Productivity Commission inquiry

International freight transport services - Productivity Commission inquiry material 2011 - 2012

The Productivity Commission completed its inquiry into international freight transport and presented its final report and recommendations to the Government in 2012.

The inquiry#

In 2011, New Zealand exporters and importers were spending about $5 billion on freight each year. The Government asked the Productivity Commission to look at whether these costs could be lowered and the services improved. The brief asked the Commission to identify:

  • Factors influencing the accessibility and efficiency of international freight transport services available to New Zealand firms; an
  • Opportunities for changes in New Zealand’s infrastructure and regulatory regimes that could increase the accessibility and efficiency of international freight transport services for New Zealand firms.

The inquiry was instigated to help ensure that New Zealand has the best regulatory framework and the right incentives to achieve best practice across the industry, to help drive improvements in infrastructure investment, innovation and supply-chain coordination.

Key recommendations#

The final report made a number of recommendations for improvement including:

  • Ports could enhance their abilities to meet the future freight needs of the country if improvements were made to the governance framework for council-controlled port companies by:
    • clarifying the purpose of those companies by bringing them into line with the statutory objective for state-owned enterprises;
    • precluding councillors and council staff from being directors of port and airport companies; and
    • establishing a monitoring function to create independent comparative performance information for port owners to consider.
  • There is scope for a significant lift in workplace productivity at a number of ports. The benefits of high-productivity workplaces include higher real wages, better working conditions, higher levels of job satisfaction, and more competitive and profitable businesses. Most New Zealand port companies, their employees and unions have some work to do to fully achieve these benefits.
  • Current exemptions for shipping companies from the Commerce Act should be removed so that normal competition laws apply. This change would outlaw any agreements between shipping lines that fix prices and/or limit capacity unless the Commerce Commission judges that their public benefits outweigh any anti-competitive detriments.
  • To better coordinate investment in freight infrastructure, greater use should be made of 'facilitated discussion' models, such as the Upper North Island Freight Plan. These are based on information sharing and relationship building but do not bind the participants to particular outcomes. They avoid the trap of excessive central direction which carries a high risk of error, and exposure of the Government to financial risk.
  • The government has an important role in gathering and disseminating freight information. More information on freight in New Zealand – collected and made available on a regular basis – would have considerable value and help freight organisations make better individual and joint decisions. It would also help stakeholders monitor performance, and policy-makers design and evaluate policies and regulations.

Government response#

In December 2012, the Government issued their response to the inquiry.

In response to the report findings, the Government agreed in full, or agreed in principle, to 14 of the 26 inquiry recommendations. Of the remainder, the Government considered 1 recommendation reflected current practice; 2 were for local authorities to consider; and the remaining 9 were the subject of ongoing reforms or further policy review work.

The Government acted on the recommendation to remove the exemption of international shipping lines from the competition provisions of the Commerce Act. There are now provisions in the Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act that remove the exemption.

Evaluation#

An independent evaluation of the Commission's performance was undertaken with inputs from expert review, focus groups and participant survey.

Timeline#

  • Terms of reference - 1 April 2011
  • Issues paper - 13 July 2011
    • Submissions closed 31 August 2011
  • Draft report - 12 January 2012
    • Submissions closed 27 February 2012
  • Final report - 24 April 2012
  • Evaluation - May 2012
  • Government response - December 2012

Key documents#

Final report and Government response#

Final Report: International Freight Transport Services Inquiry
Doc. Date Sort ascending Creator Title
Government of New Zealand
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission

Terms of reference and issues paper#

Issues Paper: International Freight Transport Services Inquiry
Doc. Date Sort ascending Creator Title
New Zealand Productivity Commission
Minister of Finance; Minister of Commerce; Minister of Transport; Minister for Regulatory Reform

Draft report#

Draft Report: International Freight Transport Services Inquiry
Doc. Date Sort ascending Creator Title
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission
New Zealand Productivity Commission

Submissions#

Public submissions on issues paper - International freight transport services inquiry

Public submissions on draft report - International freight transport services inquiry

Evaluation#

Evaluation: International Freight Transport Services Inquiry
Doc. Date Sort ascending Creator Title
Moore, David
Martin Jenkins
New Zealand Productivity Commission