaken within New Zealand. |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
| Objective - To provide effective management of the funding provided to research, science and technology in New Zealand. Impact - Develop and maintain processes that administer the funding provided to research, science and technology in New Zealand. |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
| Objective - To strengthen New Zealand's international links. Impact - Develop and maintain productive bilateral and multilateral relationships with governmental science and technology agencies in strategic priority countries. |
Advice on Shaping the Science System (MCOA)
|
Advice on Shaping the Science System MCOA (M56)
Scope of Appropriation
Negotiating, managing and monitoring contracts with the Crown's funding and investment agents and with other specific science and technology service providers.
Policy Advice
Policy advice on research, science and technology. This includes investment strategies, the performance and integration of the innovation system, scientific technical advice and ministerial services.
Explanation for Use of Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriation
Alignment of output class activity having common outcomes within one appropriation.
Expenses and Revenue
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation |
14,566 | 14,066 | 13,791 |
| Contract Management | 1,089 | 1,089 | 1,089 |
| Policy Advice | 13,477 | 12,977 | 12,702 |
Revenue from Crown |
14,247 | 14,247 | 13,587 |
| Contract Management | 1,089 | 1,089 | 1,089 |
| Policy Advice | 13,158 | 13,158 | 12,498 |
Revenue from Other |
319 | 319 | 204 |
| Contract Management | - | - | - |
| Policy Advice | 319 | 319 | 204 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The movement between 2008/09 and 2009/10 reflects a reduction in funding of $775,000. This reduction arises from:
- Third-party revenue of $80,000 that is not expected in 2009/10.
- Departmental revenues related to the reimbursement of employer contributions to retirement saving schemes is expected to be $35,000 less in 2009/10.
- Activity of $360,000 related to evaluation of the R and D tax credit (now discontinued) that will not occur.
- Activity of $300,000 related to communication of the R and D tax credit to businesses that will not occur.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Quantity | |||
| The Ministry will report quarterly against the Forecast Statement of Service Performance for MoRST, for the periods ending 30 September, 31 December, 31 March and 30 June. | N/A | Reporting on six month basis | Achieved |
| Output agreements or contracts established with each provider of research, science and technology (RST) services. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Provide ministerial support services as required, including:
|
450 - 600 items | 300 | Up to 400 items (see Note 1) |
| Quality | |||
| Ministerial satisfaction with the quality of analysis and advice will be gauged through regular feedback from the Minister to the Chief Executive. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Output agreements and contracts conform to the Ministry's standard for agreements, including the following:
|
Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Timeliness | |||
| The Ministry will respond to 95% of performance reports provided by Funding and Investment Agents (FIAs) and other contracted providers, within the time limits specified in the output agreements and contracts. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| A response to Ministerial correspondence is provided within 20 days of receipt. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| All draft responses to Parliamentary Questions are provided within deadlines. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Cost Effectiveness | |||
| The cost of MoRST's leadership in the science sector is optimal (1-3 years). MoRST costs are no more than 2.1% of total Vote RST. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Organisational | |||
| MoRST staff through the annual Gallup survey place MoRST in the upper quartile of New Zealand public sector organisations as a great place to work. | N/A | Not Achieved | Achieved |
Note 1 - This is an estimate based on 2008/09 data. It reflects the demand made by the Minister's office for Ministry input.
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Agreement to establish the multiclass output appropriation (MCOA) | The existing output expense appropriations share common outcomes. The MCOA enables alignment of the output activity to outcomes within one appropriation. |
| Movements between the output classes within the MCOA can increase each output class by up to 10% of the initial appropriation for the output contract management in the current financial year before requiring joint-Ministerial approval. | |
Quality Standards for Analysis and Advice |
|
| Purpose | The objective of the paper is clearly stated, and it answers the questions asked by Ministers and demonstrates a clear understanding of the desired outcome(s) of the Government or the Minister. |
| Problem definition | Any public policy problem, including the underlying causes, size and materiality of issues, is identified and supported by data or other evidence. |
| Context | It is clear where the advice stands in the context of the wider policy process, including what has already been undertaken and what is expected to occur in the future. |
| Logic | An appropriate analytical framework is used. Assumptions behind the advice are explicit and the argument is logical and supported by facts. |
| Accuracy | All material facts are present and accurate. Known gaps that could significantly affect the conclusions are identified and the range of uncertainty stated. Forecasts are credible at the time they are produced and take into account all relevant information. |
| Options | A range of options is presented that provides clearly differentiated choices and these are rigorously evaluated against the analytical framework. Costs, benefits, consequences and risks/opportunities of the options are assessed as part of the analysis. Where it is not appropriate to use a range of options the reasons are clearly stated. |
| Funding | The paper accurately and comprehensively describes the funding implications for the government of the proposals put forward. |
| Recommendations | Recommendations are clear, logical and action oriented and can stand alone from the rest of the advice. They are sufficient to enable a decision to be made on the proposal or to move to the next decision/action point. |
| Consultation | Evidence of thorough and timely consultation with other government departments and interested parties is presented, and their views, including objections, incorporated as appropriate. |
| Practicality | Issues of implementation, technical feasibility, practicality and timing are considered and advice accurately identifies compliance, transitional, political, legislative, revenue, expense and administrative implications and costs (quantified where possible). |
| Communication | Guidance is provided on how communications arising from decisions on the advice should be handled, including an assessment of key stakeholders who should be informed and how. |
| Presentation | Material is presented to suit the target audience and:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Advice as at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 11,826 | 11,826 | 11,826 | 11,826 | 11,826 |
| Contract Management as at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 509 | 509 | 509 | 509 | 509 |
| Reimbursement of employer contributions to State Sector Retirement Savings Scheme (SSRSS) 2004/05 OBU | 2004/05 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 |
| Policy Advice Budget 2005 Transfer for Biotechnology Futurewatch activity in MoRST | 2005/06 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| GST on baselines as at Budget 2005 - Policy Advice | 2005/06 | (1,403) | (1,403) | (1,403) | (1,403) | (1,403) |
| GST on initiatives as at Budget 2005 - Policy Advice | 2005/06 | (121) | (121) | (121) | (121) | (121) |
| GST on baselines as at Budget 2005 - Contract Management | 2005/06 | (64) | (64) | (64) | (64) | (64) |
| GST on initiatives as at Budget 2005 - Contract Management | 2005/06 | (16) | (16) | (16) | (16) | (16) |
| Policy Advice Budget 2005 Funding of science counsellor in North Asia | 2005/06 | 731 | 731 | 731 | 731 | 731 |
| Policy Advice Budget 2005 Capability consequences arising from the transfer of GIAB to the Ministry of Economic Development | 2005/06 | 232 | 232 | 232 | 232 | 232 |
| Increase in employer contributions to SSRSS 2005/06 OBU | 2005/06 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 |
| Policy Advice 2005/06 MBU Contract Management realignment | 2005/06 | (446) | (446) | (446) | (446) | (446) |
| Contract Management 2005/06 MBU realignment | 2005/06 | 446 | 446 | 446 | 446 | 446 |
| Contract Management Budget 2005 Supporting growth in CRIs | 2005/06 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2006 Transfer for Counsellors | 2006/07 | 258 | 258 | 258 | 258 | 258 |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2007 Tax on Overseas Conditions of Service - provision to be reviewed annually at each MBU | 2007/08 | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2007 Evaluation for R and D Tax credit | 2007/08 | 390 | 180 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
| MCOA Policy Advice MBU 2007/08 Adjustment for employer superannuation contributions to SSRSS and Kiwisaver | 2007/08 | 35 | - | - | - | - |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2008 Futurewatch transfer | 2007/08 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2008 MoRST capability | 2008/09 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| MCOA Policy Advice PREFU 2008/09 Income on use of AV equipment | 2008/09 | 80 | - | - | - | - |
| MCOA Policy Advice PREFU 2008/09 Communication of the R and D tax credit | 2008/09 | 300 | - | - | - | - |
| MCOA Policy Advice MBU 2008/09 Tax on overseas allowances and entitlements | 2008/09 | (30) | - | - | - | - |
| MCOA Policy Advice Budget 2009 Discontinuation of R and D tax credit evaluation | 2009/10 | - | (180) | (250) | (250) | (250) |
Part 2.2 - Non-Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives#
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Funding for agencies on a contestable basis to undertake policy and other operational research outside core business, and with cross-agency benefits. Impact - Policy and operational research informs Government's decision making. |
Cross Agency Research |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - New Zealanders' awareness of the importance and value of science and technology to themselves and New Zealand is enhanced. Impact - New Zealanders receive information about the importance and value of science and technology. |
Engaging New Zealanders with Science and Technology |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Public good research, science and technology enhances the understanding and management of our environment. Impact - Improved understanding of the environment and knowledge to underpin the management, protection and enhancement of natural ecosystems, plus knowledge of the sustainable use of ecosystems, including the productive sector's environment. |
Environmental Research |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - New Zealand firms have improved technological capability and international connectedness. Impacts -
|
Global Technology Partnerships |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Public good research, science and technology contributes to improvement in the health status of New Zealanders. Impacts -
|
Health Research |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The New Zealand innovation sector's global connectivity is enhanced. Impacts -
|
International Science and Technology Linkages |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Research capacity and capability is developed across the themes of the "Vision Matauranga" framework. Impacts -
|
Maori Knowledge and Development Research |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Excellence is achieved in the advancement of knowledge, the knowledge base is expanded, and people with knowledge, skills and ideas are supported. Impact - Profound or unexpected discoveries, or the catalysis of significant developments in previously unrelated and strategically important fields of knowledge. |
Marsden Fund |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The Minister's obligations under the Measurement Standards Act 1992 are satisfied. |
National Measurement Standards |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Researcher-led innovation develops capability and knowledge in new areas, or applications where industries are emerging or yet to emerge. Impact - To underpin new or emerging knowledge-based enterprises in New Zealand through:
|
New Economy Research Fund |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Commercialisation of R and D is accelerated and linkages between firms and research organisations are stronger. |
Research and Development Facilitation and Promotion Service |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Non-departmental output expenses and other expenses are invested effectively and efficiently. |
Research Contract Management |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The competitiveness of New Zealand industries and sectors is increased through strategic research. Impacts -
|
Research for Industry |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Public good research, science and technology improves social wellbeing and cohesion and economic wealth. Impact - To improve New Zealanders' quality of life for individuals, families and communities, foster social cohesion, sustain culture and identity, and improve economic performance. |
Social Research |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Private and public organisations are able to demonstrate the potential of new sustainable low carbon energy technologies. Impact - Understanding of new sustainable low carbon energy technologies. |
Sustainable Energy Development |
Cross Agency Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | - | - | 2,254 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Cross Agency Research is a new appropriation for 2009/10. In previous years cross-agency research activity has been included in departmental baselines. In 2008/09 $4.347 million has been appropriated for cross-agency research activity across seven votes.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number and total dollar value of new and active contracts will be reported in six-monthly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement or Terms of Reference. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | N/A | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Terms of Reference dated 22 February 2008 |
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2009 Cross Agency Research | 2009/10 | - | 2,254 | 4,118 | 4,347 | 4,347 |
Engaging New Zealanders with Science and Technology (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 6,448 | 6,298 | 7,071 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $623,000 to $7.071 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is additional funding of $1 million for the Prime Minister's Prizes for Science, less a transfer of $377,000 for the Science Learning Hub and Smash Palace initiatives made in the previous year.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
New Zealand Science Journals |
|||
| Eight journals will be published in electronic and/or paper format with a maximum of four issues per journal. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The average turnaround time from submission to publication will be 45 weeks or less. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Accepted papers will be published within 24 weeks of acceptance subject to available journal space. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Alpha and Gamma Series |
|||
| Between four and six Alpha and Gamma publications will be produced each year. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Promoting awareness of RST |
|||
| Present the New Zealand Science and Technology Medals as specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Manage a national promotional programme as specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Support talented science and technology school students as specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Develop new promotional activities as specified in the contact. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Engaging New Zealanders on Biotechnology |
|||
| New Zealand schools are using Biotechnology information on the Biotechnology Learning Hub as specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Develop a programme to give rural New Zealanders an awareness of the role of biotechnology research on food as specified in the contact. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Linking school students with RST research |
|||
| Provision of data for performance measurement framework supplied to MoRST by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the relevant agreement. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Support for Smash Palace |
|||
| Four projects to build links between scientists and artists are supported. | N/A | Project activity commences by 30 June 2008 | Achieved |
The Science and Technology Media Centre |
|||
| A media centre that strengthens linkages between the media and the RST sector is maintained as per contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
The Prime Minister's Prizes for Science |
|||
| Prizes will be awarded each year by 30 June. | N/A | N/A | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Engage New Zealanders with RST, through linking schools with research organisations and working with sector organisations to enhance their communications focus and activities. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 3,992 | 3,992 | 3,992 | 3,992 | 3,992 |
| Biotechnology Futurewatch Initiative (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) ex Sci Promotions MoRST | 2005/06 | (125) | (125) | (125) | (125) | (125) |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (444) | (444) | (444) | (444) | (444) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU) | 2005/06 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| RSNZ - Administration expenses and publication costs (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 155 | 155 | 155 | 155 | 155 |
| Linking schools and research organisations - pilot (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Reschedule Carter funding 2006/07 MBU | 2006/07 | (271) | (271) | (271) | (271) | (271) |
| Budget 2008 science learning hub and media centre | 2008/09 | 1,825 | 1,825 | 1,825 | 1,825 | 1,825 |
| Budget 2008 transfer of Futurewatch to MoRST | 2007/08 | (75) | (75) | (75) | (75) | (75) |
| Reschedule funding for science learning hub and smash palace 2008/09 OBU | 2008/09 | 377 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 Prime Minister's Prizes for Science | 2009/10 | - | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Environmental Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 100,014 | 100,014 | 102,569 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $2.555 million to $102.569 million for 2009/10. The reasons for the change are:
- a funding restructure and transfer of the undistributed funds held by the FRST, and
- reversal of the unfunded Budget 2008 commitment.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Envirolink |
|||
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of information will be reported as per the Information Sharing Agreement between MoRST and the Foundation. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Statement of Science Priorities - September 2008 | Priorities to which FRST must adhere to in allocating funds are:
The Minister of RST expects FRST to seek guidance on matters including, but not limited to:
|
| Ministerial Direction - Stable Funding July 2008 | The Foundation in its allocation of funds will ensure: there will be progressive implementation of the Negotiated Investment Process for eligible programmes within Vote RST to be considered eligible for a Negotiated Investment Process, a research programme will have to:
Outcome-based Investment and funds to which a ministerial scheme applies do not count toward the calculation of the percentage cap within the Environmental Research output expenses, but do form part of the total relevant output expense. |
| Ministerial Direction - Envirolink- November 2005 | The scheme will be administered by FRST. Envirolink is available to support two areas of environmental management:
FRST will allocate funds to those proposals that, in its view, meet the following criteria:
|
| Ministerial Direction - Climate Change Adaptation Research Scheme - December 2007 |
The Scheme will fund:
The Scheme's objectives are to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 93,629 | 93,629 | 93,629 | 93,629 | 93,629 |
| Marine Science and Information - use of MV Taharoa (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 1,545 | 1,545 | 1,545 | 1,545 | 1,545 |
| Envirolink-connecting science with management for environmental benefit (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 1,800 | 1,800 | 1,800 | 1,800 | 1,800 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (10,403) | (10,403) | (10,403) | (10,403) | (10,403) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) (1545 and 2000) | 2005/06 | (372) | (372) | (372) | (372) | (372) |
| Increasing environmental research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) NZ Ecosystems | 2006/07 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 |
| Budget 2007 International Polar Year | 2007/08 | 1,350 | 1,350 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2007 Climate change research | 2007/08 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| OBU 2007/08 Climate change adaption research | 2007/08 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 |
| MBU 2007/08 Restructure of funding for climate change adaption | 2007/08 | 834 | 833 | 833 | - | - |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 1,778 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 Land and water use and quality | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2008 coordinated call by FRST and EU | 2008/09 | - | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 |
| Budget 2008 Backbone | 2008/09 | 2,564 | 4,564 | 4,564 | 4,564 | 4,564 |
| Budget 2008 Outcome Based Investments | 2008/09 | 2,000 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| MBU 2008/09 rephasing of the undistributed funds held by FRST | 2008/09 | (6,111) | 6,111 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of the unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | (13,888) | (6,000) | (6,000) | (6,000) |
Global Technology Partnership (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 401 | 401 | 400 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will decrease by $1,000 for 2009/10. The reason for the change is a planned reduction in the level of annual funding for this service provided by the FRST.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| The cost of the Global Technology Partnerships service is reported quarterly. The cost of this service should reflect the direct processing time and cost, and the equitable distribution of all indirect costs. |
Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Objectives of the Global Technology Programme (GTP) are to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish the programme Budget 2006 | 2006/07 | 1,403 | 1,361 | 1,361 | 1,361 | 1,361 |
| Adjustment to administrative arrangements OBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | (1,002) | (1,361) | (1,361) | (1,361) | (1,361) |
| 2008 OBU Continuation of support | 2009/10 | - | 400 | 400 | - | - |
Health Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 62,955 | 62,955 | 70,955 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $8 million to $70.955 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is an increase for general contestable funding.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number and total dollar value of new and active contracts reported in six monthly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts are awarded in line with the process and criteria set out for each output in the contract between the Minister of RST and the Health Research Council (HRC). | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for RST Scorecard supplied to MoRST by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the Output Agreement. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Estimates of Appropriation 2007 | Criteria for the purchase of outputs will be:
|
| Health Research Council Act 1990 | Administer funds granted to the Council for the purpose of implementing national health research policy. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 47,734 | 47,734 | 47,734 | 47,734 | 47,734 |
| Increase investment in health research (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) to HRC | 2005/06 | 18,590 | 18,590 | 18,590 | 18,590 | 18,590 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (5,304) | (5,304) | (5,304) | (5,304) | (5,304) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (2,065) | (2,065) | (2,065) | (2,065) | (2,065) |
| Budget 2008 Increase investment in health research (HRC Contestable Fund) | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2008 Obesity Research (to have matched funds through Vote Health) | 2008/09 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Budget 2009 Increase investment in health research (HRC Contestable Fund) | 2009/10 | - | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 |
International Science and Technology Linkages (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 3,767 | 3,267 | 3,227 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will decrease by $540,000 to $3.227 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change reflects the transfer of funding made from 2007/08 in respect of bilateral activity involving the European Union, India, Singapore and Japan.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number and total dollar value of new and active contracts will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Terms of Reference. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| International Science and Technology Linkages (ISAT) Terms of Reference | All programmes will be targeted to supporting all, or some of the following fundamental objectives of the ISAT Output Class:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 2004 Budget | 2004/05 | 2,335 | 2,335 | 2,335 | 2,335 | 2,335 |
| Transfer of management costs for ISAT programmes administered by the Royal Society of NZ (RSNZ) to Research Contract Management NDE (as at 2004/05 OBU (DEFU)) | 2004/05 | (50) | (50) | (50) | (50) | (50) |
| Increased access to global science (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| Transfer to MoRST for Counsellor Activity (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | (258) | (258) | (258) | (258) | (258) |
| Budget 2007 Connecting NZ Science Globally | 2007/08 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| MBU 2007/08 transfer of funding to 2008/09 for bilateral activity with the European Union | 2007/08 | 150 | - | - | - | - |
| OBU 2008/09 transfer of funding to 2008/09 for bilateral activity with India, Singapore and Japan. | 2008/09 | 390 | - | - | - | - |
Maori Knowledge and Development Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 4,867 | 4,867 | 4,867 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation has not changed.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Statement of Science Priorities - September 2008 | Priorities to which the foundation must adhere to in allocating funds are:
The Minister of RST expects FRST to seek guidance on matters including, but not limited to:
|
| Vision Matauranga 2007 | The purpose of Vision Matauranga is to provide strategic direction for Vote RST funding for research of relevance to four themes. These themes will find expression, where appropriate, in research investments made by FRST, HRC and RSNZ. The four themes are:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 5,475 | 5,475 | 5,475 | 5,475 | 5,475 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (608) | (608) | (608) | (608) | (608) |
Marsden Fund (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 37,878 | 37,878 | 46,878 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $9 million to $46.878 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is additional funding for basic research for 2009/10 and through outyears.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number and total dollar value of existing contracts reported in six monthly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts will be awarded on the basis of research excellence. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for RST Scorecard supplied to MoRST by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract between the Minister of RST and the Royal Society of NZ (RSNZ). | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Terms of Reference - Marsden Fund - 2008. | The primary objectives of the Marsden Fund are to:
The Marsden Fund is open to applicants that meet the Marsden Fund's eligibility criteria. The eligibility criteria are determined by the Marsden Fund Council. The eligibility criteria must:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 35,289 | 35,289 | 35,289 | 35,289 | 35,289 |
| Increased funding for the Marsden Fund (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 2,880 | 2,880 | 2,880 | 2,880 | 2,880 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental Output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (3,921) | (3,921) | (3,921) | (3,921) | (3,921) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (320) | (320) | (320) | (320) | (320) |
| Administration cost of the Marsden Fund (social sciences panel) transferred to the Research Contract Management NDE (as at 2005/06 MBU) | 2005/06 | (50) | (50) | (50) | (50) | (50) |
| Budget 2007 Increased funding | 2007/08 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Budget 2008 Increased funding | 2008/09 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 |
| Budget 2009 Reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | - | (1,000) | (4,000) | (4,000) |
| Budget 2009 Increased funding | 2009/10 | - | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 |
National Measurement Standards (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 5,764 | 5,764 | 5,764 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There is no change in appropriation between 2009/10 and 2010/11.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Provision of national measurement standards and related services in accordance with the requirements specified in the contract with the Minister. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The measurement standards will be maintained in accordance with the resolutions and recommendations of the Metric Treaty Organisation with all technical procedures related to the measurement standards validated. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of outputs delivered in accordance with time lines specified in the output agreement with the Minister. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Measurements Standards Act 1992 | The Minister of RST shall provide for the use throughout New Zealand of uniform units of measurement of physical quantities, and for the establishment and maintenance of standards of measurement of physical quantities. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 5,517 | 5,517 | 5,517 | 5,517 | 5,517 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental Output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (613) | (613) | (613) | (613) | (613) |
| Extending Measurements Standards (operating) (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 860 | 860 | 860 | 860 | 860 |
New Economy Research Fund (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 69,833 | 69,833 | 73,019 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $3.186 million to $73.019 million for 2009/10. The reasons for the change are:
- a funding restructure and transfer of the undistributed funds held by the FRST, and
- reversal of the unfunded Budget 2008 commitment.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Direction - Stable Funding July 2008 | The Foundation in its allocation of funds will ensure: there will be progressive implementation of the Negotiated Investment Process for eligible programmes within Vote RST to be considered eligible for a Negotiated Investment Process, a research programme will have to:
|
| Ministerial Direction - November 2008 | The objectives of the New Economy Research Fund are to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 69,284 | 69,284 | 69,284 | 69,284 | 69,284 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (7,698) | (7,698) | (7,698) | (7,698) | (7,698) |
| Supporting existing infrastructure - Synchrotron (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | (808) | (644) | (644) | (644) | (644) |
| Transfer for Synchrotron OBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | - | - | (377) | (377) | - |
| Budget 2007 New Technologies | 2007/08 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 |
| Budget 2007 Innovative Foods | 2007/08 | 1,155 | 1,155 | 1,155 | 1,155 | 1,155 |
| Rollover reversal one off adjustment OBU 2007/08 | 2007/08 | - | - | - | 377 | - |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 1,600 | - | - | - | - |
| Emerging and high value technologies Budget 2008 | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| High technology platforms TRST Budget 2008 | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 8,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| OBU 2008 Reinstatement of funding after one-off transfer to Australian Synchrotron | 2010/11 | - | - | 644 | 644 | 644 |
| MBU 2008/09 restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST | 2008/09 | (3,200) | 3,200 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of the unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | (1,778) | (5,000) | (7,000) | (7,000) |
Research and Development Facilitation and Promotion Service (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 4,000 | 4,000 | 5,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $1 million to $5 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is the reduction in services and transfer of $1 million in 2008/09 for capital investment in the FRST in 2009/10.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Provide a quarterly report that identifies the type and nature of services, including those services contracted from third-party providers, provided to entities and sectors. The report should identify the number of entities receiving these services. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The cost of the R and D Facilitation and Promotion Service is reported quarterly. The cost of this service should reflect the direct processing time and cost, and the equitable distribution of all indirect costs. |
N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Service to facilitate relationships between firms and the research community. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2007 Establish the service activity | 2007/08 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Budget 2008 Increased funding for the service | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2009 transfer to provide for capital injection to FRST | 2008/09 | (1,000) | - | - | - | - |
Research Contract Management (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 22,456 | 22,431 | 21,834 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will decrease by $622,000 to $21.834 million for 2009/10. The reasons for the change are:
- $800,000 in 2008/09 only for FRST to further implement technical review and stable funding.
