References
Bailey, Martin N and Robert J Gordon (1988) “The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 347-420.
Bureau of Labour Statistics (1993) “Labour composition and U.S. productivity growth, 1948-90.” Bulletin 2426.
Diewert, Erwin W (1995) “On the stochastic approach to index numbers.” Vancouver, Canada, Department of Economics University of British Columbia, Discussion Paper No 95-31, September. <http://www.econ.ubc.ca/diewert/disc.htm>
Diewert, Erwin W (1992) “Fisher ideal output, input, and productivity indices revisited.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3(3): 211-248.
Diewert, Erwin W (1976) “Exact and superlative index numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 4(2):115-145.
Diewert, W Erwin and Kevin J Fox (2004) “On estimation of returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups.” unpublished manuscript, presented at the Canadian Economic Association Meeting, Ottawa, 2003.
Diewert, W Erwin and Kevin J Fox (1999) “Can measurement error explain the productivity paradox?” Canadian Journal of Economics 32: 251-280.
Diewert, W Erwin and Denis Lawrence (2000) “Progress in measuring the price and quantity of capital.” in L J Lau ed Econometrics. Volume 2. Econometrics and the cost of capital: Essays in honor of Dale W. Jorgenson (Cambridge: The MIT Press): 273-326.
Diewert, W Erwin and Denis Lawrence (1999) “Measuring New Zealand’s productivity.” Wellington, New Zealand, Treasury Working Paper No 99/5, March. <http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/1999/99-05>
Diewert, W Erwin and Alice O Nakamura (2003) “Index number concepts, measures and decompositions of productivity growth.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 19(2): 127-159.
Hall, Robert (1968) “Technical change and capital from the point of view of the dual.” Review of Economic Studies 35(1): 34-46.
Hulten, Charles (1990) “The measurement of capital.” in E Berndt and J Triplett eds Fifty Years of Economic Measurement (Chicago: University of Chicago Press): 119-152.
Hulten, Charles and Frank Wykoff (1996) “Issues in the measurement of economic depreciation.” Economic Inquiry 34(1): 10-23.
Jorgenson, Dale and Barbara Fraumeni (1992) “Investment in Education and U.S. Economic Growth.” reprinted in Dale Jorgenson (1995) ed Productivity, Volume 1: Postwar U.S.Economic Growth (Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press): 371-388.
Jorgenson, Dale and Barbara Fraumeni (1989) “The accumulation of human and nonhuman capital, 1948-84.” reprinted in Dale Jorgenson (1995) ed Productivity, Volume 1: Postwar U.S. Economic Growth (Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press): 273-331.
Jorgenson, Dale, Frank Gallop and Barbara Fraumeni (1987) Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. (Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
Jorgenson, Dale and Zvi Griliches (1967) “The explanation of productivity change.” Review of Economic Studies 34: 249-83.
Mawson, Peter Kenneth Carlaw and Nathan McLellan (2003) “Productivity measurement: Alternative approaches and estimates.” Wellington, New Zealand, Treasury Working Paper No 03/12, March. <http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2003/03-12>.
OECD (2001) OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity Growth. (OECD Statistics Directorate: Paris).
Petty, William (1690) “Political Arithmetik.” reprinted in C H Hull (1899) ed The Economic Writing of Sir William Petty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
