Note 17: Advances
| Forecast | Actual | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Original Budget $m |
Estimated Actuals $m |
30 June 2010 $m |
30 June 2009 $m |
|
By type |
||||
| 7,658 | 6,874 | Student loans | 6,790 | 6,553 |
| 8,843 | 10,411 | Kiwibank mortgages | 10,419 | 8,492 |
| 767 | 682 | Other advances | 1,238 | 559 |
| 17,268 | 17,967 | Total advances | 18,447 | 15,604 |
By source |
||||
| 11,972 | 10,970 | Core Crown | 11,088 | 10,429 |
| 452 | 379 | Crown entities | 416 | 379 |
| 9,041 | 10,758 | State-owned enterprises | 11,114 | 8,768 |
| (4,197) | (4,140) | Inter-segment eliminations | (4,171) | (3,972) |
| 17,268 | 17,967 | Total advances | 18,447 | 15,604 |
Student Loans |
||||
| 11,110 | 11,152 | Nominal value | 11,145 | 10,259 |
| (3,452) | (4,278) | Write-down on initial recognition and impairment | (4,355) | (3,706) |
| 7,658 | 6,874 | Total student loans | 6,790 | 6,553 |
| Gross carrying value | 8,152 | 7,635 | ||
| Impairment of student loans | (1,362) | (1,082) | ||
| Total student loans | 6,790 | 6,553 | ||
By maturity |
||||
| Expected to be repaid within one year | 759 | 761 | ||
| Expected to be outstanding for more than one year | 6,031 | 5,792 | ||
| Total student loans | 6,790 | 6,553 | ||
Movement During the Year |
||||
| 7,131 | 6,553 | Opening balance | 6,553 | 6,741 |
| 1,478 | 1,543 | Amount lent in the current year | 1,525 | 1,350 |
| (573) | (754) | Less initial write-down to fair value | (728) | (532) |
| (794) | (751) | Repayments made during the year | (754) | (710) |
| 516 | 473 | Interest unwind | 463 | 465 |
| (110) | (201) | (Impairment)/reversal of impairment | (280) | (779) |
| 10 | 11 | Other movements | 11 | 18 |
| 7,658 | 6,874 | Closing balance student loans | 6,790 | 6,553 |
Impairment of Student Loans |
||||
| Opening balance | 1,082 | 303 | ||
| Impairment losses recognised during the year | 280 | 779 | ||
| Closing balance | 1,362 | 1,082 | ||
Student loans are recognised initially by writing the amount lent down to fair value plus transaction costs, and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment loss. Fair value on initial recognition of student loans is determined by projecting forward expected repayments required under the scheme and discounting them back at an appropriate discount rate. The difference between the amount lent and the fair value on initial recognition is expensed on initial recognition. The subsequent measurement at amortised cost is determined using the effective interest rate calculated at initial recognition. This rate is used to spread the Crown's interest income across the life of the loan and determines the loan's carrying value at each reporting date.
| Actual | ||
|---|---|---|
|
30 June 2010 $m |
30 June 2009 $m |
|
| Significant assumptions behind the carrying value are: | ||
| Effective interest rate - current year | 9.5% | 9.4% |
| Effective interest rate - weighted average | 7.0% | 6.7% |
| Interest rate applied to loans for overseas borrowers | 6.6%-6.8% | 6.7%-6.8% |
| CPI | 2.4%-3.0% | 1.5%-2.5% |
| Future salary inflation | 3.0%-3.5% | 1.5%-3.5% |
In contrast with the amortised cost approach described above, fair value is the amount for which the loans could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's-length transaction as at 30 June 2010. It is determined by discounting the cash flows at an appropriate discount rate.
| Actual | ||
|---|---|---|
|
30 June 2010 $m |
30 June 2009 $m |
|
| Fair value of the student loan portfolio | 6,366 | 5,464 |
| Impact on fair value of a 1% increase in discount rate | (361) | (276) |
| Impact on fair value of a 1% decrease in discount rate | 412 | 308 |
The fair value differs from the carrying value due to changes in market interest rates at reporting date. The carrying value is not adjusted for such changes as it is valued using the effective interest rate determined when the loan was initially drawn. However, the fair value was calculated on a discount rate that was current at 30 June 2010. At that date the fair value was calculated on a discount rate of 7.7% (2009: 9.2%) whereas a weighted average effective interest rate of 7.0% was used for the carrying value. Therefore, the lower fair value does not represent an impairment of the asset.
Through the everyday operations of the student loan scheme the Government is exposed to the risk that borrowers will default on their obligation to repay their loans or die before their loan is repaid. The student loan scheme does not require borrowers to provide any collateral or security to support their borrowings. As the total sum advanced is widely dispersed over a large number of borrowers, the scheme does not have any material individual concentrations of credit risk. The credit risk is reduced by collection of repayments through the tax system.
The Student Loan Scheme Annual Report contains more information on the student loan scheme.