- An increase of $178,000 from 2009/10 for administration of Technology New Zealand grant schemes that was approved in the 2005 Budget.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Achievement reports from research providers are produced in accordance with timelines and content guidelines specified in contracts between the FIA and providers. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Contracts are monitored on the achievement of their performance objectives as specified in contracts between the Minister of RST and FIAs. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% or contracts are awarded in accordance with assessment processes outlined in annually updated documents. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of research contract payments are made at the agreed sum to the correct providers and no payments are made in excess of the agreed sums. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts, where appropriate, require research providers to obtain ethical approvals, and satisfy government regulatory requirements before the research can be undertaken. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| FIAs deliver 100% of key accountability reports in accordance with timelines specified in their contracts with the Minister. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| All advice to the Minister as required will be delivered, consistent with the Foundation's Act, within 15 working days of the formal request and will be of a standard acceptable to the Minister. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Investment efficiency ($ contract management budget/$ investment funds disbursed) will be reported in the 4th quarter or 2nd six-monthly reports for 2009/010. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Contracts ($ contract management budget/no. of contracts let) will be reported in the 4th quarter or 2nd six-monthly reports for 2009/010. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| At least 85% of biennially surveyed participants indicate satisfaction with the standard of delivery within the Technology New Zealand Schemes. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Processing time split (Date of application/date of contracting) to be relevant output expenses (defined in the output agreement) reported as specified in the contracts between the Minister of RST and FIAs. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The cost of research contract management (RCM) is reported for each funding scheme being administered under agreed outputs in the output agreement or service contract with the FIA. The cost of RCM should reflect the direct processing time and cost, and the equitable distribution of all indirect costs. |
Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Output agreements or contracts with FIAs | Funds the contract administration undertaken by HRC, FRST, RSNZ, and Fulbright New Zealand. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 19,317 | 19,317 | 19,317 | 19,317 | 19,317 |
| Transfer for admin cost of TBG programme (as at 2004/05 OBU (DEFU)) | 2004/05 | 225 | 225 | 225 | 225 | 225 |
| Transfer of management costs for RSNZ ISAT programmes (as at 2004/05 OBU (DEFU)) | 2004/05 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Envirolink-connecting science with management for environmental benefit (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| RCM for HRC for increased investment in Health Research (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 410 | 410 | 410 | 410 | 410 |
| Support for business R and D - the expansion of Technology New Zealand (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 480 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 |
| Expanding the Technology for Industry Fellowships (TIF) Scheme (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
| Industry Based Research Funding for Increasing the number of Research Consortia (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Expansion of the International Investment Opportunities Fund (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Transfer to MoRST for management of the CRI Capability Fund (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (150) | (150) | (150) | (150) | (150) |
| RCM for RSNZ for increased funding for the Marsden Fund (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) RSNZ | 2005/06 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (2,177) | (2,177) | (2,177) | (2,177) | (2,177) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (207) | (220) | (220) | (220) | (220) |
| RCM for RSNZ for Talented Young NZers & Teacher Fellowships Schemes (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 |
| RCM for NZ-United States Educational Foundation (Fulbright New Zealand) for admin of Science Scholarships (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | 142 | 142 | 142 | 142 | 142 |
| TechNZ - incorporation of 2005 Budget decision relating to rollout year of 2009/10 (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2009/10 | - | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 |
| RCM for RSNZ for administration of the Marsden Fund (social sciences panel) (as at 2005/06 MBU) | 2005/06 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Pastoral Research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Energy Research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
| Increasing environmental research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Introducing technical review in FRST's investment process (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 750 | 750 | 750 | 750 | 750 |
| RCM for RSNZ for administration expenses and publication costs (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 |
| RCM related to the International Polar Year Contestable research fund as at 2007 Budget BEFU | 2007/08 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Technical review of investments as at 2007 Budget BEFU | 2007/08 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| RCM for RSNZ for increased cost of administration for Teacher Fellowships MBU 2007/08 | 2007/08 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 |
| Budget 2008 increase for technical review and the implementation of the second phase of the stable funding initiative | 2008/09 | 800 | - | - | - | - |
| OBU 2008 increase in RCM for FRST | 2008/09 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
Research for Industry (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 206,040 | 206,040 | 214,263 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $8.223 million to $214.263 million for 2009/10. The reasons for the change are:
- a funding restructure and transfer of the undistributed funds held by the FRST, and
- reversal of the unfunded Budget 2008 commitment.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| At least 50% of contracts reporting co-funding greater than 5% of each contract's value. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Research Consortia is used to leverage private sector investment:
|
N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Direction - Stable Funding July 2008 | The Foundation in its allocation of funds will ensure: there will be progressive implementation of the Negotiated Investment Process for eligible programmes within Vote RST to be considered eligible for a Negotiated Investment Process, a research programme will have to
Outcome-based Investment and funds to which a ministerial scheme applies do not count toward the calculation of the percentage cap within the Research for Industry output expenses, but do form part of the total relevant output expense. |
| Terms of Reference - Research Consortia - September 2007 | Projects that meet the Scheme's objectives are eligible to receive funds from FRST. The Scheme's objectives are to:
|
| Statement of Science Priorities - September 2008 | Priorities to which FRST must adhere to in allocating funds are:
The Minister of RST expects FRST to seek guidance on matters including, but not limited to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004. | 2004/05 | 211,501 | 211,501 | 211,501 | 211,501 | 211,501 |
| GIF$ - Research consortia for research for economic growth (as at 2004 Budget) | 2004/05 | 6,650 | 6,650 | 6,650 | 6,650 | 6,650 |
| Reversal of a transfer inadvertently processed twice in previous Updates (as at 2004/05 OBU (DEFU)) | 2004/05 | (500) | (500) | (500) | (500) | (500) |
| Industry Based Research Funding for Increasing the number of Research Consortia (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 |
| Supporting technology platforms for economic growth in New Zealand's Crown Research Institutes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (6,000) | (6,000) | (6,000) | (6,000) | (6,000) |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (23,445) | (23,445) | (23,445) | (23,445) | (23,445) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 |
| Pastoral Research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 | 3,900 |
| Energy Research (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 2,925 | 2,925 | 2,925 | 2,925 | 2,925 |
| Increasing primary productivity and trade as at Budget 2007 BEFU | 2007/08 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Focusing on innovative foods as at Budget 2007 BEFU | 2007/08 | 2,345 | 2,345 | 2,345 | 2,345 | 2,345 |
| Baseline savings as at Budget 2007 BEFU | 2007/08 | (3,000) | (3,000) | - | - | - |
| Pastoral 21 as at Budget 2007 BEFU | 2007/08 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 7,778 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 sustainable primary systems | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2008 biosecurity tools | 2008/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2008 hazard management | 2008/09 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Budget 2008 renewable energy | 2008/09 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Budget 2008 deep geothermal energy | 2008/09 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Budget 2008 backbone | 2008/09 | 1,436 | 1,436 | 1,436 | 1,436 | 1,436 |
| Budget 2008 energy TRST | 2008/09 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Budget 2008 transfer for e-science | 2008/09 | (3,556) | - | - | - | - |
| MBU 2009 restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST | 2008/09 | (9,778) | 9,778 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitments | 2009/10 | - | (8,611) | (4,998) | (6,918) | (6,918) |
Social Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 5,860 | 5,860 | 5,860 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There is no change in the appropriation amount from 2008/09 to 2009/10.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and align with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Statement of Science Priorities - September 2008. | Priorities to which FRST must adhere to in allocating funds are:
The Minister of RST expects FRST to seek guidance on matters including, but not limited to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 2004 Budget | 2004/05 | 6,592 | 6,592 | 6,592 | 6,592 | 6,592 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (732) | (732) | (732) | (732) | (732) |
Sustainable Energy Development (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 3,822 | 3,822 | 4,178 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $356,000 to $4.178 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is a funding restructure and transfer of the undistributed funds held by the FRST.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet minute CBC Min (07) 16-1 | The Low Carbon Technology Fund will assist private and public organisations, which have completed basic research and have demonstrated the potential of a new technology at the laboratory or proof of concept stage, to move through the pilot/demonstration plant stage. |
| Ministerial Direction- Low-Carbon Energy Technologies Fund - February 2008. | The fund's objectives are to:
The Foundation will fund proposals that:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish Low Carbon Energy Technology Fund OBU 2007/08 | 2007/08 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | - | - |
| Budget 2008 continued funding | 2011/12 | - | - | - | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| MBU 2009 restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST | 2008/09 | (178) | 178 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | - | - | (4,000) | (4,000) |
Summary of Service Providers for Non-Departmental Outputs#
| Provider | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2008/09 Estimated Actual $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
Reporting Mechanism |
Expiry of Funding Commitment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Foundation for Research, Science and Technology | 427,164 | 427,164 | 431,753 | Annual Report | No Expiry |
| Health Research Council | 70,656 | 70,656 | 68,618 | Annual Report | No Expiry |
| Royal Society of New Zealand | 46,362 | 46,362 | 41,657 | Section 32A | No Expiry |
| Industrial Research Limited | 5,764 | 5,764 | 5,674 | Annual Report | No Expiry |
| Fulbright New Zealand | 142 | 142 | 142 | Section 32A | No Expiry |
The above table summarises funding to be allocated through Vote Research, Science and Technology to non-departmental providers, along with an indication of the mechanism to be used for reporting actual performance and (where determined) the length of the funding commitment.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5.2 - Non-Departmental Other Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The KAREN user group makes effective use of the Advanced Network. |
Advanced Network Capability Building (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Security and convenience of access to the Australian Synchrotron. Impact - To further scientific discovery, educate and grow the user base, strengthen New Zealand's competitive position and influence the direction of synchrotron science. |
Australian Synchrotron (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The purpose of the Carter Observatory is maintained for the provision of public good science in New Zealand. |
Carter Observatory Grant (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The distinctive role of CRIs is reinforced and supported to maintain the scientific capabilities required for the provision of public good science in New Zealand. |
CRI Capability Fund (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - New Zealand's subscription to the Convention du Metre is provided for and national measurement standards applied in New Zealand are supported. |
Convention Du Metre (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - To provide for the establishment and maintenance of a world-class genomic research capability in New Zealand. |
Genomics Research Infrastructure (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - Research providers are able to participate in research collaborations that attract international co-funding, to recruit highly experienced researchers from overseas and to support participation in international research programmes with a high relevance to New Zealand's economic, social and/or environmental development. Impacts -
|
International Investment Opportunities Fund (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - The rate of commercialisation of innovations from publicly funded research by public sector research providers in increased. |
Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - To promote and advance science and technology. |
Royal Society of New Zealand (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. | Rutherford Foundation (M56) |
| Objective - Human resources are supported. | |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - To improve primary health in New Zealand. |
Support for Primary Health Research (M56) |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. | Supporting Promising Individuals (M56) |
| Objective - Human resources in research, science, and technology are supported and people with knowledge, skills and ideas are developed. | |
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. | Technology New Zealand (M56) |
| Objective - Firms have increased ability to adopt new technology and to apply technological learning and technological innovation for business growth. |
Advanced Network Capability Building (M56)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 3,926 | 3,926 | 1,300 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
This appropriation will decrease by $2.626 million to $1.300 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is one-off funding provided in 2008/09 to develop the capability of users and a transfer to 2009/10 of $1.100 million for the development of grid middleware and access management systems for users.
