The Treasury

Global Navigation

Personal tools

Government
Publication

Budget 2005 Home Page Half-Year Economic & Fiscal Update 2005

Core Crown – Revenue

Tax revenue is the major source of Core Crown revenue.

Table 2.4 – Tax revenue indicators
Tax Revenue 2005 Actual 2006 Forecast 2007 Forecast 2008 Forecast 2009 Forecast 2010 Forecast
($ billion)            
Total Crown 46.6 49.2 50.8 52.3 53.8 58.0
Core Crown 47.1 49.7 51.4 52.8 54.4 58.7
(% of GDP)            
Total Crown 30.9 31.0 31.2 30.8 30.1 30.9
Core Crown 31.2 31.3 31.5 31.1 30.4 31.2

Source:The Treasury

Ignoring such things as cyclical effects and tax policy changes, tax revenue should grow slightly faster than nominal GDP. This is because the influence of fiscal drag, caused by the progressive nature of the personal tax system, outweighs the influence of some of the tax types for which growth is not necessarily linked to any component of GDP, e.g. excise taxes.

Figure 2.6 – Tax revenue forecasts
Figure 2.6 - Tax revenue forecasts.
Source: The Treasury

The small rise in tax revenue to GDP in 2006/07 comes mainly through source deductions. Source deductions is closely linked to the economic aggregate of Compensation of Employees (COE). As COE accounts for an ever-increasing portion of GDP through the forecast period, so too does source deductions, most noticeably in 2006/07. Source deductions growth is more muted later in the forecast period as the threshold adjustments announced as part of Budget 2005 start to take effect from 2007/08.

There is a pronounced business cycle present in the economic forecasts. This will necessarily be reflected in the business-related tax types of corporate tax and other persons tax. In addition, through the trough of the business cycle, we are likely to see above-average tax loss accumulation. The subsequent utilisation of these losses will suppress tax growth in 2007/08 and 2008/09. This is the major cause of the drop in tax relative to GDP in 2007/08. The further drop in 2008/09 can be ascribed to changes in the provisional tax system that will push a major revenue recognition point across the fiscal year boundary into 2009/10. Note that this occurs a year later than in the Budget Update and the Pre-election Update as the implementation of this change has been delayed for one year.

Inland Revenue’s tax forecasts

In line with established practice, the Inland Revenue Department has prepared an independent set of tax forecasts, based in the short term on more detailed analysis of taxpayer information, and in the longer term on the same broad macroeconomic trends that underpin Treasury’s tax forecasts.

Table 2.5 – Treasury and Inland Revenue tax revenue forecasts
($ million) 2006 Forecast 2007 Forecast 2008 Forecast 2009 Forecast 2010 Forecast
Individuals' Taxes          
Treasury                   23,272            24,439            25,553            26,434            28,161
Inland Revenue 23,423 24,545 25,851 26,859 28,532
Difference (151) (106) (298) (425) (371)
Corporate Taxes          
Treasury 9,141 9,070 8,568 8,357 9,983
Inland Revenue 9,172 8,693 8,925 8,731 9,617
Difference (31) 377 (357) (374) 366
Resident Withholding Tax (interest)          
Treasury 1,745 1,814 1,801 1,852 1,975
Inland Revenue 1,826 1,881 1,900 1,976 2,075
Difference (81) (67) (99) (124) (100)
Goods and Services Tax          
Treasury 10,341 10,507 10,926 11,609 12,210
Inland Revenue 10,334 10,787 11,132 11,726 12,240
Difference 7 (280) (206) (117) (30)
Other Taxes          
Treasury 4,750 4,991 5,405 5,508 5,655
Inland Revenue 4,801 5,083 5,482 5,558 5,661
Difference (51) (92) (77) (50) (6)
Total Tax          
Treasury 49,249 50,821 52,253 53,760 57,984
Inland Revenue 49,556 50,989 53,290 54,850 58,125
Difference (307) (168) (1,037) (1,090) (141)

Inland Revenue’s total tax forecasts are higher than Treasury’s in all years. The differences in 2006/07 and 2009/10 are small, given the size of total tax revenue. The difference in 2005/06 is a bit larger and is evident mainly in the individuals and resident withholding tax types.

The differences in 2007/08 and 2008/09, at just over $1 billion, are much larger than in the other years and also much larger than the differences seen in previous forecast Updates. In individuals’ taxes, the differences arise mainly in source deductions as a result of the different methods used by the respective forecasting teams to model the effect of fiscal drag. The differences in corporate taxes result from differing views around how company income tax will be affected by the business cycle with the Treasury forecast incorporating a build-up of tax losses over the next few years. In RWT on interest, the two forecasting teams have different views about the effect of interest rates on the size of the deposit base, with Treasury forecasting that the recent rate of growth in deposits will not be sustained over the full forecast period. The Treasury and Inland Revenue use different methods for forecasting GST, with Treasury putting more weight on residential investment than does Inland Revenue. With residential investment forecast to decline in each of the next two March years, Treasury’s GST forecasts are somewhat lower than Inland Revenue’s.

Detailed comparisons of Treasury and Inland Revenue tax forecasts can be found at www.treasury.govt.nz/forecasts/hyefu/2005/.

Page top