The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

You are here: Home > Publications > Research and Policy > Working Papers > 2006 > Estimating the costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04


Estimating the Costs of Crime in New Zealand in 2003/04 - WP 06/04

Publication Details

  • Estimating the Costs of Crime in New Zealand in 2003/04
  • Published: Jul 2006
  • Status: Current
  • Authors: Roper, Tim; Thompson, Andrew
  • JEL Classification: K42
  • Hard copy: Available in HTML and PDF formats only.

Estimating the costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04

New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 06/04

Published July 2006

Authors: Tim Roper and Andrew Thompson


We estimate that the total costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04 amounted to $9.1 billion. Of this, the private sector incurred $7 billion in costs and the public sector $2.1 billion. Offences against private property are the most common crimes but offences against the person are the most costly, accounting for 45% of the total estimated costs of crime. Empirically-based measures like those presented here – the total and average costs of crime by category – are a useful aid to policy analysis around criminal justice operations and settings. However, care needs to be taken when interpreting these results because they rely considerably on assumptions, including the assumed volume of actual crime, and the costs that crime imposes on victims. This difficulty in constructing robust estimates also implies that care should be taken not to draw conclusions about whether the Government should be putting more or less resources into any specific categories of crime, based on their relative costs alone.


Browse section/chapter Download/Page range


Table of Contents

List of Tables

1 Introduction

2 Purpose

3 Summary of results

4 Method

5 Results

6 Suggestions for future work


Appendix – Further details of the method

twp06-04.pdf (159 KB) pp. 1–27

List of Tables


We are grateful for comments received on earlier drafts of this paper from the Ministry of Justice, the Department of Corrections, the Police, and the Victoria University Crime and Justice Research Centre. All remaining errors are our own.


The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Working Paper are strictly those of the author(s). They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury. The Treasury takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in these working papers. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate.

Page top