Expected Results
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| A FIA is appointed to administer the Advanced Network Capability Building Fund (ANCBF), or part thereof, for 2008/09. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| The FIA reports six-monthly to MoRST on the number and value of grants made under the ANCBF, identifying their individual purpose and application. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| The FIA reports six-monthly to MoRST on whether applicants to the ANCBF are advised within 3 Business Days of their request for the status of their application. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | The capability fund is for the purposes of developing skills and opportunities for optimal utilisation of KAREN, including the resolution of any existing 'last mile' issues for accessing the Advanced Network by the user membership. Since 2007 the Advanced Network has become known as the Kiwi Advanced Research and Education Network (KAREN). |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provide capability funding for users of Advanced Network (CBC Min (05) 7/5) (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | 1,221 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 increase for e-science | 2008/09 | 3,805 | 200 | 200 | - | - |
| MBU 2008/09 rephase funding to 2009/10 | 2008/09 | (1,100) | 1,100 |
Australian Synchrotron (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 883 | 883 | 694 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will decrease by $189,000 to $694,000 for 2009/10. The reason for the change is an decrease in commitment under the funding arrangement agreed with New Zealand Synchrotron Group Limited.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| The agreed contribution is paid in full and on time, as the Crown's contribution to ensure New Zealand access to the Australian Synchrotron. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Agreement with the New Zealand Synchrotron Group Limited September 2006 | Minister's commitment to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supporting existing infrastructure - Synchrotron (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 808 | 644 | - | - | - |
| Supporting existing infrastructure OBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | - | - | 745 | - | - |
| Budget 2009 Foreign exchange cost pressure | 2008/09 | 75 | 50 | 40 | - | - |
Carter Observatory Grant (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
Recognition of the statutory obligation of $1,500 per annum to the Carter Observatory Board.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| The Crown's obligation is maintained by ensuring the annual funding is paid by due date. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Carter Observatory Act 1939 section 19 | Funding will be used for the purpose of the exercise of the Board's functions. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBU 2009 recognition of the statutory obligation | 2008/09 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Convention Du Metre (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 135 | 135 | 135 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will not change between 2008/09 and 2009/10. The appropriation for 2009/10 does take account of the impact of foreign exchange and movement in the annual subscription.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Membership obligations are maintained by ensuring the annual subscription is paid by due date. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ratification of the convention for use of the international metric measurement system. | New Zealand meets all obligations anticipated by the convention, including participation in the governing forum established in France and administered by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 |
| Increase for subscription change and forex impacts (as at 2004/05 MBU) | 2005/06 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Convention du Metre subscription increase for 2007 and outyears (as at 2005/06 MBU) | 2006/07 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| OBU 2008 annual adjustment for foreign exchange and subscription movements | 2008/09 | 25 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 foreign exchange cost pressures | 2008/09 | 15 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
CRI Capability Fund (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 50,612 | 50,612 | 60,612 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
The increase of $10 million to $60.612 million for 2009/10 is to improve the ability of each CRI to develop capability to deliver public good science outcomes.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Each CRI annual report shows adequate reporting of the application of funding. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| A quarterly exception report to CCMAU from each CRI recipient of a grant identifies changes in the use and application of the grant received. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Funding will be allocated on the basis of a CRI's research related income from all government sources, including local Government and that this income will be averaged over three years. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 31,876 | 31,876 | 31,876 | 31,876 | 31,876 |
| Budget 2005 Supporting technology platforms for economic growth in New Zealand's Crown Research Institutes | 2005/06 | 11,000 | 11,000 | 11,000 | 11,000 | 11,000 |
| Budget 2005 GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes | 2005/06 | (3,542) | (3,542) | (3,542) | (3,542) | (3,542) |
| Budget 2005 GST on Budget Initiatives | 2005/06 | (1,222) | (1,222) | (1,222) | (1,222) | (1,222) |
| Budget 2006 Supporting research capability in New Zealand's CRIs | 2006/07 | 8,500 | 8,500 | 8,500 | 8,500 | 8,500 |
| Budget 2007 Supporting research capability in New Zealand's CRIs | 2007/08 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Budget 2009 Improving CRIs ability to develop capability for public good science outcomes | 2009/10 | - | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Genomics Research Infrastructure (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | - | - | 12,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This is a new appropriation for 2009/10.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
A six-monthly report to MoRST from the Genomics group:
|
N/A | N/A | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | Funding is provided to establish a national infrastructure that will significantly enhance genomics research and analytical capability in New Zealand and which is expected to provide substantial economic and social benefits in health care, food production and environmental protection. This national genomics research infrastructure in New Zealand combines expertise in four research institutions. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBU 2008 genomics research Infrastructure | 2009/10 | - | 12,000 | 4,200 | 5,600 | 4,700 |
International Investment Opportunities Fund (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 9,735 | 9,235 | 10,092 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $735,000 to $10.092 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is:
- restructure of funding committed to support bilateral activity with the Republic of Korea
- restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST
- allowance made for foreign exchange cost pressures in the appropriations of Convention du Metre and Australian Synchrotron
- a transfer for recognition of the statutory obligation to the Carter Observatory Board, and
- reversal of the unfunded commitment made in Budget 2008.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Number of active and new contracts and total dollar value or number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly or six-monthly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Direction for the International Investment Opportunities Fund - August 2008. Objectives 1 and 2 |
The Schemes objectives are to:
|
| Terms of Reference - Strategic Relocation Fund - May 2006. Objective 3 |
The criteria for awarding the Fund are:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2004 GIF$ - International flexible response fund | 2004/05 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 |
| Budget 2005 Expansion of the International Investment Opportunities Fund | 2005/06 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 |
| Budget 2005 GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes | 2005/06 | (534) | (534) | (534) | (534) | (534) |
| Budget 2005 GST on Budget Initiatives | 2005/06 | (533) | (533) | (533) | (533) | (533) |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 3444 | - | - | - | - |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase Objective 2 funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 1,000 | - | - | - | - |
| OBU 2008/09 rephase Objective 2 funding | 2008/09 | (900) | 450 | 450 | - | - |
| MBU 2008/09 transfer for Carter Observatory | 2008/09 | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| MBU 2008/09 restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST | 2008/09 | (2,000) | 2,000 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 foreign exchange cost pressures | 2008/09 | (340) | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | (889) | - | - | - |
Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 6,667 | 6,667 | 7,756 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $1.089 million to $7.756 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is:
- A funding restructure and transfer of the undistributed funds held by FRST.
- A reversal of the unfunded commitments made in Budget 2008.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| At least 75% of contracts produce investor-ready milestones. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Direction - October 2007 | Projects that meet the scheme's objectives are eligible to receive funds from FRST. The scheme's objectives are to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (533) | (533) | (533) | (533) | (533) |
| Increased support to the Pre Seed Accelerator Fund (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 2,667 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 transfer for e-science | 2008/09 | (249) | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 transfer for stable funding and technical review | 2008/09 | (1,529) | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 increase | 2008/09 | - | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| MBU 2008/09 rephase funding to 2009/10 | 2008/09 | (2,489) | 2,489 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitment | 2009/10 | - | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) |
Royal Society of New Zealand (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There is no change in appropriation between 2008/09 and 2009/10.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Annual grant to the Royal Society is paid on time. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| A six-monthly report is provided by the Royal Society of the activities undertaken by the Society in relation to the funding. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Royal Society Annual Report provided to MoRST by 30 September 2010. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | This funding is limited to an annual grant to the Royal Society of New Zealand to contribute towards the Society's aims and function under the Royal Society of New Zealand Act 1997 to promote and advance science and technology. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBU 2008/09 Provision of annual grant | 2008/09 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Rutherford Foundation (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There has been no change in appropriation.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Annual grant to the Rutherford Foundation is paid on time. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| A six-monthly report is provided by the Rutherford Foundation Trust that identifies the amount (in number and monetary value) of grants made in the period and the purposes for which they have been made. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Agreement with Rutherford Foundation Trust | The Rutherford Foundation Trust administers grants that are made to eligible organisations and individuals that develop human resources in research, science and technology. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2008 Provision of annual grant | 2008/09 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Support for Primary Health Research (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There has been no change in appropriation.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Annual grant to the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners is paid on time. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| A six-monthly report is provided by the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners that identifies the number of grants made in the period and the purposes for which they have been made. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Cabinet decision | The funding is to support the implementation of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, New Zealand Primary Health Research Strategy. The funding is conditional on it being matched by funding from the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, and aligned with the Ministry of Health's Primary Health Care Strategy. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBU 2008/09 provision of annual grant | 2008/09 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Supporting Promising Individuals (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 18,657 | 18,657 | 19,407 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $750,000 to $19.407 million for 2009/10. The reason for the change is:
- provision for a post doctorate fellowship at the Salk Institute, and
- restructure of undistributed funds held by FRST.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| All Awards | |||
| Number and total dollar value of new and active contracts or number of active and new contracts and dollars disbursed during the financial year will be reported in quarterly reports or six-monthly reports. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of contracts meet the criteria set out in the funding agreement and any Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Provision of data for the RST Scorecard supplied by 30 September 2010 and in alignment with content guidelines specified in the contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Science and Technology Post-Doctoral Fellowships |
|||
| At least 80 active fellowships. | N/A | Achieved | |
Health Research Council awards |
|||
| 50-70 active fellowships and scholarships. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowships |
|||
| Number of active contracts as set out in the relevant contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Talented School Students Travel Award |
|||
| Number of awards defined in the relevant contract. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
James Cook Research Fellowships. |
|||
| Five active contracts. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Te Tipu Putaiao Fellowships |
|||
| At least 25 active fellowships. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Fulbright Scholarships |
|||
| At least ten scholarships awarded per annum subject to agreement with the Minister. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Terms of Reference - James Cook Fellowships - May 2006 | Funding support will be provided to researchers who are recognised for their sustained excellence, to undertake study or research in their field of scientific eminence. This study or research may be undertaken in a location and institution of their own choosing whether in New Zealand or overseas. The term of the fellowship will be two years. The award shall normally provide a stipend at the rate equivalent to an Associate Professor in a New Zealand university (but this may be varied at the discretion of the Society on a case-by-case basis), expenses specifically associated with taking up the Fellowship and possibly a contribution to research costs. Fellows will be required to present their work, and its relevance to society, to the New Zealand public (in plain language) at some time during their tenure. |
| Terms of Reference - New Zealand Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowships - 2005 | Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowships are open to all registered, practising school teachers in New Zealand whose work touches on science, mathematics or technology, or on other enterprise-related studies in conjunction with one of the above including school career advisors. Eligible teachers can be:
Fellowships will normally be approved for a period of between one and four consecutive school terms. The Fellowships Programme should be administered in a way which, over a period of three years, supports teachers covering a wide range of geographic and socio-economic sectors. |
| Ministerial Notice - Te Tipu Putaiao Fellowships | The objectives of the Scheme will be achieved by providing funding support for undergraduate, post-graduate and early career stage New Zealand scientists, technologists and engineers to undertake research of relevance to one of the four Vision Matauranga themes identified below.
Nature of SupportFellowships will be available to undertake research of relevance to one of the following four Vision Matauranga themes:
|
| New Zealand Science and Technology Post Doctoral Fellowship Scheme - August 1995 | The objectives of the Scheme are to:
Mechanisms of the SchemeThe objectives of the Scheme will be achieved by providing support, in the form of fellowships, for talented New Zealand post-doctoral students undertaking research in approved research institutes or business enterprises in New Zealand or overseas. It is anticipated that recipients of the Fellowship undertaking their research overseas will, upon the completion of their Fellowship, return to New Zealand for employment in the science, technology and engineering sector.Targeting of SupportThe Scheme will be targeted at New Zealand doctoral graduates who have recently had their degrees confirmed. It is expected that each individual Fellowship will have a duration of at least three years. |
| Terms of Reference - Talented Secondary School Science Students Travel Award | Objectives:
|
| Fulbright Scholarships - Cabinet decision | Increase the number of Fulbright researchers who study in areas important for economic growth and who commit to making a contribution to New Zealand's innovation system on completion of study. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 15,848 | 15,848 | 15,848 | 15,848 | 15,848 |
| Increase investment in Health Research (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Increasing Supply of Fulbright researchers in areas important for economic growth (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 |
| Transfer to RCM for RSNZ for Talented Young NZers & Teacher Fellowships Schemes (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | (39) | (39) | (39) | (39) | (39) |
| Transfer to RCM for Fulbright New Zealand for admin of Science Scholarships (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | (142) | (142) | (142) | (142) | (142) |
| Reversal of rollouts made in error OBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | (380) | (380) | (380) | (380) | (380) |
| Reschedule Carter Funding MBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 |
| Restructure of Carter Observatory MBU 2006/07 | 2006/07 | (271) | (271) | (271) | (271) | (271) |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 250 | - | - | - | - |
| Transfer to RCM for RSNZ for increased administration cost of Teacher Fellowship Scheme MBU 2007/08 | 2008/09 | (130) | (130) | (130) | (130) | (130) |
| OBU 2008/09 provision for a post doctorate fellowship at the Salk Institute | 2008/09 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
| MBU 2008/09 rephase funding to 2009/10 | 2008/09 | (500) | 500 |
Technology New Zealand (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 34,379 | 34,379 | 47,405 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
This appropriation will increase by $13.026 million to $47.405 million for 2008/10. The reasons for the change are:
- funding provided to the genomics research infrastructure
- a funding restructure of the undistributed funds held by the FRST, and
- reversal of the unfunded commitment made in Budget 2008.
Expected Results#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Contracts meet the criteria set out in the relevant Ministerial Direction. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| At least 15% of participants have not previously had assistance from Technology New Zealand schemes. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The FIA reports quarterly on the number and value of grants made under the grant schemes, identifying their individual purpose and application. | Achieved | Achieved | Achieved |
| Capability grants. Number and total value disbursed of new and active contracts is reported in all quarterly reports for 2009/10. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| Capacity grants. Number and total value disbursed of new and active contracts is reported in all quarterly reports for 2009/10. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| The Foundation will ensure that on average the value of targeted grants is not more than 50% of the proposed cost of research and development projects. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
| 100% of information as required will be reported as per the Information Sharing Agreement between MoRST and the Foundation. | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation#
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Ministerial Direction - Technology for Business Grants Scheme - July 2008 | The Scheme is intended to:
|
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2004 | 2004/05 | 50,999 | 50,999 | 50,999 | 50,999 | 50,999 |
| Transfer for admin. cost of TBG programme (as at 2004/05 OBU (DEFU)) | 2004/05 | (225) | (225) | (225) | (225) | (225) |
| Support for business R&D - the expansion of Technology New Zealand (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 14,400 | 14,400 | 14,400 | 14,400 | 14,400 |
| Expanding the Technology for Industry Fellowships (TIF) Scheme (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | 4,600 | 4,600 | 4,600 | 4,600 | 4,600 |
| GST on Baselines - Non-Departmental output Classes (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (5,642) | (5,642) | (5,642) | (5,642) | (5,642) |
| GST on Budget Initiatives (as at 2005 Budget (BEFU)) | 2005/06 | (2,111) | (2,111) | (2,111) | (2,111) | (2,111) |
| TechNZ - reduction to baselines through errors in rollout in previous years (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2005/06 | (11,638) | (11,638) | (11,638) | (11,638) | (11,638) |
| TechNZ - incorporation of 2005 Budget decision to support R and D and relating to rollout year of 2009/10 (as at 2005/06 OBU (DEFU)) | 2009/10 | - | 4267 | 4267 | 4267 | 4267 |
| Increased support to the Pre Seed Accelerator Fund (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | (3,000) | - | - | - | - |
| Transfer to assist fund access to the Australian Synchrotron (as at 2006 Budget (BEFU)) | 2006/07 | - | - | (368) | (368) | |
| Commercialisation and Innovation as at 2007 Budget BEFU | 2007/08 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Baseline savings as at 2007 Budget BEFU | 2007/08 | (9,400) | (9,600) | (9,600) | (9,000) | (9,000) |
| Rollover reversal one-off adjustment OBU 2007/08 | 2007/08 | - | - | - | 368 | - |
| MBU 2007/08 rephase funding to 2008/09 | 2007/08 | 12,222 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 transfer of funding from Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund | 2008/09 | 729 | - | - | - | - |
| Budget 2008 transfer to R and D Facilitation and Promotion Service NDE | 2008/09 | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) | (3,000) |
| OBU 2008/09 transfer to the genomics research infrastructure | 2008/09 | (5,000) | - | - | - | - |
| MBU 2008/09 rephase funding to 2009/10 | 2008/09 | (11,555) | 11,555 | - | - | - |
| Budget 2009 reversal of unfunded Budget 2008 commitments | 2009/10 | - | (9,200) | (750) | (250) | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
| Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Advanced Network Capability Building | Reported in the Annual Report of REANNZ Limited |
| Australian Synchrotron | Reported in the Annual Report of New Zealand Synchrotron Group Limited, and respective Annual Reports of its respective shareholder members (Technical Educational Institutes and Crown Research Institutes) |
| Carter Observatory Grant | Reported in the Annual Report of the Carter Observatory Board |
| Convention Du Metre | Section 32A |
| CRI Capability Fund | Reported in the Annual Report of the recipient Crown Research Institute |
| Genomics Research Infrastructure | Reported in the Annual Report of New Zealand Genomics Limited, and respective Annual Reports of its respective shareholder members (Technical Educational Institutes and Crown Research Institutes) |
| International Investment Opportunities Fund | Reported in the Annual Reports for the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology and the Health Research Council, and under Section 32A for activity administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand |
| Pre-Seed Accelerator Fund | Reported in the Annual Reports for the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology |
| Support for Primary Health Research | Section 32A |
| Royal Society of New Zealand | Section 32A |
| Rutherford Foundation | Section 32A |
| Supporting Promising Individuals | Reported in the Annual Reports for the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology and the Health Research Council, and under Section 32A for activity administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand and Fulbright New Zealand |
| Technology New Zealand | Reported in the Annual Reports for the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual performance for each non-departmental other expenses appropriation.
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Impact - Management and maintenance of MoRST's infrastructure. |
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (PLA) |
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology - Capital Expenditure PLA (M56)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
| Land | - | - | - |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | 310 | 310 | 372 |
| Intangibles | 144 | 144 | 358 |
| Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
454 | 454 | 730 |
| Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
| Land | - | - | - |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | 310 | 310 | 372 |
| Intangibles | 144 | 144 | 358 |
| Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
454 | 454 | 730 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Capital Expenditure in MoRST is primarily investment in information systems that support business processes and information retention within the Ministry. The ongoing investment cycle in those systems does fluctuate across the years and increases in 2009/10 to reflect the programme change in the cycle.
Expected Results
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Capital expenditure on Ministry infrastructure achieves expected expenditure levels | N/A | Achieved | Achieved |
Part 6.2 - Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives#
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome - Getting measurable benefits from New Zealand's investment in research, science and technology. Objective - To establish information management systems that simplify processes used to select and award science and research funding. |
Foundation for Research, Science and Technology |
Foundation for Research Science and Technology (M56)#
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | - | - | 1,000 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
Equity investment in FRST to establish information management systems that simplify processes used to select and award science and research funding.
Expected Results
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
|
| Investment is delivered within project scope and timetable. | N/A | N/A | Achieved |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
| Reference | Conditions |
|---|---|
| Deliver better functionality for contract management, application assessment, fund management, and investment processes. Overall simplified processes are expected. |
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget 2009 Capital injection | 2009/10 | - | 1,000 | - | - | - |
Reporting Mechanisms#
| Appropriation | Reporting Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Foundation for Research, Science and Technology | Reported in the Annual Report of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology |
The above table indicates the mechanisms to be used for reporting actual results for each non-departmental capital expenditure appropriation.
Statements of Forecast Service Performance#
The Statements of Forecast Service Performance of departments included in the Education and Science Sector comprise the service performance information for all departmental output expense appropriations that are proposed to be used by those departments. In this context, service performance information comprises the scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards for each class of outputs within those departmental appropriations, as set out in Part 2.1 of the Performance Information for appropriations in each Vote.
The following table identifies the classes of outputs incorporated in the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department in the Education and Science Sector.
| Department | Composition of Statement of Forecast Service Performance |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Education | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Education. |
| Education Review Office | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Education Review Office. |
| Ministry of Research, Science and Technology | The service performance information in Part 2.1 for the classes of outputs within all the departmental output expense appropriations in Vote Research, Science and Technology. |
Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
Statement of Common Accounting Policies#
These accounting policies have been applied in the forecast financial statements of all departments and Offices of Parliament except as outlined in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies for individual departments or Offices of Parliament.
These forecast financial statements are prepared in accordance with section 41(1)(a)-(f) of the Public Finance Act 1989. The purpose of the forecast financial statements is to facilitate Parliament's consideration of appropriations for, and planned performance of departments and offices of Parliament. Use of this information for other purposes may not be appropriate. It is not intended that these forecast financial statements be updated subsequent to publication.
Statement of Compliance
These forecast financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2009 comply with FRS-42 Prospective Financial Statements.
Specific Accounting Policies#
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these statements. These statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis. The measurement base applied is historical cost modified by the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities as identified in this statement of accounting policies.
The accrual basis of accounting has been used unless otherwise stated. These financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars, which is the entity's functional currency. All financial information presented has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
Judgements and Estimations#
The preparation of forecast financial statements in conformity with FRS-42 requires judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and these variations may be material.
Revenue#
Revenue is derived through the provision of outputs to the Crown and from services to third parties. Revenue is recognised in the forecast statement of financial performance when earned.
Leases#
Operating Leases
Where substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor, leases are classified as operating leases.
