Statement of Specific Fiscal Risks (continued)
Criteria and rules for disclosure in the fiscal forecasts or as specific fiscal risks
The criteria and rules set out below are used to determine if government decisions or other circumstances should be incorporated into the fiscal forecasts, disclosed as specific fiscal risks or, in some circumstances, excluded from disclosure. Since the last Economic and Fiscal Update, the materiality criterion for disclosure has been raised from $10 million in any one year to $100 million over five years (2010/11 to 2014/15) in order to provide greater focus on the more material risks. There are 12 risks that are not published because of the revision, with a combined average value per annum of approximately $88 million.
Criteria for including matters in the fiscal forecasts
Matters are incorporated into the fiscal forecasts provided they meet all of the following criteria:
- The quantum is more than $100 million over five years.
- The matter can be quantified for particular years with reasonable certainty.
- A decision has been taken; or a decision has not yet been taken, but it is reasonably probable[10] the matter will be approved, or it is reasonably probable the situation will occur.
Additionally, any other matters may be incorporated into the forecasts if the Secretary to the Treasury considers, using his best professional judgement, that the matters may have a material effect on the fiscal and economic outlook and are certain enough to include in the fiscal forecasts.
Rules for the disclosure of specific fiscal risks
Matters are disclosed as specific fiscal risks if:
- the likely cost is more than $100 million over five years, and either
- a decision has not yet been taken, but it is reasonably possible[11] (but not probable) that the matter will be approved or the situation will occur, or
- it is reasonably probable that the matter will be approved or the situation will occur, but the matter cannot be quantified or assigned to particular years with reasonable certainty.
Additionally, any other matters may be disclosed as specific fiscal risks if the Secretary to the Treasury considers, using his best professional judgement, that the matters may have a material effect (more than $100 million over five years) on the fiscal and economic outlook, but are not certain enough to include in the fiscal forecasts.
Exclusions from disclosure
Matters are excluded from disclosure as specific fiscal risks if they fail to meet the materiality criterion (ie, are less than $100 million over five years), or if they are unlikely[12] to be approved or occur within the forecasting period.
Additionally, the Minister of Finance may determine that an item included in the fiscal forecasts or a specific fiscal risk not be disclosed, if such disclosure would be likely to:
- prejudice the substantial economic interests of New Zealand
- prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand or international relations of the Government
- compromise the Crown in a material way in negotiation, litigation or commercial activity, or
- result in a material loss of value to the Crown.
Furthermore, the Minister of Finance has to determine that there is no reasonable or prudent way the Government can avoid this prejudice, compromise or material loss by making a decision on the fiscal risk before the finalisation of the forecasts, or by disclosing the forecast item or fiscal risk without reference to its fiscal implications.
Charges against the fiscal forecasts
Communications - Broadband Investment Initiative
Based on the criteria outlined above, it is probable that additional funding to Crown Fibre Holdings Limited for a new broadband network will be approved by the Government during the forecast period. Consequently, this matter has been incorporated into the fiscal forecasts as a potential charge against the capital allowances for future Budgets.
| 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | 2014/15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadband Investment Initiative | 0 | 0 | $300m | $200m | $200m |
Notes
- [10]For these purposes “reasonably probable” is taken to mean that the matter is more likely than not to be approved within the forecast period (by considering, for example, whether there is a better than 50% chance of the matter occurring or being approved).
- [11]For these purposes “reasonably possible” is taken to mean that the matter might be approved within the forecast period (by considering, for example, whether there is a 20% to 50% chance of the matter occurring or being approved).
- [12]For these purposes “unlikely” is taken to mean that the matter will probably not be approved within the forecast period (by considering, for example, whether there is a less than 20% chance of the matter occurring or being approved).
