The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

Treasury
Publication

Health and Retirement of Older New Zealanders WP 12/02

9 Appendix B

9.1  Representativeness at baseline and sample attrition

A primary goal for the sample selection process of any national study is to ensure that the final sample accurately represents the national population which it is intended to reflect. Table 1 illustrates the degree to which the HWR Māori and non-Māori sub-samples from the baseline survey in 2006 reflect the demographic characteristics of the New Zealand 55 to 70 year old Māori and non-Māori populations, as per demographic data from the 2006 New Zealand National Census (Statistics New Zealand, 2011).[13]

Table 12 shows that both the HWR baseline sub-samples (Māori and non-Māori ) align closely with their respective New Zealand populations, as evident in the proportions of (1) participants across age groups, (2) men and women, (3) those in full time work, and (4) those with no secondary-school qualifications. However, in comparison to their respective populations, the HWR baseline sub-samples both have perceptibly higher proportions than expected of people who are (1) currently in relationships (partnered), (2) in part-time work versus retired/other, (3) tertiary educated, and (4) earning above $20,000. In this regard, as opposed to the New Zealand population aged 55-70, the HWR sample in general reflects a disproportionately greater number of New Zealanders who are still working.

Table 12 – Demographic characteristics of HWR sample at baseline (2006) in comparison with their age-matched New Zealand populations
  Māori Non-Māori
  HWR sample NZ 55-70 HWR sample NZ 55-70

Sex

       
Male 44.12% (1369) 47.61% (20544) 47.01% (1603) 49.12% (255735)
Female 55.88% (1734) 52.39% (22608) 52.99% (1807) 50.88% (264870)

Age (year groups)

     
55-59 41.36% (1187) 43.18% (18633) 38.82% (1235) 39.53% (205779)
60-64 30.56% (877) 29.69% (12810) 32.25% (1026) 30.73% (159975)
65-70 28.08% (806) 27.13% (11709) 28.92% (920) 29.74% (154854)

Marital status

       
Partnered 63.97% (1985) 53.86% (21726) 76.56% (2616) 70.76% (359592)
Separated 16.82% (522) 22.49% (9072) 12.47% (426) 16.58% (84267)
Widowed 12.60% (391) 15.15% (6111) 6.91% (236) 7.49% (38088)
Never married 6.61% (205) 8.49% (3426) 4.07% (139) 5.17% (26265)

Work status

       
Working full-time 41.49% (1217) 41.37% (17850) 42.17% (1460) 44.01% (229107)
Working Part-time 19.62% (562) 13.85% (5976) 22.62% (765) 15.50% (80715)
Unemployed 2.44% (70) 2.63% (1134) 1.03% (35) 1.28 (6663)
Other (including retired) 35.44% (1015) 42.15% (18189) 33.18% (1122) 39.21% (204126)

Educational qualifications

       
No secondary 57.01% (1508) 57.35% (20514) 38.50% (1160) 35.15% (169314)
Secondary 9.72% (257) 21.08% (7539) 15.07% (454) 29.95% (144240)
Post-secondary 12.25% (324) 8.60% (3075) 15.50% (467) 11.16% (53775)
Tertiary 21.02% (556) 12.97% (4641) 30.93% (932) 23.74% (114321)

Annual income ($)

       
0-20,000 38.27% (843) 52.10% (19572) 33.18% (927) 43.25% (212922)
20,001-35,000 22.47% (495) 23.55% (8847) 20.33% (568) 22.02% (108411)
35,001-70,000 32.09% (707) 20.53% (7710) 32.93% (920) 25.49% (125505)
70,001+ 7.17% (158) 3.82% (1434) 13.56% (379) 9.24% (45507)

Source: HWR wave 1 and 2006 Census.

Notes:

  1. Sub-sample given in parentheses. These may vary from sample total due to missing data.
  2. For the purposes of comparing with the Census, approximately 375 participants are excluded from the age-group analysis as they were 54 years old at the time of the wave 1 survey. This reflects the imprecision of the Electoral Roll's age-indicator which is based on participants' “birth year” rather than their specific birth-date. Four further participants were excluded from the age-group analysis, as they reported ages beyond the 70-year upper limit.
  3. Secondary = high school; post secondary = trade or polytechnic; tertiary = university

The demographic characteristics of the cross-sectional baseline sample were compared with the HWR longitudinal sample characteristics at wave 2 and wave 3 (see Table 13).