Lease payments under operating leases are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Finance Leases
Leases which effectively transfer to the department substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the leased items are classified as finance leases. These are capitalised at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. The leased assets and the corresponding lease liabilities are recognised in the statement of financial position. The leased assets are depreciated over the period the department is expected to benefit from their use. The interest expense component of finance lease payments is recognised in the statement of financial performance.
Borrowing Costs#
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.
Property, Plant and Equipment#
Property, plant and equipment, other than land and buildings, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Land and buildings are stated at fair value as determined by an independent registered valuer. Fair value is determined using market-based evidence. Land and buildings are revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that carrying value is not materially different from fair value at the end of the reporting period. Additions between revaluations are recorded at cost. Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Depreciation#
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis so as to allocate the cost [or valuation] of an item of property, plant and equipment, less any estimated residual value, over its estimated useful life.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Leasehold improvements are capitalised and the cost is amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Items under construction are not depreciated. The total cost of a capital project is transferred to the appropriate asset class on its completion and then depreciated.
Intangible Assets#
Intangible assets with finite useful lives (such as computer software) are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
Any capitalisation thresholds applied are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Amortisation is charged to the statement of financial performance on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
The estimated useful lives are set out in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested at least annually for impairment.
Where there is an active market for an intangible asset, the asset is recorded at a revalued amount, being fair value less any subsequent accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
Cash and Cash Equivalents#
Cash includes cash on hand and funds on deposit with banks with a maturity of 3 months or less from date of acquisition.
Debtors and Other Receivables#
Debtors and other receivables are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate, less impairment charges. Allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired.
Inventories#
Inventories held for sale or use in the production of goods and services on a commercial basis are recorded at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of purchased inventory is determined using the weighted average cost method.
Inventories held for distribution for public benefit purposes are recorded at cost (calculated using the weighted average cost method) adjusted when applicable for any loss of service potential. Where inventories are acquired at no cost, or for nominal consideration, the cost is the current replacement cost at the date of acquisition.
Employee Entitlements#
Pension Liabilities
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution retirement plans are recognised in the statement of financial performance as they fall due.
Other Employee Entitlements
Employee entitlements to salaries and wages, annual leave, sick leave, long service leave, retiring leave and other similar benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance when they accrue to employees. Employee entitlements to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Long-term employee entitlements are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Termination Benefits
Termination benefits are recognised in the statement of financial performance only when there is a demonstrable commitment to either terminate employment prior to normal retirement date or to provide such benefits as a result of an offer to encourage voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits to be settled within 12 months are reported at the amount expected to be paid. Other termination benefits are reported at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows.
Onerous Contracts#
Where the benefits to be derived from a contract are lower than the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligation under the contract, a provision is recognised. The provision is stated at the present value of the future net cash outflows expected to be incurred in respect of the contract.
Foreign Currency#
Foreign currency transactions are reported at the New Zealand dollar exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Statement of Cash Flows#
The following are definitions of the terms used in the statement of cash flows:
- cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in transit, bank accounts and deposits with a maturity of no more than three months from date of acquisition
- investing activities are those activities relating to the acquisition and disposal of non-current assets
- financing activities comprise capital injections by, or repayment of capital to, the Crown, and
- operating activities include all transactions and other events that are not investing or financing activities.
Taxation#
Departments and Offices of Parliament are exempt from income tax as public authorities. Accordingly no charge for income tax has been provided for.
Goods and Services Tax#
These forecast financial statements are GST exclusive, except for receivables and payables in the statement of financial position, which are stated on a GST inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as input tax, then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense.
The net amount of GST owing to or from the Inland Revenue Department at balance date is included as part of receivables or payables (as appropriate) in the statement of financial position.
Commitments#
Future expenses and liabilities to be incurred on contracts that have been entered into at balance date are disclosed as commitments to the extent that there are equally unperformed obligations.
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets#
Contingent liabilities are disclosed if the possibility that they will crystallise is not remote. Contingent assets are disclosed if it is probable that the benefits will be realised.
Changes in Accounting Policies#
Any changes in accounting policies since the date of the last audited financial statements prepared under New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice are described in the statement of entity-specific accounting policies. The last audited financial statements (30 June 2008) were prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS (New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards) as appropriate for public benefit entities.
Forecast Financial Statements Ministry of Education #
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
| Crown | 1,512,165 | 1,558,161 | 1,630,846 | 1,661,696 | |
| Department(s) | 5,195 | 3,015 | 3,161 | 3,249 | |
| Other revenue | 1 | 5,870 | 6,856 | 10,056 | 9,456 |
| Gains | - | - | - | - | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Income | 1,523,230 | 1,568,032 | 1,644,063 | 1,674,401 | |
Expenses |
|||||
| Personnel | 187,480 | 192,795 | 192,795 | 192,237 | |
| Operating | 2 | 225,199 | 240,397 | 242,769 | 247,535 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 352,737 | 384,965 | 415,259 | 425,885 | |
| Capital charge | 738,645 | 749,875 | 793,240 | 808,744 | |
| Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
| Other | 2,085 | - | - | - | |
| Total Expenses | 1,506,146 | 1,568,032 | 1,644,063 | 1,674,401 | |
| Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | - | - | |
| Other comprehensive income | 705,741 | - | - | - | |
| Total Comprehensive Income | 722,825 | - | - | - | |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
| General funds | 3,935,626 | 4,043,005 | 3,986,684 | 4,108,207 | |
| Revaluation reserve | 5,900,836 | 5,930,633 | 6,596,874 | 6,596,874 | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 9,836,462 | 9,973,638 | 10,583,558 | 10,705,081 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| Comprehensive income for the period | 722,825 | - | - | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | (17,084) | - | - | - | |
| Capital contribution | 65,000 | 117,633 | 159,996 | 183,633 | |
| Capital withdrawal | (23,645) | - | (38,473) | (5,217) | |
| Other | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | 747,096 | 117,633 | 121,523 | 178,416 | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
| General funds | 3,986,684 | 4,160,638 | 4,108,207 | 4,286,623 | |
| Revaluation reserve | 6,596,874 | 5,930,633 | 6,596,874 | 6,596,874 | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 10,583,558 | 10,091,271 | 10,705,081 | 10,883,497 | |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 55,854 | 68,666 | 27,930 | 30,305 | |
| Debtors and other receivables | 3 | 29,061 | 74,642 | 23,211 | 22,211 |
| Prepayments | 24,424 | 3,241 | 27,103 | 26,672 | |
| Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
| Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Assets | 109,339 | 146,549 | 78,244 | 79,188 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 4 | 10,516,939 | 9,953,253 | 10,643,000 | 10,832,402 |
| Intangible assets | 5 | 25,978 | 43,275 | 31,810 | 34,208 |
| Other non-current assets | 49,756 | 34,675 | 49,756 | 35,428 | |
| Total Non- current Assets | 10,592,673 | 10,031,203 | 10,724,566 | 10,902,038 | |
| Total Assets | 10,702,012 | 10,177,752 | 10,802,810 | 10,981,226 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
| Creditors and other payables | 84,802 | 72,700 | 81,162 | 81,162 | |
| Repayment of surplus | 17,084 | - | - | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 11,484 | 9,129 | 10,387 | 10,387 | |
| Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 113,370 | 81,829 | 91,549 | 91,549 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
| Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 5,084 | 4,652 | 6,180 | 6,180 | |
| Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Non-current Liabilities | 5,084 | 4,652 | 6,180 | 6,180 | |
| Total Liabilities | 118,454 | 86,481 | 97,729 | 97,729 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| General funds | 3,986,684 | 4,160,638 | 4,108,207 | 4,286,623 | |
| Revaluation reserve | 6,596,874 | 5,930,633 | 6,596,874 | 6,596,874 | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Taxpayers' Funds | 10,583,558 | 10,091,271 | 10,705,081 | 10,883,497 | |
| Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 10,702,012 | 10,177,752 | 10,802,810 | 10,981,226 | |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Crown | 1,532,165 | 1,558,161 | 1,630,846 | 1,661,696 | |
| Department(s) | 4,670 | 3,015 | 2,895 | 3,249 | |
| Other | 7,331 | 7,856 | 16,172 | 10,456 | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
| Suppliers | (234,541) | (241,718) | (244,634) | (248,818) | |
| Employees | (184,258) | (194,474) | (191,475) | (190,954) | |
| Capital charge | (738,645) | (749,875) | (793,240) | (808,744) | |
| Goods and services tax (net) | (527) | (1,000) | (106) | - | |
| Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Operating Activities | 6 | 386,195 | 381,965 | 420,458 | 426,885 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | 22,847 | - | 20,876 | 18,777 | |
| Sale of intangible assets | 303 | - | - | - | |
| Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | (418,126) | (465,002) | (552,568) | (608,226) | |
| Intangible assets | (8,181) | (14,345) | (17,188) | (13,477) | |
| Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Investing Activities | (403,157) | (479,347) | (548,880) | (602,926) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
| Capital contribution | 65,000 | 113,693 | 156,056 | 183,633 | |
| Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | (122) | - | (17,085) | - | |
| Capital withdrawal | (23,645) | - | (38,473) | (5,217) | |
| Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Financing Activities | 41,233 | 113,693 | 100,498 | 178,416 | |
| Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 24,271 | 16,311 | (27,924) | 2,375 | |
| Cash at the beginning of the year | 31,583 | 52,355 | 55,854 | 27,930 | |
| Cash at the end of the year | 55,854 | 68,666 | 27,930 | 30,305 | |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These prospective financial statements have been compiled on the basis of government policies and the Ministry of Education's Output Plan as agreed with the Minister of Education and the Minister for Tertiary Education at the time the statements were finalised. These prospective financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 22 April 2009.
In preparing these financial statements the Ministry has made estimates and assumptions concerning the future. These estimates and judgements may differ from the subsequent actual results. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2009/10 actual financial statements include:
- revaluation of school sector land and buildings at the end of June 2009 may significantly alter the value on the Ministry balance sheet, which would in turn change the capital charge and depreciation expense for the year
- the timing of disposal of surplus school sector property assets may affect revenue and expenditure and capital withdrawals related to the sale
- economic conditions may affect assumptions used to calculate employee entitlement provisions
- the impact of some of the new policies and savings across specific Ministry outputs may differ from the initial estimates after full details of implementation have been worked out, and
- further changes to the operating budget through additional new initiatives or technical adjustments later in the year.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Ministry of Education has applied the accounting policies set out in The Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting entity
Ministry of Education is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Ministry of Education is a public benefit entity.
The reporting entity is known as the Ministry of Education, which includes all activities carried out in terms of the outputs purchased by the Minister of Education and the Minister for Tertiary Education.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Secretary for Education on 22 April 2009. The Secretary for Education is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosures.
Specific Accounting Policies
These prospective financial statements of the Ministry of Education have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Public Finance Act 1989, which includes the requirement to comply with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practices (NZ GAAP).
These prospective financial statements of the Ministry of Education have been prepared in accordance with, and comply with, NZ IFRS as appropriate for public benefit entities.
The measurement base applied is historical cost adjusted for revaluations of assets. Revaluations are made to reflect the forecast service potential or economic benefit to be obtained through the control of assets.
Statutory Base
The prospective financial statements for the Ministry of Education are prepared pursuant to section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at the lower of cost less accumulated depreciation and net realisable value, except in the case of school buildings, which are stated at cost or valuation less accumulated depreciation.
School buildings are stated at fair value as determined by an internal valuation process. Fair value is determined using optimised depreciated replacement cost. Early childhood education centre buildings (playcentres and kindergartens) are valued based on depreciated replacement cost. Valuations are conducted on an annual basis.
School land, early childhood education land, house land and houses are recorded at market value, as assessed by an independent registered valuer. Valuations are conducted on an annual basis. Additions between valuations are recorded at cost.
The capitalisation threshold for property, plant and equipment is $2,500.
Depreciation
Depreciation, on other than freehold land and assets under construction, is provided on a straight line basis at rates that will write off the cost or valuation of the assets, less their estimated residual values, over their estimated useful lives.
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
- Permanent school building roof, services, fitouts, lifts and boilers - 15 to 45 years.
- Relocatable classrooms - 40 years.
- Ancillary buildings, covered ways, houses, kindergartens, playcentres, site improvements, swimming pools - 30 to 50 years.
- Permanent school building fabric - 75 years.
- Computer software - 3 to 5 years.
- Motor vehicles - 4 years.
- Plant and equipment - 3 to 8 years.
Properties Intended for Sale
Assets identified as surplus are recorded at the lower of carrying value at the date the asset is designated as surplus, and net realisable value.
Cost Allocation
All costs are charged to activities or projects. Direct costs are charged directly to non-overhead activities or projects. Indirect costs are charged to overhead activities. Costs in overhead activities are then ascribed to non-overhead activities based on cost drivers.
Criteria for Direct and Indirect Costs - direct costs are those costs charged directly to a non-overhead activity. Indirect costs are those overhead costs that cannot be identified with a specific output in an economically feasible manner, and are charged to an overhead activity.
Direct Costs Assigned to Outputs - non-overhead activities are mapped directly to outputs. Costs in these activities are therefore assigned directly to the relevant outputs. This includes costs related to the provision of school sector property.
Basis for Assigning Indirect and Corporate Costs to Outputs - indirect costs are assigned to non-overhead activities, and thereby to outputs, on the basis of direct personnel costs captured within the non-overhead activity.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Other Revenue
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
| School house rentals | 4,239 | 4,056 | 4,210 | 4,000 |
| Sundry rentals | 269 | 250 | 242 | 250 |
| Sale of learning materials | 319 | 400 | 218 | 250 |
| Special education | 418 | 500 | 480 | 450 |
| Receipts from property disposal | - | - | 4,300 | 4,000 |
| Miscellaneous revenue | 625 | 1,650 | 606 | 506 |
Total other revenue |
5,870 | 6,856 | 10,056 | 9,456 |
Note 2 - Operating Expenses#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
| Consultants' fees | 3,540 | 4,000 | 3,500 | 3,500 |
| Overseas travel | 893 | 660 | 720 | 720 |
| Domestic travel | 11,751 | 8,100 | 11,998 | 11,500 |
| Contracts for services | 76,379 | 85,000 | 84,818 | 85,000 |
| Special education payments | 72,256 | 70,000 | 75,140 | 75,000 |
| Operating lease rental | 18,354 | 17,200 | 18,537 | 18,500 |
| Maintenance of school land and buildings | 18,117 | 18,000 | 21,604 | 21,000 |
| Other | 23,909 | 37,437 | 26,452 | 32,315 |
Total operating expenses |
225,199 | 240,397 | 242,769 | 247,535 |
Note 3 - Debtors and Other Receivables#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
| Debtor Crown | 15,600 | 35,600 | 15,600 | 15,600 |
| Debtors other | 13,461 | 39,042 | 7,611 | 6,611 |
Total debtors and other receivables |
29,061 | 74,642 | 23,211 | 22,211 |
Note 4 - Property, Plant and Equipment#
| Land $000 |
Buildings $000 |
Leasehold improvements $000 |
Furniture/office equipment $000 |
Other $000 |
Total $000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost or revaluation |
||||||
| Balance as at 1 July 2009 | 3,385,896 | 7,612,450 | - | 68,259 | 11,790 | 11,078,395 |
| Additions by purchase | 28,000 | 584,000 | - | 9,062 | 3,144 | 624,206 |
| Additions internally developed | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Revaluation increase | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Transfers between classes | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Disposals | (7,600) | (10,300) | - | (10,023) | (3,144) | (31,067) |
| Balance as at 30 June 2010 | 3,406,296 | 8,186,150 | - | 67,298 | 11,790 | 11,671,534 |
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses |
||||||
| Balance as at 1 July 2009 | - | 391,515 | - | 39,827 | 4,053 | 435,395 |
| Depreciation expense | - | 401,766 | - | 10,914 | 2,126 | 414,806 |
| Eliminate on disposal | - | - | - | (8,802) | (2,267) | (11,069) |
| Eliminate on revaluation | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Transfers between classes | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Impairment losses | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Balance as at 30 June 2010 | - | 793,281 | - | 41,939 | 3,912 | 839,132 |
Carrying amount as at 30 June 2010 |
3,406,296 | 7,392,869 | - | 25,359 | 7,878 | 10,832,402 |
Note 5 - Intangible Assets#
| Acquired software $000 |
Internally generated software $000 |
Other $000 |
Total $000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost |
||||
| Balance as at 1 July 2009 | - | - | 72,819 | 72,819 |
| Additions by purchase | - | - | - | - |
| Additions internally developed | - | - | 13,477 | 13,477 |
| Disposals | - | - | (8,000) | (8,000) |
| Balance as at 30 June 2010 | - | - | 78,296 | 78,296 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses |
||||
| Balance as at 1 July 2009 | - | - | 41,009 | 41,009 |
| Amortisation expense | - | - | 11,079 | 11,079 |
| Disposals | - | - | (8,000) | (8,000) |
| Impairment losses | - | - | - | - |
| Balance as at 30 June 2010 | - | - | 44,088 | 44,088 |
| Carrying amount as at 30 June 2010 | - | - | 34,208 | 34,208 |
Note 6 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus / (deficit) |
17,084 | - | - | - |
Add/ (less) non-cash items |
||||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | 352,823 | 384,965 | 415,259 | 425,885 |
| Total non-cash items | 352,823 | 384,965 | 415,259 | 425,885 |
Add/ (less) items classified as investing or financing activities |
||||
| (Gains)/ losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | 1,790 | - | - | - |
| Total items classified as investing or financing activities | 1,790 | - | - | - |
Add/ (less) movements in working capital items |
||||
| (Inc)/ Dec in debtors and other receivables | 21,145 | 1,000 | 5,850 | 1,000 |
| (Inc)/ Dec in prepayments | (888) | - | (1,992) | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in creditors and other payables | (7,270) | (1,000) | 1,342 | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | 2,339 | (1,100) | (1,097) | - |
| Net movements in working capital items | 15,326 | (1,100) | 4,103 | 1,000 |
Add/ (less) movements in non-current liabilities |
||||
| Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | (828) | (1,900) | 1,096 | - |
| Net cash from operating activities | 386,195 | 381,965 | 420,458 | 426,885 |
Forecast Financial Statements Education Review Office#
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
| Crown | 27,859 | 27,769 | 28,675 | 27,959 | |
| Department(s) | 570 | 628 | 822 | 803 | |
| Other revenue | 15 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| Gains | - | - | - | - | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Income | 28,444 | 28,437 | 29,537 | 28,802 | |
Expenses |
|||||
| Personnel | 20,419 | 20,794 | 21,515 | 20,971 | |
| Operating | 1 | 6,871 | 6,312 | 6,748 | 6,462 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 1,130 | 1,191 | 1,158 | 1,253 | |
| Capital charge | 118 | 140 | 116 | 116 | |
| Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
| Other | 22 | - | - | - | |
| Total Expenses | 28,560 | 28,437 | 29,537 | 28,802 | |
| Net Surplus / (Deficit) | - | - | - | - | |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Comprehensive Income | (116) | - | - | - | |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
| General funds | 3,619 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,598 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 3,619 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,598 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| Comprehensive income for the period | (116) | - | - | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | - | - | - | - | |
| Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
| Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | (26) | |
| Other | 95 | - | - | - | |
| Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | (21) | - | - | (26) | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
| General funds | 3,598 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,572 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 3,598 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,572 | |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,748 | 2,193 | 3,280 | 3,160 | |
| Debtors and other receivables | 218 | 120 | 230 | 230 | |
| Prepayments | 108 | 26 | 100 | 100 | |
| Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
| Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Assets | 4,074 | 2,339 | 3,610 | 3,490 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 3,242 | 3,960 | 3,325 | 3,361 | |
| Intangible assets | 542 | 586 | 1,263 | 1,074 | |
| Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Non- current Assets | 3,784 | 4,546 | 4,588 | 4,435 | |
| Total Assets | 7,858 | 6,885 | 8,198 | 7,925 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
| Creditors and other payables | 1,843 | 1,113 | 1,988 | 1,986 | |
| Repayment of surplus | - | - | - | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 1,131 | 1,096 | 1,341 | 1,096 | |
| Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 2,974 | 2,209 | 3,329 | 3,082 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
| Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 1,286 | 950 | 1,271 | 1,271 | |
| Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Non-current Liabilities | 1,286 | 950 | 1,271 | 1,271 | |
| Total Liabilities | 4,260 | 3,159 | 4,600 | 4,353 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| General funds | 3,598 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,572 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Taxpayers' Funds | 3,598 | 3,726 | 3,598 | 3,572 | |
| Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 7,858 | 6,885 | 8,198 | 7,925 | |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Crown | 27,859 | 27,769 | 28,675 | 27,959 | |
| Department(s) | 535 | 628 | 811 | 803 | |
| Other | 13 | 40 | 39 | 40 | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
| Suppliers | (6,854) | (6,577) | (6,594) | (6,464) | |
| Employees | (20,127) | (20,529) | (21,320) | (21,216) | |
| Capital charge | (118) | (140) | (117) | (116) | |
| Goods and services tax (net) | - | - | - | - | |
| Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | 1,308 | 1,191 | 1,494 | 1,006 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | 21 | 131 | 100 | 100 | |
| Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | (678) | (1,124) | (1,051) | (900) | |
| Intangible assets | (78) | (333) | (1,011) | (300) | |
| Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Investing Activities | (735) | (1,326) | (1,962) | (1,100) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
| Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
| Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | (50) | - | - | - | |
| Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | (26) | |
| Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Financing Activities | (50) | - | - | (26) | |
| Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | 523 | (135) | (468) | (120) | |
| Cash at the beginning of the year | 3,225 | 2,328 | 3,748 | 3,280 | |
| Cash at the end of the year | 3,748 | 2,193 | 3,280 | 3,160 | |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- ERO's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Personnel costs are based on 224 full time equivalents.
