The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

You are here: Home > Publications > Research and Policy > Working Papers > 2003 > New Zealand Labour Supply from 1991-2001: An Analysis Based on a Discrete Choice Structural Utility Model (WP 03/23)

Treasury
Publication

New Zealand Labour Supply from 1991-2001: An Analysis Based on a Discrete Choice Structural Utility Model - WP 03/23

Publication Details

  • New Zealand Labour Supply from 1991-2001: An Analysis Based on a Discrete Choice Structural Utility Model
  • Published: Sep 2003
  • Status: Current
  • Authors: Kalb, Guyonne; Scutella, Rosanna
  • JEL Classification: C25; J22
  • Hard copy: Available in HTML and PDF formats only.
 

New Zealand Labour Supply from 1991-2001: An Analysis Based on a Discrete Choice Structural Utility Model

New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 03/23

Published: September 2003

Authors: Guyonne Kalb and Rosanna Scutella

Abstract

This paper presents results for four separately estimated sets of discrete choice labour supply models using the Household Economic Surveys from 1991/92 up to 2000/01. The New Zealand working-age population is divided into sole parents, single men, single women, and couples. The labour supply models use imputed wages for the non-workers. Some of the preference parameters for work and income are made dependent on personal and household characteristics to allow for heterogeneity in preferences among households. In addition, allowance is made for unobserved heterogeneity in preferences. The estimated parameters for the different groups are used to calculate confidence intervals for expected labour supply and the probability of working at the different discrete hours points. The effect of particular characteristics on labour supply is illustrated by computing marginal effects across the samples. The wage elasticities fall within the range of values found in other studies.

Expected labour supply, predicted by using the estimated models, results in values close to the observed averages and confidence intervals around the expected values are reasonably narrow in most groups. The results are as anticipated and similar to results in other countries, with preferences for work being higher for people with higher education, who are in their thirties. Furthermore, for women the presence of young children decreases the preference for work. In addition to these variables, which are usually included in labour supply models, the “eligibility for New Zealand Superannuation” indicator and a “living with parents” indicator are included. For all groups, the delayed eligibility for the state provided superannuation scheme is found to increase labour supply. The indicator for living with one’s parents is found to increase labour supply for sole parents (indicating that living with one’s parents may be a childcare strategy), although the effect was not significant.

Table of Contents

Browse section/chapterDownload/Page range

Abstract

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures

1 Introduction

2 The Economic Model

3 The Data

4 Econometric Specification of a Labour Supply Model

5 Results

6 Conclusion

References

Appendix

twp03-23.pdf (429 KB) pp. 1–41

List of Tables

List of Figures

Acknowledgements

This research was commissioned by New Zealand Treasury. Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand, under conditions designed to give effect to the confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act 1975. We should like to thank John Creedy for his helpful comments, Melissa McKenzie for providing unemployment data and Ivan Tuckwell for calculating net incomes at different discrete labour supply points for all households in the Household Expenditure Survey. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Treasury or Statistics New Zealand.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate.

Page top