4 Consultation
Guidance on undertaking efficient and effective consultation is provided in the box below. In addition to consultation with affected parties, a number of government agencies may need to be consulted, depending on the nature of the option or proposal:
- The Ministry of Economic Development (MED) should be consulted on proposals that may impact on businesses, particularly those that impose compliance costs and direct costs.
- The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has certain obligations with respect to ensuring New Zealand's compliance with international agreements to which we are a Party. It is therefore important to consult MFAT where a regulatory proposal could affect New Zealand's international obligations.
These obligations include the Agreements of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Closer Economic Relations (CER), free trade agreements, etc. Where a proposed regulation affects, or may affect traded goods and services, or foreign investment, the advice of the Ministry should be sought on whether the proposed regulation is consistent with these obligations. Even where proposed regulation is consistent, there may be an obligation to notify an international organisation or a trading partner of the proposed measures and allow them to comment. The usual timeframe for comments is 60 days.
- In addition, the Treasury policy team should be consulted on the development of all regulatory proposals.
- Requirements for consultation with other government agencies are set out in the CabGuide.
The draft RIS provides a useful basis for consultation, both with affected parties and with government agencies. It also provides a useful vehicle for providing advice to the portfolio Minister, during the course of policy development.
The draft RIS should be circulated for comment to relevant government agencies. Ideally, this should be done before the Cabinet paper is prepared. Otherwise it must be circulated with the draft Cabinet paper. It must also be included with draft Cabinet papers when they are submitted to Officials' Committees.
Efficient and effective consultation
The purpose of consultation is two-fold: to gain information to assist with policy development; and to inform stakeholders about what's happening.
The value of consultation
Undertaking consultation during the policy development process can result in better quality regulatory proposals that are more likely to achieve their objectives. Having a consultation process acknowledges that those who are going to be affected by regulation may have access to more and better information about the real world impacts of proposals than the government officials who are developing them. This information can be critical to developing regulatory proposals that maximise the benefits, minimise the costs and avoid unintended consequences. Consultation therefore provides an important safeguard against regulatory failure.
The practical benefits of consultation include:
- better information, contributing to better quality regulatory proposals
- increased scrutiny of officials’ analysis and advice, allowing potential problems with a proposal to be identified early
- durability as better designed policies are less likely to need amendments once introduced
- increased public buy-in/acceptance as stakeholders are more likely to accept a proposal they have been involved in developing, and
- improved understanding and increased compliance (therefore improved regulatory effectiveness).
Costs and risks
While there are a number of benefits from consultation, there is also a risk that the consultation process will not achieve the desired outcomes. Policy makers need to consider who they are consulting and what they are consulting on to ensure that the process is effective and efficient.
Poorly designed consultation can be time consuming (both for stakeholders and officials) and fail to improve the policy design. Over-consulting stakeholders creates a risk of consultation fatigue where stakeholders are disinclined to be involved in future consultation processes. If the consultation process is poorly targeted or vague, the feedback received from stakeholders is unlikely to significantly improve policy.
Timing
The benefits from consultation arise throughout the policy process: from correctly identifying the nature and source of the problem and identifying feasible alternative options and the associated costs, benefits and risks; through to practical design and implementation issues. When designing policy, it is important to ensure that the policy addresses the source of the problem rather than the symptoms and is correctly targeted, to avoid “over-regulation”. Stakeholders often have better access to empirical information on the size of problem as well as day-to-day experience with the nature of the real issues. In addition, stakeholders' practical experience can help identify potential unintended effects that policy makers have not considered. Stakeholders may also suggest more practical solutions to achieve the policy objectives.
As consultation can add value at all the various stages of analysis, it is important that for it to be considered and planned for at the very outset of the policy development process. Undertaking consultation late in the process limits the benefits that can be gained, as it can be too late to substantially alter the policy design.
What does efficient and effective consultation look like?
Essentially, good consultation is fit for purpose and tailored to both the nature and magnitude of the proposals, and the needs of stakeholders. One size does not fit all.
Principles for effective and efficient consultation have been developed and published by a number of organisations. A summary of these is provided in the following table.
| Continuous | Undertaken throughout policy development process. |
|---|---|
| Timely | Realistic timeframes for stakeholders to respond. Undertaken early enough to have an impact on policy design. |
| Targeted | Need to consult relevant groups, including Māori. |
| Appropriate and accessible | The way the consultation is carried out should be tailored to the information needs and preferred engagement styles of those being consulted such as email, meetings and written submissions. It should also be scaled to the magnitude and proposed impact of the proposal. |
| Transparent | Stakeholders should understand how feedback was incorporated in policy development. Officials also need the capability to understand feedback to be able to incorporate (eg, may need to bring in technical expertise). |
| Clear | Consultation scope and objectives (including decisions already made) should be clear to stakeholders. |
| Co-ordinated | To the extent possible, processes should be co-ordinated across policy areas/sectors. |