- Operating costs are based on historical experience adjusted for any known expected increase in expenditure items.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 22 April 2009.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2009/10 actual financial statements include changes to the baseline budget through new initiatives, or technical adjustments.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Education Review Office (ERO) has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting Entity
These are the prospective financial statements of ERO, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
ERO is a Government Department as defined by section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting ERO is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by the Chief Review Officer on 22 April 2009. The Chief Review Officer is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, Plant and Equipment
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out as follows:
- Computer hardware - $1,000.
- Motor vehicles - $500.
- Office equipment - $1,000.
- Leasehold Improvements - $1,500.
- Furniture and fittings - $1,500.
The estimated useful life and associated depreciation rates applied to each class of fixed assets are as follows:
- Computer hardware - 2.5 years to 4 years, 25% to 40%.
- Motor vehicles - 4 years to 5 years, 20% to 25%.
- Office equipment - 5 years, 20%.
- Leasehold Improvements - 10 years, 10%.
- Furniture and fittings - 10 years, 10%.
Intangible Assets
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out as follows:
- Computer software - $1,000.
- Review procedures - $20,000.
The estimated useful life and associated amortisation rates applied to intangible assets are as follows:
- Computer software - 4 years, 25%.
- Review procedures - 5 years, 20%.
Cost Allocation
Direct costs are costs incurred by output delivery management units. Direct costs are attributed to outputs based on time spent on each output from ERO's time recording system.
Indirect costs are the costs of corporate management and support services which cannot be identified with a specific output in an economically feasible manner. Indirect costs are allocated to output-delivery management units (excluding Policy Services and Ministerial Services) through the most appropriate cost driver as a proxy for consumption.
The cost of Education Evaluation Reports includes a transfer of time from institutional reporting activities. This transfer represents time spent by review officers in institutions collecting overview information.
The costs of Policy Services and Ministerial Services are based on the estimated hours at the average charge-out rate.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating Expenses
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
| Operating expenses include: | ||||
| Consultancy | 285 | 300 | 369 | 300 |
| Fees paid to Auditors for Audit of Financial Reports | 49 | 54 | 54 | 55 |
| Fees paid to Auditors for the Opening IFRS Balance Sheet | 9 | - | - | - |
| Domestic Travel | 2,371 | 2,392 | 2,470 | 2,300 |
| International Travel | 82 | 75 | 83 | 80 |
| Leasing and Rental | 2,097 | 2,100 | 2,146 | 2,125 |
| Other | 1,978 | 1,391 | 1,626 | 1,602 |
Total operating expenses |
6,871 | 6,312 | 6,748 | 6,462 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net Surplus (deficit) |
(116) | - | - | - |
Add/(less) non-cash items |
||||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | 1,130 | 1,191 | 1,158 | 1,253 |
Total non-cash items |
1,130 | 1,191 | 1,158 | 1,253 |
Add/(less) items classified as investing or financing activities |
||||
| Net loss on sale of property, plant and equipment | 22 | - | - | - |
Total items classified as investing or financing activities |
22 | - | - | - |
Add/less movements in working capital items |
||||
| (Inc)/ Dec in debtors and receivables | (12) | - | (11) | - |
| (Inc)/ Dec in prepayments | (21) | - | 7 | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in creditors and payables | 116 | - | (84) | 239 |
| Inc/ (Dec) in current provisions | - | - | 229 | (241) |
| Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | 48 | - | 210 | (245) |
Net movements in working capital items |
131 | - | 351 | (247) |
Add/ (less) movements in non-current liabilities |
||||
| (Inc)/ Dec in employee entitlements | 141 | - | (15) | - |
Net movements in non-current liabilities |
141 | - | (15) | - |
Net cash from operating activities |
1,308 | 1,191 | 1,494 | 1,006 |
Forecast Financial Statements Ministry of Research, Science and Technology #
Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Income |
|||||
| Crown | 13,634 | 13,977 | 14,247 | 13,587 | |
| Department(s) | 208 | 239 | 239 | 204 | |
| Other revenue | 80 | - | 80 | - | |
| Gains | - | - | - | - | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Income | 13,922 | 14,216 | 14,566 | 13,791 | |
Expenses |
|||||
| Personnel | 8,340 | 8,300 | 9,400 | 8,950 | |
| Operating | 1 | 4,608 | 5,021 | 3,811 | 3,953 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 608 | 714 | 674 | 707 | |
| Capital charge | 181 | 181 | 181 | 181 | |
| Finance costs | - | - | - | - | |
| Other | 10 | - | - | - | |
| Total Expenses | 13,747 | 14,216 | 14,066 | 13,791 | |
| Net Surplus / (Deficit) | 2 | - | - | 500 | - |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Comprehensive Income | 175 | - | 500 | - | |
Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Balance at 1 July |
|||||
| General funds | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Opening Balance | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
Changes in Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| Comprehensive income for the period | 175 | - | 500 | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | (175) | - | (500) | - | |
| Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
| Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
| Other | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Changes in Taxpayers' Funds | - | - | - | - | |
Balance at 30 June |
|||||
| General funds | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Taxpayers' Funds Closing Balance | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
Forecast Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Assets |
|||||
Current Assets |
|||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,386 | 2,911 | 3,535 | 3,012 | |
| Debtors and other receivables | 169 | 84 | 84 | 84 | |
| Prepayments | 15 | - | - | - | |
| Inventories | - | - | - | - | |
| Other current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Assets | 3,570 | 2,995 | 3,619 | 3,096 | |
Non-current Assets |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,766 | 1,608 | 1,634 | 1,572 | |
| Intangible assets | 471 | 436 | 383 | 468 | |
| Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Non- current Assets | 2,237 | 2,044 | 2,017 | 2,040 | |
| Total Assets | 5,807 | 5,039 | 5,636 | 5,136 | |
Liabilities |
|||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||
| Creditors and other payables | 2,795 | 2,305 | 2,305 | 2,305 | |
| Repayment of surplus | 175 | - | 500 | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 402 | 295 | 420 | 420 | |
| Other current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 3,372 | 2,600 | 3,225 | 2,725 | |
Non-current Liabilities |
|||||
| Provisions | - | - | - | - | |
| Employee entitlements | 24 | 28 | - | - | |
| Other non-current liabilities | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Non-current Liabilities | 24 | 28 | - | - | |
| Total Liabilities | 3,396 | 2,628 | 3,225 | 2,725 | |
Taxpayers' Funds |
|||||
| General funds | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
| Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | |
| Other reserves | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Taxpayers' Funds | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | 2,411 | |
| Total Liabilities and Taxpayers' Funds | 5,807 | 5,039 | 5,636 | 5,136 | |
Statement of Forecast Cash Flows for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Crown | 13,634 | 13,977 | 14,247 | 13,587 | |
| Department(s) | 264 | 239 | 276 | 204 | |
| Other | 72 | - | 128 | - | |
| Interest | - | - | - | - | |
Payments to: |
|||||
| Suppliers | (4,735) | (5,021) | (4,351) | (3,953) | |
| Employees | (8,234) | (8,300) | (9,406) | (8,950) | |
| Capital charge | (181) | (181) | (181) | (181) | |
| Goods and services tax (net) | (42) | - | 65 | - | |
| Other operating activities | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Operating Activities | 2 | 778 | 714 | 778 | 707 |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|||||
Receipts from: |
|||||
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | |
| Sale of intangible assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Sale of other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
Purchase of: |
|||||
| Property, plant and equipment | (88) | (167) | (310) | (372) | |
| Intangible assets | (528) | (164) | (144) | (358) | |
| Other non-current assets | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Investing Activities | (616) | (331) | (454) | (730) | |
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
|||||
| Capital contribution | - | - | - | - | |
| Other financing cash inflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Repayment of surplus | (375) | - | (175) | (500) | |
| Capital withdrawal | - | - | - | - | |
| Other financing cash outflows | - | - | - | - | |
| Net Cash from Financing Activities | (375) | - | (175) | (500) | |
| Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash | (213) | 383 | 149 | (523) | |
| Cash at the beginning of the year | 3,599 | 2,528 | 3,386 | 3,535 | |
| Cash at the end of the year | 3,386 | 2,911 | 3,535 | 3,012 | |
Statement of Significant Assumptions#
These forecast financial statements have been compiled on the basis of existing government policies and Ministerial expectations at the time the statements were finalised.
The main assumptions are as follows:
- The department's activities will remain substantially the same as for the previous year.
- Personnel costs are based on 89 staff positions (85 full time equivalents).
- Operating costs are based on historical experience. The general historical pattern is expected to continue.
- Estimated year end information for 2008/09 is used as the opening position for the 2009/10 forecasts.
These assumptions are adopted as at 1 April 2009.
Factors that could lead to material differences between the forecast financial statements and the 2008/09 actual financial statements include:
- Changes to the baseline budget through new initiatives, or technical adjustments.
- Changes in the level of activity undertaken by the Ministry over the last three months.
Statement of Entity-Specific Accounting Policies#
The Ministry of Research, Science and Technology has applied the accounting policies set out in Statement of Accounting Policies Standard included in this document, except as stated below.
Reporting entity
These are the prospective financial statements of Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, prepared in accordance with section 38 of the Public Finance Act 1989.
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology is a Government Department as defined by Section 2 of the Public Finance Act 1989. For the purposes of financial reporting Ministry of Research, Science and Technology is a public benefit entity.
Authorisation Statement
These forecast financial statements were authorised for issue by Ministry of Research, Science and Technology on 20 April 2009. The Ministry of Research, Science and Technology is responsible for the forecast financial statements presented, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the forecast financial statements and all other required disclosure.
Specific Accounting Policies
Property, Plant and Equipment
Capitalisation thresholds applied are set out below:
- IT Equipment / Hardware - $1,500.
- All other property, plant and equipment - $1,500.
Depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are set out below:
- Leasehold improvements - expected life of the lease (12 years at present).
- IT Equipment / Hardware - 3 years.
- Furniture and office equipment - 5 years.
- Other categories - 5 years.
Intangible Assets
Capitalisation thresholds applied are:
- Purchased software - $1,500.
- Internally developed software - $1,500.
The estimated useful lives of intangible assets are set out below:
- Purchased software - 3 years.
- Internally developed software - 3 years.
Cost Allocation
The Ministry has derived the costs of outputs using the cost allocation system outlined below:
- Direct costs assigned to outputs - direct costs are charged directly to outputs.
- Allocating indirect and corporate costs to outputs - indirect costs (including personnel directly applied but whose cost is pooled) are allocated by a proportion of budgeted direct staff time for each output.
'Direct costs' are those costs directly assigned to an output whereas 'indirect costs' are those costs that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner with a specific output. Corporate costs are all costs incurred by the Ministry's service and support units.
Notes to the Financial Statements#
Note 1 - Operating
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
| Operating expenses include: | ||||
| Consultants' fees | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| Overseas travel | 241 | 300 | 200 | 250 |
| Domestic travel | 208 | 220 | 175 | 200 |
| Other | 3,459 | 3,801 | 2,736 | 2,803 |
| Total operating expenses | 4,608 | 5,021 | 3,811 | 3,953 |
Note 2 - Reconciliation of Net Surplus to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities for the year ending 30 June 2010#
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
In 2008 Budget $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
|
Net surplus / (deficit) |
175 | - | 500 | - |
Add/ (less) non-cash items |
||||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | 608 | 714 | 674 | 707 |
| Net foreign exchange (gains)/losses | - | - | - | - |
| Total non-cash items | 608 | 714 | 674 | 707 |
Add/ (less) items classified as investing or financing activities |
||||
| (Gains)/ losses on disposal property, plant and equipment | 10 | - | - | - |
| Total items classified as investing or financing activities | 10 | - | - | - |
Add/ (less) movements in working capital items |
||||
| (Inc)/ Dec in debtors and other receivables | 48 | - | 85 | - |
| (Inc)/ Dec in prepayments | (15) | - | 15 | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in creditors and other payables | (174) | - | (342) | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in current provisions | 20 | - | (148) | - |
| Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | 110 | - | 18 | - |
| Net movements in working capital items | (11) | - | (372) | - |
Add/ (less) movements in non-current liabilities |
||||
| Inc/ (Dec) in employee entitlements | (4) | - | (24) | - |
| Net cash from operating activities | 778 | 714 | 778 | 707 |
Purpose of Information Supporting the Estimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates provides members of Parliament with information on expected performance to:
- support their examination of the appropriations and other authorities requested by the Government in the first Appropriation Bill for the forthcoming financial year, and
- provide a base against which they can later assess the actual performance of each individual department and Office of Parliament over that financial year.
The Information Supporting the Estimates is organised into 10 volumes by sector, each of which covers one or more Votes. The scope of each sector and the allocation of Votes to a sector reflect a balancing of three desired characteristics - namely that each volume should, where possible:
- reflect natural sectors
- keep together Votes administered by the same department, and
- keep together Votes allocated to a particular select committee of the House of Representatives for examination.
The number of sectors and coverage of each sector is set in consultation with the Finance and Expenditure Committee. The 10 sectors are:
- Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector
- Education and Science Sector
- Environment Sector
- External Sector
- Finance and Government Administration Sector
- Health Sector
- Justice Sector
- Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector
- Primary Sector
- Social Development and Housing Sector.
Votes and Departments in Each Sector#
| Votes by Sector | Departments by Sector |
|---|---|
| Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector - B.5A Vol.1 | |
| Vote Economic Development Vote Commerce Vote Communications Vote Consumer Affairs Vote Energy Vote Tourism |
Ministry of Economic Development |
| Vote Transport | Ministry of Transport |
| Vote Labour Vote ACC Vote Employment Vote Immigration |
Department of Labour |
| Education and Science Sector - B.5A Vol.2 | |
| Vote Education | Ministry of Education |
| Vote Crown Research Institutes (this Vote is administered by the Treasury, which is in the Finance and Government Administration Sector.) | |
| Vote Education Review Office | Education Review Office |
| Vote Research, Science and Technology | Ministry of Research, Science and Technology |
| Environment Sector - B.5A Vol.3 | |
| Vote Environment Vote Climate Change |
Ministry for the Environment |
| Vote Conservation | Department of Conservation |
| Vote Local Government (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the National Identity Sector) | |
| Vote Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment | Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment |
| External Sector - B.5A Vol.4 | |
| Vote Foreign Affairs and Trade Vote Official Development Assistance |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |
| Vote Defence | Ministry of Defence |
| Vote Defence Force Vote Veterans' Affairs - Defence Force |
New Zealand Defence Force |
| Vote Customs | New Zealand Customs Service |
| Finance and Government Administration Sector - B.5A Vol.5 | |
| Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet | Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet |
| Vote Communications Security and Intelligence | Government Communications Security Bureau |
| Vote Security Intelligence | New Zealand Security Intelligence Service |
| Vote State Services | State Services Commission |
| Vote Finance Vote State-Owned Enterprises |
The Treasury |
| Vote Revenue | Inland Revenue Department |
| Vote Ministerial Services (this Vote is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs, which is in the National Identity Sector) | |
| Vote Office of the Clerk | Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives |
| Vote Ombudsmen | Office of the Ombudsmen |
| Vote Parliamentary Service | Parliamentary Service |
| Vote Audit | Office of the Auditor-General |
| Health Sector - B.5A Vol.6 | |
| Vote Health | Ministry of Health |
| Justice Sector - B.5A Vol.7 | |
| Vote Justice Vote Courts |
Ministry of Justice |
| Vote Corrections | Department of Corrections |
| Vote Police | New Zealand Police |
| Vote Serious Fraud | Serious Fraud Office |
| Vote Attorney-General | Crown Law Office |
| Vote Parliamentary Counsel | Parliamentary Counsel Office |
| Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector - B.5A Vol.8 | |
| Vote Arts, Culture and Heritage Vote Sport and Recreation |
Ministry for Culture and Heritage |
| Vote Statistics | Statistics New Zealand |
| Vote National Archives | Archives New Zealand |
| Vote National Library | National Library of New Zealand |
| Vote Māori Affairs | Te Puni Kōkiri |
| Vote Treaty Negotiations (this Vote is administered by the Ministry of Justice, which is in the Justice Sector) | |
| Vote Pacific Island Affairs | Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs |
| Vote Women's Affairs | Ministry of Women's Affairs |
| Vote Internal Affairs Vote Community and Voluntary Sector Vote Emergency Management Vote Racing |
Department of Internal Affairs |
| Primary Sector - B.5A Vol.9 | |
| Vote Agriculture and Forestry Vote Biosecurity |
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry |
| Vote Fisheries | Ministry of Fisheries |
| Vote Food Safety | New Zealand Food Safety Authority |
| Vote Lands | Land Information New Zealand |
| Social Development and Housing Sector - B.5A Vol.10 | |
| Vote Social Development Vote Senior Citizens Vote Veterans' Affairs - Social Development Vote Youth Development |
Ministry of Social Development |
| Vote Housing | Department of Building and Housing |
Purpose and Nature of Appropriations#
An appropriation is a statutory authority from Parliament allowing the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure.
