The following template may be a useful format for providing high-level QA comments. More detailed assistance is likely to require an evaluation of the ‘four Cs' QA criteria for each element of the RIA framework.
Annex 5.2 Example QA Template
Dimensions
Complete
Is all the required information (see Annex 5.1) (including the disclosure statement) included in the RIS?
Are all substantive elements of each fully-developed option included (or does the RIS identify the nature of the additional policy work required)?
Have all substantive economic, social and environmental impacts been identified (and quantified where feasible)?
Reviewer's opinion:
Convincing
Are the status quo, problem definition and any cited evidence presented in an accurate and balanced way?
Do the objectives relate logically to, and fully cover, the problem definition?
Do the options offer a proportionate, well-targeted response to the problem?
Is the level and type of analysis provided commensurate with the size and complexity of the problem and the magnitude of the impacts and risks of the policy options? (See Part 2.)
Is the nature and robustness of the cited evidence commensurate with the size and complexity of the problem and the magnitude of the impacts and risks of the policy options? (See Part 2.)
Do the conclusions relate logically and consistently to the analysis of the options?
Reviewer's opinion:
Consulted
Does the RIS show evidence of efficient and effective consultation (see Part 3) with all relevant stakeholders, key affected parties, government agencies and relevant experts?
Does the RIS show how any issues raised in consultation have been addressed or dealt with?
Reviewer's opinion:
Clear and concise
Is the material communicated in plain English, with minimal use of jargon and any technical terms explained?
Is the material structured in a way that is helpful to the reader?
Is the material concisely presented, with minimal duplication, appropriate use of tables and diagrams, and references to more detailed source material, to help manage the length?
