Other Revenue
Other core Crown revenue is forecast to increase slightly as a GDP over the forecast period. This is primarily due to the introduction of an ETS. The ETS will create tradable units (the NZ Unit) and will generate revenue when surrendered to the Government by emitters. Further information on the ETS can be found on page 44.
Inland Revenue’s tax forecasts
In line with established practice, Inland Revenue has also prepared a set of tax forecasts, which, like the Treasury’s tax forecast, is based on the Treasury’s macroeconomic forecast. Inland Revenue’s forecasts are shown here for comparative purposes. The Treasury’s forecasts remain the Crown’s official forecasts.
| $billion | 2007/08 Forecast |
2008/09 Forecast |
2009/10 Forecast |
2010/11 Forecast |
2011/12 Forecast |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source deductions | |||||
| Treasury | 22.6 | 24.0 | 25.4 | 27.1 | 28.7 |
| Inland Revenue | 22.7 | 24.1 | 25.4 | 26.9 | 28.5 |
| Difference | (0.1) | (0.1) | - | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Net other persons tax | |||||
| Treasury | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Inland Revenue | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| Difference | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Corporate taxes | |||||
| Treasury | 10.8 | 9.3 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.9 |
| Inland Revenue | 11.0 | 9.7 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Difference | (0.2) | (0.4) | - | - | 0.2 |
| Goods and services tax | |||||
| Treasury | 11.8 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 13.1 | 13.5 |
| Inland Revenue | 11.7 | 12.3 | 12.7 | 13.3 | 13.8 |
| Difference | 0.1 | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| Other taxes | |||||
| Treasury | 8.1 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Inland Revenue | 7.9 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Difference | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Total tax | |||||
| Treasury | 57.2 | 58.1 | 61.1 | 64.1 | 67.2 |
| Inland Revenue | 57.1 | 58.2 | 60.9 | 63.7 | 66.5 |
| Difference | 0.1 | (0.1) | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| Total tax (% of GDP) | |||||
| Treasury | 32.1 | 31.1 | 31.4 | 31.6 | 31.6 |
| Inland Revenue | 32.0 | 31.1 | 31.3 | 31.4 | 31.3 |
| Difference | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Source: Inland Revenue, The Treasury
The main differences between the Treasury’s and Inland Revenue’s forecasts occur in:
- net other persons tax, where the two agencies have differing views on the amount of tax that will be payable on the additional dairy income
- corporate taxes, where Treasury’s forecast is initially lower than Inland Revenue’s, but is higher by 2012, owing to Treasury forecasting a higher average growth rate than Inland Revenue, and
- GST, where Inland Revenue’s implicit GST rate on nominal private consumption is higher than the Treasury’s from 2009 onwards.
Core Crown – Expenses
| Year ended 30 June | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Actual |
2008 Forecast |
2009 Forecast |
2010 Forecast |
2011 Forecast |
2012 Forecast |
|
| Expenses $billion | ||||||
| Core Crown | 54.0 | 57.1 | 60.5 | 63.1 | 66.6 | 70.0 |
| Total Crown | 69.1 | 73.0 | 77.0 | 80.4 | 84.7 | 88.8 |
| % of GDP | ||||||
| Core Crown | 32.4 | 32.1 | 32.4 | 32.4 | 32.8 | 33.0 |
| Total Crown | 41.4 | 41.0 | 41.2 | 41.3 | 41.8 | 41.8 |
Source: The Treasury
Expense growth
- Figure 2.11 – Core expenses ($ and % of GDP)

- Source: The Treasury
Core Crown expenses are forecast to increase by around 1% of GDP between 2007/08 and 2011/12. In nominal terms, expenses are forecast to increase by $12.9 billion over the same period.
Budget initiatives
- Figure 2.12 – Net amounts for new operating initiatives

- Source: The Treasury
The forecast growth in expenses largely arises from expense initiatives introduced in recent Budgets. A number of policy decisions made in previous Budgets have rising spending profiles to allow sufficient time for full implementation. The enhancement to the KiwiSaver initiative announced in Budget 2007 is one of the main drivers of this rising profile (around $0.8 billion in 2007/08 rising to around $1.4 billion by 2011/12).
The fiscal forecasts also include indicative amounts for new operating initiatives for future Budgets. The allowances for each of the next four Budgets have been set at around $2 billion, so are broadly consistent with the forecast growth in the economy. New operating spending initiatives add around $8 billion to the expense base by the end of the forecast horizon.
Emissions Trading Scheme
As part of the new ETS the Government has agreed to allocate NZ Units to emitters free of charge. This has resulted in an increase to expenses of $0.6 billion in 2008/09 and $0.5 billion in subsequent forecast years. Further information on the ETS can be found on page 44.
Benefit expenses
Social security and welfare expenses are forecast to broadly grow in line with the forecast growth in the economy. In nominal terms they are forecast to increase from $17.9 billion in 2007/08 to $20.4 billion in 2011/12. Around $1.7 billion of this reflects cost of living adjustments for New Zealand Superannuation payments and welfare benefits, which reflect inflationary pressures. Most benefits are adjusted each April by the CPI movement over the previous calendar year.
Partly offsetting nominal growth in benefit expense forecasts are second round effects from the assumed revenue reduction contingency. They assume tax paid on benefits will be lower, resulting in reduced gross payment of benefits for the Government.
Top-down adjustment to spending
Forecasts are initially compiled from returns provided by individual entities. The need for a top-down adjustment to core Crown expense and capital expenditure forecasts arises from the extent to which departments use appropriations, which are an authority for the maximum that a department may spend, rather than a mid-point estimate for these forecasts. As appropriations apply to the core Crown only, no adjustment is required to SOE or Crown Entity forecasts.
The size of the adjustment reflects analysis of key departments, trend analysis of expense variances across all departments and a review of results to September 2007. This analysis includes identifying where appropriations have been used as proxy for forecasts, where appropriations and hence forecasts reflect contingencies that may have low probability of being realised in any one year, and past trends of variances between results and forecasts.
In this update the outyear forecasts also have a top-down adjustment in order that aggregate department forecasts better reflect mid-point estimates, rather than appropriation levels, for Government policies. The top-down adjustment is applied to both cash and accrual forecasts and is explicitly identified in the financial statements. The adjustment is:
| Year ended 30 June | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $millions | 2008 Forecast |
2009 Forecast |
2010 Forecast |
2011 Forecast |
2012 Forecast |
| Operating expenditure | 750 | 275 | 250 | 200 | 150 |
| Capital expenditure | 250 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Total | 1,000 | 375 | 350 | 300 | 250 |
The adjustment for the 2007/08 financial year is higher than the outyears because it reflects the extent to which some expenses will be transferred from 2007/08 to subsequent outyears in Budget 2008. While we expect transfers to be made in the years beyond 2007/08, the amounts transferred into each of those years will be largely offset by the transfers out at the end of those same years.