Neither the Crown nor an Office of Parliament can legally incur any expense or capital expenditure - as those terms are defined in the Public Finance Act 1989 (PFA) - unless it is expressly authorised by or under an Act of Parliament.
Limits Created by Appropriations#
Each appropriation is allocated to, and managed as, one of six types of appropriation.
Each appropriation has a defined scope that limits the uses or activities for which the expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred. The scope should be sufficient on its own to establish the nature and extent of the authority to incur expenses or capital expenditure. The wording of the appropriation scope should achieve the balance between being sufficiently precise to act as an effective constraint against non-authorised activities and not so specific that it inadvertently limits activity intended to be authorised.
In most cases an appropriation also limits the amount of expenses or capital expenditure that can be incurred, and the time period within which those expenses or capital expenditure can be incurred.
Aside from the very limited exclusions provided for in the PFA, the amount of expense or capital expenditure authorised by an appropriation is measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.
As generally accepted accounting practice does not normally treat GST as an expense, appropriation amounts also generally exclude GST. Prior to 2005/06, however, appropriations included applicable GST. All prior-year appropriation data, such as in the Summary of Trends table in the Estimates and the Summary of Financial Activity Table for each Vote in Information Supporting the Estimates - have been adjusted to exclude GST to allow appropriate comparison.
Responsibility for Appropriations#
Each appropriation is the responsibility of a designated Minister, who controls the right to use that appropriation within the limits authorised by Parliament. A department is also assigned to administer that appropriation in accordance with the Minister's wishes concerning its use.
A Vote is a group of appropriations (and can be a single appropriation) administered by a single department. Different appropriations within a Vote may be the responsibility of different Ministers.
Types of Appropriation#
The PFA provides for six types of appropriation. Four appropriation types authorise the incurring of expenses; one type authorises the incurring of capital expenditure; and the remaining type authorises both.
These appropriation types can be further differentiated by whether the expenses or capital expenditure are departmental or non-departmental transactions.
| Appropriation Type | Transaction Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Output Expenses | Departmental | Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament in supplying a specified category of outputs (goods and services). |
| Non-Departmental | Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in purchasing a specified category of outputs (goods and services) from Crown entities or other third parties. | |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) in transferring resources (generally to individuals for their personal benefit) for which the Crown receives nothing directly in return. Examples include the Unemployment Benefit, student allowances and various scholarships and awards. |
| Borrowing Expenses | Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to a department or an Office of Parliament, or public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by a department or an Office of Parliament. In practice, limitations on the rights of departments to borrow or issue securities mean that these are likely to be incurred only by Offices of Parliament. |
| Non-Departmental |
Authorises the incurring of interest or other financing expenses for loans made to the Crown (excluding departments), or public securities (undertakings that represent part of the public debt) issued by the Crown. Crown debt management is centralised, which means that most debt-servicing expenses appear in Vote Finance. |
|
| Other Expenses | Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament that are not either output expenses or borrowing expenses. Other expenses should be used only for events that cannot be related back to output production, such as redundancy costs arising from a government decision to cease purchasing certain types of outputs, or a loss on sale of assets made surplus by departmental restructuring. |
| Non-Departmental |
Authorises expenses to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) that are not structured or managed as output expenses, benefits and unrequited expenses, or borrowing expenses. Other expenses is the residual appropriation type, which should not be used where an appropriation could be better classified or managed as one of the other appropriation types (eg, as output expenses). Examples include disposal of an asset for less than market value, grants to community organisations, subscriptions for membership of international bodies and remuneration of independent statutory officers. |
|
| Capital expenditure | Departmental | Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by a department or an Office of Parliament to acquire or develop assets for the use of the department. |
| Non-Departmental | Authorises capital expenditure to be incurred by the Crown (excluding departments) to acquire or develop Crown assets, including the purchase of equity, or making a loan to a person or organisation that is not a department. | |
| Expenses or Capital expenditure incurred by an intelligence and security department | Departmental | Authorises both expenses and capital expenditure to be incurred by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service or the Government Communications Security Bureau. |
Types of Output Expense Appropriations#
A number of variations are possible for output expense appropriations. In particular, the constraint on the amount of expense that can be incurred is not always a fixed amount; and an output expense appropriation can cover more than one class of outputs.
| Output Expense Appropriation Type and Authority | Description, Constraints on Form and Typical Application |
|---|---|
|
Standard Output Expense Appropriations (section 7(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase a specified class of outputs. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Single output class only: The scope is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of a standard output expense appropriation is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. Typical application: The normal or default form for an output expense appropriation, used for a wide range of outputs for which the flexibility offered by the other types of output expense appropriation is not required. |
|
Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriations (MCOA) (section 7(3)(b), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental or non-departmental: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying more than one specified class of outputs (goods and services), or the Crown (excluding departments) to incur expenses to purchase more than one specified class of outputs. A proposed MCOA must be approved by the Minister of Finance before it is presented in the Estimates. The information supporting the Estimates must explain why the Minister has allowed those classes of outputs to be grouped in one appropriation. Annual or multi-year: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year or multi-year period specified. Multiple output classes: The scope of an MCOA is determined by the combined scope of each of the output classes included in that appropriation. Amount limited by Appropriation Act: The amount of an MCOA is limited to a set amount of NZ dollars specified in an Appropriation Act. The amount of expense that can be incurred in relation to each component output class is flexible within the total amount of the MCOA, although expenses must be separately forecast and reported for each individual class in the Estimates, Information Supporting the Estimates, Supplementary Estimates and the department's annual report. Typical application: An MCOA is used where it is appropriate to give the responsible Minister or department ongoing discretion over the output mix across two or more classes of outputs. Such discretion will most commonly be sought where the output classes contribute to a common outcome, or use a common or closely related set of inputs or processes, and the circumstances that determine the appropriate output choice or mix are likely to vary during the appropriation period. |
|
Revenue-Dependent Appropriations (RDA) (section 21(1), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying a specified a class of outputs (goods and services) that are not paid for directly by the Crown. A proposed RDA must be approved by the Minister of Finance, before it is presented in the Estimates. Each class of outputs for which an RDA is approved is listed in an Appropriation Act for the relevant financial year. Annual only: The authority lapses at the end of the financial year specified. Single output class only: The scope of an RDA is limited to a single class of outputs (defined as a grouping of similar outputs). Amount limited by amount of revenue earned: The amount of an RDA is limited tothe amount of revenue earned by a department or an Office of Parliament from other departments or from parties other than the Crown during a financial year. The Minister of Finance can further direct a department to incur expenses to a level lower than the amount of revenue earned, though such directions have been rare. Typical application: An RDA provides flexibility to respond to unanticipated changes in the level of external demand for a class of outputs, where the full cost of the outputs is met by external parties and not the Crown. |
|
Department-to-Department Appropriation (DDA) (section 20(2), Public Finance Act 1989) |
Departmental only: Authorise a department or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses in supplying specified outputs (goods and services) paid for by another department. Creation of a DDA requires an agreement between two departments. Implicitly it also requires the approval of the Minister who will become responsible for the appropriation - namely, the Minister responsible for the supplying department - as the agreement has implications for the scope and risk of that department's operations. Annual or multi-year: The period of a DDA will depend on the negotiated terms of the agreement. Single or multiple output class(es): The scope of a DDA (and hence whether it covers one or more classes of outputs) will depend on the way in which the agreement defines what is to be delivered. In most cases, an agreement that provides for a range of different outputs is better treated as creating several single-class DDAs. Amount limited by departmental agreement: The amount of a DDA is limited to either the amount of revenue earned from the commissioning department, or the cost incurred by the supplying department in providing those outputs (if that cost is less than the amount of revenue earned under the agreement). Typical application: DDAs are intended to make collaboration between departments easier by reducing the time and effort required to obtain / adjust the relevant appropriations while also allowing a commissioning department to retain full control over the resources it provides. The use of a DDA is not confined to bilateral agreements. A set of related DDAs could be used to enable one department to co-ordinate and manage the work of several departments that must work together to contribute to providing an integrated service to third parties, or to pool contributions from several departments to enable another department to provide a specific service to or on behalf of those departments. |
Appropriation Period#
The length of the appropriation period affects how appropriations are presented in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates. Three kinds of appropriation can be distinguished on the basis of period - annual and multi-year (as referred to in the above table on types of output expense appropriations), and permanent:
- Annual Appropriations - Most appropriations listed in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred only during a particular financial year. The annual amounts, for which parliamentary authority is normally sought, are shown in bold type in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote. The amounts for RDAs and annual DDAs are forecasts only, and so are not shown in bold type.
- Multi-Year Appropriations (MYAs) - The PFA also permits appropriations that allow expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred during a specified period that spans the whole or parts of more than one financial year, but no more than five financial years. The details of each MYA, including its commencement date and expiry date, are specified in Details of Multi-Year Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for relevant Votes.
- Permanent Appropriations (sometimes referred to as permanent legislative authorities or PLAs) -Permanent appropriations are authorised by legislation other than an Appropriation Act and continue in effect until revoked by Parliament. Generally the authorising legislation will impose limits on the scope of the appropriation and not its amount. For those appropriations that with limits set in cash terms, section 11(2) of the Public Finance Act 1989 requires that they be reported on an accrual basis. The usual legislative wording allows for expenses or capital expenditure to be incurred for the purpose specified in the legislation “without further appropriation than this section”. Details of permanent appropriations are included in Details of Annual and Permanent Appropriations in the Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for each Vote for completeness, though the amount specified is a forecast rather than a limit. The amounts of permanent appropriations are therefore not shown in bold type. The scope of a permanent appropriation will reference the relevant section of the authorising legislation.
Guide to Reading Information Supporting the Estimates#
The Information Supporting the Estimates for each of the 10 sectors comprises five components, each of which is briefly described, below.
1 Sector Overview Information#
The first component of the Information Supporting the Estimates may include a statement, agreed by all Ministers responsible for appropriations in each Vote included in the sector, that presents an overview of the sector and a high-level summary of the government's expectations and priorities. The Overview also includes Ministerial and Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility for the information provided in the Information Supporting the Estimates.
2 Performance Information Relating to Appropriations in Each Vote#
The second component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents performance information relating to each appropriation.
The title pages for each Vote specify the Minister(s) responsible for existing and proposed appropriations in the Vote, and the Responsible Minister for the department. The performance information meets the requirements of sections 15 and 41(1)(e) of the PFA and contains up to six parts. If particular information is not applicable to the Vote or a specific appropriation or type, or is otherwise unavailable, the relevant heading is not included.
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
The Summary of the Vote comprises:
- Part 1.1 Overview of the Vote - A plain-language summary of the focus of the appropriations through a brief explanation of the Vote. The Overview also appears at the start of the Vote in the Estimates.
- Part 1.2 High-Level Objectives of the Vote - The objectives for the Vote presented through links and relationships and high-level priorities and outcomes to which they contribute. Where applicable, priorities and outcomes are drawn from the priorities and desired outcomes and published strategy documents. Links are also made to specific government strategies. Links may also be made to specific Government objectives.
- Part 1.3 Trends in the Vote - A presentation of the actual and estimated trends in the Vote, comprising:
- Summary of Financial Activity - A table showing financial information over the preceding five years (actual, budgeted or estimated actual), the current year (Budget) and the following three years (estimated) for the type of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts.
- New Policy Initiatives - A table showing how new initiatives (and the associated expenses or capital expenditure) are allocated to appropriations in the Vote. References are included where appropriations in other Votes are affected by the same initiative.
- Analysis of Significant Trends - High-level analysis of appropriations and Crown revenue and capital receipts by type over the nine financial years covered by the Summary of Financial Activity table, explanations of significant changes and may also contain graphical presentations.
- Part 1.4 Reconciliation of Changes in Appropriation Structure - a table providing a reconciliation and explanation of any changes in the structure or classification of appropriations made in the Budget year. These changes are restated for the previous financial year to facilitate comparison.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
This Part provides further detail about appropriations and expected performance for output expenses.
- Part 2.1 Departmental Output Expenses - Intended impacts, outcomes and objectives are presented for departmental output expense appropriations in the Vote. This is followed by information on each appropriation, including its scope, a table showing expenses and revenue (distinguishing the revenue sources between the Crown and others), a statement of reasons for change in the appropriation (if material), and tables detailing performance measures and standards for significant aspects of expected output performance, any conditions on use of appropriation, any memorandum accounts (which record accumulated surpluses and deficits incurred in the provision of outputs on a full cost-recovery basis), and any current and past policy initiatives affecting the appropriation.
- Information on impacts and outcomes or objectives to which the outputs contribute is provided. Further information on the relationships between outputs, impacts, and outcomes or objectives is outlined in Part 1.2 and the Statement of Intent. Conditions on use include administrative criteria and processes contained in legislation, regulation and Government decisions, which may be reference in scope statement or performance measures. The current and past policy initiatives tables provides a five-year history of announced initiatives that impact on the Budget year, the preceding year and the following three years.
- For MCOA, an explanation is provided as to why the classes of outputs have been grouped under a single appropriation, and the scope statement, expenses and revenue, and performance information is presented for each output class.
- Information provided for MYAs enables the original appropriation to be reconciled to the adjusted level if changes have been approved or are proposed, and the balance remaining to be derived taking account of actual or estimated expenses incurred to date.
- The appropriation scope, expenses and revenue, and output performance measures and standards match information required to be included in a department's Statement of Forecast Service Performance with respect to departmental output expense appropriations used by the department.
- Part 2.2 Non-Departmental Output Expenses - This sub-part contains comparable information to that presented in Part 2.1 on departmental output expense appropriations. The main differences are that details of third parties’ other revenue is not relevant and a summary of service providers is included.
- The service providers table shows Crown entities and non-governmental organisations providing outputs funded through the Vote, and (where applicable) the mechanism for reporting actual performance to Parliament and the expiry of the Government's resource commitment. The reporting mechanisms are typically an entity's annual report or a report by the responsible Minister required by section 32A of the PFA. Where the provider is a Crown entity that is required to produce a Statement of Intent, its annual report may contain more detailed performance information at the output class or output level. ‘Section 32A' reports include a statement of service performance in relation to the appropriation.
Part 3 - Details for Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses#
Part 3 provides performance information about appropriations for benefits and other unrequited expenses incurred by the Crown. No departmental transactions arise under this appropriation type.
- Part 3.2 Non-Departmental Benefits and Other Expenses - Information on each appropriation includes impacts and outcomes intended to be achieved, a scope statement, expense components, reasons for material changes, any conditions of use, and details of any current and past policy initiatives over the five years up to and including the Budget year.
Part 4 - Details for Borrowing Expenses#
This Part provides detail about appropriations for borrowing expenses. No departmental borrowing expense appropriations exist at present.
- Part 4.2 Non-Departmental Borrowing Expenses - The set of performance information is the same as that for non-departmental benefits and other expenses, except that conditions on use are no specified.
Part 5 - Details and Expected Results for Other Expenses#
Part 5 provides detail about appropriations for:
- Part 5.1 Departmental Other Expenses - It is uncommon for this category of appropriation to be utilised. In the few cases where it occurs, the performance information is the same as that for non-departmental other expense appropriations except for a summary of reporting mechanisms.
- Part 5.2 Non-Departmental Other Expenses- Information on other expenses incurred by the Crown covers intended impacts and outcomes, appropriation scope, expenses analysed by component, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, expected results and standards, any conditions on use, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of mechanisms for reporting actual performance to Parliament.
Part 6 - Details and Expectations of Capital Expenditure#
This Part provides further details about appropriations for capital expenditure.
- Part 6.1 Departmental Capital Expenditure - The purchase or development of assets by a department is made under a permanent appropriation authorised by section 24(1) of the PFA. Capital expenditure is defined in section 2 as the cost of assets acquired or developed, including tangible, intangible or financial assets, and any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventories. The appropriation appears in the Vote that contains appropriations belonging to the department's Responsible Minister.
- Information is provided on intended impacts and outcomes of the appropriation, its scope, expenditure analysed by standard asset categories, reasons for material changes in the appropriation, and expected results. The scope statement is in a standard form for all departments. The performance information relates to the department as a whole and is not limited to any specific capital injection.
- Part 6.2 Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure - Performance information for capital expenditure incurred by the Crown is the same as that for departmental capital expenditure except for not detailing asset categories and the addition of any conditions on use of the appropriation, any current and past policy initiatives, and a summary of the mechanism for reporting to Parliament.
- The scope statement indicates the form of interest or asset acquired by the Crown, such as a capital injection (equity), loan or shares.
The following table summarises the performance information that is required for a ‘standard' appropriation in each sub-part.
| Standard Appropriations | Part 2.1 | Part 2.2 | Part 3.1 | Part 3.2 | Part 4.1 | Part 4.2 | Part 5.1 | Part 5.2 | Part 6.1 | Part 6.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For each sub-part: | ||||||||||
| Intended impacts, outcomes or objectives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| For each appropriation: | ||||||||||
| Scope of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Expenses and revenue | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expenses | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A |
| Capital expenditure | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ |
| Reasons for change in appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Output performance measures and standards | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expected results | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Conditions on use of appropriation | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
| Memorandum account | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Current and past policy initiatives | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | N/A | √ |
| Summary of service providers | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Reporting mechanism | N/A | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | √ | N/A | √ |
Information on reasons for change, conditions on use, current and past policy initiatives, and reporting mechanisms appears where applicable or material. Memorandum accounts are relevant only in Part 2. Some variations exist for non-standard appropriations, including MCOAs in Parts 2.1 and 2.2 and MYAs in Parts 2.2, 5.2 and 6.2. Furthermore performance information may not be available for some appropriations.
3 Statement of Forecast Service Performance of Departments#
The third component of the Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations comprises the Statement of Forecast Service Performance for each department included in the sector, by reference to material already set out in Part 2.1 of Votes containing appropriations proposed to be used by the department.
4 Forecast Financial Statements of Departments#
The fourth component of the Information Supporting the Estimates begins with a Statement of Common Accounting Policies applicable to all departments. The forecast financial statements for the forthcoming financial year for each department covered by the sector includes a:
- Statement of Forecast Comprehensive Income
- Statement of Forecast Changes in Taxpayers' Funds
- Forecast Statement of Financial Position
- Statement of Forecast Cash Flows
- Statement of Significant Assumptions.
Each department will include a Statement of Entity- Specific Accounting Policies detailing policies for any matters not addressed by the Statement of Common Accounting Policies (such as a “going concern” statement) or where its policies are more specific than the common policies (such as capitalisation thresholds and estimated useful lives of individual classes of assets). Notes to the Financial Statements provide additional details to assist interpretation of the accounts and to meet disclosure requirements outlined in legislation and accounting standards.
5 Statements of Intent of Departments#
The final component of the Information Supporting the Estimates presents the Statements of Intent of the departments covered by each sector. These statements contain the information required by section 40 of the PFA. They focus on the medium term and generally cover:
- Nature and scope of the department's functions - A brief high-level description of the department's functions, addressing its role(s) and purpose and how it intends fulfilling them.
- Strategic direction - impacts and outcomes - A brief high-level overview of the department's strategic direction covering both the impacts and outcomes the department is seeking to achieve (or contribute to) and the strategic environment in which the department operates through, in particular, its responses to the government's priorities.