These results suggest that the wave 2 sample is comprised of baseline participants who are more likely to be working, in better health, better educated and less likely to smoke, but more likely to consume alcohol. The transition from wave 2 to wave 3 highlighted an ethnicity-specific divergence in demographic hallmarks. Whereas Māori in wave 3 were more likely than attritors to be partnered, in better health, and non-smoking, the non-Māori in wave 3 were more likely than attritors to be female, educated, non-smokers and more frequent drinkers. These differences should be borne in mind when considering the results and conclusions of the analysis.

Table 13 – Changes in the characteristics of the HWR sample across waves using baseline data from 2006.
  Baseline (2006) Wave 2 (2008) Wave 3 (2010)
Total number 6,657 2,472 1,835
Māori 3,117 1065 707
Non-Māori 3,540 1407 1128

Mean age (SD)

     
Māori 60.79 (4.69) 61.00 (4.59) 61.16 (4.63)
Non-Māori 61.07 (4.69) 61.15 (4.48) 61.29 (4.50)

Females

     
Māori 55.88% (1734) 56.17% (596) 54.69% (385)
Non-Māori 52.99% (1807) 51.31% (707) 52.67% (581)

Partnered (married/de facto)

     
Māori 63.97% (1985) 65.60% (696) 68.14% (479)
Non-Māori 76.56% (2616) 76.56% (1055) 77.54% (856)

Working (full & part-time)

     
Māori 62.12% (1779) 64.84% (649) 65.57% (438)
Non-Māori 65.79% (2225) 69.40% (948) 68.97% (758)

Lives in urban centre (30,000+)

     
Māori 42.46% (1289) 43.40% (454) 43.62% (304)
Non-Māori 52.38% (1808) 51.26% (714) 51.84% (579)

% Current smoker

     
Māori 22.39% (683) 18.80% (198) 16.50% (115)
Non-Māori 12.95% (450) 11.33% (158) 10.28% (115)

Educational qualifications

     

Māori

     
No secondary 56.27% (1508) 45.85% (431) 45.24% (285)
Secondary 9.59% (257) 10.11% (95) 8.89% (56)
Post-secondary 12.09% (324) 14.57% (137) 14.92% (94)
Tertiary 22.05% (591) 29.47% (277) 30.95% (195)

Non-Māori

     
No secondary 38.12% (1160) 31.14% (383) 30.29% (299)
Secondary 14.92% (454) 15.20% (187) 14.49% (143)
Post-secondary 15.35% (467) 15.77% (194) 15.40% (152)
Tertiary 31.61% (962) 37.89% (466) 39.82% (393)

Economic living standard

     

Māori

     
Hardship 37.74% (685) 33.28% (207) 30.60% (123)
Comfortable 49.09% (891) 50.16% (312) 51.24% (206)
Good 13.17% (239) 16.56% (103) 18.16% (73)

Non-Māori

     
Hardship 20.53% (403) 18.50% (151) 17.78% (117)
Comfortable 51.55% (1012) 53.92% (440) 53.50% (352)
Good 27.92% (548) 27.57% (225) 28.72% (189)

Current health

     

Māori

     
Fair/poor 20.77% (640) 17.77% (188) 15.63% (110)
Good 34.21% (1054) 31.47% (333) 31.25% (220)
Very good/excellent 45.02% (1387) 50.76% (537) 53.13% (374)

Non-Māori

     
Fair/poor 12.28% (431) 10.16% (142) 9.45% (106)
Good 31.30% (1099) 29.28% (409) 29.14% (327)
Very good/excellent 56.42% (1981) 60.56% (846) 61.41% (689)

Alcohol consumption

     

Māori

     
Never 26.78% (824) 22.37% (236) 20.86% (146)
Monthly or less 27.95% (860) 27.68% (292) 27.57% (193)
2-4 times per month 16.28% (501) 17.06% (180) 16.86% (118)
2-3 times per week 14.53% (447) 16.02% (169) 16.14% (113)
4 or more times per week 14.46% (445) 16.87% (178) 18.57% (130)

Non-Māori

     
Never 15.37% (539) 12.65% (177) 11.41% (128)
Monthly or less 17.88% (627) 16.44% (230) 16.49% (185)
2-4 times per month 16.14% (566) 16.80% (235) 17.83% (200)
2-3 times per week 20.87% (732) 21.16% (296) 21.39% (240)
4 or more times per week 29.74% (1043) 32.95% (461) 32.89% (369)

Notes

  • [13]The distinction between Māori and non-Māori in this table (and henceforth) reflects prioritised responses (see Statistics New Zealand, 2001) to HWR ethnicity questions rather than the Electoral Roll-based categorisation used for sample selection purposes.
Page top