The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

Treasury
Publication

Regulatory Impact Analysis Handbook

4 Define the objectives

The objectives should summarise the Government's policy intentions, but also inform how any potential regulatory solution will be evaluated for effectiveness.

The objectives, outcomes, goals or targets that are sought in relation to the identified problem should be described. These may be a restatement of the current policy objectives if they are relevant to the status quo, or they may be particular to the problem identified in the previous section - it is important to state the objectives of any current policy arrangements and whether those objectives have changed as a result of identifying a problem. If there is an authoritative or statutory basis for undertaking the analysis eg, legislative requirement to annually review an item of regulation, this should be explained.

The objectives should be clear and should not pre-justify a particular solution. They should be specified broadly enough to allow consideration of all relevant alternative solutions. It may be appropriate to distinguish between primary and subsidiary objectives. The objectives should focus on the desired final outcome rather than the means of achieving it, but should allow the consideration of all feasible alternative options. If they do not, the objectives are likely to be too narrow.

There is usually more than one policy objective, meaning there may be potential for conflict between objectives. Balancing objectives may reflect that regulating is not costless, or that there are multiple outcomes expected by society. It should be clear how trade-offs between competing objectives are going to be made and the weightings given to objectives - not just those in direct conflict. The Treasury’s Living Standards Framework provides one example of how to think about trade-offs and how to incorporate social aims into regulatory objectives[4].

There may also be a hierarchy of objectives, particularly when the desired high-level policy outcomes cannot be directly measured. More specific assessment criteria and observable targets should be used to measure progress towards achieving policy objectives. If the outcomes are subject to constraints, for example if they must be achieved within a certain time period or budget, then these should be clearly specified in the statement of objectives.

Stating the objectives should also provide scope for the subsequent impact analysis. What questions will officials be asking themselves (and what information will Ministers need) when ranking options?

Notes

Page top