The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

You are here: Home > Publications > Research and Policy > Working Papers > 2006 > The Role of R&D in Productivity Growth: The Case of Agriculture in New Zealand: 1927 to 2001 (WP 06/01)

Treasury
Publication

The Role of R&D in Productivity Growth: The Case of Agriculture in New Zealand: 1927 to 2001 - WP 06/01

Publication Details

  • The Role of R&D in Productivity Growth: The Case of Agriculture in New Zealand: 1927 to 2001
  • Published: Mar 2006
  • Status: Current
  • Authors: Hall, Julia; Scobie, Grant M
  • JEL Classification: O30; O40
  • Hard copy: Available in HTML and PDF formats only.
 

The Role of R&D in Productivity Growth: The Case of Agriculture in New Zealand: 1927 to 2001

New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 06/01

Published March 2006

Authors: Julia Hall and Grant M Scobie

Abstract

Productivity growth is a key determinant of rising living standards. The agricultural sector has been an important contributor to the overall growth of productivity in New Zealand. The average rate of multifactor productivity growth in agriculture from 1926-27 to 2000-01 was 1.8%. We find evidence that this rate has been increasing especially since the reforms of the 1980s. This paper estimates the contribution that R&D has made to agricultural productivity. It develops a theoretical framework based on the stock of knowledge available to producers. This model incorporates foreign stocks of knowledge and the spill-in effect for New Zealand. The estimation allows for extended lag effects of research spending on productivity. We find that foreign knowledge is consistently an important factor in explaining the growth of productivity. It appears that the agricultural sector relies heavily on drawing on the foreign stock of knowledge generated off-shore. The contribution of domestic knowledge generated by New Zealand’s investment in R&D is less clear cut. However, there is typically a significant positive relation between domestic knowledge and the growth of productivity. We find a wide range of estimates of the return to domestic R&D. The results are sensitive to the type of model used and the specification of the variables. Based on our preferred model we estimate that investment in domestic R&D has generated an annual rate of return of 17%. The results underscore the importance of foreign knowledge in a small open economy. The very existence of foreign knowledge may be a necessary condition for achieving productivity growth in a small open economy. However in no way could it be argued that this was sufficient. Having a domestic capability that can receive and process the spill-ins from foreign knowledge is vital to capturing the benefits. The challenge is to be able to isolate those effects from aggregate data for the agricultural sector. In that task we claim only modest success.

Contents

Browse section/chapter Download/Page range

Abstract

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures

1 Introduction

2 Agricultural R&D and the Contribution to Overall Productivity Growth

3 Literature Review and Existing Estimates

4 Spillovers

5 Estimation

6 Results

7 Summary and Conclusions

Appendix One: Unit root tests

Appendix Two: Almon Distributed Lag

Appendix Three: Results using Different Depreciation Rates

Appendix Four: Description of the Data

References

twp06-01.pdf (745 KB) pp. 1–64

List of Tables

List of Figures

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Tim Helm for a very substantial effort in preparing the data for this study. They also thank Dimitri Magaritis who provided advice and generous help with the modelling. Nathan McLellan and Kam Szeto provided advice on the modelling. Robin Johnson responded to many questions about data sources. Substantial help was derived from very thorough comments by Richard Fabling.

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Working Paper are strictly those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury. The Treasury takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in these working papers. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate.

Page top