- Operating intentions - Information that describes how the department intends to achieve (or contribute to) those desired impacts and outcomes through its operations. This section should also include the main measures and standards the department will use to assess and demonstrate what it has achieved, including measures of outcome achievement, impact and cost effectiveness.
- Managing in a changeable operating environment - Information on the risks to achievement of the desired outcomes and priorities, and the department's mitigation strategies.
- Assessing organisational health and capability - The department's intentions for building and strengthening its internal capability, including its responses to the development goals for the State Services and its strategic approach to managing its asset base and forecast capital expenditure in the medium term. If capital expenditure is significant, it is in a separate section.
- Additionalinformationand statutory reporting requirements - As required either by the responsible Minister or Minister of Finance, or by specific legislation.
Terms and Definitions#
The table below contains terms that are used in the Supplementary Estimates and the Information Supporting the Supplementary Estimates.
| Appropriation | An appropriation is a parliamentary authorisation for the Crown or an Office of Parliament to incur expenses or capital expenditure. |
|---|---|
| Appropriation scope | One of the defining terms of an appropriation that establishes limits on the activities for which the Crown or an Office of Parliament is authorised to incur expenses or capital expenditure under that appropriation. |
| Capital expenditure | The cost of assets acquired or developed including any ownership interest in entities, but excluding inventory. |
| Crown revenue and capital receipts | Flows accounted for as revenue and capital receipts on behalf of the Crown rather than as departmental revenue. |
| DDA | Department-to-department appropriation - as authorised by section 20(2) of the PFA. |
| Department | Generally references to Departments also include an Office of Parliament as provided in section 26E(4) of the PFA. |
| Expenses | Amounts consumed or losses of service potential or future economic benefits, other than those relating to capital withdrawals, in a financial year. Expenses are an accrual concept measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice. |
| GST | Goods and services tax. Appropriations are stated GST- exclusive. |
| MCOA | Multi-class output expense appropriation. |
| MYA | Multi-year appropriation. |
| N/A | Not applicable. |
| Outcomes | States or conditions of society, the economy or the environment, including changes in those states or conditions. |
| Outputs | Goods or services supplied by departments and other entities to external parties. Outputs are a variety of types, including policy advice, administration of contracts and grants, and the provision of specific services. |
| PFA | Public Finance Act 1989 |
| PLA | Permanent legislative authority - a traditional term for a permanent appropriation, ie, one that is authorised for an indefinite period by legislation other than an Appropriation Act. |
| Minister | The Minister responsible for specific appropriations being sought within a Vote. As several Ministers may now hold appropriations within a single Vote, each appropriation will have a tag (M1, M2, etc) identifying the Minister responsible for that line item. |
| RDA | Revenue-dependent appropriation - as authorised by section 21(1) of the PFA 1989. |
| Responsible Minister | The Minister responsible for the financial performance of a department or Crown entity. In relation to an Office of Parliament, the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, and the Parliamentary Service, the Speaker is the Responsible Minister. |
| Revenue from the Crown | Revenue earned by a department from the Crown for the provision of outputs to or on behalf of the Crown. These flows are accounted for as departmental revenue. Revenue from the Crown is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
| Revenue from Others | Revenue earned by a department from other departments and from third parties. Revenue from other departments is eliminated for purposes of reporting the Crown's overall financial performance and position. |
| Vote | A grouping of one or more appropriations that are the responsibility of one or more Ministers of the Crown and are administered by the one department. |
Useful Links#
The suite of Budget 2009 documents can be accessed in the Budgets section of the website: www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2009. Documents providing guidance on the PFA and the public sector financial management system can be accessed in the Public Finance Overviews section of the Treasury's website: www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/publicfinance.
Sector Overview#
Ministerial Statements of Responsibility#
Each of us is satisfied that the information on future operating intentions provided by our respective departments and included in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Education and Science Sector is in accordance with sections 38 and 41 of the Public Finance Act 1989 and is consistent with the policies and performance expectations of the government.
Hon Anne Tolley
Responsible Minister for the Ministry of Education
Responsible Minister for the Education Review Office
27 April 2009
Hon Dr Wayne Mapp
Responsible Minister for the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
22 April 2009
Chief Executive Statements of Responsibility#
Ministry of Education#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Education and Science Sector relating to the Ministry of Education and for the Vote for which the Ministry of Education is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Ministry of Education's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Karen Sewell
Secretary for Education
Ministry of Education
22 April 2009
Tina Cornelius
Chief Financial Officer
Ministry of Education
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Education Review Office#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Education and Science Sector relating to the Education Review Office and for the Vote for which the Education Review Office is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Education Review Office's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Graham Stoop
Chief Review Officer
Education Review Office
22 April 2009
James Kwing
Chief Financial Officer
Education Review Office
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology#
In signing this statement, I acknowledge that I am responsible for the information contained in the Information Supporting the Estimates for the Education and Science Sector relating to the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology and for the Vote for which the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology is the administering department. Specifically, this information is contained in the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology's statement of forecast service performance, forecast financial statements and statement of intent.
This information has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989. It is also consistent with the proposed appropriations set out in the Appropriation (2009/10 Estimates) Bill, as presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 13 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and with existing appropriations and financial authorities.
Helen Anderson
Chief Executive for Research, Science and Technology
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
22 April 2009
Geoff Palmer
Chief Financial Officer for Research, Science and Technology
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
22 April 2009
Counter-signed
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Crown Research Institutes#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Research, Science and Technology (M56)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: The Treasury
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TREASURY: Minister of Finance
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Research, Science and Technology (RS&T) is responsible for appropriations in Vote Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) for the 2009/10 financial year totalling $1.074 million. These appropriations will be spent on ownership, performance monitoring and governance advice to the Minister of Research, Science and Technology and the Minister for Economic Development in respect of the CRIs, Research and Education Advanced Network New Zealand Ltd (REANNZ) and New Zealand Venture Investment Fund Ltd (NZVIF) monitored by the Crown Company Monitoring Advisory Unit (CCMAU).
Non-tax revenue of $1.240 million in 2009/10 is the projected dividend flows from CRIs.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Contribution of Appropriations to Government Priorities and Outcomes#
| Appropriations | Government Priorities | Government Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Crown company monitoring advice to the Minister of RS&T and Minister for Economic Development. | Grow the New Zealand economy in order to deliver greater prosperity, security and opportunities for all New Zealanders. | Build and retain scientific capability in New Zealand; enable public good science of general benefit to New Zealand; ensure that scientific capability boosts export performance. |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
| 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
| Output Expenses | 957 | 970 | 1,028 | 1,062 | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 | - | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Expenses | 847 | - | 134 | 1,347 | 764 | 764 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
1,804 | 970 | 1,162 | 2,409 | 1,838 | 1,838 | 1,074 | - | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
| Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Tax Revenue | 15,000 | 18,000 | 803 | 887 | 2,654 | 2,654 | N/A | 1,240 | 1,240 | 1,610 | - | - |
| Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
15,000 | 18,000 | 803 | 887 | 2,654 | 2,654 | N/A | 1,240 | 1,240 | 1,610 | - | - |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
The variation in output expenditure under Vote CRIs reflects the increasing cost of maintaining a core capability within CCMAU to provide ownership monitoring advice to, and manage issues on behalf of, responsible Ministers. Over time, CCMAU has not only maintained its core monitoring and governance role, but has also undertaken additional work to clarify the owner's expectations and enhance the ways in which both financial and non-financial performance is measured. In addition, CCMAU has provided, and will continue to provide, issue-specific advice affecting CRIs, REANNZ and NZVIF covering a wide range of issues.
The variation in other expenditure reflects the one-off nature of these transactions. Appropriations enable the Crown to settle claims under indemnities and provisions provided to CRIs when they were established. More recently, all of the expenditure has been associated with reimbursing CRIs for the costs associated with cleaning up contaminated sites. While most of these contaminated sites have been cleaned up, there is ongoing groundwater testing at AgResearch's Invermay site and, potentially, other excluded liabilities that may arise in the future.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Outcome: CCMAU provides valuable ownership, performance monitoring, and governance advice to Ministers. Impact: CRIs, REANNZ and NZVIF build and retain scientific capability in New Zealand that contributes to economic growth. |
Crown company monitoring advice to the Minister of RS&T and the Minister for Economic Development. |
Crown Company Monitoring Advice to the Minister of Research, Science and Technology and the Minister for Economic Development (M56)
Scope of Appropriation
Expenses and Revenue
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 1,074 | 1,074 | 1,074 |
| Revenue from Crown | 1,052 | 1,052 | 1,052 |
| Revenue from Other | 22 | 22 | 22 |
Output Performance Measures and Standards
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Quality standards for Analysis and Advice. | Achieved. | Achieved. | Achieved. |
| Ministerial Satisfaction. | Materially met. | Materially met. | Materially met. |
Statement of Estimated and Forecast Net Worth of Entities Owned
The Minister for CRIs and the Minister for Economic Development are responsible Ministers for the Government's ownership interests in CRIs, REANNZ and NZVIF, respectively (the Minister of Finance is the other shareholding Minister). The estimated net worth (total assets less total liabilities) of CRIs, REANNZ and NZVIF, which are monitored under the auspices of Vote CRIs, are listed in the table below.
Changes in net worth result from the net effects of profit (after tax), dividends paid and capital injections or withdrawals. The data for these organisations are based on forecasts provided for inclusion in the 2009 Budget.
| Balance date | 2009 Estimated Net Worth $000 |
2010 Forecast Net Worth $000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Research Institutes: | |||
| AgResearch Ltd | 30 June | 187,951 | 189,639 |
| Institute for Environmental Science & Research Ltd | 30 June | 32,285 | 35,256 |
| Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Ltd | 30 June | 22,297 | 23,885 |
| Industrial Research Ltd | 30 June | 33,491 | 35,905 |
| Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd | 30 June | 26,796 | 27,930 |
| National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd | 30 June | 90,786 | 95,100 |
| New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd | 30 June | 25,057 | 27,419 |
| The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd | 30 June | 74,469 | 78,761 |
| Crown entities: | |||
| New Zealand Venture Investment Fund Ltd | 30 June | 63,300 | 67,500 |
| Research and Education Advanced Network of New Zealand Ltd | 30 June | 18,627 | 9,903 |
Conditions on Use of Appropriation
Treasury quality standards for policy
This Quality Standard for Policy Advice sets out the characteristics or dimensions of policy advice that will best enable it to promote well-informed high-quality decision-making by Ministers. However, the quality dimensions below are not a checklist and not all dimensions will be equally important in every case - judgements are required at the outset about how to apply and balance the quality dimensions to ensure a particular piece of advice is fit for purpose in achieving the result sought.
When undertaking a piece of work, explicit consideration needs to be given to the following:
- What point are Ministers at in their decision-making process? Can Treasury add value? What are our opportunities to have an impact?
- What result are we seeking by providing a piece of advice?
- How should the quality dimensions below be applied and balanced to achieve this result?
- What is the relative priority of this piece of work?
- What level of investment is warranted?
Dimensions of quality policy advice |
||
|---|---|---|
| Analytically rigorous (Analysis) | Set in a wider strategic context (Applied analysis) | Customer focused and persuasive (Advice) |
Relevant frameworks
|
Strategic
|
Clear
|
Robust reasoning and logicAdvice has a clear purpose, problem definition, evaluation of options against criteria, and assessment of risks and opportunities. We come to a conclusion and give action-oriented recommendations. |
PracticalIssues of implementation, technical feasibility, practicality and timing are considered and advice accurately identifies compliance, transitional, legislative, revenue and administrative implications and costs. |
TimelyReports should meet Ministers' need for advice that helps in the decision-making process (even if it means, at times, that advice is not fully developed) and indicate when a decision is required. |
Evidence-based
|
Public sector consultation
|
Politically aware
|
Free and frankOur advice is honest, impartial and politically neutral - we have a duty to alert Ministers to the possible consequences of following particular policies, whether or not such advice accords with Ministers' views. Good free and frank advice is offered with an understanding of its political context and the constraints within which the Minister is operating. |
Perspectives of wider stakeholdersWe understand and advise Ministers on the perspective of groups outside the public sector, consult with key stakeholders, and provide advice on communications where appropriate. |
Solution focusedWe are pro-active, anticipating, as well as responding to, Ministers' needs. Advice suggests a clear way forward ("Here is what you can do" as well as "Here is a problem") and includes a range of practical options (first best advice, but also second and third). |
At the end:
- Did we achieve the result we were seeking?
- Were our judgements about what would be fit for purpose correct?
- What would we do differently next time?
- How can we capture and share this learning?
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Education Review Office#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister Responsible for the Education Review Office (M27)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Education Review Office
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR EDUCATION REVIEW OFFICE: Minister Responsible for the Education Review Office
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister Responsible for the Education Review Office is responsible for appropriations in the Vote for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- a total of $26.145 million for reviews of early childhood education service providers, and schools and other education service providers, and
- a total of $2.707 million for education evaluation reports, policy services, ministerial and contractual services.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
Vote Education Review Office (ERO) contributes to "a world leading education system that equips all New Zealanders with the knowledge, skills and values to be successful citizens in the 21st Century" by assuring government that there will be high quality early childhood education services that provide children with the foundations for achieving literacy and numeracy levels, and that the schooling system helps students to develop the knowledge and skills needed to contribute to the Nation's future economic and social success.
The work of ERO supports the Government's themes for education: "every child participates in high quality early childhood education", "every child achieves literacy and numeracy levels that enable their success", "every young person has the skills and qualifications to contribute to their and New Zealand's future", "Maori enjoying success as Maori", and "capable, efficient and responsive to education priorities".
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations#
| Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
|---|---|---|
| A world leading education system that equips all New Zealanders with the knowledge, skills and values to be successful citizens in the 21st Century. (Education Priorities for New Zealand, May 2003.) |
|
Accountability Reviews MCOA:
|
| Quality of Education Reports and Services. |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
| 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
| Output Expenses | 25,244 | 28,381 | 28,739 | 28,560 | 29,568 | 29,537 | 28,852 | - | 28,852 | 28,941 | 28,941 | 28,941 |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Capital Expenditure | 1,505 | 1,336 | 987 | 736 | 2,062 | 2,062 | 1,200 | - | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 |
| Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
26,749 | 29,717 | 29,726 | 29,296 | 31,630 | 31,599 | 30,052 | - | 30,052 | 30,141 | 30,141 | 30,141 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
| Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Capital Receipts | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
- | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
New Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cessation of adult and community education reviews. | Schools and Other Education Service Providers output class. | - | (137) | (137) | (137) | (137) |
| Cessation of post-review assistance workshops to schools. | Schools and Other Education Service Providers output class. | - | (207) | (207) | (207) | (207) |
| Reduction in the number of homeschooling education reviews. | Schools and Other Education Service Providers output class. | - | (283) | (283) | (283) | (283) |
| Maintaining capability for recruiting and retaining appropriately skilled review officers following increases in teaching salaries approved by the last Government. | ||||||
| Early Childhood Education Services output class. |
314 | 314 | 314 | 314 | 314 | |
| Schools and Other Education Service Providers output class. | 535 | 535 | 535 | 535 | 535 | |
| Quality of Education Reports and Services. | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 | |
| Departmental Output Expense. | ||||||
| Total Initiative | 906 | 279 | 279 | 279 | 279 |
Analysis of Significant Trends#
Total Vote: All Appropriations
Vote ERO contains appropriations for departmental output expenses and capital expenditure.
Departmental output expense appropriation levels for outputs supplied by ERO was increased:
- in 2004/05 to 2005/06 for maintaining capability in the face of increased input costs and for improved review coverage of schools and early childhood services
- in 2004/05 for maintaining capability for review of early childhood services and kura kaupapa Maori
- in 2005/06 to 2008/09 for maintaining capability to recruit and retain appropriately skilled review officers in the face of increases in teaching salaries.
In line with the Government's priorities for 2009/10 the above increases were offset by decreases in departmental output expense appropriation levels for:
- cessation of adult and community education reviews
- cessation of post-review assistance workshops to schools
- reduction in the number of homeschooling education reviews.
There are no significant trends in capital expenditure appropriation levels.
Part 2 - Details and Expected Performance for Output Expenses#
Part 2.1 - Departmental Output Expenses#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
Education Sector Outcome
Enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the pre-tertiary education system by delivering high quality evaluations and reports that inform the decisions made to improve student achievement, the quality of teaching and learning, governance, self-review and leadership. |
Accountability Reviews MCOA
|
Education Sector Outcome
Add value by undertaking system-wide evaluations to provide information and advice on the development and implementation of education policy and practice. |
Quality of Education Reports and Services. |
Accountability Reviews MCOA (M27)
Scope of Appropriation
This output class is limited to evaluations of the performance of early childhood education services.
Schools and Other Education Service Providers
This output class is limited to evaluations of the performance of schools and other education service providers.
Explanation for Use of Multi-Class Output Expense Appropriation
From 2006/07 a multi-class output expense appropriation called Accountability Reviews was established. This multi-class output expense appropriation aggregates output classes Early Childhood Education Services and Schools and Other Education Service Providers that deliver the same service (education reviews) to two different parts of the education sector (early childhood education services and schools). Both of the output classes use similar resources in working toward the same outcome of ensuring delivery of the highest quality pre-tertiary education to all young New Zealanders. Grouping these will recognise this alignment and allow for more flexibility in resourcing levels across the two.
Expenses and Revenue
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
Total Appropriation |
26,696 | 26,665 | 26,145 |
| Early Childhood Education Services | 9,500 | 9,500 | 10,002 |
| Schools and Other Education Service Providers | 17,196 | 17,165 | 16,143 |
Revenue from Crown |
26,284 | 26,284 | 25,733 |
| Early Childhood Education Services | 9,384 | 9,384 | 9,886 |
| Schools and Other Education Service Providers | 16,900 | 16,900 | 15,847 |
Revenue from Other |
412 | 381 | 412 |
| Early Childhood Education Services | 116 | 116 | 116 |
| Schools and Other Education Service Providers | 296 | 265 | 296 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The change in appropriation levels between output classes reflect the latest forecasts in output activities.
Output Performance Measures and Standards
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
Early Childhood Education Services Output Class |
|||
| Number of early childhood education services education reviews. | 1,045-1,245 | 1,045-1,245 | 1,215-1,375 |
| Education reviews of early childhood education services are consistent with approved standard procedures for reporting to the Minister. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Education review reports of early childhood education services will pass a quality assurance check for reporting to the Minister. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Unconfirmed (near final) reports sent to early childhood education services for confirmation of accuracy and comment will meet target for reporting to the Minister (% within working days of the end of the last week on site). | 75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
| Number of post-review assistance workshop to early childhood education services. | 80-120 | 80-120 | 80-120 |
Schools and Other Education Service Providers Output Class |
|||
| Number of state schools education reviews. | 715-850 | 715-850 | 760-890 |
| Number of homeschooling education reviews. | 600-640 | 600-640 | 25-35 |
| Number of private school education reviews. | 35-45 | 35-45 | 35-45 |
| Education reviews of schools and other education service providers are consistent with approved standard procedures for reporting to the Minister. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Education reviews of schools and other education service providers will pass a quality assurance check for reporting to the Minister. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Unconfirmed (near final) reports sent to schools and other education service providers for confirmation of accuracy and comment will meet target for reporting to the Minister (% within working days of the end of the last week on site). | 75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
75% within 20 days 85% within 25 days 98% within 35 days |
ERO recognises an education review as an output at the time it is available for delivery to the Minister responsible for the Education Review Office. Partially complete reports are not reported.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cessation of adult and community education reviews. | 2009/10 | - | (137) | (137) | (137) | (137) |
| Cessation of post-review assistance workshops to schools. | 2009/10 | - | (207) | (207) | (207) | (207) |
| Reduction in the number of homeschooling education reviews. | 2009/10 | - | (283) | (283) | (283) | (283) |
| Maintaining capability for recruiting and retaining appropriately skilled review officers following increases in teaching salaries approved by the last Government. | 2008/09 and 2005/06 | |||||
|
980 | 314 | 314 | 314 | 314 | |
|
1,815 | 535 | 535 | 535 | 535 |
5
Quality of Education Reports and Services (M27)#
Scope of Appropriation#
Expenses and Revenue#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Total Appropriation | 2,872 | 2,872 | 2,707 |
| Revenue from Crown | 2,391 | 2,391 | 2,226 |
| Revenue from Other | 481 | 481 | 481 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation#
There have been minimal changes to this appropriation.
