Appendix B: Full Regression Results
| Value of Workplace Super scheme | Value of Personal Super scheme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | t-value | Coefficient | t-value | |
| Log super scheme | 0.25 | 4.74*** | 0.32 | 6.51*** |
| Male*Log super scheme | -0.14 | -2.48** | -0.06 | -1.23 |
| Partnered*Log super scheme | -0.12 | -2.19** | -0.16 | -3.08*** |
| Has another Super scheme | 0.51 | 3.68*** | 0.55 | 4.00*** |
Personal characteristics |
||||
| Male | 1.37 | 2.51** | 0.45 | 0.95 |
| Partnered | 1.53 | 2.99*** | 1.72 | 3.50*** |
| Age | 0.64 | 3.88*** | 0.45 | 3.48*** |
| Age squared | -0.01 | -3.02*** | -0.01 | -2.94*** |
| Age cubed | 7.56E-05 | 2.53** | 5.68E-05 | 2.66*** |
| Pakeha | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 1.30 |
| Migrant | -0.37 | -3.29*** | -0.12 | -1.16 |
| Residence | ||||
| Rural | 0.32 | 1.82* | 0.04 | 0.38 |
| Metropolitan region | 0.19 | 2.06** | -0.11 | -1.48 |
| Education | ||||
| Years of education | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 2.09** |
| Inheritances | ||||
| Inherited >$10,000 | 0.25 | 1.80* | 0.11 | 0.89 |
| Inheritance amount | 1.66E-06 | 1.62 | 4.31E-06 | 4.98*** |
| Expecting inheritances | 0.30 | 3.25*** | 0.24 | 2.90*** |
| Income | ||||
| Main source=Self-employment | 0.51 | 2.43** | 0.60 | 6.06*** |
| Main source= “Other” # | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.39 | -2.28** |
| Total income | 2.83E-05 | 6.22*** | 1.43E-05 | 5.99*** |
| Income squared | -8.94E-11 | -3.76*** | -2.03E-11 | -2.89*** |
| Constant | -4.37 | -1.93* | -0.91 | -0.46 |
| Sample size | 553 | 835 | ||
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.52 | 0.40 | ||
| F-statistic for overall model | F(21, 531) = 29.51*** | F(21, 813) = 27.09*** | ||
Note: The dependent variable is log net worth excluding the value of the super scheme on the RHS. The t-statistics are based on the test of the hypothesis that the coefficient is different from zero. *Significant at the 10% level. **Significant at the 5% level. ***Significant at the 1% level.#The reference category is that group whose main source of income is wages and salaries.
| Value of Workplace Super scheme | Value of Personal Super scheme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | t-value | Coefficient | t-value | |
| Log super scheme | 0.09 | 2.70*** | 0.11 | 3.43*** |
| Couple’s characteristics | ||||
| Respondent’s age | 0.31 | 1.38 | 0.47 | 2.29** |
| Respondent’s age squared | -0.01 | -1.10 | -0.01 | -2.06** |
| Respondent’s age cubed | 3.68E-05 | 0.94 | 6.66E-05 | 1.90* |
| Partner’s age | 0.02 | 1.71* | 0.02 | 1.99** |
| Married couple | 0.17 | 1.15 | 0.22 | 1.77* |
| Both partners are Pakeha | 0.16 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 2.30** |
| Either partner is migrant | -0.30 | -2.33** | -0.11 | -0.97 |
| Residence | ||||
| Rural | 0.40 | 1.83* | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Metropolitan region | 0.29 | 2.56** | -0.19 | -2.09** |
| Education | ||||
| Respondent’s years of education | -0.02 | -1.00 | 0.03 | 1.84* |
| Partner’s years of education | 0.01 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 1.31 |
| Inheritances | ||||
| Inherited >$10,000 | 0.17 | 1.20 | 0.21 | 1.85* |
| Inheritance amount | 9.10E-07 | 1.10 | 2.50E-06 | 3.26*** |
| Expecting inheritances | 0.52 | 4.43*** | 0.10 | 1.06 |
| Income | ||||
| Main source=Self-employment | 0.39 | 1.68* | 0.40 | 3.55*** |
| Main source= “Other” # | 0.85 | 0.97 | -0.52 | -1.97** |
| Total income | 1.57E-05 | 5.56*** | 1.08E-05 | 4.88*** |
| Income squared | -2.56E-11 | -3.72*** | -1.71E-11 | -2.82*** |
| Constant | 2.74 | 0.89 | 1.16 | 0.40 |
| Sample size | 422 | 552 | ||
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.42 | 0.32 | ||
| F-statistic for overall model | F(19, 402) = 17.10*** | F(19, 532) = 14.55*** | ||
Note: The dependent variable is log net worth excluding the value of the super scheme on the RHS. The t-statistics are based on the test of the hypothesis that the coefficient is different from zero. *Significant at the 10% level. **Significant at the 5% level. ***Significant at the 1% level.#The reference category is that group whose main source of income is wages and salaries.
