The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

You are here: Home > Publications > Research and Policy > Working Papers > 2015 > Inequality in New Zealand 1983/84 to 2013/14 (WP 15/06)

Treasury
Publication

Inequality in New Zealand 1983/84 to 2013/14

Publication Details

  • Inequality in New Zealand 1983/84 to 2013/14 (WP 15/06)
  • Published: 23 Jun 2015
  • Status: Current
  • Authors: Creedy, John; Ball, Chris
  • Pages: (3),v,33
  • ISBN: 978-0-478-43658-7 (Online)
  • Ref. No: WP 15/06
  • Pub. type: Working Papers
  • JEL Classification: H20
 

Inequality in New Zealand 1983/84 to 2013/14

Published 23 June 2015

Authors: Christopher Ball and John Creedy

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical analysis of annual income and expenditure inequality in New Zealand over a thirty-year period from the early 1980s. The extent of redistribution through the tax and benefit system is also explored. Household Economic Survey data are used for each year from 1983/84 to 1997/98 inclusive, 2000/01 and 2003/04 , and for each year from 2006/07. Survey calibration methods are used to examine income and expenditure inequality on the assumption that a range of (approximately 50) population characteristics remain constant over the period. Furthermore, decomposition methods are used to examine the separate contributions to changing inequality of population ageing, changes in labour force participation and household structure.

Contents

Browse section/chapter Download/Page range

Executive Summary

1 Introduction

2 Welfare Metric and Unit of Analysis

3 Inequality over Thirty Years

4 Changing Population Structure

5 Backward and Forward Looking Profiles

6 Inequality Decompositions

7 Conclusion

Appendix A: Alternative Metrics and Distributions

Appendix B: Comparisons with Earlier Results

Appendix C: Survey Calibration

Appendix D: Decomposing Changes: Further Details

References

twp15-06.pdf (755 KB) pp. (2),i-vi,1-33
Charts and Data twp15-06.xls (267 KB)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to colleagues for comments during a Treasury seminar, and Polly Vowles, Kristie Carter and Nicolas Herault for comments on an earlier draft.

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Working Paper are strictly those of the author(s). They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury or the New Zealand Government. The New Zealand Treasury and the New Zealand Government take no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in these working papers. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate.

Page top