Output Performance Measures and Standards#
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measures | Budgeted Standard |
Estimated Actual Standard |
Budget Standard |
| Number of education evaluation reports. | 12-20 | 12-20 | 12-20 |
| Education evaluation reports are consistent with approved presentational standards and agreed terms of reference. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Number of policy services. | 25-30 | 25-30 | 25-30 |
| Policy services are consistent with approved presentational standards. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Number of ministerial services comprising of parliamentary questions, ministerial correspondence, briefing papers and official information requests. | 145-210 | 145-210 | 145-210 |
| Ministerial services are consistent with Cabinet Office Manual and Minister's requirements. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Number of contractual services. | 5-10 | 5-10 | 5-10 |
| Contractual services are consistent with terms of contracts. | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Education evaluation reports evaluate educational issues including delivery of the curriculum, the effectiveness of governance, management structures and systems, student achievement, the delivery of teaching services, and barriers to learning across a number of institutions. Education evaluation reports may include guides to good practice.
Education evaluation reports tend to follow specific themes. These themes may be drawn from issues arising from the Government's education initiatives and issues of strategic importance identified by ERO from its regular reporting on schools and early childhood education services.
Policy services involve advice to, or on behalf of, the Minister responsible for the Education Review Office, on policy proposals or any other issues referred to, or identified by, the Chief Review Officer.
ERO is not primarily a provider of policy advice. From its regular presence in schools and early childhood services it is, however, in a position to make a useful contribution to assist the policy agencies. This service will contribute to the Government's policy priorities for schools and early childhood education service providers.
Contractual services include one-off reviews of institutions (or certain aspects of them), and analyses of particular matters under specific terms of reference agreed with ERO. Contractual reviews are conducted on a fee-for-service basis.
Current and Past Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Year of First Impact |
2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintaining capability for recruiting and retaining appropriately skilled review officers following increases in teaching salaries approved by the last Government. | 2008/09 and 2005/06 | 178 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 |
Part 6 - Details and Expected Results for Capital Expenditure#
Part 6.1 - Departmental Capital Expenditure#
Intended Impacts, Outcomes and Objectives
| Intended Impacts, Outcomes or Objectives of Appropriations | Appropriations |
|---|---|
| Purchase of assets to maintain and upgrade capability essential to the operation of ERO. | Education Review Office - Capital Expenditure PLA. |
Education Review Office - Capital Expenditure PLA (M27)
Scope of Appropriation
Capital Expenditure
| 2008/09 | 2009/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Budget $000 |
|
| Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
| Land | - | - | - |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | 1,051 | 1,051 | 900 |
| Intangibles | 1,011 | 1,011 | 300 |
| Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
2,062 | 2,062 | 1,200 |
| Forests/Agricultural | - | - | - |
| Land | - | - | - |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | 1,051 | 1,051 | 900 |
| Intangibles | 1,011 | 1,011 | 300 |
| Other | - | - | - |
Total Appropriation |
2,062 | 2,062 | 1,200 |
Reasons for Change in Appropriation
The decrease in capital expenditure is mainly due to the timing of computer software purchases in 2008/09 carried forward from 2007/08.
Performance Information for Appropriations Vote Education#
MINISTER(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS: Minister of Education (M26), Minister for Tertiary Education (M68)
ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT: Ministry of Education
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR MINISTRY OF EDUCATION : Minister of Education
Part 1 - Summary of the Vote#
Part 1.1 - Overview of the Vote
The Minister of Education is responsible for appropriations in Vote Education for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- A total of just over $1,659 million for services from the Ministry of Education (depreciation and capital charge on school accommodation, and special education services being the most significant costs).
- A total of just over $395 million for educational services from central education Crown entities (New Zealand Qualifications Authority and Career Services) and other non-departmental providers. The most significant costs are for professional development in the schools and early childhood education sector and school transport services.
- A total of nearly $52 million for allowances, bursaries, scholarships (including national study awards for teachers), and grants.
- A total of nearly $5,840 million for educational services from schools (including teacher salaries), early childhood education providers, and other education providers.
- A total of nearly $32 million for capital for Crown entities and schools.
- A total of nearly $638 million for capital expenditure by the Ministry of Education, mainly related to school sector property.
The Minister for Tertiary Education is responsible for appropriations in Vote Education for the 2009/10 financial year covering the following:
- A total of just over $15 million for services from the Ministry of Education.
- A total of nearly $2,003 million for student achievement component funding provided to tertiary education institutions, educational services from the Tertiary Education Commission and other non-departmental providers.
- A total of just over $27 million for tertiary scholarships, international education and other grants.
- A total of nearly $811 million for educational services from tertiary education institutions (including capability and research funding), the adult and community education sector and other education providers, as well as other expenses.
- A total of just over $36 million for capital for tertiary education institutions.
Details of these appropriations are set out in Parts 2-6 below.
Part 1.2 - High-Level Objectives of the Vote#
The Ministry of Education will focus on implementing a set of specific policies and programmes to deliver on six education priority outcomes determined by Government:
Every child participates in high quality early childhood education.
- Every child needs the opportunity to participate in early childhood education. Increased participation in target geographical areas and among groups with traditionally low participation rates will be the focus.
Every child achieves literacy and numeracy levels that enable their success.
- Every child needs the opportunity to develop their literacy and numeracy skills, and to be supported and enabled to make as much progress in developing these skills as they can.
Every young person has the skills and qualifications to contribute to their and New Zealand's future.
- To keep young people engaged in education, a wider range of relevant learning options needs to be developed within schools and through partnerships between schools, training and tertiary education providers and local businesses. Schools must be supported to ensure that they are responsive to the needs of every student.
Relevant and efficient tertiary education provision that meets student and labour market needs.
- In the current financial context, tertiary education is critical to sustain and grow productivity, and to support industry and employers in developing and retaining skilled employees.
Maori enjoying education success as Maori.
- Identity, culture and Maori language are critical ingredients for the success of Maori students in education. Collaboration with schools and providers is essential to ensure they meet the educational needs of Maori students.
The Ministry is capable, efficient and responsive to achieve education priorities.
- The performance of the Ministry needs to be continually improving to support outcomes for every student and ensure that expenditure produces the maximum benefits.
The departmental appropriations are focused primarily on strategic leadership of the sector and education system, management of the school sector property portfolio, support and resources for education providers, teachers and communities and interventions for target student groups. Non-departmental funding is primarily used for early childhood education, primary and secondary schooling, tertiary education and research.
The table below shows how the Government priorities, education priority outcomes and appropriations interconnect.
Government Priorities and Outcomes - Links to Appropriations#
| Government Priorities | Government Outcomes | Appropriations |
|---|---|---|
| Early Childhood Care and Education. | Every child participates in high quality early childhood education. Maori enjoying education success as Maori. |
Strategic Leadership in the Sector(M26) Support and Resources for the Community (M26) Support and Resources for Education Providers (M26) Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) Professional Development and Support (M26) Supporting Parenting (M26) |
| The Literacy and Numeracy Crusade. | Every child participates in high quality early childhood education. Every child achieves literacy and numeracy levels that enable their success. Maori enjoying education success as Maori. |
Strategic Leadership in the Sector(M26) Support and Resources for the Community (M26) Support and Resources for Education Providers (M26) Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) School Property Portfolio Management (M26) Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) Professional Development and Support (M26) Supporting Parenting (M26) Curriculum Support (M26) Education Research Initiatives (M26) Provision of Information and Advisory Services (M26) School Transport (M26) |
| The Ladder of Opportunity. | Every young person has the skills and qualifications to contribute to their and New Zealand's future. Relevant and efficient tertiary education provision that meets student and labour market needs. Maori enjoying education success as Maori. |
Strategic Leadership in the Sector (M26) Support and Resources for the Community (M26) Support and Resources for Education Providers (M26) Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) School Property Portfolio Management (M26) Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) Strategic Leadership in the Tertiary Sector (M68) Centres of Research Excellence (M68) Education Research Initiatives (M26) Managing the Government's Investment in the Tertiary Education Sector (M68) Ownership Monitoring of Tertiary Education Institutions (M68) Quality Assurance (M26) Tertiary and International Advisory Services (M68) Tertiary Education and Training Policy Advice (M68) Tertiary Education: Student Achievement Component (M68) Training for Designated Groups (M68) Curriculum Support (M26) Professional Development and Support (M26) |
| Trades and Skills. | Every young person has the skills and qualifications to contribute to their and New Zealand's future. Relevant and efficient tertiary education provision that meets student and labour market needs. Maori enjoying education success as Maori. |
Strategic Leadership of the Sector (M26) Support and Resources for the Community (M26) Support and Resources for Education Providers (M26) Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) School Property Portfolio Management (M26) Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) Strategic Leadership in the Tertiary Sector (M68) Tertiary and International Advisory Services (M68) Tertiary Education and Training Policy Advice (M68) Tertiary Education: Student Achievement Component (M68) Training for Designated Groups (M68) Curriculum Support (M26) Professional Development Support (M26) |
| Tertiary Education. | Every young person has the skills and qualifications to contribute to their and New Zealand's future. Relevant and efficient tertiary education provision that meets student and labour market needs. Maori enjoying education success as Maori. |
Strategic Leadership in the Tertiary Sector (M68) Centres of Research Excellence (M68) Education Research Initiatives (M26) Managing the Government's Investment in the Tertiary Education Sector (M68) Ownership Monitoring of Tertiary Education Institutions (M68) Quality Assurance (M26) Tertiary and International Advisory Services (M68) Tertiary Education and Training Policy Advice (M68) Tertiary Education: Student Achievement Component (M68) Training for Designated Groups (M68) |
| Value for Money in the Education Sector. | Relevant and efficient tertiary education provision that meets student and industry needs. The Ministry is capable, efficient and responsive in achieving education priorities. |
Curriculum Support (M26) Education Research Initiatives (M26) Managing the Government's Investment in the Tertiary Education Sector (M68) Ownership Monitoring of Tertiary Education Institutions (M68) Provision of Information and Advisory Services (M26) Qualifications Support Structures (M26) Quality Assurance (M26) Secondary School Examinations (M26) Tertiary and International Advisory Services (M68) Strategic Leadership in the Sector (M26) Support and Resources for the Community (M26) Support and Resources for Education Providers (M26) Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) School Property Portfolio Management (M26) Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) |
Part 1.3 - Trends in the Vote#
Summary of Financial Activity#
| 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Actual $000 |
Budgeted $000 |
Estimated Actual $000 |
Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Non- Departmental Transactions Budget $000 |
Total Budget $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
Estimated $000 |
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||||
| Output Expenses | 1,928,501 | 2,148,925 | 2,267,581 | 2,995,422 | 3,967,451 | 3,960,971 | 1,674,401 | 2,398,350 | 4,072,751 | 4,069,939 | 4,074,562 | 4,071,902 |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | 62,880 | 68,764 | 72,521 | 67,202 | 80,336 | 80,336 | N/A | 79,249 | 79,249 | 72,658 | 78,759 | 69,766 |
| Borrowing Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Expenses | 5,787,705 | 6,194,316 | 6,575,567 | 6,499,984 | 6,405,755 | 6,394,912 | - | 6,650,667 | 6,650,667 | 6,707,317 | 6,700,471 | 6,726,975 |
| Capital Expenditure | 587,608 | 558,617 | 548,741 | 593,745 | 768,276 | 763,196 | 637,683 | 68,161 | 705,844 | 621,559 | 511,805 | 494,046 |
| Intelligence and Security Department Expenses and Capital Expenditure | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - |
Total Appropriations |
8,366,694 | 8,970,622 | 9,464,410 | 10,156,353 | 11,221,818 | 11,199,415 | 2,312,084 | 9,196,427 | 11,508,511 | 11,471,473 | 11,365,597 | 11,362,689 |
Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
||||||||||||
| Tax Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Tax Revenue | 51,944 | 56,495 | 62,782 | 61,442 | 71,733 | 71,733 | N/A | 64,144 | 64,144 | 62,669 | 63,072 | 63,331 |
| Capital Receipts | 1,400 | 8,008 | 9,621 | 10,773 | 22,613 | 22,613 | N/A | 1,080 | 1,080 | - | - | - |
Total Crown Revenue and Capital Receipts |
53,344 | 64,503 | 72,403 | 72,215 | 94,346 | 94,346 | N/A | 65,224 | 65,224 | 62,669 | 63,072 | 63,331 |
New Policy Initiatives#
| Policy Initiative | Appropriation | 2008/09 Budgeted $000 |
2009/10 Budget $000 |
2010/11 Estimated $000 |
2011/12 Estimated $000 |
2012/13 Estimated $000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Century Building Programme. |
School Property Portfolio Management (M26) |
28,000 | 38,610 | 57,406 | 70,306 | 70,738 |
| Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Primary Education (M26) |
- | 129 | 145 | 247 | 294 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 129 | 369 | 449 | 450 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Integrated Schools Property (M26) |
- | 5,636 | 5,636 | 5,636 | 5,636 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Departmental Capital Injection | - | 166,000 | 136,950 | 5,500 | - | |
| Departmental Capital Withdrawal | (28,000) | (5,000) | (5,000) | (5,000) | - | |
Schools Furniture and Equipment (M26) |
- | 6,133 | 5,994 | 5,048 | - | |
| Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure | ||||||
Property Disposal Incentives Scheme (M26) |
- | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | - | |
| Non-Departmental Capital Expenditure | ||||||
| Additional Funding for Independent Schools. |
Primary Education (M26) |
- | 3,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 2,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Additional Funding to Fight Truancy on the Front Line. |
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Additional Funds for the Interim Response Fund for Disruptive Pupils. |
Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) |
- | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| Awards for Top-Performing Teachers. |
National Study Awards (M26) |
- | 500 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | ||||||
| Bringing Forward Infrastructure Spending. | Departmental Capital Injection | 28,000 | - | - | - | - |
| Caretakers, Cleaners and Groundstaff Collective Agreements. |
Primary Education (M26) |
- | 10,318 | 10,318 | 10,318 | 10,318 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 7,122 | 7,122 | 7,122 | 7,122 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Special Needs Support (M26) |
- | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Early Childhood Education 20 Hours Policy Changes. |
Early Childhood Education (M26) |
- | - | 11,650 | 28,425 | 29,624 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Expanding Te Kotahitanga. |
Professional Development and Support (M26) |
- | 6,360 | 4,553 | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| Extension of the Ongoing and Reviewable Resourcing Schemes. |
Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) |
- | 3,130 | 6,250 | 11,250 | 11,250 |
| Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Primary Education (M26) |
- | 710 | 1,425 | 2,565 | 2,565 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 1,160 | 2,325 | 4,185 | 4,185 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Funding for The Correspondence School to Enrol Alternative Education Students. |
Secondary Education (M26) |
571 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 571 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Funding for the Heat, Light and Water Component of the Operations Grant. |
Primary Education (M26) |
502 | 875 | 1,445 | 1,447 | 1,446 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
(1,250) | 2,045 | 816 | 813 | 812 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Special Needs Support (M26) |
(76) | 278 | 159 | 159 | 158 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Increased Operational Funding for Schools. |
Curriculum Support (M26) |
- | 42 | 83 | 82 | 82 |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Primary Education (M26) |
- | 5,995 | 11,819 | 11,907 | 12,081 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Secondary Education (M26) |
- | 4,300 | 8,510 | 8,492 | 8,517 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Special Needs Support (M26) |
- | 1,173 | 2,332 | 2,335 | 2,340 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Increasing Medical Training Place. (See also Vote Health in the Health Sector). |
Tertiary Education: Student Achievement Component (M68) |
- | 932 | 2,769 | 4,707 | 6,745 |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Tertiary Education Organisation Component - Capability Fund (M68) |
- | 108 | 320 | 545 | 780 | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Maintaining Current Level of National Certificate of Educational Achievement Moderation. |
Quality Assurance (M26) |
- | 2,720 | 2,720 | 2,720 | 2,720 |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| Maintaining Existing Level of Funding for School High Health Needs Fund. |
Interventions for Target Student Groups (M26) |
- | 2,671 | 2,671 | 2,671 | 2,671 |
| Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| National Certificate of Educational Achievement Standards Review - Assessment Resource Development. |
Support and Resources for Teachers (M26) |
- | 2,526 | 2,731 | 2,431 | 350 |
| Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| Performance Based Research Fund. (See also Vote Research, Science and Technology in the Education and Science Sector). |
Tertiary Education Organisation Component - Performance Based Research Fund (M68) |
- | 27 | 4,283 | 7,083 | 7,083 |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
| Promote Greater Enrolment of International Students. |
Tertiary and International Advisory Services (M68) |
- | 2,000 | - | - | - |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
| Reduction of the International Student Levy from 2010. | Overseas Students' Fees | - | 1,800 | 3,600 | 3,600 | 3,600 |
| Crown Revenue | ||||||
| Reversing Unfunded Budget 2008 Commitments for Economic Transformation - Innovation. (See also Vote Research, Science and Technology in the Education and Science Sector, Vote Social Development in the Social Development and Housing Sector, Vote Revenue in the Finance and Government Administration Sector and Vote Economic Development in the Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector). |
||||||
|
Training for Designated Groups (M68) |
- | (1,500) | (5,700) | (7,600) | (7,600) |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Tertiary Education: Student Achievement Component (M68) |
- | (4,400) | (27,500) | (46,200) | (46,200) | |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
Tertiary Education Organisation Component - Capability Fund (M68) |
- | (700) | (4,700) | (8,000) | (8,000) | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Tertiary Education Grants and Other Funding (M68) |
- | - | (100) | (200) | (200) | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Adult and Community Education (M68) |
- | (400) | (1,000) | (1,400) | (1,400) | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
Tertiary Education Organisation Component - Performance-Based Research Fund (M68) |
- | (700) | (4,100) | (6,900) | (6,900) | |
| Non-Departmental Other Expense | ||||||
|
Training for Designated Groups (M68) |
- | (2,154) | (4,308) | (4,308) | (4,308) |
| Non-Departmental Output Expense | ||||||
|
Tertiary Scholarships (M68) |
- | (2,776) | (5,308) | (7,852) | (10,000) |
| Benefits and Other Unrequited Expenses | ||||||
|
Tertiary Education Organisation Component - Capability Fund (M68) |